FLAT EARTH RANT #3 Wake Up People!

d

Well the people within the video are actually adults. My question is, do you think a child cannot teach you anything? One must be an adult. If that's your logic, I really don't know what to tell you. It's most unfortunate that you will not finish the video, for these two are in a argument in real life, thus there is a little confrontation within their presentations. I like how you leave out the attitude of the globetard, and specifically only mention the flat earther as being "childish". You think one needs a phd or white cloak in order to understand reality. I don't need that, I don't kneel at the feet of wolves in sheeps clothing. Not sure if you heard, but wikilieaks is reporting a vault drop on the moon landings. The documents prove it was faked.

Just wondering what you will think, once that is released?

 

"Globetard." Adults don't use language like this, jrr777. It drives them away.

I never got to the part with the 2nd person. I'm not that interested in what they said anyway, I can make the globe case just fine. The first guy was unbearable.

I watched man's first step on the moon in '69, and won't be dissuaded as to what happened up there. Earth was known to be round thousands of years before NASA. I notice you inserted the word "lie" into "wikilieaks", was that intentional?

How's that FE eclipse prediction coming? (lol)

 

...flat.. ...erm.. ...wha-a-a-at?

That is a joke of some sort? Ok, either you serious and dangerously ignorant, or just kidding. So what I am going to remind you about, either will enrage you - or will make you smile.


He flew around Earth - and saw that it is round.

 

Your videos are CGI.

Your entire argument relies an a giant hypocrisy.

"Globetards believe they live on an animated spinning ball..." about 1 minute in. No one believes we live on an animated spinning ball.

Now when are you going to address the numerous non-photographic proofs I've presented to you?

 

Of all the experiments ever done by man, as to the movement of the earth, they all came back as the earth is stationary. The only one and with extreme controversy, is Focault's Pendelum. Many engineers and normal people had built their own, only to find out it matters how you let it drop, and the swivel that is at the top. It's a hoax. Every experiment shows it's stationary, and the one they claim that doesn't.... they use. What about all the other ones that show it to be stationary? They just ignore those because it doesn't fit their wanted science, another words religion. More experiments have come back to show it's stationary than moving, yet they choose the lesser.

There is nothing you yourself can do to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the earth is a ball and spinning. Matter of fact if the flat earth and globe was to go to court, the globe would be out. Far more evidence for a flat non-rotating earth. A globe ball spinning defies everything we see and feel here on earth. It contradicts the actions of water, or any liquid for that matter. Gravity in the court room would be nothing more than a joke to a judge. Especially if that judge stuck exactly to the law. "Well your honor, it's an invisible force that allows water to form to the exterior of a shape". Judge: Can you demonstrate this within the courtroom? "No". But your honor that's because nothing on earth is bigger than earth, so the water runs to the biggest mass. Judge: So you cannot demonstrate it? No, we can't your honor. "Let the record show the hypothesis cannot even be demonstrated".

 

That's right, because if you see it on tv it must be real.

Look Sandra Bullock went to space to film a movie.
http://search.myway.com/search/vide...CFQ2ffgodsTYPgQ&ss=sub&st=tab&tpr=sbt&trs=wtt

 

Quite wrong. There are no experiments done, as to the movement of the Earth, which show it is stationary. They all prove the Earth is round and orbiting the sun.

Or perhaps you could name such an experiment which shows what you claim. I am sure you never will.

No judge would ever support your claim and would throw you out because the evidence has been thrust in your face and your only response is unnh unnh.

There is no evidence whatsoever of a flat rotating earth which is why you have never shown any.

It has been proven to you that the earth is basically round if it were flat there would be no night and day on different sides which can be proven simply by web caming with someone around the world.

You consistently lie about that truth

 

You don't have slightest idea what your talking about! You don't even research before you open your mouth. It is indeed hard to tell who a fool is, until they open their mouth.

 

And you believe this? Ok, so what did the Wright brothers use, or even planes before we even had such "earth curvature technology"?

The earth is flat! Airplane, it's in the air over a plane thus airplane. Through the majority of mankind it's always been known to be a plane. Great deceivers just put the letter "T" at the end. And everybody ate it up like a burger and fries. The greatest lie in human history which reveals all the players involved. "You will know them by their fruits".

 

Yes I do and i stated facts proving you wrong.

You have no experiments and can name no experiments which support a flat non rotating earth. Go ahead and try.

You know well ans good that the evidence proves you wrong

 

He is talking about long distance flights not sort hops. And to answer you the earliest long distance pilots took account of the curvature of the earth the same way sailors did for hundreds of years.

Even before planes and modern technology it was proven the earth was round. Sailors had to account for the curvature of the earth to cross oceans. This is why long distance navigation became much more precise when a reliable ocean going clock was established. Navigational errors were common before that technology because a sailor could not account for longitudinal lines without an accurate time piece. Longitudinal lines are a concept absolutely reliant on the earth being round.

Sorry but even hundreds of eyars ago the average sailor knew how full of BS your claims are

 

Uh, no they didn't. Most thought it was flat. And used flat maps and the stars for navigation. Get over yourself, the flat earth never died. There has always been people that know the earth is flat.
Things are seen at distances that they should be behind the curve. However there is no curve. That's where the debate is won or lost. And guess what, you cannot find any curve. You must rely on what your told, and you do. That's the difference between me and you. Now check this out, notice and if you have to pause the video so you can see. But in the very beginning of the video the earth curve calculator is being used as to show that nothing goes behind a curve.

 

Wrong it is historic fact that sailors knew about the curve of the earth for centuries you are simply wrong. Navigating by stars is doable but not as accurate and maps do no good where there is just water and no land marks. The methods of navigating by stars also proves you wrong. When one travels long enough the stars change because some are blocked by the curve of the earth and new stars come into view. For example the northstar and constellations associated with it are not visible below the equator. Sailors therefore had to learn to sue the southern cross when below the equator.

A few posts ago you ridiculed someone by lying about them and claiming that what you see on TV is not real ( even though they did not cite tv ) Now you are doing the same thing citing a you tube vid which is a massive fail and offers no evidence of any kind.

The flat earth died because it is proven wrong by all scientific evidence and you have yet to cite one experiment which shows a flat earth cite one or leave.

 

Are you kidding me man, watch the video.

The camera is standing less than 5 feet in elevation to sea level. The Rogers Center is over 30 miles. For your sake I will say 6 feet high with the camera, giving you a chance here. However the distance must remain for proof.

Earth curve calculator says that at that distance and height there would be 486.1575 ft of hidden terrain due to the curve. You can verify this yourself. The Rogers building is only 285 ft from sea level.
Thus from that distance the Rogers Center should not be seen, yet it is. Please continue with your cognitive dissonance. For you have no proof of a globe that my eyes can see. The proof in which was presented to you, allows your eyes to see this. If I was to add 200 ft to the Rogers Center, it would still be 1 foot behind the curve. HELLO!!

 

No, those who thought it was a ball only knew about the curve as much as you do. They never seen the curve....never. They merely thought there was a curve. And there is not. You better calm down a little. Because your world is about to be turned upside down. Schools will be teaching a flat earth here shortly, because it is. Don't be going insane turning into a lunatic when it is revealed.

 

ll wrong the video showed no evidence whatsoever it only showed pictures which offer no proof one way or the other and that is fact.

Now it is proven your video is garbage and worthless by YOUR OWN admission so cite some evidence as io asked for or begone and stop lying

You are proven to be sensationally decietful and dishonest which is a sin against your false idol

 

Just because one cannot see it does not make it real.

You cannot see a cold virus but it makes you sick and is proven to exist. The curve of the earth was proven long ago and undserstood by sailors. Their navigational methods proven it and you cannot challenge them.

No it never will be taught except maybe at comedy schools for a laugh.

Now show some evidence and stop lying

 

Utter nonsense.

Sure you can. I posted over and over what you can do yourself, and you just ignore it because you are not interested in truth.

LOL, Go ahead and file suit.

Of course I can demonstrate it. With all the proofs I've given you you just ignore because you are more interested in your agenda rather than the truth.

Of course you can. You can look at how the angle of Polaris changes in the sky with your latitude until it disappears in the Southern Hemisphere. You can observe how the stars do not spin around the earth, but spin around the poles. You can see large ships and buildings sink below the horizon at sea.

Or do any of the other proofs I've repeatedly listed you've repeated ignored. Because you are not interested in the truth.

 

So what's your point. Polaris proves a flat earth, and so do all the stars which have never changed. Boats don't go over a curve, this has been demonstrated with today's technology. You see you claim that I don't know your side or the "heliocentric model". I do, I know it very well. I doubt more-so than you, then again I most certainly could. You claim that I'm not interested in the truth, that's all that interests me.

So in essence it is you that only knows one side of the argument, and you hold to yours without hearing the other. What you claim I do, is exactly what your doing.

"If one answereth a matter before he first hears it, folly and shame unto him." Don't take that as an insult because that's not how it was intended, rather common sense is well within that statement.

 

Utter nonsense is all you got? Why don't you show the proof provide a link, name, a trail for me to go down? Because you can't?

Your telling me that my eyes and senses are deceived, and what I see and feel is not true. So how is it that the heavenly bodies prove the shape of the earth, when it could very well be the stars and movement of the heavens that make it seem like a ball. Does it only work for the way you want? I'll trust my God given eyes and senses long before someone in a white cloak (wolves in sheep clothing).

If you watch this and still think boats go over the curve that is clearly not there, I don't know what to tell ya.

Oh and it would be impossible for the sun to appear closer the higher one goes if it was 93,000,000 miles away. It's small and very near, and beyond what we was told.
Adele Laurie Blue Adkins is the singer and flat earther.

 

The Internet is under the ocean. There are no satellites. The first television broadcast was radio waves, the broadcast was world wide. This was done with radio waves and receivers (antenna's). No satellites needed at all. Same with cb's.

 

Then why does my GPS not work unless it can get line of sight on 3 or more satellites?

 

Then why can we see satellites.

no it was not world wide.

 

If I told you I had a pink unicorn but I cannot show you. Your not going to believe me. Same here, show me the satellite. For there are UFO videos everywhere. It's very easy to do what one wants with imagery and video today. Good luck!