Economists want uncarbonated...

Discussion in 'Economics & Trade' started by (original)late, Aug 7, 2020.

  1. Have at it

    Have at it Banned

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2020
    Messages:
    1,545
    Likes Received:
    804
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    More educated then you..

    And I am just a poor ass dumb redneck
     
    Last edited: Nov 1, 2020
  2. Melb_muser

    Melb_muser Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2020
    Messages:
    10,485
    Likes Received:
    10,827
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Lol. Ok deal. Let's check back in in 5/10 years' time. Although of course, being a conspiracy theorist you can just claim anything that I say to be fabricated
     
  3. bringiton

    bringiton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2016
    Messages:
    11,833
    Likes Received:
    3,109
    Trophy Points:
    113
    :lol: People first told me, "Let's check back in five or ten years' time," 20 years ago. ACTUAL PHYSICAL EVENTS -- the non-disappearance of arctic sea ice, the non-appearance of millions of climate refugees, etc. -- proved me right five years, ten years, fifteen years and now twenty years later. They will continue to prove me right 25 years, 30 years, 35 years, 40, 45 and 50 years later. Take it to the bank. But I expect superhuman artificial intelligence (SAI) will figure out the role of CO2 in climate within about 20 years, and that will be the last time I need to be proved right about it. The main barrier to AI solving the CO2/climate question now is all the falsified empirical data it is being fed.
     
    Lil Mike likes this.

Share This Page