Dr Don Easterbrook Exposes Climate Change Hoax

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by DDT, Jun 18, 2017.

  1. mamooth

    mamooth Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    6,415
    Likes Received:
    2,182
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    No. Why did you say such a crazy thing? If I had meant to say such a crazy thing, I would have said it. I didn't, so you shouldn't have said such a crazy thing.

    Well, yes, Hadley cells result in drier conditions, which leads to hot deserts. Thank you for confirming my point like that. A lack of moisture means a lack of evaporation, and higher temperatures.

    And no, Hadley cells do not explain all deserts. For example, look at the Nevada desert, which is well north of the Hadley zones. That desert is due to a rain shadow from the Sierra Nevada mountains.
     
  2. mamooth

    mamooth Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    6,415
    Likes Received:
    2,182
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I often point out the cowardice and dishonesty of the "just asking questions" tactic. It's a denier staple tactic, also known as "JAQing off".

    http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Just_asking_questions

    I also notice you were unable to answer you own questions. Hence, nobody should take you seriously.
     
  3. Robert

    Robert Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2014
    Messages:
    68,085
    Likes Received:
    17,134
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    So, you persist on yaking off. I figured that.
     
  4. Robert

    Robert Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2014
    Messages:
    68,085
    Likes Received:
    17,134
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I shall for debate introduce the spots on leopard theory of mine.

    We do not add up the total area of spots on the animal and divide by number of spots and announce an average area for spots. Why do this? It is of non use and not serious science. We ought not to add up the climate spots on Earth either and add them then divide.

    Deserts are all over earth, Even the South Pole is alleged to be a very cold desert.
     
  5. Robert

    Robert Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2014
    Messages:
    68,085
    Likes Received:
    17,134
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    How much of Earth is desert?



    https://www.pearsonschoolsandfecoll...aphy/OCRGCSEGeogA/OCRgcseGeogAsamplepages.pdf
     
  6. bringiton

    bringiton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2016
    Messages:
    11,394
    Likes Received:
    3,008
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'll be charitable and assume you don't understand any of this stuff.
    Nope. Land stations show much more warming because the thermal inertia of the oceans is so great.
    Only if you interpret the data to mean heat rather than temperature.
    Nope.
    Ah, yes, actually, it is. An infallible proof of nonscience is the claim that a live issue is "settled," or "not arguable."
    The climategate emails proved the "conspiracy theory" is most definitely not a lie.
     
  7. bringiton

    bringiton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2016
    Messages:
    11,394
    Likes Received:
    3,008
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No. The climate simulations (GCMs) that are cited to support global warming nonscience are not based on what can be concluded from empirical evidence, they make assumptions -- especially absurdly exaggerated positive water vapor feedback -- that are directly contradicted by empirical evidence.
     
  8. bringiton

    bringiton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2016
    Messages:
    11,394
    Likes Received:
    3,008
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes, I most certainly am.
    Data can be anything, and just because you post it does not mean it provides empirical support for your position. Facts likewise. Evidence is not necessarily empirical (the evidence for global warming nonscience is not), and logic depends on the validity of the premises (the premises underlying global warming nonscience are known to be incorrect).
    Joke, right?
    Or more accurately, they would if they were based on sound scientific logic and factual premises.
     
  9. Robert

    Robert Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2014
    Messages:
    68,085
    Likes Received:
    17,134
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    https://judithcurry.com/2017/08/14/the-blame-game/#more-23277

     
  10. Lesh

    Lesh Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2015
    Messages:
    42,206
    Likes Received:
    14,119
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Thanks for the diatribe by the most debunked Denier on the planet
     
    Grumblenuts likes this.
  11. mamooth

    mamooth Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    6,415
    Likes Received:
    2,182
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Look, just because Curry predicted immediately strong cooling, and instead the world saw immediate record warming instead, is no reason to think her science stinks.

    Oh wait, it is a reason.

    Curry didn't want to hang around and explain why she failed so badly at the science, so she ran away from the scientific field, screaming "You scientists are all a bunch of poopyheads!". That's all she does now. That is, aside from collecting money from her "forecasting company", which doesn't show any of its forecasts, or list any clients. It certainly looks like a front company that allows her to grab some sweet fossil fuel cash in exchange for propagandizing. I mean, given her record, who would pay for a forecast from Curry?
     
    Grumblenuts likes this.
  12. Grumblenuts

    Grumblenuts Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2017
    Messages:
    768
    Likes Received:
    332
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Wrong. The bottom line is that human survival is no longer "even put it on the list if it comes at the expense of any" major corporate oil profits. The bottom line is their bottom line. Period.
    Far too much is never enough for the morally bankrupt.
     
    Last edited: Aug 19, 2017
    politicalcenter likes this.
  13. bringiton

    bringiton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2016
    Messages:
    11,394
    Likes Received:
    3,008
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You need to get a dictionary that explains the difference between "debunked" and "attacked."
     
    upside222 likes this.
  14. bringiton

    bringiton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2016
    Messages:
    11,394
    Likes Received:
    3,008
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There is no possibility whatever -- none -- that using fossil fuels will jeopardize human survival in any way. To claim that it could is just absurd grandstanding.
     
  15. Grumblenuts

    Grumblenuts Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2017
    Messages:
    768
    Likes Received:
    332
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Heh. Heh heh. "in any way"! Hahahahaaa! Haha, hooo... Thanks for the laugh.
     
  16. bringiton

    bringiton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2016
    Messages:
    11,394
    Likes Received:
    3,008
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The material you quoted is garbage with no basis in fact. There is no credible suggestion, in the geological record or anywhere else, that fossil fuel burning might have eliminated most life on earth. The oceans are not acidifying, as they are sitting on petatonnes of alkali rock. That's why they are alkaline, not acidic. And large-scale vulcanism like that which produced the Siberian Traps chills the earth, it doesn't warm it.
     
  17. Grumblenuts

    Grumblenuts Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2017
    Messages:
    768
    Likes Received:
    332
    Trophy Points:
    63
    And all simply because you say so. Lol
     
  18. bringiton

    bringiton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2016
    Messages:
    11,394
    Likes Received:
    3,008
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, because those are the facts, which you would know if you were acquainted with any of the relevant facts.
     
  19. Grumblenuts

    Grumblenuts Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2017
    Messages:
    768
    Likes Received:
    332
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ah, don't just simply deny everything, ya crybaby. Just the facts, ma'am. Try backing your claims with credible links & quotes. For starters:
    There's a good boy. Go fetch..
     
  20. bringiton

    bringiton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2016
    Messages:
    11,394
    Likes Received:
    3,008
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don't need links to show that the oceans are alkaline and will stay alkaline, it's a fact known to everyone who isn't completely ignorant on the subject.
     
  21. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You aren't aware oceans are alkaline? Do some research.
     
  22. Grumblenuts

    Grumblenuts Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2017
    Messages:
    768
    Likes Received:
    332
    Trophy Points:
    63
    The man said
    Do some reading.
     
  23. Lesh

    Lesh Banned

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2015
    Messages:
    42,206
    Likes Received:
    14,119
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And becoming less so (and it matters)...do some research
     
  24. Hoosier8

    Hoosier8 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2012
    Messages:
    107,541
    Likes Received:
    34,488
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Still alkaline. The alleged shift toward neutral is unmeasurable since ocean water can swing up to as much as one ph normally.

    This is all about models not observed science.

    Reread what @Grumblenuts posted with a more critical eye.
     
    Last edited: Sep 1, 2017
  25. Grumblenuts

    Grumblenuts Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2017
    Messages:
    768
    Likes Received:
    332
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Try to keep up and make sense. Of course no one here has claimed the oceans aren't alkaline, so you may stop choking on all that straw. Models are always based upon "observed" data.
    "an increase of almost 35% in H+ ion concentration in the world's oceans" is "unmeasurable", ROTF!

    [​IMG]
    Yeah, sure. NOAA just makes it all up!
     

Share This Page