Former DNI Expects More Indictments From Durham

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by RodB, Apr 25, 2022.

  1. RodB

    RodB Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2015
    Messages:
    22,469
    Likes Received:
    11,186
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    https://www.theepochtimes.com/forme...q5O+e9Sg8AfrhqL2vvoDvHKyrzTp6N2RQ8bzCA5zrLKrE

    The former DNI said the 2016 effort was wide and heavily coordinated with the Clinton campaign, DNC, elected officials, media, law firms, Fusion GPS, foreign agents, and intelligence officials. He added that not everyone has criminal liability but when the public finds out about it they will be "more and more appalled."
     
    ButterBalls and Steve N like this.
  2. kazenatsu

    kazenatsu Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 15, 2017
    Messages:
    34,682
    Likes Received:
    11,247
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You think this is going to be allowed to be released under the Biden Administration?
     
  3. Andrew Jackson

    Andrew Jackson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2016
    Messages:
    48,593
    Likes Received:
    32,330
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Does anybody remember a couple of years ago, when something called "Bucket 5" was supposed to "blow the lid off"?
    Whatever happened to that?
    I figured that by now (over 2 years later) that every document known to mankind would be "declassified".
    This thing in the OP looks like another Nothingburger.
    (Just like the other 99 times that "declassified" documents were going to "blow the lid off").
    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]
     
    Phyxius likes this.
  4. The Mello Guy

    The Mello Guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Messages:
    109,940
    Likes Received:
    37,648
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Ratcliffe has a long record of being full of ****.
     
    WalterSobchak and Phyxius like this.
  5. RodB

    RodB Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2015
    Messages:
    22,469
    Likes Received:
    11,186
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I don't think (but am not certain) that Biden can do anything about it. He would be hard pressed to stop a DNI from declassifying anything a DNI says can be unclassified.particularly in response to a special prosecutor.
     
  6. Yulee

    Yulee Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2016
    Messages:
    10,341
    Likes Received:
    6,383
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I don’t think that’s accurate. But the former DNI isn’t really speaking in knowledge, and his core loyalty is Trump not America.
     
    Last edited: Apr 25, 2022
    WalterSobchak and Phyxius like this.
  7. RodB

    RodB Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2015
    Messages:
    22,469
    Likes Received:
    11,186
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I don't recall Bucket 5, but you are correct that getting criminal (or ethical) proof of conspiratorial wrong doing in high government circles is very hard, a long row to hoe, and unlikely. It was the DNI who said the documents would make the public "more and more appalled." I personally would like it but would not bet much on it.
     
    ButterBalls likes this.
  8. RodB

    RodB Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2015
    Messages:
    22,469
    Likes Received:
    11,186
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    How does a former DNI authoritatively declaring that documents can be declassified make him full of anything???
     
    ButterBalls likes this.
  9. The Mello Guy

    The Mello Guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Messages:
    109,940
    Likes Received:
    37,648
    Trophy Points:
    113
    He said a bit more than that now didnt he?
    If they’re so damning why didn’t he declassify them?
     
    Last edited: Apr 25, 2022
    WalterSobchak likes this.
  10. lemmiwinx

    lemmiwinx Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2016
    Messages:
    8,069
    Likes Received:
    5,430
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I always thought Durham's investigation would die on the vine. And it still could if he should ever venture into Ft. Marcy Park at night.
     
    ButterBalls and RodB like this.
  11. hawgsalot

    hawgsalot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2017
    Messages:
    10,528
    Likes Received:
    9,660
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Why couldn't he be someone that's nonpartisan and the stuff done never needs to be repeated against any president? Loyal to Trump lol
     
  12. Yulee

    Yulee Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2016
    Messages:
    10,341
    Likes Received:
    6,383
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Did you just try to insinuate John Ratcliffe was bipartisan?
     
    WalterSobchak and The Mello Guy like this.
  13. hawgsalot

    hawgsalot Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2017
    Messages:
    10,528
    Likes Received:
    9,660
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    I'm saying you don't have to be partisan to never ever want this type of corruption to happen again. He may be partisan yet the findings not. We'll see, just as I said in 2017 let the chips fall where they may with Trumps investigation, same goes here. If somebody is guilty put their ass in jail, it completely divided this country like we were fighting in nam again and it's becoming obvious it was nothing more than political ploy.
     
  14. The Mello Guy

    The Mello Guy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 13, 2010
    Messages:
    109,940
    Likes Received:
    37,648
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It’s silly to think we wouldn’t investigate a campaign who was getting help from Russia, and had a campaign mgr whose business partner was a Russian agent.
     
    WalterSobchak likes this.
  15. Zorro

    Zorro Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    77,000
    Likes Received:
    51,699
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Never heard of Bucket 5.

    Durham May Have Enough to Pursue Conspiracy Charges in Russiagate Investigation.
    But wait, they may be Democrats and some Democrats seem to have a license to lie to the government.

    The "Hillary Clinton campaign, her lawyers, and others hired by the campaign" conspired "to dig up dirt on Donald Trump" and "present the bogus dirt to the U.S. government — a criminal conspiracy."

    We'll see what charging decisions are made.
     

Share This Page