Extinction Rebellion

Discussion in 'Australia, NZ, Pacific' started by garry17, Oct 8, 2019.

  1. garry17

    garry17 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2011
    Messages:
    3,992
    Likes Received:
    149
    Trophy Points:
    63
    https://www.theguardian.com/environ...ising-public-on-climate-veteran-activist-says
    It has become apparent that many consider that it is ok to break laws if your cause you lobby for is Important enough to society (according to the particular protagonists).

    In Australia, Greens made correlation between bushfires and climate change while in other areas of the nation snow fell.
    https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-09-22/bushfire-arson-warning-ahead-of-school-holidays/11528192
    https://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-11-20/why-do-people-light-bushfires-a-convicted-arsonist-explains/9162190
    So, 85% of bushfires are human induced… So nothing to do with climate change at all…


    Anyway, As quoted there are many reasons for arsonists to light fires and many have nothing to do with fires themselves.


    Complaining that bushfires are direct outcome of climate change and supporting breaking the law for a cause these Green groups support while demonising others for holding to account for doing so, the question has to be asked:

    Just how many of these “so called” green activists light bushfires to highlight their cause???


    Now I know, many will try subjugate the subject and many will attempt to suggest it could never happen. But the truth is it reality.

    Now, Australia has been busy indoctrinating the children, in accordance with the head of the climate council the completely discredited Tim Flannery, it doesn’t take much (in the words of activists) “Yes XR is going to create inconvenience, but they are telling people what to expect. It is totally acceptable what they’re doing...”


    So, were do people draw the line???
     
  2. Steady Pie

    Steady Pie Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2012
    Messages:
    20,500
    Likes Received:
    4,598
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The core problem for this sort of activist is that it has the opposite to desired effect. Just look at Bob Brown's caravan.

    They forget that it is not about changing the views of the elites who happen to be in power today, it is about changing the views of the electorate and seeing this through an election.

    I think that if catastrophic climate change is the outcome, that our descendents won't have kind things to say about the Bob Brown's and Greta Thunburg's of the world either.

    We had the opportunity to go with the only viable solution - a LFTR nuclear grid and household solar without batteries - and instead got caught up trying to exploit the situation to create socialism.

    If you want broad electoral support on climate change you argue the air pollution case to the conservatives. You keep power prices AND emissions low with a nuclear grid. You strive for a broad implementation which does not discriminate in favor of "developing nations" like China and India.

    Instead we're left with Green New Deals Bob Brown's utterly counterproductive caravan.

    Go figure.
     
    modernpaladin likes this.
  3. scarlet witch

    scarlet witch Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2016
    Messages:
    8,509
    Likes Received:
    4,935
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    These are the lessons learnt from the South African uprising, of the 21,000 dead during apartheid, 14,000 died in the 4 years prior to the end of Apartheid with the majority of the violence committed by school children in the townships.

    Those who got sick of the violence started defending their property against these kids and the violence escalated.... it was very effective combined with the fake news the international media kept pumping out. Open Societies/Get Up understand the power of kids and they will use it to devastating effect, along with their fake stream media you're going to have to strap yourself in.
     
    Last edited: Oct 9, 2019 at 4:44 PM
  4. Sallyally

    Sallyally Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2017
    Messages:
    8,833
    Likes Received:
    15,872
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    Disrupting traffic isn’t so heinous.
     
  5. LeftRightLeft

    LeftRightLeft Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2015
    Messages:
    2,366
    Likes Received:
    1,518
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No but disagreeing with him is.
     
    Sallyally likes this.
  6. garry17

    garry17 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2011
    Messages:
    3,992
    Likes Received:
    149
    Trophy Points:
    63
    I think you missed the point; I am not actually talking about the protests. I am talking about potential issues with activism. Such as lighting bushfires for no other purpose than to highlight the issues of climate change.


    But are we learning them???

    As everyday people I do believe majority are considerably decent in this area. They teach their children to what depth they should go and to consider others in all their acts.

    BUT when you have political rhetoric not just excusing criminal activity but actively promoting it, I think your nation has a problem. I highlight the Greens in this area due to the fact they are supporting this type of activism. Previously excusing criminal activity by saying “they feel so strongly about the issue”. ALP have been on record telling the people it is perfectly alright to break the law in activism and the coalition (during the Gillard years) standing with protesters displaying signs promoting criminal activity.

    Is the world set to repeat Again and again the stupidity of the past???
     
  7. garry17

    garry17 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2011
    Messages:
    3,992
    Likes Received:
    149
    Trophy Points:
    63
    I think the problem comes about when activists believe they are above the people and the law because in their mind they are acting on such a serious matter the world needs to stop and take notice of their particular issue... it is a shame, that if we did stop to hear ALL the activists issues, the world would never achieve anything.



    I did think the Greta Thunburg's speech to the UN was interesting. How dare we steal her childhood??? I think that speaks volumes to indoctrinating the children on these issues. Studies today have found children are now living in fear of climate change rather than learning for the future or just living for today.

    However, the issue I am looking at is just how far people will go, especially when people now accept ANY activity that they believes supports their personal causes... Australians previously would condemn people, businesses and leaders for ignoring or promoting indecent activities, if not illegal just down right inconsiderate. Today, if it suites your opinion, applaud it while condemning others for similar...
     
  8. Sallyally

    Sallyally Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2017
    Messages:
    8,833
    Likes Received:
    15,872
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    That’s a big jump in reasoning. Arsonists don’t light fires to draw attention to climate change, it’s because they are nuts!
     
    garry17 likes this.
  9. garry17

    garry17 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2011
    Messages:
    3,992
    Likes Received:
    149
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Well take David (quoted) lit one of the Ash Wednesday fires, his motive was his girlfriend's infidelity... Didn't consider the possible outcome...


    I once knew a fire chief in a small country town in rural Australia who lit a bunch of fires around his town. When he was finally caught, his excuse was that he wanted to show the need for new fire truck in the area and the need for another bushfire brigade. Maybe nuts and we need to address such appropriately, which is what I am discussing.


    Considering the actions of activism in Australia (which is why I am not discussing the topic of the protest) it isn't a big jump. It is possible that people with questionable mental stability or intellect could decide that they could be justified in such because certain political leaders say it is ok. OR consider the Rhetoric seems to say such…


    I am not pointing the finger at arsonists and suggesting they are saying this, I am saying we should consider OUR rhetoric. Things like Greens Hanson-Young saying the vegan activists breaking and entering on private property and releasing livestock only to be hit and killed on the road nearby is justified because “they feel so strongly about the issue” so we should not prosecute law breakers because of such… And this may give some people the idea…

    I guess, it comes down to knowing what constitutes ‘civil disobediencer’ I would suggest most people don’t understand such.
     
  10. Sallyally

    Sallyally Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2017
    Messages:
    8,833
    Likes Received:
    15,872
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
    I suppose there will be activists on both sides who are nuts.
    Agents provocateurs.
    I feel uneasy about activists targeting private property as you have quoted.
    Many lab animals are bred specifically and don’t have the capacity to live outside that environment. Should we be using animals in this manner?
    Canner worms.
     
  11. garry17

    garry17 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2011
    Messages:
    3,992
    Likes Received:
    149
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Yes, that is the issue.


    Oh and just to say, I am not targeting the Greens, as they were the latest to make comment they were the party I recalled first. As stated earlier, there are examples throughout the political spectrum..


    I do wonder about experiments on animals. For testing of health reasons I suggest we have too, but it should be limited to necessity. Testing for any other purpose should never happen...


    There are many aspects we all can agree in many of these areas protested, however I do wonder how many are completely switched off by the activities of protestors as indicated in another thread.
     
    Sallyally likes this.
  12. Steady Pie

    Steady Pie Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2012
    Messages:
    20,500
    Likes Received:
    4,598
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Depends on the animal. Mice for instance I don't think anyone seriously cares about.
     
  13. garry17

    garry17 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2011
    Messages:
    3,992
    Likes Received:
    149
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Still, I don't believe testing cosmetics on animals are right. as I say, there are just certain things we shouldn't do as a people.
     
  14. Monash

    Monash Active Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2019
    Messages:
    253
    Likes Received:
    140
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Gender:
    Male
    Not sure there are many places where cosmetic testing on animals is still a 'thing' at least on a large scale, commercial basis. Prepared to be proven wrong of course but most western countries seem to have banned the practice. In any case all the big name, multinational producers want to avoid the PR risks associated with animal testing, even if it is still legal in some obscure jurisdiction.
     
    Last edited: Oct 13, 2019 at 8:20 AM
    Sallyally likes this.
  15. Steady Pie

    Steady Pie Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2012
    Messages:
    20,500
    Likes Received:
    4,598
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That's fine, we can disagree.

    The things they do to mice... by golly. Get them hooked on heroin and watch as their organs slowly shut down due to withdrawal.

    Chucking some makeup on them seems rather tame in comparison.
     

Share This Page