if you believe in the claim of god, then possibly more than 50 % of your thoughts are not true. einstein believed in god, I believe so. polscie
what if 'god' is mother nature itself? you can believe as you wish i saw a show, in which an actor (playing einstein) that shared a nurse asking if 'he believed' and he (the actor) shared EINSTEIN: You believe? In God? NURSE: Yes. Yes I do. Do you? Believe? EINSTEIN: Do I believe there is someone who plans the daily life of Albert Einstein? No. Although sometimes I think he may have been leading me up the garden path. NURSE: But didn't he make the garden? EINSTEIN: I think he is the garden. NURSE: And isn't he the gardener too? EINSTEIN: Yes, and all my life I have been trying to catch him at his work. http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/tvradio/programmes/horizon/einstein_symphony_trans.shtml i believe HE IS THE GARDEN (nature itself) ie... our creator (via evolution), our food, our body, our air, our everything. meaning; when a person lies (false witnesses truth) they are perhaps imposing against all (mankind, life and every god) that be my comprehension of 'god'
I could not believe what you are talking about. You are definitely have taken so much steps backward. what an analogy..."garden"*"gardener" this is the 21st century, take a hike. polscie
be honest you just havent heard such ideology before and why you dont 'comprehend' sorry. evolving is more like my walk i know, and since einstein was of the 20th century that old garden junk is almost funny................ weak i will be hiking today how did you know? are you psychic?
What a ridiculous statement. If you believe in god? First, what do you mean by god? Second, how can you apply a percentage to something that is not quantifiable. I will follow your subjective assertions, with a subjective assertion of my own. You sir, are an idiot. - jmho
Is important is that it is ambiguous at best, first define Spinozas GOD. Thats what we are talking about. Umm misleading thread title. I want it to be understood that some of the things we see attributed to relativity are simply bold assertions made with a fine combing of mathematical ambiguity's loosely linked to it. Associated by individuals who latched onto fame and glory void of the substantive scrutiny from their peers, the way Einstein was.
funny part is, many a fool practically worship einstein while he himself knew the work was not complete. kind of like jesus charging his disciples to not call him 'christ' (matt 16;20) idiots making mountains out of mole hills THE EPR paradox was Einstein genius to prove QM was a joke.
He hated Bohr's proposition of the "dismal infinatismal", " God don't play dice". lo.l You understand like I do. I think we may be living in the beginning of a resurgence of theoretical physics. I sure hope some of the new up and comings question modern thought. Especially Penn rose-Hawking, it always bugged me that we could have something that existed in nature so it could suck itself to death. Thanks Bishadi.
god in the context of the bible. there are only 2 beliefs that stand. belief in god. belief in science. it is up to you if you want to quantify or not. polscie.
Ok, so the Christian Deity. No, there are many beliefs with credibility. I believe in the basic goodness of people for instance. Science however is not a belief, it is an academic discipline.
the battle to know what is true is far from over. I am here to defeat the false claim of the belief in god.
reductionary scope it all aint random. nature does have a causal description (but not by an overseeing entity (god)) paradigm shift copernicus just moved the pieces to the model. (took the sun and put it in the middle and moved the earth to be circling it). Same parts just changed the way we looked at them. Change energy itself as being the specimen; energy is em (light). The gravity of existence is just that property known as entanglement. keep those in mind and all of the sciences come together.
i agree.... the diety as some dude on a thrown is like a zeus from a phraronic foundation (moses was born and raised in egypt) that is why they survive exactly and it is fair to assess that each belief have them same qualities of teaching 'good wisdom' that gives each belief, a possibility of existing but it is 'people' that make the choice to exhibit and observe the learned information. first case in point; people are good naturally (conscious/empathy) exactly i consider it 'the pursuit of truth' Kind of like a living process. ie.... knowledge evolves over time and 'we the people' (mankind) are its 'creator' All you have to do is realize mankind created all words.
