Flight 93 recovered underground?

Then please show us this evidence the OP has requested.

So you believe Communist Obama was born in the USA?

 

The OP is a straw man argument. The poster provides no evidence that the government claims any such thing.

Ignoring this fact won't make it go away, suede.

 

I need not present any evidence to disprove the fact that no evidence has been presented either way. No evidence for, no evidence against. And I have no dog in this fight so what would you have me do?

And I don't care where the incompetent idiot clown fool Communist obama was born, he is the president, wherever he was born. And that glaring error has to be fixed in Nov. 2012.

If you have difficulty assessing my position on obama, read my signature.

 

Sounds like you thought there was plenty of evidence, then when I asked you for it, you realized there wasn't much evidence.

If you have no dog in this fight, then why did you come post on this thread?

I agree he needs to go, but just curious to know if you think Communist Obama was born in the USA?

You should have been clued in that I have no difficulty assessing your position on Obama when I referred to him as "Communist Obama" in my previous post to you.

 

Wouldn't it be more noteworthy if there wasn't a dodge from a twoofer?

 

The only dodge I see is from you skeptics not providing evidence that most of the plane wreckage was buried under the ground.

 

I don't know for certain where he was born and neither do you. And now that he is president, it doesn't matter where he was born. What matters is getting him beat in 2012. And unproven conspiracy theories are not the way to win an election. Post every bad thing you can about obama, but FIRST, triple check that it is TRUE. Posting unfounded rumors hands liberals ammo on a silver platter. TRUTH will send his lying ass back to Chicago. Bullsh!t just makes anti-obama people look as bad as liberal obamalamaloopas do.

Why did I post on the thread. Ever heard of FREE SPEECH? Bad enough that liberals are against it. You want to decide where I can post and where I can't? Arm yourself well and pack a large lunch because you're going to be the rest of your life attempting that, and failing.

 

Yet you still steadfastly refuse to provide any evidence that the 'official story' claims what you say it does.

Just as you refuse to actually contact anyone who was actually on the scene.

Ignoring the evidence doesn't make it go away, suede.

 

Gee, what happened, I guess the "ignore" function doesn't work. Yeah, I'd get tired of listening only to other twoofers too...

The FR was found under ground. Pictures of parts of the plane were shown on this thread as being uncovered from beneath the earth.

You're simply not telling the truth.

 

You are evading. You said you're not a Birther, but you won't say where you think he was born. I think he was born in the USA. Where do you think he was born?

I'm not telling where to post or not. Curb your paranoia nut.

 

I only have Hannibal and NAB currently on ignore, so feel special.

The black boxes. OK, that constitutes about .01% of a 757. Very far from "most of a 757" and also very easy to plant since they are relatively small objects, might I add.

Well I remember seeing one pic of an engine, the one rightwingfrawd showed how obvious it was that it was planted by the backhoe that was also in the photo. Were there other photos? Would love to see them.

We are about to see who's telling the truth, or not.

 

Can anyone provide proof that this was claimed by anyone other than a 'truther' posting a straw man argument? It certainly seems like they are just making this up, and then demanding proof for their own fantasy.

We already see who is dodging.

 

Really...so you're alleging Flight 93 didn't crash there.

Where is it, please?

Engines were found
DNA was found
Wreckage was found
Witnesses saw the plane
Phone calls from the plane confirm it was hijacked
Air Traffic Controllers tracked it to the place where it crashed.

Slam Dunk that it crashed there.

But please keep worrying about if it was buried; after all, your movement shouldn't be the only thing deep sixed.

 

At least not fully! There seems to be a LOT missing.

That's what we've been asking!

Where was the other one allegedly found?

Well that is one of the biggest claims of the crash. But who cares about those big details?!

You're obsession with the TM is noted.

 

By whom? Source, please. Your only 'official source' seems to be a 'guy in a bar'.

 

When someone gets to close to the truth, 'truthers' plug their ears and ignore evidence.

 

Going three times...fair warning...
Show your proof now for the underground Flight 93.
Last chance for proof......
(It's looking like there WASN'T ANY!!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHA!)

So...they lied about 93 too huh? Why in the world would they want to do that? Those noble, "official" defenders apparently don't know.

So why was 93 shot down? (which caused small pieces of the plane to go everywhere, an engine a half mile from a missile hole, and parts at Indian Lake).
Why couldn't they just tell us that to begin with?

Shills are the lock...I have the key.

 

Seeing as how no 'truther' has been able to provide any evidence of the OP's claim, it must be completely made up.

Evidence = 1
Straw Men = 0

 

Looks like they have none.

Score for the "failed" truth movement!

 

Ah - the 'truther' 'victory cry'.

Now what? Surely with this unstoppable momentum they will launch the 'new investigation' and bring the horrid NWO to its collective knees.

The suspense is terrible. I hope it will last.

 

In debate forums (at least one's that aren't moronic like this one), the OP is required to back up their topic so there is something to actually debate.

If not, you get topics like this and the equally disingenuous one suede started.

I know this might be a hard concept to grasp, but why don't you try and make the attempt at an honest topic.

 

And there was much rejoicing from sock-puppets everywhere.

 

I don't see evidence of a shoot down. There would be debris leading up to the crater, not the other way around.

There's a good video on youtube by some researcher who interviewed a bunch of witnesses their and when putting their testimony together, it showed that most likely there was a flyby over Indian Lake, which Flight 93 never flew over officially.

One of the witnesses was asked to work at the Flight 93 memorial there, but she refused because she didn't want to go along with the official lies!!!

 

The "crater" was created by something other than Flight 93. That's why there isn't any evidence of it and the hole together. I believe the plane disintegrated (after it was fired upon) at high altitude. The crater was created to facilitate the would be "official" story. If the plane had actually crashed there, it would have been obvious by now. The shills and other "official" supporters would have been tripping all over themselves showing us the proof (if were actually there). There are also witnesses who claim the plane was on fire, and falling out of the sky. 93 was the backup plane for the WTC's. It wasn't needed and so was disposed of IMO.

 

Cite a source for the above claims. Your speculations are based on false information.