FEA data regarding WTC1

Discussion in '9/11' started by Gamolon, May 30, 2014.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
  2. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
  3. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    As you can see, no truthers want any part of this.

    Why?

    Because they have no counter argument. Their side is afraid to put forth ANY calculations or papers showing that the perimeter columns SHOULD have resisted and that the planes should have crumpled up against the facade like an accordion and fallen to the ground. Because they see that it happened the way it happened.

    Plain and simple.
     
  4. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Not so plain and simple. I don't have the background to do those calculations but the whole argument is moot anyway as there's a ton of other proof that 9/11 was an inside job that any layman can understand. Here's a link to some of it.
    http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=358521&p=1063932002#post1063932002

    The proof that whatever hit the Pentagon wasn't a 757 has already closed the whole case.
     
  5. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Also the fact that virtually all of our "leaders" have been asked about this,
    I know that I personally have already asked my Congressman about the
    events of 9/11/2001 and he said he would have to look into it and get back
    to me, ( he never did ) and so it goes, our "leaders" are either in denial,
    or they have signed on to the whole criminal plot and are accessories to
    said crime. Some people refuse to believe that its possible for virtually
    all of our "leaders" ( actually employees of the taxpayers ) could be in on it
    or possibly so deep in denial that they are effectively useless as representatives.

    The working people of this world that is the rank&file of the 99%
    we need to come up with a creative and non-violent solution to this
    problem, that is the fact that the people who are the 1% are abusing
    power and indeed committing murder without consequences.
     
  6. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    They are attempting to change the subject. Why do they fear the facts?
     
  7. torch1980

    torch1980 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2011
    Messages:
    158
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    that isnt "proof", you need a reliable source
     
  8. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Thanks for admitting that. Where are all the truther engineers showing their calculations that it was NOT possible? You have people like n0spam, who doesn't have the background either, making arguments against the FEAs I provided. What is the basis for these arguments?

    They're "cartoons".

    That's the argument.

    Bottom line? You folks have absolutely nothing.
     
  9. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    As I said in post #4, it's a moot point as there's a ton of other proof that 9/11 was an inside job. This issue isn't about whether the government did it. It's about how the government did it. Your making it sound as if the issue were about whether the government did it is very misleading. You're trying to mislead the viewers who haven't seen all of the other proof.
    http://www.politicalforum.com/showthread.php?t=348380&p=1063729867#post1063729867

    The case was closed a long time ago.
     
  10. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Is that why your cult following exists in obscure internet forms and in a couple of off the wall groups? You folks can't even get more than 1% of the total engineering population to agree with you!

    In 12+ years!

    Like I said. You have NOTHING in the way of evidence. That's why your "movement" is so lackluster.
     
  11. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Start listening to this at the 4:00 time mark.

    The Death of Controlled Demolition Expert Danny Jowenko after Speaking about 9/11 WTC 7 Building 7
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-zHHvo6U4lA

    Are you saying an engineer's career wouldn't be hurt at all if he or she were to say that controlled demolition brought down the towers and building 7?
     
  12. Gamolon

    Gamolon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 4, 2013
    Messages:
    2,385
    Likes Received:
    88
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Pure garbage on your part.

    To come here and say that someone's career would be hurt for saying that the controlled demolition was involved and then supply Danny's death as proof of this is complete idiocy. What you've proven here is that your claim is exactly what I said. GARBAGE.

    Why?

    Because you supposedly have, ON RECORD, 2,204 engineers and architects who have expressed their beliefs an they remain unharmed. Richard Gage tours the country saying exaclty what you said should cause him harm and he CONTINUES to collect over $80,000 from misled truthers. What about Niels Harrit? Tony Szamboti?

    You have no proof whatsoever to substantiate a bogus claim like this, nor are statistics on your side.

    Again, total garbage.
     
  13. Stndown

    Stndown Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2014
    Messages:
    889
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0

    The Kean disinformation constitutes the smelliest garbage of all. Still, we can't get an honest investigation, and the stench of the garbage continues to spread.
     
  14. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You can find no evidence disputing the commission's report or the FEA presented here so you whine and twist the facts.

    Keep trying to derail all the threads you can, Boss. Must be a tough job, posing as an idiot.
     
  15. Scott

    Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    5,268
    Likes Received:
    845
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If they kill all of them, it will be too obvious and the public will know about it. You can be pretty dogmatic.

    Here's a video about mysterious deaths of 9/11 witnesses.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvay28lZiHU


    Thanks for telling us about those two researchers. I didn't know about them. I'll watch their videos when I have time.

    9/11 - Evidence of Controlled Demolition of WTC - Dr. Niels Harrit PART 1
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9Vr1WbPF9I

    http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=Tony+Szamboti+9/11
     
  16. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Do the words "half baked farce" & "set-up to fail" ring any bells?

    + exactly how logical is it to embrace a report that states
    "total collapse was inevitable .. after collapse initiation ..... "
    This statement alone should set off alarms with people.
    ALL of the taxpayer funded "reports" are questionable at best.
     
  17. Stndown

    Stndown Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 25, 2014
    Messages:
    889
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0

    Derailing via insults is sometimes all that is left for some people. (I don't mean you Bob).
     
  18. LoneStrSt8

    LoneStrSt8 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2011
    Messages:
    9,012
    Likes Received:
    33
    Trophy Points:
    0
    :roll:
     
  19. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    To address the hurting your career bit.
    I have known a number of different sorts of individuals who have
    widely varying spiritual beliefs. An electrician who had a pentagram
    on a chain around his neck, was denied work on a job site controlled
    by a devout "christian" individual because the pentagram was seen to
    be a symbol of satanic allegiance. Different people have different takes
    on what is good and not-so-good, in some circles its limiting to let it be known
    that one is gay, or devout catholic or for that matter agnostic, this is why on
    most job-sites, people are reluctant to talk about anything except the current
    sports scores, because religion/political party affiliation can be a disruptive influence.

    There are probably people who select an architect to do whatever job they
    are planning by checking all the info available and they may see membership
    in AE911TRUTH as a negative, and then select a different architect for the project.
    so be it, this sort of thing would be VERY difficult to nail down as to exactly how
    often it happens. I have no doubt that it does happen.
     
  20. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So what?

    If I was hiring for a Professorship in Biology and I learned were a Creationist, you don't think I should weight that in the decision to hire you?
     
  21. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Where have you been hiding out?
    There is abundant evidence that the "commission" was a CROCK!

    ever hear of "Half Baked Farce" .... or "Set Up to Fail"
    and there is more .....

    I'm certain that you really don't want to see it, but its there.

    - - - Updated - - -

    How about this, If I was hiring for a Professorship in Chemistry
    and I found out that you were a card-carrying Republican
    ( now what? )
     
  22. LogicallyYours

    LogicallyYours New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2013
    Messages:
    2,233
    Likes Received:
    5
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Now what, what? How there ARE many Republicans who acknowledge Scientific fact.
     
  23. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,673
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113

    [​IMG]
     
  24. Kokomojojo

    Kokomojojo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2009
    Messages:
    23,673
    Likes Received:
    1,771
    Trophy Points:
    113
    really?


    [​IMG]
     
  25. genericBob

    genericBob New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2014
    Messages:
    2,831
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    and it is scientific fact that the events of 9/11/2001
    were NOT as described in the mainstream media.
    Buildings simply do not crumble, & crush themselves
    to tiny little bits in response to asymmetrical damage.
    airliners do NOT fly at 590 mph @ <1000 ft
    ... There was NO airliner crashed into the PENTAGON.
    the official story is a LIE!
     

Share This Page