Their decision. NOT the decision of some guy on the internet who has no idea of their individual medical history.
We don't know because they refuse to collect statistics on the actual medical reasons (if any) for all these abortions. Probably a reason they don't want to do that.
FoxHastings said: ↑ ...even if it kills the woman... Prove it..... I know that just like all your other claims there is no proof because it isn't true. If I t was YOU in that situation you wouldn't care how rare it was...but since it's only a woman, expendable trash to Anti-Choicers, it doesn't matter to you. Stop trying to dazzle with BS.
There is no reason not to collect data ,....just because they didn't share that information with YOU doesn't mean it doesn't exist..
Gee, don't tell me you are actually finally "getting it"....ya, it's her decision whether to take the risk or not.....it has nothing to do with you......
Moronic reply on your part. Manic depressives are mentally ill before pregnancy, not because of it. Why do you want to kill women?
Moronic reply on your part. I said mentally ill people need options in regards to pregnancy. You really don't have anything except forcing women to carry babies do you? You don't understand women's health issues. You don't understand mental illness. You got nothing.
The mental health exception has been repeatedly abused, in fact it's probably the single most often loophole that's abused. If she's going to claim she needs abortion, I'd like to see some consistency there when it comes time to her wanting a baby. If she wants to get an abortion she should be sterilized. No more fetuses should have to die at her hands.
Something you keep babbling BUT HAVE NEVER PROVEN. Then it's a good thing that what YOU want has no bearing on anyone else's life Your wet dream won't happen.... FORCED sterilization FORCED gestation FORCED sex... It's all about FORCE for Anti-Choicers...
No one is going to force a woman to have a pregnancy that might kill her. If she died because she was forced to carry a pregnancy to her death. murder charges could be filed against those who did so.
Key word "might". Anything "might" cause anything else. It of course all hinges on what the probabilities are.
Being forced into pregnancy is extremely unlikely to cause death, at least not above and beyond a normal pregnancy. Most of that is a myth that pro-choicers like to throw around as a smokescreen. In the extremely unlikely event her pregnancy will be incompatible with life (>30%), no one is going to stop her.
"Being FORCED" is the key phrase…..But I have seen that you don't think anything is a crime if it's done to a woman.
Why do pro-choicers keep trying to change the issue rather than discuss the topic in the opening post? Is it because they're left speechless with no argument, so they have to derail the thread by starting other arguments?
Says the poster who cherry picks or ignores posts because he can't address all the comments or answer all the questions. Says the poster who starts so many threads that are totally unrelated to abortion and women's right to it....LIKE THAT ELECTIVE TWIN REDUCTION THREAD.........HOW'S THAT WORKING OUT FOR YA "Speechless with no argument? HA! We just shut down all your ridiculous "arguments"....if you want to stay on topic quit complaining and make a comment....and we'll blow that out of the water, too!
You, iow, are spreading your myth of forced pregnancy is not a danger to women, and that 'might' can be ignored. That's why arguments such as that continually fail in politics as well as on the board.
Why? If the risk is high, she'll be allowed to get an abortion. If the risk is trivial, it won't really be any higher than a regular pregnancy. Maybe you're referring to more controversial risk levels between 0.7 to 30 percent ? Or was your claim that regular pregnancy is dangerous to women? (Even though every year a lot more women die in car accidents than in pregnancy) (And no woman aborts her pregnancy for health reasons who wants her baby, not when we're not talking about something serious being wrong) Or is more abortion your idea of "saving" women from the complications that can sometimes come from normal pregnancy?
That makes no sense. It is the woman's choice, not yours: and there is the end of it. You have an opinion, and that is all. But please keep sharing it.
What you stated made no sense. That's why I was trying to get you to clarify. It seems you don't want to.
He said, "It is the woman's choice, not yours: and there is the end of it."" Of course you think that makes no sense even though you've been shown a thousand times that it is a fact...
I wasn't referring to that post, I was referring to the post of his before that. That should be obvious if you had taken a moment to think about it.