Electronic Harassment is Real

Discussion in 'Civil Liberties' started by James7, Apr 16, 2014.

  1. edna kawabata

    edna kawabata Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2018
    Messages:
    4,478
    Likes Received:
    1,421
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Not sarcasm. It was my opinion, someone without "mental health issues", after reading over your world view. You can stay the fearful, mistrusting, victim you see yourself as or get diagnosed and treated.
     
  2. James7

    James7 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2014
    Messages:
    444
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    I'm presuming you don't have any qualifications in medicine? So how can you be so absolutely certain of your position that I am completely delusional?

    State your case.

    If you can't then we will have to assume your opinion is entirely based upon prejudice.
     
  3. edna kawabata

    edna kawabata Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2018
    Messages:
    4,478
    Likes Received:
    1,421
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I will not go down that rabbit hole. I foresee endless counterarguments. Just get evaluated or stay the way you are, it's up to you.
     
  4. James7

    James7 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2014
    Messages:
    444
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    Irrespective of what edna kawabata may think, I still believe I am not delusional when I observe that all of my neighbours in all four directions appear to be currently outside of work. This has been the case since before the pandemic started and the circumstance cannot be just pure coincidence.

    The electronic harassment signal (which can come from all four directions), appears to be fully real in the sense that it can be stopped with aluminium metal plate.
     
  5. James7

    James7 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2014
    Messages:
    444
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    Although I do not agree with what she is saying, edna kawabata has raised a question which is deserving of a little more discussion.

    It appears to be the "official" line of the government, and it is often repeated by many health care professionals, that individuals reporting to be victims of electronic harassment or gang stalking, are delusional psychotics.

    This view is typified by the Wikipedia page on Electronic harassment. Within this page it says the following: "Multiple medical professionals have evaluated that these experiences are hallucinations, the result of delusional disorders, or psychosis."

    Well let me say the following, I have read two books on the subject of gang stalking/electronic harassment from cover to cover and I DIDN'T FIND ONE SINGLE COMMENT OR HINT THAT THE AUTHOR WAS IN ANY WAY DELUSIONAL OR MENTALLY ILL.

    And you can read the exact same books if you like at your leisure:

    The Hidden Evil: The Financial Elite's Covert War Against the Civilian

    by Mark M. Rich



    Closing The Gap: Gang Stalking

    by GmB Bailey



    For anyone you knows anything at all about the subject, it is a patently obvious FACT that labelling reports of electronic harassment or gang stalking as BOTH a "conspiracy theory" AND a "delusional psychosis" (as the Wikipedia page clearly states) is an attempt to both smear and to cover for the harassment itself.
     
    Last edited: Jan 18, 2021
  6. James7

    James7 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2014
    Messages:
    444
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    Back in the nineties I recall political dissidents in Northern Ireland complaining of "microwave harassment". Obviously this was quite some time ago now and long before I myself ever witnessed such a thing.

    If there are any genuine researchers out there taking an interest in electronic harassment this might be one possible source of information on this subject.

    You've probably heard me say this before but the mainstream media is very much filtered and selective. Some really important stories get only the smallest mention and some stories aren't even covered at all. And of course you can't forget, who actually owns and runs the media anyway?
     
  7. James7

    James7 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2014
    Messages:
    444
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    Found a possible reference to the the above story which I recalled from the 1990's:

    Faughill Mountain reclaimed - An Phoblact

    This online news article dating from 2006 refers to the closure of an army base after more than 20 years of operation.

    Here's a quote:

    The article seems to suggest that 'microwave cameras' were used for the purpose of surveillance, and that further it is also suggested that the cameras somehow projected a narrow beam of microwave radiation at the target in order to work.

    As I remember the story as it was reported back in the 1990's, the subjects of the surveillance described it as being "not very pleasant". However the article at the time didn't divulge precisely in what way the microwave surveillance was not very pleasant.

    Would this count as a form of microwave harassment?
     
  8. FatBack

    FatBack Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2018
    Messages:
    52,324
    Likes Received:
    48,718
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    It's easier to smear and label others as "mentally ill...etc" than it is to accept that all you think you know is not the sum total of all that is possible.
     
    Collateral Damage likes this.
  9. James7

    James7 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2014
    Messages:
    444
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    It's interesting that the article places the surveillance installation on a mountain. This suggests that it could survey quite a wide area and focus in on targets from a distance.

    Where I live there's a tall, distant ridge that's visible from most parts of the town. It's 8.5 miles away and I have driven onto it. It's deserted apart from a farm, but a short distance beyond the farm is a small entertainment complex with go-karting, clay pigeon shooting and a hotel. Beside the entertainment complex is a large, white golf ball mounted on top of a pylon. Obviously inside the golf ball is a radio dish antenna. But what it's used for and where it's pointed at, I haven't a clue.

    Also I couldn't help noticing that the largest employer in the town is a military contractor. Where they are based in the town, other smaller military contractors are also located nearby within the same industrial estate.

    Also there's something rather peculiar about the police station in the town. It's an incredibly tall building with many floors to it and it looks almost like a high rise apartment block. Considering that the town is only small to medium sized, the police station is just far too large in comparison. Coincidentally it's immediately adjacent to the industrial estate where the military contractor is located, so it's practically overlooking the entire site. On top of the police station are a large number of antennas of all shapes and sizes.

    I really get the impression there's something creepy going on in the town and you really get the impression that people are looking over your shoulder and that the whole thing is being co-ordinated.
     
    Last edited: May 3, 2021
  10. James7

    James7 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2014
    Messages:
    444
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    I've also noticed that directly opposite to the main entrance to the military contractor, on the other side of the road and embedded in the roadside footpath, is a tall mast. It's as tall as a lamp post but with no light at the top. Also it's thicker than an ordinary lamp post indicating that it may contain something such as electronic surveillance gadgetry for example.

    I've not seen anything like it before and it seems a huge coincidence it's literally directly opposite to the entrance to the military contractor. Is it used to monitor traffic into the military contractor or even to monitor the behaviour of traffic driving passed the military contractor as well? Perhaps the mast is being used for advanced warning/counter surveillance purposes?

    At the main entrance to the military contractor is a check point and a permanent security guard. There is also much wire fencing surrounding the whole site which has regular anti-scale fencing.
     
  11. James7

    James7 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2014
    Messages:
    444
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    I'd never actually heard of "microwave cameras" before. They sound a bit far fetched to begin with but apparently such a thing does exist:

    Time-of-Flight Microwave Camera

    Here's one short quote from this rather scientific article, "Cost and complexity of imaging systems must be reduced below military or security budgets to allow for widespread adoption in commercial and consumer applications."

    Makes you wonder in what commercial and consumer environments such equipment could be used in?

    We've already strongly criticized the Chinese government for their Orwellian use of technology against members of their own population, such as facial recognition, but then we ourselves are quietly pioneering the exact same technology via the backdoor hoping no-one pays much attention to the fact. Double standards yet again.
     
  12. James7

    James7 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2014
    Messages:
    444
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    I note the above quoted article dates from 2015 and it comes across that the technology is still very much in the developmental stage. But this doesn't mean to say that the military didn't already have the technology and that it was actively being used before this but in secret. All the article really is telling us is that, yes, such a technology IS in fact possible.

    Other examples exist where the government or military have developed a secret technology and then civilians independently developed and circulated the exact same technology quite lawfully without breaking any official secrecy laws. One example is asymmetric encryption also known as public-key cryptography used in computer to computer secure network communications. Members of the public routinely use this technology every time they carry out a secure online transaction or use a https:// website.
     
  13. James7

    James7 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2014
    Messages:
    444
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    Estimates vary as to how much money the government spends yearly on military black budget programs. However it is inevitable that some of the technology the government/military creates will be used against its own civilian population.

    One important problem is how exactly all the money, which ultimately is completely funded by the tax payer, is spent is beyond any form of democratic scrutiny. But not only is how the money spent beyond democratic scrutiny, how the hardware and know-how is used after the technology has been created is also beyond scrutiny as well.
     
  14. James7

    James7 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2014
    Messages:
    444
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    Of course I could add to the above that no one can be really sure what secret technology the military has because obviously..........it's a secret!

    So many technologies have been pioneered by the military which then became available for civilian use. Even the internet itself had military origins.

    Edward Snowden's leaks about secret government surveillance on the Net back in 2013 seem like water under the bridge these days. I mean these days they're openly and proudly admitting it and censoring anything they strongly disagree with. How times change.
     
  15. James7

    James7 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2014
    Messages:
    444
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    Gang Stalking UK


    The police are often quick to dismiss gang stalking as a purely delusional phenomena, but even Members of Parliament and leading politicians are regularly the victims of gang stalking in the UK.

    Not only can MP's and leading politicians receive multiple death threats via social media, angry crowds can gather outside their homes threatening to break in and injure them and their families.

    This is a form of Mob Rule where unpopular policies can be immediately punished with harassment and direct threats.

    From my own personal experience of stalking, I wonder what role the far right has to play in such matters. The targets of such harassment are often left-wing or liberal leaning politicians.

    I've personally observed how one of my stalkers behaves using his mobile phone: He doesn't seem to do anything for a living but he's up at six in the morning and he's continually typing in messages into his mobile phone and he does this routinely throughout the day. He does come across as someone with right-wing views.
     
  16. James7

    James7 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2014
    Messages:
    444
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    The other day I witnessed strong circumstantial evidence that the police are participating in the stalking and not just looking the other way.

    The harassment comes across as a team effort involving many layers of society and amounts to blatant political repression.

    On the one hand they are telling us in the media how bad racism and sexism is on social media or in the workplace, but then on the other hand they are quietly persecuting anyone deemed too left-wing or critical of the status quo.

    It reveals just how twisted and two-faced the society we are living in is.
     
  17. James7

    James7 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2014
    Messages:
    444
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    I can reveal some further detail as to who is calling the shots as far as the stalking and harassment is concerned. And it also explains how exactly they manage to get away with it and why they are so successful in organizing boots on the ground.

    It involves members of the British aristocracy. Every town in the UK has some noteworthy family living in a large house who own land and property in the area, but it is also possible to get on the wrong side of these same people.

    It seems the democracy we live in is a curious hybrid creature and that on the quiet persons of influence are able to pull strings to influence the police, politicians and the media alike. Officially, of course, none of this happens, but unofficially, everyone knows it does.
     
  18. James7

    James7 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2014
    Messages:
    444
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    Can't remember if I've mentioned this already on this thread, but in the UK it is technically illegal to harass people in a public place or in private, i.e. within their own home. This is covered by the Protection from Harassment Act 1997:

    Claiming that you are delusional and just imagining it, is an ideal cover story and one which apparently is regularly used by the UK police. I don't believe the police have any factual evidence at all that I am delusional, it comes across as more of a way of thinking than anything else.

    Stalkers are increasingly using technology in order to stalk their victims. See this article from the BBC:

    Stalkerware: The software that spies on your partner

    I get the strong impression that my stalkers have spyware installed on my laptop. I use several anti-spyware/anti-malware packages but none of them seem to be able to detect the spyware in question. Presumably the spyware they are using has yet to be properly identified and studied by the anti-spyware companies. The purpose of the spyware on my laptop appears to be so as to enable my stalkers to neutralize and modify patterns of behaviour.

    I also believe my car carries a tracking device. Such tracking devices can easily be purchased on the internet and are controlled by an average mobile phone and the tracking device can easily be removed and replaced when the batteries need recharging. My stalkers seem to know exactly where I am in my car and can harass you while driving their own vehicles. One method they are using at the moment is to drive towards you while overtaking parked vehicles and to hog too much of the road while doing so, forcing you to adjust your steering to avoid colliding with them. It's a shocking display of poor driving, but then it's completely deliberate anyway.
     
  19. James7

    James7 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2014
    Messages:
    444
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    These days the Internet really should be renamed the Spynet or the Stalknet, because in reality that's what it has become.

    And it's a case of double standards. The News of the World was closed down because they put spyware onto people's mobile phones, but as we've seen in the post above, such illicit surveillance is more or less routine these days on the net.

    From hardcore spyware to nuisance tracking cookies, it all adds up to the same thing.

    Tracking cookies are routinely placed on your browser by certain leading internet companies (you know who they are but I won't mention their names for legal reasons) who claim that their purpose is to optimize targeted and personalized advertising. However what they don't tell you is that they also sell all the data they've gathered on you to literally all and sundry, in fact anyone who wants to pay for it. And they have your complete browsing history. They can see what medical conditions you may have, they can predict who you are going to vote for, they can see the whole lot.

    But should it be legal?
     
  20. James7

    James7 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2014
    Messages:
    444
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    The internet companies often try to reassure their users that no human operators actually see the data they are routinely gathering and that it's all fully automated.

    But can the same be said of the third parties the internet companies are further selling their data to? They may claim that the data they sell on has been fully anonymized, but it's already been proved you can fairly easily trace who generated the search data in a fairly short space of time.

    Based upon your internet searches they can quickly ascertain which country and city you live in, your age group, your social status, what you do for a living, etc, etc, and eventually your exact name and address.

    And then the data itself has to be connected to at least some unique identifier for further reference to make the data of any use at all, and what other unique identifier can there be but your IP address?

    And of course anyone can look up an internet IP address online to find the exact postal address..........
     
    Last edited: Sep 28, 2021
  21. James7

    James7 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2014
    Messages:
    444
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    As everyone knows aristocrats have trucks load of money and don't have much of a problem spending it on any enterprise they feel is fit for purpose. They may even be not that adverse to the odd discreet bribe here and there.

    Operation Tiberius in the UK revealed how corrupt the British legal system was with jurors, solicitors, police and prison services being open to bribes. Up for grabs was a 'get of jail' pass for £50,000 a go.

    The corruption of Britain: UK’s key institutions infiltrated by criminals
     
  22. James7

    James7 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2014
    Messages:
    444
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    Democracy means rule by the people. But does it or will it ever really happen? Sometimes it sounds like a left-wing ideal and that in practice something else is actually going on.

    Aristocracy means rules by the best. Or at least they like to think they're the best (genetically superior) and that everyone else has to believe the same. Because at the end of the day it IS a belief system. It's part of the Protestant social outlook that everyone is 'allowed' to identify with their lords and ladies. It's a centuries old tradition that dates back to William of Orange. However the whole thing is associated with bigotry, we've seen this in Northern Ireland. And let's face it, the people stalking and harassing me certainly are bigots in the full sense of the term.

    And it can happen on a subconscious level as well. People can subconsciously believe that the aristocracy have a God given right to do as they please and that they are the natural born leaders to run our society. This ultimately is because the monarch is the next in line after God Almighty himself. This is the belief but at the end of the day it is a cult of ancient origins. It's not much different from what they were saying in ancient Egypt. Sometimes I just find it mind-bending that people can still subscribe to such nonsense in this day and age.

    Does anyone else have any opinions on this?
     
  23. James7

    James7 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2014
    Messages:
    444
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    A story at the moment is the 'Havana syndrome'. There has been some speculation as to whether it is caused by microwave harassment.

    See this quote from the following BBC online article:

    ‘Havana syndrome ’ and the mystery of the microwaves

     
  24. James7

    James7 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2014
    Messages:
    444
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    Opinion appears to be divided on the 'Havana syndrome'.

    This article from NBC News would suggest it was 'likely' caused by pulsed microwaves:

    'Havana Syndrome' likely caused by pulsed microwave energy, government study finds

    Whereas this article from the Mail Online suggests it is some sort of psyop/hoax:

    All in the mind? How the mysterious Havana Syndrome is a 'global experiment in mass suggestion' and NOT targeted attacks expert claims
     
  25. James7

    James7 Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 16, 2014
    Messages:
    444
    Likes Received:
    29
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Gender:
    Male
    Even though I am almost certainly the target of pulsed microwave harassment (also known as the 'Frey effect'), I have never experienced any of the symptoms described in the 'Havana syndrome'. Indeed some of the symptoms described in the Havana syndrome are quite extreme.

    I believe that the microwave harassment I have experienced effects your health in more subtle ways. In fact scientists are still learning about the ill effects of RF radiation and opinion is divided as to what counts as harmful or safe levels. Most studies concern constant, unchanging and fairly low levels of RF radiation, rather than the effect of pulsed, higher levels. And it has to be remembered that although the pulses are fairly short in the Frey effect, the microwaves are intense enough to significantly heat parts of your anatomy! So it can't be completely safe.
     

Share This Page