From you. Yes. Right. Wrong again. I do reject its importance because it isn't important. I'm not a Georgist, and the fact that you refuse to know facts no matter how many times they are explained to you does not make those facts a "script." The super-yachts do not result from monopsony. They result from privilege, of which monopsony can also be a result. You just confuse cause with effect. True: you claim, absurdly, that it is of less importance than discrimination. Just makin' $#!+ up again I see.... I have on many occasions stated that bankster privilege, IP monopoly privilege, etc. are also important. Just not as important as landowner privilege.