Well, that's awfully open minded of you. Not buying it is not the same as having evidence that supports your opinion. Well, YOU ALL think it was a self inflicted false flag attack. But YOU ALL can't prove it. And unfortunately there are folks out there that think EVERYTHING that hits the news is a false flag attack. Aurora, the temple shooting -- EVERYTHING. In the din of "the government is evil and is behind every bit of bad news", it gets a little hard to separate fiction from possible fact. It's the boy who cried wolf taken to an extreme.
What I am REALLY saying is: state what you believe, cite your sources and be prepared to defend your position. Period.
i keep hearing this "evidence" montra again time after time.. are you asking for a fox news link where bush jr says to sean hannity "yea we planned 9/11" ?
How about just ONE PIECE of real evidence that 9/11 wasn't carried out by 19 hijackers from Al Qaeda and was instead done by our government. What Hannibal is getting at is truthers won't even state what they believe anymore because as soon as they commit to a specific theory, they get exposed as liars, idiots or both. Don't you find it a little odd that truthers can't agree on any one aspect of 9/11 when they should be agreeing IF their claims were true as they like to pretend? Seriously. Truthers can't agree on who was behind 9/11. Some say it was our government. Some say it was the Jews. Some say it was the NWO. Truthers can't agree on how 9/11 was carried out. Some say planes flew into the towers while others claim it was holograms. Some say a drone hit the Pentagon while others say it was explosives. Some say it was a controlled demolition of the towers while others say the towers were "dustified" by some strange energy weapon while others say it was a small nuke. Some say flight 93 was shot down while others say it was all staged. So how is ANYONE suppose to believe a group that can't even stand up for what they believe in, much less proclaim in one voice what happened on 9/11?
because they are not honest "like me" you see sir... the reason they cannot agree is because nobody knows... like me... they dont believe the official BS story... so yes.. they cannot agree because they...like me..dont buy the official BS... but thats good for debunkers right? pays the bills dont it?
But all truthers claim they are honest. Wh Your post is nonsense and the reason truthers have zero credibility.... even the ones who claim we should trust them for some reason even though they cannot provide a single shred of evidence to back up their claims.
You don't understand the very simple fact that when someone is trying to pretend they are honest they are doing so to gain one's trust? Wow. And yes, truthers ask everyone to trust them all the time when they ask everyone to believe their claims even though there is zero evidence to back up said claims.
still sounds weird... im having a hard time understanding what youre trying to say... so they are not LITERALLY saying to trust them?
oh.. my point was if it cannot be sourced..or the source is shady..or completly unfounded...then i will admit it.. i have no problem admitting something isnt true... because like i said. at the end of the day i dont believe the official story BS..
oh.. my point was if it cannot be sourced..or the source is shady..or completly unfounded...then i will admit it.. i have no problem admitting something isnt true... because like i said. at the end of the day i dont believe the official story BS..
So what is your evidence the official story is BS? What do you think happened on 9/11? Please stop beating around the bush and answer these two simple questions.
Actually a lot of people know. There have been plenty of investigations by government and non-government entities to determine what happened. Lots of folks don't believe them though. Just like they don't believe in the moon landing and they don't believe that lone nutjobs go on shooting rampages every so often It's not enough to just "not buy it". If your saying it didn't happen one way then you need to say how it DID happen if you expect to be taken seriously. Other wise your just saying "I know that it didn't happen the way the government said it did but I have no idea how it really happened". Seems kind of stupid, no? More paid shills nonsense.
Yes you DO need evidence....you make claims that the official story is BS.you need to provide evidence of why you think so Giggling,and saying 'I don't have to show you no stinking evidence',isn't going to cut it..
Evidently in your world calling someone a liar requires no proof from you...And you don't seem shy about spouting your 'thoughts or beliefs' here You make a claim,You back it up
no....just like i dont believe in jesus or allah.. i dont owe you ANYTHING...and it kills you that i wont lay out what i "think" happened..so you can dissect it...lol
No,it doesn't 'kill' me that you refuse to back up your claims. However,you have no credibility here because of your refusal..
when i misquote its the end of the world and im a piece of truther scum...when you do it....its not so bad.
I quoted you directly. Not so fun with the shoe on the other foot, eh? You keep your faith in the truther cult. You need no evidence for your religion.
