EXCLUSIVE: 'He put on my frilly nightie, and danced around playing his sax.' Former Miss Arkansas...

It calls into question the entire story due to the inconsistencies and the forgery, it was unprovable and undefendable. Since when do we convict people under such nonexistent evidence?

Trash.

 

Don't think the points you brought up were that big of a deal.. and at most it calls into question the story of "one" of the accusers.

Your claim that all the accusers claims were refuted is abject nonsense - which is all to common for you.

 

So afraid that she goes public with her story. Yeah....that doesn’t add up. Only a gullible sheep would buy that load of BS about being afraid. That being said....I sure hope her story is all true. The Clintons are total a55clowns in my opinion.

 

First their claims had no corroboration. Key points were directly refuted by contemporaneous witnesses as I listed. And then the forged entry in the yearbook. It would be summarily dismissed out of court. It was a reprehensible political ploy just like Kavenaugh by the Democrats to destroy their political opposition. As I said they actually paid a prostitute to make up a story about the Republican candidate for Lt. Governor, tried to RUIN his life and his marriage in order to win. Heck they even tried to claim Gov. Ivey is a lesbian to go after her religious conservative voters this last election. They have decency in such campaigning and trying to ruin people who get in their way. It's amazing people would defend them they are so blatant about it.

 

Is Bill Clinton running again? If not who gives a rat’s ass about this idiotic OP?

 

You are drifting into gibberish land and repeating yourself like some kind of continuous loop. I did not deny that there was some hanky panky - but nothing that refutes the testimony of all the claimants.

It sounds like you are surprised some liberals paid some prostitute to make up a story at some point in time - Welcome to the corrupt system we have.. God forbid we get into CIA false flags.

This however has nothing to do with the Moore case.

 

Anyone who cares about understanding our elite classes.

 

I have been quite clear and quite direct and post the statements of the adults at the time which refute key elements of the alleged accusations. And stop trying to claim any testimony was given that is false. No testimony was given.

Welcome to Democrats in Alabama who can't win on the issue so they play dirty tricks and try to smear their opponents, as they do on the national level. As I said they tried to claim the Governor had a lesbian lover.

It has to do with these Democrats schemes.

And BTW I have voted Democrat over Moore in the past but voted write in this last time as I planned to do anyway.

 

You don't care about holding men who sexually abuse and harass women and young girls accountable?

 

Wait...you're claiming that you DO?

Since when?

 

Not sure why you are still talking - returning to the same vomit over and over - stuff I have already responded to - will not change my response.

1) I never said anything about testimony ..
2) I cant stand the Dems and have granted that they have previously engaged in dirty tricks.
3) Given you still can't figure out that the fiscal year 2009 started in October 2008 - and the proposed budget spending for that year was largely spent before Obama got into office - despite this fact being proven to you six ways to Sunday - I have little expectation of you heeding any kind of logic or reason in general - when it conflicts with your perspective.

 

1) I never said anything about testimony ..

Geez now you are denying your own post

There was no testimony just unsupported accusations with key points refuted by adults who were there at the time as I cited and youvhave produced nothing to refute it.

And as I showed still doing it even to the current government.

Given that you still cannot figure out the budget process or the legislative history for the FY2009 budget even though have shown repeatedly that the Democrats withheld passing the FY2009 budget until a Democrat won the election that being Obama who then added his additional spending shows you have no accurate perception. Once AGAIN.

"In FY2009, Congress did not complete work by September 30, 2008. President Bush did sign some appropriations bills and a continuing resolution to keep the government running into President Obama�s first term, yet a Democrat controlled Congress purposely held off on the big spending portions of the appropriations bills until Obama took office. They did so for the purposes of jacking up spending. President Obama signed the final FY2009 spending bills on March 11, 2009.
The Democrats purposely held off on the appropriations process because they hoped they could come into 2009 with a new Democrat-friendly Congress and a President who would sign bloated spending bills. Remember, President Obama was in the Senate when these bills were crafted and he was part of this process to craft bloated spending bills. CQ reported that �in delaying the nine remaining bills until 2009, Democrats gambled that they would come out of the November 2008 elections with bigger majorities in both chambers and a Democrat in the White House who would support more funding for domestic programs.� And they did.
The Truth about President Obama's Skyrocketing Spending
"Unlike last year, when Bush forced Democrats to accept lower spending figures, this year could prove more difficult for the president. The fiscal year begins Oct. 1, less than four months before he leaves office.
"He doesn't have us over a barrel this year, because either a President Clinton or a President Obama will have to deal with us next year," said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev. "We are not going to be held hostage to the unreasonableness of this president."
Much of the president's plan has little chance of passage, lawmakers and budget experts say. Nearly $200 billion in Medicare and Medicaid savings need congressional approval, which Democrats are unlikely to provide. "Dead on arrival," vowed Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., chairman of the Senate Finance Committee.
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/washington/2008-02-03-bush-budget_N.htm

 

When it is proven.

 

No more than BC was.


Flashback: Bill Clinton Settles Rape Accusation With $850,000 Payoff
+
Hillary Clinton: "We Came Out Of The White House Dead Broke"

Too many payoffs will break the bank.

 

I hear Christopher Steele is writing a dossier about it.

 

Certainly we are finding out more about Lisa Bloom and Harvey Weinstein.

#TIMESUP: Attorney Lisa Bloom Sold Herself To Harvey Weinstein As Someone Who Could Help Discredit His Accusers.

“We can place an article re her becoming increasingly unglued, so that when someone Googles her this is what pops up and she’s discredited.”​

Plus: “If you’re wondering why Lisa Bloom, daughter of Gloria Allred and champion of victim’s rights, was so eager to badmouth Weinstein’s accusers, recall the two had a business relationship. Weinstein’s company had optioned Bloom’s book about Trayvon Martin.”

 

I can't relate to his particular fetish, but I have to admit that it sounds like he was having fun.

I once dated a girl who liked feet, so... whatever turns you on, I guess. I have to admit, I loved getting a pedicure from her. If you can get a woman who loves massaging your feet, you've got a keeper!

 

I've always been split on Clinton.

On the one hand, he is responsible for a lot of bad legislation and executive actions.

On the other, he would be exiled by the DNC as a right winger if he put on a mask and tried to run.

Plus, I like his personality. Cool that the President was into the sax. Good on him for getting head in the oval office (tell me that wouldn't be close to the top of the agenda once you're sworn in).

And I really feel for him for having to be married to Hillary.

If I had to go home every night to cankles I'd probably look elsewhere for my kicks too.

 

100% more than either of the Clintons.