Evidence severely lacking for claim that most of Flight 93 had buried

Discussion in '9/11' started by suede, Sep 28, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Skeptics are claiming the reason you don't see much plane debris at the Shanksville site even though the FBI claimed they eventually recovered 95% of the plane was because most of the plane had buried in the ground:

    However the evidence produced so far in the 10 long years since 9/11 to support this claim is severely lacking, so the most obvious conclusion is that the very few photos of parts allegedly unearthed were staged and nothing was really buried in the ground. The claim was just made up to offer an explanation as to why there's hardly any debris left after the Boeing 757 supposedly crashed there.

    Think of it logically, instead of the conspirators having to haul about 60 tons or so of 757 wreckage to the scene to plant, creating more risk for them, they just had to say most of the plane got buried in that "soft reclaimed stripmine" so they wouldn't have to bring much debris to stage and they would never have to show all that alleged buried debris. It was a good plan since it fooled most of the world (and all of the skeptics).
     
  2. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Evidence is only lacking for those that refuse to look to the source.
     
  3. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You have evidence from the source to prove most a of 757 was in the ground? Sweet! Let's see what you got. We've only been waiting for 10 long years. :bored:
     
  4. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The direct source has been posted on this board numerous times. Some are to married their agenda to contact the people who were there.
     
  5. candycorn

    candycorn New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,633
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I guess the alternative theory is that a 5th plane was hijacked that day? It literally never ends with these people. I'm glad they don't vote.
     
  6. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Are these the people you claimed to have contacted before?
     
  7. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I know, they believe most of a 757 buried, but can't prove it. I'm with you on being glad they don't vote. They probably don't even know how to vote if they can't even prove most of a huge plane like a 757 buried in the ground, especially with all those people and media fixed on the crater from the day of the alleged crashed until the end of the clean up.
     
  8. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The direct source has been posted on this board numerous times.
     
  9. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0


    I don't see the "bouncing engine" in that simulation. Did you miss that?
     
  10. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    This thread gets the Sisyphus seal of approval.

    [​IMG]
     
  11. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I think that was in the moving goalpost gif.
     
  12. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Undisputed: Evidence severely lacking for claim that most of Flight 93 had buried
     
  13. raytri

    raytri Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2004
    Messages:
    38,841
    Likes Received:
    2,140
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Only if you ignore the fact that investigators recovered, as you say, about 95% of the plane. Guess where they got most of it? In the hole.

    You, of course, claim -- without evidence -- that investigators staged the whole thing and are lying about where they found the plane.

    So who should we believe: the people who actually went to the site and spent months digging up the wreckage, and have the wreckage to show for it?

    Or you, who simply asserts that the investigators are lying?

    Tough choice. Not.
     
  14. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38

    Undisputed: You have absolutely no evidence the plane was planted in Shanksville, yet you keep starting this same topic over and over expecting a different outcome.

    You're just trolling under the auspices of actually have a point or evidence. Neither of which you have.
     
  15. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Evidence?

    The evidence is that the evidence is severely lacking for that claim.

    Then show me all that debris!
     
  16. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Why?...It wouldn't make a (*)(*)(*)(*) bit of difference
     
  17. DDave

    DDave Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2010
    Messages:
    2,002
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    So, just to be clear, are you saying all of the exhibits and info on this page are faked?

    http://www.911myths.com/index.php/United_Airlines_Flight_93
     
  18. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That's what people with no evidence say.
     
  19. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This thread is only concerned about the claim that most of Flight 93 had buried. Do any of the exhibits on that page provide significant evidence to support this claim?
     
  20. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    No it's what people who have had dealings with truthers,and their inability toaccept facts
     
  21. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Well try me then, show me the facts.
     
  22. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    32
    Trophy Points:
    0
    What are your criteria for said 'evidence'?
     
  23. suede

    suede Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2011
    Messages:
    1,718
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Videos, photos, interviews, news reports, or anything else you think would prove the claim.
     
  24. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    How about direct testimony, photographs and video from people who worked the crash site?
     
  25. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Argument by assumption: a logical fallacy.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page