Language has consequences. I suppose you just didn't anticipate these. Unintended consequences seem to be the standard operating position of most liberal folk. And here you are. Yes, we can all agree that your post self identified itself as nonsensical gibberish.
It can be consensual but more often than not its a preteen/teen involved with an older family member. Of course the baby did no violating, but it would be cruel to add more trauma onto her. She deserves to have a choice. A potential independent living being? lol. ...yes there is life since the heartbeat can be detected at 5 weeks.
Except women, apparently. Since they do the ONE THING which causes conception, while not consenting to conception.
You're like your own party, Fox. I have said NOTHING about what women should or shouldn't do after choosing to conceive. I'm referring only to their choice to become pregnant.
FoxHastings said: ↑ You just reinforced what Renee posted and you don't even know it You just posted that since she had consensual sex she should have to gestate ….YOU just posted that. OR maybe you can explain your statement.....OK, the woman chose to expose herself to the possibility of pregnancy...… but she can still get an abortion, right? (ya, it's a trick question ) Women cannot "choose" to become pregnant...they have sex and either become pregnant or not... A woman could have sex a thousand times "choosing" to get pregnant each time and NOT get pregnant... It's science....
I get that you think this is a little victory, Fox. Your funny ways are familiar to us Meantime, please show me where I said women should be forced to gestate. I'm happy to stand corrected if that's what I actually said.
Alabama NEEDS to force victims of incest to gestate....they need to improve their gene pool They don't call victims of incest "victims" they call them honorees...and Mommy/sisters
I'm not 'concerned' about sex = babies. I'm repeatedly reminding you that women who are not raped, CHOOSE to conceive.
Oh, and here I thought from your other post you were ready to enter the world of science...darn... Women cannot "choose" to become pregnant...they have sex and either become pregnant or not... A woman could have sex a thousand times "choosing" to get pregnant each time and NOT get pregnant... It's science.... But you don't want to accept that for some reason so maybe you could explain if you have a point or not, and what it is..
Well...at least you have some concept of "Choice". even if inaccurate. Do you "Choose" to have a baby every time you have sex?
In that case it's statutory rape, so the incest is irrelevant to the issue of consent. So it's less cruel to execute an innocent child? Like an infant that can't feed itself?
...this is where you might want to park science at the door. Try looking at it from a human perspective. The "procedure" is quite different. I just don't see it that way. It is not a tumor or an ingrown hair. Contraceptives are effective...when people use them. Look Fox, Im not against choice (in fact I support choice almost ALWAYS), this is just my unwavering opinion on this whole abortion issue. I also like to watch some of these progressives go crazy over this. Its rather satisfying. . What don't you get about that FACT that abortion due to rape is EXACTLY the SAME thing as abortion due to consensual sex...the procedure and outcome are the SAME. SO WHY would the raped woman be allowed to kill that "innocent life" but the woman who had consensual sex can't.
Alas...I am male so abortion is not something I can do. I do however have sex because its enjoyable....you should try it sometime.
It's inaccurate that women who are not raped are choosing to have sex? That's some unique logic you have there. If I don't want babies, I don't do that which makes babies (and you may be surprised to hear this, but the science on how babies are made has been settled for a while now). There is literally no dignified and adult way you can torque that into something you think is more palatable to irresponsible women and their enablers.
The pro-choice argument is that people can't help but make babies, and/or that they have the right to both make babies and not have a baby. Even though there's only one way to do that.
