Discussion in '9/11' started by RtWngaFraud, Aug 24, 2011.
The engine was where? Cite your source.
In a hanger somewhere?
I have, many times. You continue to avoid contacting them.
Is it still around today, or is that "classified" information that nobody's allowed to have? The proof is a "them"? No, I was looking for actual proof....not "official" hearsay.
You have nothing. I know. That's why we keep going round and round. It's all you have. You guys would be plastering the proof all over the place if there were actually any to plaster. You won't because you cannot. I get it.
The title should be Flight 93s missing Flight 93. It's just another in a long line of lies and distortions.
bump for Hannibal
Bump for suede.
And STILL.......(drumroll please) No proof that 93 was ever buried underground. Zip. Zero. None. Nada.
There will never be at this rate.
It doesn't really matter because
Proof doesn't matter. Thank you Hannibal.
The jet being buried and the alleged passenger rebellion is the only way the gov can get the sheople to believe the BS story.
Every major component was allegedly buried except one engine...where is that engine?
Who cares?...people died there,and you don't think it happened the way it did,tough tittie,no one ASKED you to like it.
quit wasting time asking about the plane being buried
I never asked about the jet allegedly being buried...I want to know where that engine is?
I want to know who found it.
I want to see photos of it.
I want to know where it is now.
What would these things prove to you?
I am not a mushroom, in this country we have the right to know every F****** thing government is doing.
It is called oversite, and is there to keep the elected appointed and employed government officials honest.
Corrupt government officials, are plague that should not be tolerated.
A perfect example is the scum being rooted out of the US Attorneys office in Phx for the coverup in the Fast & Furious gun running cluster f***
Seems you might be in danger of overanalyzing the subject a bit
This nutjob is seriously lacking common sense.
Sure, he gives some examples of other crashes. However, he is also talking mostly about planes that crashed at lower speeds, at a very different flight path.
Flight 93 was going almost straight down, into the ground. For an example of what this might be like, check this footage:
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qR0f8n10DR4"]Jet crash into wall - YouTube[/ame]
Or if you want to see another actual real-life plane crash, do some research on ValuJet Flight 592, on 11 May 1996.
[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eylDlokUpuw"]WSVN-TV "7 News at 10:00" "Crash of Valujet Flight 592" 1996 - YouTube[/ame]
Well, look at it this way. The soft earth the supposedly 93 hit, caused it to be blown apart, buried, engines bouncing over 1/2 mile away treetops. The aluminum plane. Another aluminum plane maintained its structure well enough to pierce through steel vertical columns and pop out the other side of the building. Something inconsistent there I'd say. Soft earth destroys aluminum plane. Hard steel columns that same aluminum has no problem slicing through the WTC's like butter.
Still don't understand mass do you?
The plane left a BIG,deep hole in shanksville, and the planes left BIG gashes in the towers.
Yea, sure. Now here is a question, which is harder. Dirt, or water?
Then jump off of the top of the Golden Gate Bridge, and tell me how soft the water is. Because after falling around 220 feet, you strike the water at the terminal velocity of 75 MPH. Almost all fatalities die not from drowning, but from the blunt force trauma of hitting the water at that speed.
And out of the over 1,200 jumpers, only 26 have survived. So much for "soft water".
You are trying to make a comparison here which is illogical. You are trying to compare an aircraft striking a hard dense mass with one striking a soft building which is mostly air. The density of the ground is 100% solid, the density of the WTC was probably only around 15% solid to 85% air.
that is synonymous with yummy breakfast ya all had eh!
How does knowing who found an engine, or where the engine is now tell you anything about what the government is doing?
An FBI agent found the engine, and it was returned to its owner.
Separate names with a comma.