Federal lawmakers seek to deregulate gun silencers

Do try and keep up,
Or if you can't, don't bother posting.

 

of course rate of fire changes the inherent accuracy. It's physics.

 

they are simple. You seem afraid to admit you don't know anything about firearms, specifically full autos.

 

I don't need to try. I'm way ahead of you.

 

And so you don't know anything about physics either. Noted.

I have personally fired select-fire M4 rifles, with a proper stance, and put a 3 round burst into a group roughly equivalent to what I could fire firing semi-automatically. I have fired a HK MP10 in 10mm, with the unusual setting of a two instead of a three round burst, and put both rounds into a single oval. It's simple recoil control.

A weapon maintains the exact same intrinsic accuracy no matter how quickly it is fired. It's reality.

 

most certainly do, which is why I keep correcting you.

but not exactly the same, due to the inherent inaccuracy of full auto or 3 round burst fire.

that's a sub machine gun. and is still inherently less accurate than semi auto.

no it doesn't. It's physics.

 

Long story short: you don't know what you're talking about. I do. I have put literally thousands of rounds through a myriad of weapons systems proving you wrong. There is no "inherent inaccuracy", and you can call nonsense "physics" all you want, but that doesn't make it anything other than nonsense.

 

Lol, of course I do. That's why I keep correcting you.

I've shown otherwise.

I have put thousands of rounds through as well, which is why you have been proven wrong.

recoil and muzzle rise are a direct result of the physics behind full auto fire. making them inherently less accurate.

 

Paul Ryan just shelved the suppressor act.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-govern...llary-shelves-bill-to-deregulate-suppressors/

 

Smart move. No way it's getting passed this year now.

 

No, you don't. And you "correcting" me is laughable on its face as it's clear you are incompetent with firearms.

No, you haven't.

If you don't know how to shoot, that's your problem. If you can't control recoil, spend some more time in the gym. You haven't proven me wrong in any way, shape or form. The exact opposite is true.

Yeah, you don't know what you're talking about.

 

Maybe but his political future may now be challenged. Many view Ryan as spineless and this puts the cherry on it.

 

Bambi has really good ears ...

 

Clearly I am more competent than you are.

of course I have.

it's not a matter of knowing how to shoot. It's a matter of physics.

it isn't a matter of strength.

completely proven wrong.

I quite clearly do.

 

I'm a Liberal Progressive Gun Owner and Lover ... and I've yet to find a justification for a GD Silencer?

A) My ears are adequately protected when required
B) If I shoot, the last thing anyone needs to worry about, is the sound my Gun makes

 

Yet the UK, France and the Nordic countries allow the easy sale and encourage the use of sound moderators. Are they just doing that to encourage assassins?

 

But I've yet to hear UK, France and the Nordic countries find a justification for a GD Silencer?

 

Why do you want one?

... and do the have one for my S&W 686 Plus?

 

Hearing protection.

 

Evidently those countries don't feel that gun owners need to justify that want.

 

I kinda want people to hear me when I unload a 147 grain 9mm HST, I'm not really concerned about the intended target.

But when I shoot my 686 Plus ... Sound Counts

 

Sure I have that.

 

The libs plan has succeeded. The only reason the suppressor conversation began in relation to this tragedy in Vegas was because the libs are using the tragedy to kill the suppressor bill in congress. When have suppressors ever be part of a mass shooting conversation?

 

Regardless it was a battle that couldn't be won at this time, no sense wasting time on it.

 

Like I said, the libs politicized this tragedy and won.