Elective twin reduction

Discussion in 'Abortion' started by kazenatsu, Mar 1, 2019.

  1. JakeStarkey

    JakeStarkey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2016
    Messages:
    25,747
    Likes Received:
    9,526
    Trophy Points:
    113
    This anti-abortion nonsense is simply . . . nonsense.

    Get this through your heads.

    Within the law this is the woman's choice, not yours.

    You have your own opinion, and that means that is only for you. It has no weight in law.
     
    FoxHastings likes this.
  2. JakeStarkey

    JakeStarkey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2016
    Messages:
    25,747
    Likes Received:
    9,526
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It is devilish to put a mother's health or life at risk to have a baby.
     
    FoxHastings likes this.
  3. kazenatsu

    kazenatsu Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2017
    Messages:
    34,613
    Likes Received:
    11,200
    Trophy Points:
    113
    But abortion is worse because the woman is deciding for someone else.
     
    Last edited: Mar 3, 2019
  4. Daniel Light

    Daniel Light Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2015
    Messages:
    31,455
    Likes Received:
    34,888
    Trophy Points:
    113
    And you want to decide for her. Here's a mirror for your glass house.
     
    OKgrannie and FoxHastings like this.
  5. Daniel Light

    Daniel Light Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2015
    Messages:
    31,455
    Likes Received:
    34,888
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Please, you want to pretend that conservatives never get abortions. Sell it somewhere else.
     
    OKgrannie and FoxHastings like this.
  6. FoxHastings

    FoxHastings Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2014
    Messages:
    56,891
    Likes Received:
    21,024
    Trophy Points:
    113

    No, she isn't .

    And why do you want to decide for HER????
     
    OKgrannie likes this.
  7. kazenatsu

    kazenatsu Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2017
    Messages:
    34,613
    Likes Received:
    11,200
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So do you, unless you support elective abortion in the 7th month of pregnancy.

    Look, the woman in this situation is already deciding to carry a pregnancy. It's not like the question is about whether to be pregnant or not. She just wants to terminate one of her twins.
    I question how much of a difference that really actually makes to her body.
    Yeah, the bump might be a tiny bit bigger, and there might be a tiny increase in risk.

    Most pregnant women who find out they have twins are elated.
     
    Last edited: Mar 3, 2019
  8. JakeStarkey

    JakeStarkey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2016
    Messages:
    25,747
    Likes Received:
    9,526
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There is no one else, kazenatsu, but your comments can be applied the to you, who is trying to decide issues immorally and illegally for the mother.
     
    Last edited: Mar 3, 2019
  9. JakeStarkey

    JakeStarkey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2016
    Messages:
    25,747
    Likes Received:
    9,526
    Trophy Points:
    113
    But none of that is any business of yours.
     
    FoxHastings likes this.
  10. kazenatsu

    kazenatsu Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2017
    Messages:
    34,613
    Likes Received:
    11,200
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'd hardly call choosing to electively abort one of your twins a complex moral issue.

    They usually don't even identify that twins exist until later into the pregnancy, and then they usually prefer to wait a few more weeks after that so the fetuses will be big enough that they can easily pick out one without harming the other.
     
    Last edited: Mar 3, 2019
  11. JakeStarkey

    JakeStarkey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2016
    Messages:
    25,747
    Likes Received:
    9,526
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's not your issue, kazenatsu, is the point.

    It is not your business.
     
    FoxHastings likes this.
  12. kazenatsu

    kazenatsu Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2017
    Messages:
    34,613
    Likes Received:
    11,200
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Are you aware how much of a radical Pro-Choice position that is?

    Or do Pro-Choicers now support Elective Twin Reductions (i.e. "The Two Minus One Pregnancy" it is sometimes called)
     
  13. JakeStarkey

    JakeStarkey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2016
    Messages:
    25,747
    Likes Received:
    9,526
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The radical position is yours, kazenatsu. It is not your business, period, to interfere with others' choices.
     
    FoxHastings likes this.
  14. JakeStarkey

    JakeStarkey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2016
    Messages:
    25,747
    Likes Received:
    9,526
    Trophy Points:
    113
    kazenatsu failed to acknowledge "t is devilish to put a mother's health or life at risk to have a baby."
     
    FoxHastings likes this.
  15. Daniel Light

    Daniel Light Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2015
    Messages:
    31,455
    Likes Received:
    34,888
    Trophy Points:
    113
    So what's the problem? The majority of women with twins will carry to term. But women who were high risk to start with need to have the option open to them to reduce the risk. Isn't it better to bring one healthy child to term than have a high risk of miscarriage or complications that might endanger both?

    When it comes to women making life or possible death decisions, it should be left to her and her doctors - not some key-banger who slept in a Holiday Inn last night and knows nothing of her medical history.
     
    Last edited: Mar 3, 2019
    JakeStarkey and FoxHastings like this.
  16. FoxHastings

    FoxHastings Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2014
    Messages:
    56,891
    Likes Received:
    21,024
    Trophy Points:
    113

    Pro-Choice ONLY means the woman has the choice. It does not mean anything else.

    You have been told that many, many times....why is so hard for you to get??

    Do you need it explained in simpler terms? There aren't any.


    Is it so hard for Anti-Choicers to understand that women are humans with rights!!! ??WTF...why is that so hard to understand??
     
  17. JakeStarkey

    JakeStarkey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2016
    Messages:
    25,747
    Likes Received:
    9,526
    Trophy Points:
    113
    kazenatsu, you can't interfere with a mother's choice, period.
     
  18. kazenatsu

    kazenatsu Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2017
    Messages:
    34,613
    Likes Received:
    11,200
    Trophy Points:
    113
    There are women choosing to abort one of them who have no increased risk.
     
  19. JakeStarkey

    JakeStarkey Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 4, 2016
    Messages:
    25,747
    Likes Received:
    9,526
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Not your business.
     
    FoxHastings likes this.
  20. Bassman

    Bassman Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    Messages:
    1,876
    Likes Received:
    332
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    No, but God certainly can. After all, every child is a gift from God. But again, pro aborts who think THEY have the moral high ground will answer to a HIGHER authority in God Almighty.
     
  21. FoxHastings

    FoxHastings Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2014
    Messages:
    56,891
    Likes Received:
    21,024
    Trophy Points:
    113

    So what?
     
  22. FoxHastings

    FoxHastings Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2014
    Messages:
    56,891
    Likes Received:
    21,024
    Trophy Points:
    113


    Even the ones ripped from their parents and caged like animals and sexually abused on the border ??




    There are no "pro-aborts"...there are Pro-Choicers who believe everyone, even women , should retain the right to their own bodies.

    Pro-Choicers do NOT insert their morals as Anti-Choicers want to do....they just want everyone to have the same rights...it is not a moral issue..
     
  23. Bassman

    Bassman Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2010
    Messages:
    1,876
    Likes Received:
    332
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Male
    It IS a moral issue. it is about the sanctity of life. Not terminating it all because the woman wants to be a selfish self-centered bitch.
     
  24. FoxHastings

    FoxHastings Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2014
    Messages:
    56,891
    Likes Received:
    21,024
    Trophy Points:
    113
    FoxHastings said:
    Even the ones ripped from their parents and caged like animals and sexually abused on the border ??


    There are no "pro-aborts"...there are Pro-Choicers who believe everyone, even women , should retain the right to their own bodies.

    Pro-Choicers do NOT insert their morals as Anti-Choicers want to do....they just want everyone to have the same rights...it is not a moral issue..





    No, it's not a "moral" issue...it is a legal rights issue.

    And your "morals" are not everyone's nor should they be and YOU have NO right to impose them on others..



    YOU:"""because the woman wants to be a selfish self-centered bitch""""

    The hatred and misogyny ALWAYS oozes out eventually...



    BTW, you forgot to address the question in blue bolded above....
     
    Last edited: Mar 4, 2019
  25. Doofenshmirtz

    Doofenshmirtz Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2016
    Messages:
    28,021
    Likes Received:
    19,308
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You have the same right to think its wrong as she has to abort one of the twins. The solution is simple. Pass a law against thinking its wrong.
     

Share This Page