For who think the Clinton Email Scandle won't amount to anything...

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by rkhames, Feb 25, 2016.

  1. rkhames

    rkhames New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2013
    Messages:
    3,360
    Likes Received:
    39
    Trophy Points:
    0
    There has been two new developments. On Tuesday, a Federal Judge ordered State Department Personal, and Hillary Clinton's Aides to testify under oath. The lawsuit brought by Judicial Watch alleges that Hillary's personal server was an attempt to circumvent Open Records Laws. Additionally, the Judge indicated that he might order Hillary to turnover all her emails and documents from that timeframe. That would even include those that she claimed were personal.

    On Wednesday, AG Lynch testified before the house on a variety of measures. Congressman John Carter, of Texas, ask her, ""If the FBI makes the case that Hillary Clinton mishandled classified information and put America's security at risk, will you prosecute the case? Do you know of any efforts underway to undermine the FBI investigation,"
    http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-clinton-idUSMTZSAPEC2N0MQ10D

    Lynch replied, "With respect to our investigation into how information was handled by the State Department, how they handled classified information, as I'm sure you know that matter is being handled by career, independent law enforcement agents, FBI agents as well as the career, independent attorneys in the Department of Justice. They follow the evidence. They look at the law. And they'll make a recommendation to me when the time is appropriate." Of course, Politico called that a "non-committal" response, but it did contain a new piece of information. This is no longer an investigation limited to the FBI. Now there are "independent attorneys in the Department of Justice" included. That means they are working to finalize the formal charges.
    http://www.politico.com/blogs/under...ynch-hillary-clinton-email-prosecution-219733

    The noose is around Hillary's neck, and they are waiting on the hangman to pull the lever.
     
  2. Spooky

    Spooky Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2013
    Messages:
    25,592
    Likes Received:
    9,322
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Sounds like Hillary is in too deep and the WH is going to cut their ties to her and leave her on her own. She better hope this wraps up quick because Obama's pardon is quickly running out.
     
  3. Uber Lib

    Uber Lib New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2015
    Messages:
    3,058
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    0
    sounds more like the desperation perspiration level is at a high flood level, warning warning
    turn around, don't drown
     
  4. Alucard

    Alucard New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2015
    Messages:
    7,829
    Likes Received:
    40
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Loretta Lynch knows what she is doing. Hillary did nothing wrong. Hillary will remain victorious. She did nothing criminal. This silly witch hunt has gone on way too long. Time to move on!
     
  5. akphidelt2007

    akphidelt2007 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    19,979
    Likes Received:
    114
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Conservatives remain desperate. Hillary will be fine. You guys should take a year off and analyze why all your predictions don't pan out.
     
  6. AlphaOmega

    AlphaOmega Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2013
    Messages:
    28,752
    Likes Received:
    4,810
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No we prefer to grill her minions under oath. They certainly wont want to spend a decade in jail for ole Hillary.
     
  7. democrack

    democrack Banned

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2014
    Messages:
    3,649
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    0
    BUT , the witch is ABOVE THE LAW !!!!! :steamed:
     
  8. Pax Aeon

    Pax Aeon Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2015
    Messages:
    7,291
    Likes Received:
    428
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Gender:
    Female
    `
    `

    In related news, Tom DeLay will hold his 51st news conference this afternoon to tell us that indictments against Hillary Clinton could come any day now.
     
  9. rkhames

    rkhames New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2013
    Messages:
    3,360
    Likes Received:
    39
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Didn't bother to actually read the law did you? Here let me help you:

    https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/793

    Hillary Clinton had more then 1700 emails containing classified information on her personal unsecured server. This included 22 that are so classified that they could not be published in redacted form. So, please tell me how she is not guilty under this statute.

    Otherwise, your nothing but a troll!
     
  10. rkhames

    rkhames New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2013
    Messages:
    3,360
    Likes Received:
    39
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'm sure all you Hillary fans wish they would leave your beloved criminal candidate alone. But do you really think that career State Department personnel, or her aides won't attempt to save their own necks by claiming "the devil (Hillary) made me do it." They may have worked for her, but do you really think they sold there soul to her.

    - - - Updated - - -

    No more disparate then your signature!
     
  11. akphidelt2007

    akphidelt2007 New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2011
    Messages:
    19,979
    Likes Received:
    114
    Trophy Points:
    0
    We heard this for 8 years of Obama. Last election you crazies were saying he wouldn't be able to run. It was hilarious. You guys should really take a year off. Hillary is not going anywhere just like Obama didn't.
     
  12. Aleksander Ulyanov

    Aleksander Ulyanov Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2013
    Messages:
    18,774
    Likes Received:
    4,090
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    The law says the violation must have happened due to "gross negligence", failing to notice that 22 emails out of 1700 that had been reclassified had possibly sensitive info on them is far from that. Saying that you can throw people in jail simply for not having superhuman filing skills qualifies you as being worthy of your very own suspension highway bridge IMO.
     
  13. milorafferty

    milorafferty Banned

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2015
    Messages:
    4,148
    Likes Received:
    21
    Trophy Points:
    0
    But, but, but....Cankle has decided, with the Democratic party's blessing, that it's her turn. Who cares if she is a lying, stealing, murdering (*)(*)(*)(*)(*). It's her turn and she has a (D) after her name. That's all the lemmings know.

    - - - Updated - - -

    Having a private email server in an unsecured location would be considered gross negligence.
     
  14. toddwv

    toddwv Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 18, 2009
    Messages:
    30,445
    Likes Received:
    6,425
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Whatever happened to Benghazi? How'd that go?
     
  15. Pollycy

    Pollycy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    19,080
    Likes Received:
    4,891
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    If you knew anything about what the federal governments demands (not "asks") of those who have security clearances, you wouldn't make such ridiculous statements. It's already been discovered, and documented -- Hillary broke the law, and in several different ways....

    I respect your knowledge about banking and the economy, but truly, you are very incorrect regarding Hillary and what we already know that she's done. She will be indicted...and, really, she must be indicted, or we have no "justice" system at all and the laws and protocols that apply to classified intelligence information mean nothing....
     
  16. BestViewedWithCable

    BestViewedWithCable Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2010
    Messages:
    47,515
    Likes Received:
    6,136
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Obama should just pardon her now, and then claim executive privilege over the email server.
     
  17. Pycckia

    Pycckia Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2015
    Messages:
    8,819
    Likes Received:
    1,827
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    If you run your own homebrew server off premises rather than use the one the State Dept. kindly provides for free, yes, you can be required to have superhuman filing skills.
     
  18. rkhames

    rkhames New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 5, 2013
    Messages:
    3,360
    Likes Received:
    39
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Oh look. Another Clinton supporter with a reading disability. How can a Sec of State do her job without access to classified material? Yet, Hillary Clinton refused to have an account assigned to her on the two classified networks. So, how was she going to access classified emails and documents? She had her staff cut-and-paste, or retype, classified material into the unclassified networks, and email them to her on her personal unsecured server. That constitutes "gross negligence".

    All 1700 of the emails identified contained classified information. In accordance to a court order FOIA request, they were published in redacted form. That means the actual classified information was cut out of them. All but the 22 that contained the highest level of security possible.

    Further, Hillary Clinton as a former Senator, and as a Sec of State, has been briefed as to what constitutes classified and non-classified material. There is no excuse for her to have classified material on an unsecured server. Other than "gross negligence".
     

Share This Page