This was posted in the homosexual forum, but was politically cleansed with the claim that there was no citation to the source. Aside from the bigger issue that the source was clearly cited, in the forum rules nowhere can I find that one must cite a source. Can you? Although homosexual propaganda has been around for 50 years, the current campaign started with a manifesto called The Homosexual Agenda, later developed into a manifesto titled Overhauling Straight American (Google it), then with a sanitized title in 1989 with a very popular book within the militant homosexual lobby called: After the Ball: How America Will Conquer Its Fear and Hatred of Gays in the 1990s by Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen, both homosexual lobbyist leaders and both Harvard trained mass public persuasion and media manipulation tactic experts. This very popular book within the militant homosexual lobby makes a bigoted argument that homosexual agenda extremists should implement an organized hate filled propaganda campaign to force via deception and propaganda a change public opinion to gain public acceptance to their bizarre chosen sexual behaviors and obtain special rights, benefits, and privileges based upon their particular sexual perversions. Their rationalization for launching such a hateful, intolerant campaign is that people who do not agree with them are bigots, haters, or ignorants, and therefore activists can and should justifiably employ any hate filled tactic possible, including mass deceit, lying, slander, maliciousness, intimidation, violence, terrorism, child recruitment, child molestation, Civil Rights violations, etc. Although many homosexual activists initially condemned this fascist approach at first in public, remaining hold outs have jumped on board after benefiting from the success of the propaganda and bullying campaign. The following are excerpts taken from After The Ball...., a psy-ops propaganda manifesto of which is available from DoubleDay Press and Amazon books. I have a copy on my bookshelf. These psy-ops strategies, tactics, and techniques have been and are currently employed by most homosexual activist groups , as verified by their well documented hate-speech heterophobic, conservative-bashing posts. Read them and think for a moment if any of them sound familiar. "The homosexual agenda can succeed by conversion of the average Americans emotions, mind, and will, through, a planned psychological attack in the form of propaganda to the nation via media." (page 153) Propaganda relies more upon emotional manipulation that upon logic, since its goal is to bring about public change (page 162) "Propaganda can be unabashedly subjective and one-sided, there is nothing wrong with this." (page 163) "Homosexual agenda can succeed by desensitization achieved by lowering the intensity of antigay emotional reactions to a level of sheer indifference." (page 153) "Homosexual agenda can succeed by jamming and confusing adversaries, so as to block or counteract the rewarding of prejudice. (page 153) Desensitizing is our recipe for converting ambivalent skeptics "Make victimizers look bad by linking to Nazi horror while helping straights to see gays as victims and feel protective towards them." (page 221) "The Nazi story of pink triangle as a symbol of victimization should be a sufficient opening wedge into the vilification of our enemies." (page 190) "Show grisly victimization of gays and demand that readers identify themselves with either social tolerance or gruesome cruelty." "Discourage anti-gay [dissent] by linking and calling all those that have opposing opinions to latent homosexuality (i.e., call people homophobic)." (page 227) "Jam people by pointing out that its inconsistent with the readers belief in the value of love between individuals/" (page 233) "AIDS epidemic should be exploited to increase attention and sympathy as victimized minority.(page xxv) We argue that for all practical purposes, gays should be considered to have been born gay, even though sexual orientation, for most humans, seems to be the product of a complex interaction between innate predispositions and environmental factors during childhood and early adolescence (page 184). Here is the Born Gay hoax genesis-even the hoax creators admit its a lie. Muddy the moral waters, that is, to undercut the rationalization that justify religious opposition this entails publicizing support by moderate churches and raising serious theological objections. (page 179) "Portray opposing churches as antiquated backwaters, badly out of step with the time and with the latest findings of psychology." (page 179) "Jam the self-righteous pride by linking to a disreputable hate group." (page 235) "The main thing is to talk about gayness until the issue becomes thoroughly tiresome." (page 17 "It is acceptable to call people Homophobic or Homohaters if they do not agree 100% with homosexual views, opinions, or behavior. "(page xxiii) "A media campaign should portray only the most favorable side of gays." (page 170) "Show others accepting gays and homosexuals." (page 241) "Homosexual persecution is identical to Jewish persecution." (link homosexual sex to jewish holocaust survivors) (page 57, 62, ) "Homosexual persecution is identical racial prejudice to Blacks, Asians, and Hispanics." (inferring inborn) (page 62, 73) claim Two-thirds of all boys have rudimentary homosexual experiences (inferring most teenagers want to have homosexual sex) (page 44) Claim the vast majority of homosexuals do not engage in compulsive high-risk sex." (page 49) "Claim all homosexually suicides are based entirely on societal rejection.(the victim tactic) (page xv) "All sexual morality should be abolished." (pages 64 to 67) Claim "Homosexual civil rights are explicitly set forth in the Bill of Rights Claim kids in gay households ultimately receive better-than-average parenting (page 97) "All speech that is opposing homosexual behavior should be banned under clear and present danger to public order. (page 101) "All and any news or media coverage that is presents homosexual in negative form is prejudiced and invalid." (page 54) "Everyone comes out must be prepped by a media campaign carefully crafted, repeatedly displayed mass-media images of gays." (page 169) Gay activists have tried to manipulate the American judicial system. Sometimes the tactic works: many executive orders (which side step the democratic process) and ordinances passed by city councils now protect certain rights (page 171) Employ images that desensitize, jam, and/or convert on an emotional leve. (page 173) Gain access to the kinds of public media that would automatically confer legitimacy upon these messages and sponsors (page 173) Ambivalent skeptics are our most promising targets (page 176) "Associate gay cause with talk about racism, sexism, militarism, poverty, and all the conditions that oppress the unempowered. (page 181) "Project gays as victims of circumstance and oppression, not as aggressive challengers." (page 183) Mustachioed leather men, drag queens, and bull dykes should not appear in gay commercials and other public presentations (until later after wide acceptance)." (page 183) "Groups on the farthest margins of acceptability, such as NAMBLA, must play no part at all in the media campaign. Suspected child molesters will never look like victims." (page 184) "Gays should be portrayed as victims of prejudice graphic pictures of brutalized gays, dramatizations of job and housing insecurity, loss of child custody, public humiliation " (page 185) "In time we see no reason why more and more diversity should not be introduced into the projected image (i.e., drag queens, pedophiles, etc.)" (page 186) "Infer and speculate that famous historical figures were gay for two reasons: first, they are dead as a door nail, hence in no position to deny the truth and sue for libel." (page 18 "In TV and print, images of victimizers can be combined with those of their gay victims by a method propagandists call the bracket technique. (page 190) "The media campaign will reach straights on an emotional level, casting gays as societys victims and inviting straights to be their protectors." (page 187) "We like television because its the most graphic and intrusive medium for our message." (page 201) "Over the long-term, television and magazines are probably the media of choice." (page 204) "Ads must manage to get the word gay into the headline or tagline." (page 207) "Each message should tap public sentiment, patriotic, or otherwise, and drill an unimpeachable agreeable proposition into the mainstreams head." (page 20 "Several years down the road, our tactics will have carved out, slice by slice, a large portion of access to mainstream media." (page 213) "Associate and link gays to good causes and non-controversial activities." (page 219) "The more people who appear to practice homosexuality, and the more innate it appears to be, the less abnormal and objectionable, and the more legitimate it will seem (which is why it is important to maintain untruthful claims to 10% of the population)."(page 217) "Stage candid interviews with gays who appear as solid citizens. Subjects in commercials should be interviewed alone, not with their lovers (for now)." (page 247) "Most people derive their impressions of the world through the national media." (page 250) Too many Americans share this mistrust of gay citizens. (page 55) And for good reason!
I suggest you actually study fair use doctrines before your attempts to politically cleanse information and books you don't like and flamebaiting posters of info you don't like. Kindly stay on topic and discuss the post.
You asked a question, I answered it for you, and for that I get this! 15. LINKS, ADVERTISING, IMPROPER QUOTING, AND COPYRIGHT VIOLATIONS No commercial advertising is permitted anywhere on the forum - links in posts must be relevant to the discussion, and must not be intended simply to direct members to another website. Quotes, links, and images should be used to support a member's opinion, not to replace it - all posts containing them should also contain the poster's own comments as to their relevance. All quotes from other sources must be given appropriate credit, preferably with a link to the original article - long articles should be quoted from and/or summarized, not quoted in their entirety. Content copied from other sources must meet "fair use" guidelines, and violations of copyright will be deleted and subject to infraction. When quoting other posters, we ask that you use the site's "quote" function, so that other members can backtrack the conversation if they wish Rule 15 No wonder you are an expert on the subject of asses.
And? You could find similar papers on how to advertise a McDonalds. You might even be able to find similar posts from some dude spouting anti-homosexual agendas. Imagine that. Next.
Are you flamebaiting and bashing a member without making a coherent counter-argument other than ad hominems in a shameless attempt to censor information you don't like? If I may kindly direct your attention to: Rule 2 Rule 3 Rule 4 Rule 5 Kindly stay in topic, thanks in advance. I would also ask our other members to not quote the ENTIRE original post. It's not necessary...you can quote the opening line, that will suffice and should save costly server bandwidth. Thanks!
What is wrong with you, you asked a question in your opening post, i've quoted it, and I have bolded it. I answered the question with rule 15.
Quoting Rule 15 was not applicable, but Rule 2-5 is applicable to what you're doing. Now, what comments do you have as to the quotes from the original post?
Look you asked the question in your opening post, YES I CAN SHOW YOU WHERE IN THE FORUM RULES THAT YOU MUST CITE A QUOTE IN, RULE 15, IT TELLS YOU THAT YOU MUST CITE A QUOTE. GOT IT?
Perhaps reading and comprehension is not your strong suit. I asked where it says one MUST cite a source. Notice I didn't ask where it says one SHOULD cite a source? If you bothered to read my post, and bothered to actually read and comprehend Rule 15, you would see it says: Notice how it doesn't say "must"? Do you understand the contractual verbiage difference between "should" and "must"? Considering I clearly cited the source and made fair use of it, Rule 15 does not apply, therefore one must assume the rule was misquoted to abuse, bully, flame, bait and harass the OP.
Yes I do which is why I bolded the correct bit you are looking for. 15. LINKS, ADVERTISING, IMPROPER QUOTING, AND COPYRIGHT VIOLATIONS No commercial advertising is permitted anywhere on the forum - links in posts must be relevant to the discussion, and must not be intended simply to direct members to another website. Quotes, links, and images should be used to support a member's opinion, not to replace it - all posts containing them should also contain the poster's own comments as to their relevance. All quotes from other sources must be given appropriate credit, preferably with a link to the original article - long articles should be quoted from and/or summarized, not quoted in their entirety. Content copied from other sources must meet "fair use" guidelines, and violations of copyright will be deleted and subject to infraction. When quoting other posters, we ask that you use the site's "quote" function, so that other members can backtrack the conversation if they wish
What part of "other" sources do you not get? My sources were not "other sources". - - - Updated - - - Readers, how does it feel when The Homosexual Agenda activists want to take away your basic human and civil right of free speech, and they publicly admitted it in the referenced propaganda manifesto? "All speech that is opposing homosexual behavior should be banned under “clear and present danger to public order.” (page 101)
I was just answering your question, all this rather than say "Oh I see what you meant" or maybe even a "sorry for misunderstanding you" nope accusations of all sorts. Its like a Peter Cooke and Dudley Moore sketch. I and anybody reading this gets the bit about other sources, and it is applicable to the question you asked. You just wont admit you were wrong with all the rubbish you have now committed yourself to. Stop looking for gays under the bed and chill out. And I certainly will not be offering to help you understand forum rules again!
Yes Rule #15 15. LINKS, ADVERTISING, IMPROPER QUOTING, AND COPYRIGHT VIOLATIONS No commercial advertising is permitted anywhere on the forum - links in posts must be relevant to the discussion, and must not be intended simply to direct members to another website. Quotes, links, and images should be used to support a member's opinion, not to replace it - all posts containing them should also contain the poster's own comments as to their relevance. All quotes from other sources must be given appropriate credit, preferably with a link to the original article - long articles should be quoted from and/or summarized, not quoted in their entirety. Content copied from other sources must meet "fair use" guidelines, and violations of copyright will be deleted and subject to infraction. When quoting other posters, we ask that you use the site's "quote" function, so that other members can backtrack the conversation if they wish. Linking to websites that require user registration is discouraged, but where it cannot be avoided notice should be given that that is the case. No links should involve any sites or material that are illegal or pornographic, and warnings should be posted with any links to material that might be considered 'graphic' or 'offensive' (and such links should only be posted when strictly relevant to the discussion).
