Dr. Judy Wood Ph.D, Materials Science, 9/11, & Directed Energy Weapons

It's a shame that you JudyWood worshippers can't see what a
total moron she sounds like.

Matter just doesn't 'disappear',and there are no secret energy weapons that cause it to.

Period.

 

Here are the principal data that must be explained:

The Twin Towers were destroyed faster than physics can explain (at free fall speed "collapse").

They underwent mid-air pulverization and were turned to dust before they hit the ground.

The protective bathtub was not significantly damaged by the destruction of the Twin Towers.

The rail lines, the tunnels and most of the rail cars had only light damage.

The WTC mall survived well, witnessed by Warner Bros. Road Runner and friends.

The seismic impact was minimal, far too small based on our comparison with the Kingdome controlled demolition.

The Twin Towers were destroyed from the top down, not bottom up.

The demolition of WTC7 was whisper quiet and the seismic signal was no greater than background noise.

The upper 80 percent, approximately, of each tower was turned into fine dust and did not crash to the earth.

The upper 90 percent, approximately, of WTC7 was turned into fine dust and did not crash to the earth.

File cabinet with folder dividers survived.

Office paper was densely spread throughout lower Manhattan, unburned, often along side burning cars.

Vertical round holes were cut into buildings 4, 5 and 6, plus a cylindrical arc into Bankers Trust and into Liberty street in front of Bankers Trust.

All planes except top secret missions were ordered down until 10:31 a.m. (when only military flights were allowed to resume), after both towers were destroyed, and only two minutes after WTC 1 had been destroyed.

Approximately 1,400 motor vehicles were towed away, toasted in strange ways, during the destruction of the Twin Towers.

The order and method of destruction of each tower minimized damage to the bathtub and adjacent buildings.

Twin Tower control without damaging neighboring buildings, in fact all seriously damaged or destroyed buildings had a WTC prefix, and no others.

The north wing of WTC 4 was left standing, neatly sliced from the main body which virtually disappeared.

The WTC1 and WTC2 rubble pile was far too small to account for the mass.

The WTC7 rubble pile was too small and contained a lot of mud.

Eyewitness testimony about toasted cars, instant disappearance of people by "unexplained" waves, a plane turning into a mid-air fireball, electrical power cut off moments before WTC 2 destruction, and the sound of explosions.

There were many flipped cars in the neighborhood of the WTC complex near trees with full folliage.

* The possibility that a technology exists. Since invention of the microwave for cooking in 1945 and laser beam in 1955*, commercial and military development of beam technology has proceeded apace, so use of high-energy beams are likely.

 

supposition........not a shred of hard proof in the lot.

 

It's not even supposition. No suppositions are made in that last post. It's just random partially true and misleading statements. Look at them individually. Some of them don't even make any sense.

So what if vehicles were towed away? There's a high ratio of vehicle to square foot of landscape in NYC. Why should I be surprised that 1400 of them were towed? What does "toasted in strange ways" mean? What the heck do you think this is evidence for? What purpose would there be to toast vehicles? Why would a directed energy weapon cause vehicles to be toasted? Doesn't that sort of rule out a directed energy weapon if the damage isn't...directed?

If this was a directed energy weapon why would sheet metal cars be "toasted" but not sheet metal file cabinets?

How exactly did you weigh the mass of the rubble pile? Show your calculations. Did you simply look at a picture and figure that the height of the pile wasn't tall enough? Because that doesn't take into account how wide the debris pile was. Contrary to truther common convention, the buildings did not "fall into their own footprint" In fact, there was debris spread over a large portion of lower Manhattan. You might have figured that, given the number of cars that had to be towed...

 

These statements always make me laugh.

Do truthers think that the laws of physics are changed by demolition, or directed energy weapons?

No. The laws of physics have never been violated by the collapse of a building.

 

psikey disagrees and has solid proof.

 

[ame="http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-558096240694803017"]Dr. Greg Jenkins Interviews Dr. Judy Wood[/ame]

That's some top notch science there, Dr. Judy wood!

 

That is what secret technology is. It is classified and secret. But then, playing devils advocate and ignoring the proof is your job. By the way, 9/11 was not the first time this technology was used on innocent and unsuspecting American civilians. Our government has a long history of this type of behavior. But because of Dr. Judy Wood and her 10 years of forensic scientific research into the "dustification" of the World Trade Center Complex we now know what evidence "magnetic-electrogravitic-nuclear reactions" leaves behind.

The Murrah Building in OKC is on the left and WTC 6 is on the right
Note the same circular cutouts and vertical shearing of the floors.


Examples of "toasted" cars in the parking lot across the street from the Murrah Building in OKC​

 

So you have no desire to address my question then?

How about this one:

How much of the physical evidence has Dr. Judy wood examined? What was her methodology? What was her control? How many types of direct energy weapons did she experiment with?

 

I whole heartedly agree.

 

That's the thing about 'secret technology', goldy....you don't have to PROVE jack, all you have to do is CLAIM it exists, knowing full well we can'tdispute you

 

Your sarcasm detector is broken.

 

What did she say that you can show is false? Her science is impeccable, and she has a degree in structural engineering. She should know.

 

Sounds like both you and Dr Judy Wood are wholeheartedly unfamiliar with the scientific method.

One does not do science by assembling pictures of evidence that you trust.

Dr. Judy Wood's hypothesis is not falsifiable. It does not even rise to the level of junk science.

 

Her science is not impeccable. It's non existent.

She conducted no experiment.
She tested no physical evidence.
She recorded no data.
She published no paper.

Her entire hypothesis is based on her own disbelief and a warped interpritation of a few photographs.

That is not science.

 

Explain how calling dust kicked up by the feet of firemen and rescue workers 'fuming' is an example of 'impeccable' science?

Or how she's amazed at the fact that steel rusts quickly when exposed to heat?

Or how she evidently never stood in front of a fire and had the front part of her overheated,while her backside remained cold......

 

How about everything other than, "My name is Judy Wood."

 

Why don't you pick what you think is her most compelling piece of evidence for the existence of a "direct energy weapon" and we'll discuss it.

 

Oh how quaint. Yes, indeed you needed to edit out the stuff you didn't want to respond to...! But no-one noticed......

It's 'whether' and 'retraction'. Where do these people get their education?
That is lame semantics - you know quite well what was being referred to.

And AS YOU SAID, if they could be from anywhere, they could be from space. Sorry, not only do you lose, but it is patently obvious that you avoided all the major points, namely that Wood's non'science' is unmitigated claptrap that is only accepted by the ill-informed and gullible, and she offers NO citations, support or proof of applicability. It's excrement of the worst kind. But it's good enough for those who so want to believe and have no science background (let alone simple training in logic..).

So I'm guessing either you are Wood, or in one of the latterly-referred-to groups..


Is that the retraction you were seeking?

Hunter Rose, I have a simple challenge for you. If your opinion is worth anything, then you can now tell us what, in your opinion, is the most compelling evidence for your claim. Tell us in YOUR WORDS, no wood-links. And be prepared to defend the claim - PROPERLY. No weasel words, no opinions, no 'look-at-this', no handwaving. FACTS. MATHS. PHYSICS. SUPPORTED and PROVABLE. Use citations from RECOGNISED, peer reviewed publications or institutions.

If you know the topic, you will be able to do it. Easily.

If you choose not to do this, it is quite clear:
- what your level of knowledge is
- what your game is



Here, I'll give you a clue. To do a proper analysis, one of the things you need to start with is a definition of your methodology.. You could start by reading this, and seeing how little of it applies to Wood's garbage.

No wait, that might be too hard for a beginner. How about this just get you started thinking?

Then go see if you can find some *real* analyses. Do they look anything like Wood's? (Hint - if your answer is yes, you haven't yet found, let alone read, a real analysis.)

 

"Empirical evidence is the truth that theory must mimic."

​

Are the agent provocateurs who defame and mischaracterize Dr. Wood's research just a bunch of psychopaths that can easily justify covering-up mass murder or is this simply an example of Stockholm syndrome on a grand scale?​

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E8X-Sb18lCM"]Where did the Towers Go? - YouTube[/ame]

Welcome to the Web Content for WHERE DID THE TOWERS GO?
These videos are provided for convenience to those who have the book.
http://drjudywood.com/towers/​

 

Where Did the Towers Go? Interview with Dr. Judy Wood
by Tim Gatto in Politics Progressive Wed, Aug 17, 2011 (MP3 91:19)

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/convertplaylist.aspx?PlayListUrl=http%3a%2f%2fwww.blogtalkradio.com%2fliberalpro%2fplay_list.xml%3fshow_id%3d2210049&OutputType=m3u​

 

Logical Fallacy: Ad Hominem.

No further discussion is needed, as your post was nonresponsive to the questions asked.

 

Oh get off your cross goldie,someone needs the wood....If anyone is dishonoring the memory of the 2974,it's YOU,and to paraphrase Fredrick Frohkensteen, '"Judy Wood's research is doodoo!'

 

​

Serpent-songs in America​

Signs are that the battle against 911-Truth is growing desperate: Those who​

are interested—and all humanity should be very interested—can tell that the​

fight is heating up and coming to a head. How can they tell? By opening their ​

ears and listening to the serpents singing in America.​

http://www.intrepidreport.com/archives/2317​

Deanna Spingola | June 30, 2011 at 7:39 am |

One may see Mark Hightower’s document, The Nanothermite Challenge at http://www.spingola.com/HighExplosiveNanothermiteMoreBarkThanBite.pdf Given the fact that the profit-generating corporate media, within the first two days introduced the notion that the buildings came down via controlled demolition through statements supposedly made inadvertently or casually by Dan Rather and Larry Silverstein, I would cast an eye of suspicion on that “theory” rather than the lengthy investigation made by Dr. Judy Wood, the object of questionable, intense criticism from the very people who should be anxious to see what she has discovered. What well-organized agency is behind such venom? Certainly, it is not spontaneous. This same corporate media announced that Osama bin Laden directed 19 Arabs with box cutters. Are we really so naive to think that Rather’s statement and the alleged slip-up made by Silverstein were not deliberate? We are also naive if we really think that a managed “truth” movement was not organized prior to the event to counter the skeptics who would surely question the official version. Astute people connect the dots and acknowledge the fact that the government and their corporate cronies long ago seized (1927) and continue to regulate the public airways, conceal cures to maintain massive profits, participate in public-private partnerships, outsource our production, strip us of our resources through taxation and phony bailouts, treat us as profit-producing commodities rather than humans and hundreds of other egregious behaviors. Yet, we are to believe that certain people have not developed and concealed beneficial technologies, some currently used to wreak havoc in the Middle East. The government seized and continue to conceal Tesla’s research. Instead of revealing science that would benefit all mankind, they use it to extract profit and generate more warfare, also for profit. We can be sure that they would be well organized and have an intelligence apparatus in place before an orchestrated event to protect these activities and their investments. The real question in this Hegelian Dialectical drama is – why is the majority of the “truth” movement, a group supposedly seeking information, vehemently castigating Dr. Wood, ignoring her work and marginalizing her book? Another question, one that she has asked – Did the perpetrators also plant thermite or thermate in those toasted cars? There were too many anomalies surrounding the physical aspects of 9/11 to attribute them all to thermite, thermate or even nanothermite. Read our history people – this is just a repeat of old tactics.

 

Wow 9/11 truthers setting themselves up as 'martyrs to the cause'..Is there NO cheap,slimy ploy they won't try?