Evidence thread

Why are you still here? You've made your claim. You've claimed nothing will follow. You refuse to look at or address evidence. You cannot produce a single shred of evidence to prove your beliefs, which makes your beliefs untrustworthy. So what else are you here for? Certainly not to discuss 9/11.

 

Apparently "nothing to follow" is code for rambling, dodging rants incoming.

Truthers cannot tell the truth.

 

after 200 coincidences kinda makes me suspicious.. ever get that feeling youre being lied to by the media and government? i get that feeling from 9/11

 

Feelings do not equal evidence. Feelings equal cults and group thinking.

 

You know what? If one looks hard enough, one can find tons of coincidences behind any event. The bigger the event, the more coincidences one can come up with. What does it mean? Well, if you let it rule your life, it means you're extremely gullible and can be manipulated by people like Alex Jones and Richard Gage. All they have to do is sit back and feed truthers "coincidences" and pretend there is some valid connection and truther worshipers make a comfortable living for them. I would rather think for myself than be someone's tool like so many truthers choose to live.

 

i like alex jones.... i think theres more to him then what we see.. i dont think hes just a guy with a radio show.. his hatred for bill cooper seems odd.. his die hard christian beliefs and "atheists work for the new world order" stuff is just....weird.

i dont trust known liars...sorry.. they can manipulate any federal agency..

 

So you like, but don't trust, Alex Jones. Hmmmm. Interesting.

 

yes...

i like listening to his wild rants...and his not picking a side...he reports on the government as a whole...

i do get a bad feeling about his true agenda... i dont instantly belive everything he says... most of his articals are linked and sourced..i like that.

 

It's "articles".

You might want to call Tech Support and see if your ChiCom shill software needs a spell check patch or something.

 

i believe obsessively correcting peoples spelling is a form of OCD.

 

You believe a lot of things without evidence, don't you.

 

You did correct his spelling Dave...

Denial city, as usual.

 

Back to heckling?

 

Where did I say I didn't correct his spelling.

I was responding to his entire quote and his belief that correcting spelling was a form of OCD.

I know it's probably getting to be a force of habit for you to just take part a quote out of context and react. You're becoming quite an accomplished truther.

 

You don't believe that trail of steam was a plane???? Shame on you Sir! SHAME!!!!! ROFL!!

 

Dave,

So why say anything at all then? You corrected his spelling. I'm sure if I made more typos or missed auto-corrects, that you'd 'correct' me too. Why? Because lousy spelling bothers you. Look at sparky, he does the same thing. But instead of just admitting it, you denied it.

Your side of the tracks likes denial.

 

You can learn to hate. You can learn to spell.

Apparently you can't do both.

 

There is no evidence that 9/11 is an inside job that would impress even the most disreputable of DA's.

The only thng you've got is buckloads of assumptions about this or that visual clue and most of those don't hold water.

 

Please show me where I denied correcting his spelling.

I can show you where I admitted correcting his spelling.

Your side of the tracks likes making stuff up.

 

I wouldn't correct your spelling, Jango.

Lousy spelling doesn't bother me. Posters who constantly make snarky comments that contribute nothing to the discussion and just waste everyone's time bother me. Therefore, I decided to screw with him a bit. Why are you so fixated about it?

 

First off, why is it unacceptable for lousy spelling to bother people? This conversation consists of reading words written on a forum. If someone was talking to me like they had a mouthful of cotton I would end that conversation as well. It's not my job to have to decipher what people are writing. If you want to participate in a conversation that is completely written than take the time to learn how to write. If you can't spend what little time it takes to spell properly than why should anyone listen, or read, what you have to say. What does that say about your research or knowledge? If you can't express yourself intelligently than you shouldn't be thought of as intelligent.

I know you never said improper spelling shouldn't bother people, it just irritates me that people think horrible spelling should be accepted by the reader. There are situations where English is a second language, but those people still choose to post on a board in a language they are not fluent in. I would never go to a Spanish speaking forum and butcher their language to try and get people to believe that 9/11 was not a product of a conspiracy. Anyway, /rant off. It's just a pet peeve of mine.

 

Dup post, my bad

 

...little obbesssssive about it, methinks.

 

One can be taught to hate.
One can be taught to spell.
Apparently one cannot be taught both.

 

Glad to know that a single post commenting on the situation instantly makes me "obsessed" about something. Thank you for commenting on it though, it's very telling as to how you grade things. Kind of makes more sense as to why you believe what you believe.