nope a jetliner flying 500mph does not sever columns - - - Updated - - - the tower did not collapse FAIL
it did on 9-11. you can see the severed exterior columns on the wtc towers. - - - Updated - - - the all-steel section did indeed collapse.
Tony Szamboti seems to think so. You ever read his paper? He's a truther just like you. An engineer in fact. - - - Updated - - - The steel did. BJ says that office fires are not hot enough to weaken/collapse steel. So how did that steel portion collapse?
what gives a real fire and the TOWER still stands daflunky sites are still comparing real fire to their imagined one?
Here we go again. Koko is asked a tough question which would force him to answer in a way that would refute his and his cohort's claims, so he just rebuts with another question. This group is very good at that when they don't want to answer. - - - Updated - - - Your turn Koko. How did the steel portion collapse?
Its distinctive appearance was due to its elemental geometry, lacking composite elements. Its façade was completely covered by reflective glass-like panels that mirrored the sky of Madrid, diminishing its visual impact. The structure was divided into two halves by a technical floor without windows. It was a very solid building, with a central core of reinforced concrete that resisted the high temperatures of the fire without collapsing. The building did not have a fire sprinkler system. Sprinklers were being retrofitted, but they were not yet operable when the building was destroyed by fire. [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windsor_Tower_(Madrid)#Characteristics_of_the_building
Do you have the blue prints and a list of construction materials used in the composition of the building? Or are you just asking a dumb question cause you have nothing to back your assertions?
This is no small matter. Kokomojojo is documenting evidence of mass murder and cover-up. It is documented.
It's the Guangzhou Opera House. Steel structure encased in granite and concrete. That's not a dent in the building; it's part of the artsy design.
Well would you look at that building! It DIDN'T fall down from fire in an hour? That must not be an "official" building.
"Officially", buildings completely collapse from fire, in one hour. (It only occurred twice in one day though, granted). Dumb statements like that are always "officially" embraced though.
I can see now why you think 9/11 was an inside job. Your idea of evidence and documentation is flimsy as a boiled noodle. No wonder you got suckered by Gage. How much did you donate to his slush fund?
Let's see....both buildings were constructed in exactly the same manner....both buildings suffered the same exact catastrophe....and both building collapsed in just about the same amount of time. What is it you don't understand? I think the Twoofers under estimate the initial damage done by the initial plane crash and explosion.
