Dr. Judy Wood Ph.D, Materials Science, 9/11, & Directed Energy Weapons

That's exactly what Wood does. She looked at a few pictures, opined that the pictures showed the "dustification" of steel, and drew conclusions based on those opinions. Included in those conclusions was the opinion that most of the dust flew away and is unaccounted for, since samples of dust do not contain enough steel to support her opinion.

On the other side of the argument, we take Judy's claims and show them to be false with actual data. Steel does not turn to dust without reacting with its environment. It's pyrophoric. This is fundamental property of iron within the steel that is not opinion, but established fact. There is no record of this reaction of steel with its environment so we can be sure that Judy's conclusions based on her opinion of dustification are quite false.

That's not my opinion. That's a fact that has yet to be disputed by anyone in the Judy camp.

 

Yep, the evidence is not wrong, that is why Judy is wrong. Have a good conspiratorial day!

 

What evidence does she base her cal;ling dust kicked up by the boots of rescue workers as 'fuming'?


And you're doing something wrong if you need to spend three hours working out.....unless of course you want to be the next mr olympia...

 

​

Site the specific Chapter, section, and page number from Dr. Judy Wood's textbook that you make your opinion from. Ignorance is a choice.

If you doubt the overwhelming and indisputable evidence found in Dr. Judy Wood's textbook, I suggest you read it. Ignorance is a choice.

Your repeated silly and childish abuse of this forum is getting ridiculous. Why do you continue to thumb your nose at the administrators and moderators of this forum by posting comments that are inflammatory with the intent to disrupt and distract? The reason why it takes me three hours to work out is because I do three sets on each weight machine and two circuits starting with the upper muscle group followed by the mid section and ending with the lower group. Each circuit takes about 1.5 hours to complete depending on how busy the gym is. I also apply a transdermal testosterone gel before my work out routine. What's wrong with looking attractive? I'm turning a lot of heads from both sexes and a wide range of age groups. If you have a question about the overwhelming and indisputable evidence found in Dr. Judy Wood's textbook, I suggest you read it. Ignorance is a choice.

 

You must have a stake in selling this book since all you do is hawk it.

 

I wouldn't spend a dime on Judy Woods bit of fools folly, and the only one I'm thumbing my nose at is YOU,goldie....your constant spamming of her ridiculous book of fiction should be scrutinized more that our posts.....and three sets on a gyms machines shouldn't take you anywhere near 3 hours......your vanity is showing



and your ignorance is showing

 

The pyrophoric nature of steel is not an opinion. It's a property that has been established through experimentation and observation. The chapter, section, or page number that discusses the pyrophoric nature of steel is non existent in Judy's so called text book. I cannot site[sic] that which does not exist. Judy's ignorance is willful.

 

Blind devotion to a ridiculous disproven,utterly fantastic set of theories is a choice too......

 

No. The evidence shows that the crazy old bat has no idea what she is talking about. There is absolutely ZERO evidence that any device exists which can harness the power of a hurricane to power a discombobulator ray gun.

The crazy old bat does not even have any idea how a device could be engineered to emit the sort of energy that she claims was used.

The crazy old bat cites a retard who plays around with electronic scrap and a welding torch and, apparently, pot metal, as proof that her discombobulator ray gun can be made. There is no Hutchison Effect. Only a dimbulb takes his word for the crap he sells without examining and testing the metals he shows to see if they are what he claims they are.

The crazy old bat makes idiotic assumptions about the cars burning in the street. She has no bleeding clue what a normal car fire would look like. She has obviously never asked an experienced fire fighter whether there is anything abnormal about the burned cars.

As an experienced fire fighter, let me state, for the record, that the cars that the crazy old bat thinks look wrong are PERFECTLY NORMAL.

The crazy old bat claims that steel was made to instantly rust, but this is not so. None of the steel on the exposed surfaces of the rubble pile look rusted in the days immediately after the event. Some of the cars show massive rusting within a short time, but this, to anyonne who knows anything about fire damage to steel, is perfectly predictable.

Hot steel, when it is exposed to steam, takes oxygen from the water vapor and releases the hydrogen.

Google it. It was the most common way of producing hydrogen gas before somebody figured out how to do it cheaper by electrolysis.

As for the metal m,issing from around door handles on the cars, let me remind those who are too lazy to look such things up that the metal used for most door handles and the well in which they sit is POT METAL. This is usually an alloy of zinc and tin which had a far lower melting point than even aluminum.

As for the papers not burning around the burning cars, bear in mind that the dust had still not settled in the picture we are discussing. Half of the papers were buried in dust with a high content of calcium carbonate. This is a good extinguishing agent. DERP!

Eventually, most of that paper was either doused with water or consumed in the fires.

The crazy old bat may know how to make false teeth that do not wear out, but she knows sod all about fire investigations.

(I have some on-the-job experience and college-level training in the subject myself.)

 

Actually,

Rust is a function of the iron content in the steel. It's oxidation of this iron that we call rust. When exposed to oxygen, iron does almost instantly oxidize. Even at room temperature. That is to say, all steel instantly rusts. However, the oxidation on the surface of a sample acts as a barrier to prevent oxygen from coming in contact with elemental iron in the middle of the sample. This is called a passivation layer.

The oxidation of iron is exothermic. As iron rusts, heat is released. In larger masses of iron, this heat is conducted away from the reaction. This allows the passivation layer to form on the surface of the sample, and prevent further reaction. In smaller samples, the heat cannot be conducted away as quickly. This causes an expansion between the particles of iron oxide in the passivisation layer, and allows more oxygen to come into contact with more iron which creates a release of more heat.

If the sample has a great enough surface area to mass ratio, it will actually combust at room temperature because so much heat is released so quickly that the entire sample will react.

According to square cube law, as a particle gets smaller, it's surface area increases in relation to mass. This is why steel sparks. What you're actually doing is creating a particle with a large surface area and a small mass which instantly rusts.

Now, if steel was actually turned to "dust", as Judy claims, it would have looked like a gigantic shower of sparks and everything within miles would have been covered in iron oxide.

Steel does not turn to dust and then float away never to be seen again.

 

1.) You don't know how many machines I use.

2.) You don't know how long I have to wait for a machine since I use them in a particular order.

3.) Why do you keep spamming personal insults intended to disrupt and distract the subject of this thread which is "Dr. Judy Wood Ph.D, Materials Science, 9/11, & Directed Energy Weapons". .

4.) Don't confuse having a good self image and honesty with vanity.

Now whose ignorance is showing?

 

​

Richard Gage is a stooge and AE911Truth is a government funded front operation that was created to muddle-up and cover-up the research of Dr. Judy Wood. If you question my claim of the illegal use of government funds to operate a psychological operation on its own people, then look at a copy of their tax returns.

It appears that the muddle-up/cover-up game of musical chairs is changing. Thermite has run out of gas and they know one of the chairs has been removed so the juggling clown (Fetzer) must juggle things just right to keep the game going. Fetzer can't afford to deny what Hutchison demonstrates any longer. So, is the new and improved tactic having Gordon Duff to pretend to support "Judy" and claim she is "guessing" and is close -- but wrong? Then the next step for Duff and Fetzer is to say, "Judy's guess was close, but here is what it is: look behind door number 4 for the next lie."

What Dr. Judy Wood presents in her textbook isn't a theory, nor is it a hypothesis, nor is it a belief. It is evidence and it is a conclusion based on the evidence. Dr. Judy Wood does not want people to believe her; she wants them to believe themselves. It remains to be seen how many people are too disoriented to be able to truly think independently. The objective of this subversion is to prevent people from determining truth from fiction by ignoring the evidence and joining a club or a team. (i.e The Vancouver 9/11 Hearings) You won't find truth in a clubhouse. More and more people have turned their thinking over to someone else's keeping and merely recite a list of talking points they were given to chant without the cognition to verify anything. They simply want to play "follow the leader". And a "leader" will always appear. People cannot be subverted against their will. So they are often coaxed into giving up their will. How is that done? Subverters call it a "theory" and then say the "theory" is wrong or unsupported or unscientific, etc. The music is played faster and faster just hoping the players get so disoriented that they don't know the difference between evidence and theory, or the difference between evidence and speculation, or the difference between science and cover-up. Those who TELL you it is or isn't scientific do so because they know you wouldn't conclude that on your own. If you believe the conclusion that a Directed Energy Weapon "dustified" the World Trade Center complex from the evidence presented by Dr. Judy Wood is too scary to think about, what you will end up with will be far more scary if you don't think about it.

 

Pot, kettle, etc.

I would use the word "shill" but we've reached our quota.

 

Speaking of verification. How does steel turn to dust without igniting? Did you verify this point, or are you just reciting her talking points?

Judy's team seems kinda hypocritical doesn't it?

 

Is there such a word as hyper-hypocritical?

 

1:You can only use so many machines
2:waiting a long time between sets defeats the purpose
3:I haven't insulted you,and you're the one that keeps bringing up your '3 hour workout'
4: I don't confuse anything about you....

Now that that's out of the way,care to tell us,based on your hero's 'textbook',WHAT kind of 'directed energy' weapon was used on the WTC?

Where did the power come from?

Why weren't the survivors in the stairwell killed by said weapon?

I await your spinning

 

Since the subject of this thread is Dr. Judy Wood Ph.D, Materials Science, 9/11, & Directed Energy Weapons, here is this the last half hour of a special 2 hour fund raiser with Professor Eric Larsen, editor and publisher of The Oliver Arts & Open Press. A novelist and writer, he is the author of A Nation Gone Blind: America in an Age of Simplification and Deceit, and The Skull of Yorick: The Emptiness of American Thinking at a Time of Grave Peril—Studies in the Cover-up of 9/11.

Although its a fund raiser, there is a powerful discussion on left gate keepers who obediently write and embrace lies, ultimately broadcasting state truths that cover up the deep investigation into what happened on September 11, 2001. The deep investigation – mainly referring to Dr Judy Wood’s research and one of the most important books to have Where Did The Towers Go? Evidence Of Directed Free Energy Technology On 9/11 of which he wrote the Forward to.

Professor Eric Larsen writes about the cultural damage sustained from a media landscape saturated with lies and deceit. He writes:

“And so we come toward our end by returning to the great question that caused all of this searching—Can there be a literary life in a post-1984 nation? Can there be a literary life in a nation of the kind the United States has become over the past few decades, and especially since 9/11? The answer is very clear. No, there can’t and won’t be a literary life in such a time and place, nor will there be the production of a literature of depth, complexity, authenticity, significance, or durability. Why not? Because the creation of a true, real, or significant literature is impossible when a people lives or is forced to live in ignorance of the whole truth of their own lives, of their nation’s life, and of the lives of those they live among. For so long as Americans continue to be deprived of, or continue to be conditioned into an inability to see and know at least half of the truth of what their own lives are, and at least half of the truth of what their own nation is and is doing, they will remain at the very best halfpeople living halflives in halfblindness and thinking in halfthought. ”

"Accepting the lies of 9/11 kills you inwardly." - Professor Eric Larsen

In Other News
Host Geoff Brady interviews Professor Eric Larsen
Monday, May 14, 2012
World Broadcast Associates, Inc (WBAI)
120 Wall St # 1002
New York, NY 10005
http://www.filefreak.com/files/885459_a71sm/wbai_120514_220038inothernews.mp3

​

 

Do you intend to discuss the subject, or are you simply here to raise money for her?

How does steel turn to dust without igniting?

 

Wait. Is that crazy old bat claiming that there is free energy? Have you seen her present specific proof of that? If I have to buy her book, I will just assume that she and you are scamming us.

 

למה אתה שואל? לקרוא את הספר שלה, להפסיק לשאול שאלות טיפשיות.

 

This is just spam. Goldstein is pushing the book to sell it. This tread should be removed.

 

ההוכחה נעוצה ראיות היא מציגה ספר שלה. אינך חייב לרכוש את הספר כמו ספריות לך עותקים.

http://www.worldcat.org/title/where-did-the-towers-go-evidence-of-directed-free-energy-technology-on-911/oclc/704874500

 

You don't have to buy the textbook. What you have to do is read it. Libraries have them too. The Library of Congress has a copy.

"Accepting the lies of 9/11 kills you inwardly." - Professor Eric Larsen


WorldCat Listing
http://www.worldcat.org/title/where-did-the-towers-go-evidence-of-directed-free-energy-technology-on-911/oclc/704874500

 

Do not think that poorly translating your comments into Hebrew will confuse me. I ask questions because this is a forum in which dialog is expected. This forum is not your personal marketing vehicle. If you came here to talk about the book I expect you to discuss the books content, or lack of it.

It's quite telling that you demand for people to think for themselves, but you cannot bother to confirm Judy's claims on your own. Where did the towers go? They fell down. Steel from the structure of the buildings did not turn to dust because we did not observe any of the reactions that take place when steel is turned to dust.

 

It is pretty clear at this point that the crazy old bat and EG are just trying to bilk gullible people out of the money to buy her garbage and to garner sympathy for themselves in an endless parade of frivolous lawsuits.

There is no space-based discombobulator ray gun, no free energy that can be tapped from hurricanes, there is no Hutchison effect, and there is no known energy weapon that can destroy a steel structure without generating light, heat and noise. This is total tinfoil helmet stuff.