Having noticed, as I am sure that all of you have, Obamas failure to name Radical Muslim Terrorism as the cause for anything, and how Obama claims that the term will offend the entire Muslim world while still claiming that the Muslim world is peaceful, I just have to ask the simple, basic question. Why does Obama not mention the radicals and just differentiate them from the peaceful members of this religion? Instead, he claims naming them would incite the entire Muslim world against us, instead of urging the Muslim world to act against the radicals. Make no sense, unless one considers who is making those claims. Or is Obama and the liberal party just continuing to blow smoke to confuse the issue?
FYI, Clinton used the term "radical Islam" in an interview last week. Nothing has changed because of it. Also FYI, Bush had the same policy.
If you understood the psyops against the American people, you would understand how cognitive distortions make a slippery slope for any who accept them as rational. The media and public icons deal in them almost exclusively at this point. The public that tries to work the icons or the info surrounding them, get nowhere. Meanwhile the agenda of the puppet masters advances.
In other words, bs supporting more bs and an attempt to cram it down the throat of the people. Or, from the Obama playbook, lie until you get caught then either blame it on someone else or ignore it.
