Fox News Anchor Chris Wallace On Biden’s Border Crisis: It’s Time To ‘Build A Wall’

“I mean, to me, that is the real shame here, is our immigration policy and that it allows people to come over, it doesn’t just stop them,” Wallace continued. “And that’s what I think the real focus ought to be on. Yes, the horse story, the Border Patrol, CBP on horseback has become a story. I happen to think it’s bad. Forget the whipping for a second — and I understand that’s one of the allegations, and there doesn’t seem to be true. And the president shouldn’t have talked about strapping as he did, because that’s another word for whipping. I don’t think that the Border Patrol, they ought to be able to find a way to keep people from coming across the border. Build a fence.”

“A wall maybe?” radio host Guy Benson asked.

“Yeah, I was going to say build a fence, build a wall, have some kind of a gate so they can’t walk across that dam over the Rio Grande into Del Rio,” Wallace responded.



https://www.dailywire.com/news/fox-...bidens-border-crisis-its-time-to-build-a-wall

Lol Wallace is not only a registered Democrat, he also is an unabashed Biden supporter.

This is quite a change of view.

Biden of course attacked the Border Patrol for carrying out his own policies at the border stating they were racist.

 

How about instead of a wall that is an environmental disaster we implement programs that actually stop them from wanting to come here?

End jobs by fining or prosecuting the OWNERS of the companies that hire them.

Immediate deportation

End birthright citizenship if neither parent is a US citizen

Penalize Mexico for not stopping large scale migrations

End all public support for illegals

Streamline the immigration process

 

You sound like every elected dem from 10 years ago. Of course you mean none of that.

You know its bad when Chris Wallace sides with Trump over Biden on a major political issue.

 

Bold: Note here: That is already done. The "problem" is that it only applies to owners who KNOWINGLY hire those that are here illegally. And quite frankly that is as it should be. It's not right to fine those that are fooled because illegals are using stolen/false identities.

Underlined: Not that simple. I'd agree with that for those caught as they're crossing the border. Not so much for those that have been here for years or legitimately applying for asylum (something that honestly can't be determined unless there is a hearing...unless they f up and admit it).

Rest: Pretty much agree.

 

End birthright citizenship if neither parent is a citizen? You've accepted the Nationalist position that the 1965 law is a ****ing travesty? Hallejuah, if mainstream Democrats can get on board, we can fix this serious issue.

 

I have worked as a construction clerk doing new hire verification for several very large firms. I can assure you — they know.

Maybe not all of them but many definitely do.

 

As always, thanks for your incorrect opinion on how others think. Maybe one day you will get it right.

 

Yes to fines, yes to rapid deportation, yes to ending birthright citizenship, yes to sanctions on Mexico, yes to an absolute end to any and all welfares for illegals, but as far as immigration goes it needs to be ended not streamlined. We simply do not need more people. Only immigrants of substantial personal wealth should be admitted for a period of no less than 50 years. Then we can reassess. Oh and we'll need the wall too, and it will need to be defended by landmines because despite doing all the above and more there will still be hoards streaming in looking to take advantage of loopholes and non-enforcement.

 

I never didn’t accept it. It doesn’t make sense and promotes birth tourism and illegal entry.

Also not a democrat… both parties disgust me — one I just feel is taking it to the extreme.

 

You realize the US is in a population decline without immigrants, yes?

I agree we need to promote getting educated individuals or ones that can invest in the nation — but we need laborers. At least until mass automation becomes a thing. Then I really have no idea what will happen.

Maybe the US should just be investing heavily in robotics.

 

Major political issue ?

Illegal immigration is the 13th most important issue for American voters....

Your totally out of touch with the real issues in this country.

 

I realize that's a theory and I'm willing to put it to the test since we have too many people anyways. As a backup plan we can explore ways to encourage and incentivize the right people to breed in much the same way we currently encourage and incentivize the wrong people to breed.

 

Notice you don’t actually post the wall but the failed portions. You want to pay them to not come here like Biden?

 

I think its one of the most important issues. Post PEWS numbers now.

Wallace was an unabashed Biden supporter.

How do explain his sudden reversal.

 

Mass automation is becoming a thing, which is why we don't need any more unskilled laborers. If the population is naturally declining then we should take it as a sign that there is a problem with increasing the population. Cause there are clearly problems related to climate (droughts), employment, housing, education, etc. that is exacerbated by increasing the population via immigration. And Automation actually solve the problems with an aging population, while incurring and exacerbating ones with an increasing population.

 

So continue to live in your parallel universe.

Do you think he will never vote Democrat again?

How many times has Wallace trashed Trump on Fox?

Do you ever give a s***?

 

they come here for jobs, the right does not want to crack down on those hiring illegals

make it a felony with a mandatory 5 year sentence to knowingly hire illegals and the problem ends almost overnight

 

So you prefer only images be posted that show you want you want to see? Figures.

As to paying them, no — but we could decrease US aid to other industrialized nations and direct it to our direct neighbors.

 

"knowingly," being your weasel word.

Tell me...'cause I do not know.....if you were a potential employer of an obvious Mexican, what documentation would you require of them before you hired them?

 

I have long advocated for this solution. I think birthright citizenship is an archaic idea.

 

Yes we do. In the last decade, I have not met a Republican that isn't for punishing people that hire illegal aliens. It's only people on the internet (Bush types).

And I don't believe Democrats want to punish people for hiring illegals. I worked as an Attorney litigating Fair Wage act claims. Everyone in the industry is a Democrat that relies on illegal immigrants as customers. The left in no way wants to crack down on those hiring illegals. It's an old BS talking point that they peddle out.

 

I would require a SS Number and Photo ID that I can cross-check. But 99% of the time it doesn't even get to that point. Guy can't speak English, remember basic information, or provide past history of employment. Nothing. Even the ones with fake documents starts to act strange when you ask these questions.

I was a construction manager. The only illegal aliens that received employment did so through sub-contractors that gave us bids. It's obvious. But I'm not going to stop and delay a job that I'm contracted with the building owner to complete within a certain amount of time.

This is a situation where the contractor is not in a position to know about employment status of a subcontractor, but I'm certain Democrats would attempt to include liability to as many small businesses as possible.

 

Dumb assed Wallace, red-pilled after it's too late.

 

when Trump's was found to have hired illegals, did not hear a uproar from the right

 

Yes....and that is the problem.....a blind eye is turned for cheap labour. Mate, you own the construction site.....you have an obligation to ensure that only legal people work on it. It is very convenient "I know nothing" to sheet the blame/responsibility onto a contractor for a dodgy. Nah, does not work.

Down here...If I was building a home on a site under my head contractual control and I saw some bloke, an employee of a sub-contractor who was dodgy for whatever reason, I'd intervene and piss that suss bloke off my site if he did not meet legal status to be working.

Ya see....that is the problem at its very base. The US whinges about these people coming in, and at the same time, it is quite happy to see them exploited....for the sake of the dollar. Good old Capitalism. Screw the Country and the locals if we can get away with a cheaper alternative.

Come on Team USA! You cannot eat cake and have it.....credibly.

Perhaps, before you contract with a subbie, you get proactive and ask to see a list of his employees and their credentials....but....you won't because it suits you Sgt (I know nothing) Schultz.

I mean no personal offence or insult....I am talking generically, not literally specific at you personally.