Free video/pdf destroys all "official"

Discussion in '9/11' started by RtWngaFraud, Jun 2, 2011.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Which brings us right back to the OP.

    Do you think the link to hurricane powered death beams from space helps or hurts the credibility of the 'truth' cult?
     
  2. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    All things official....

    Do bouncing engines qualify as a cult belief or shill propaganda?
     
  3. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Since the cult of 9/11 truth is the only one claiming bouncing engines, it's a cult belief.
     
  4. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You posted a link that makes the argument that the WTC towers were brought down by Direct Energy Weapons from Space.

    Do you consider this link credible, and if not - why did you post it?

    Engage the point or run from it.
     
  5. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    So, 93's engine didn't bounce. What did it do (officially)?
     
  6. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Per the OP of this thread:

    You posted a link that makes the argument that the WTC towers were brought down by Direct Energy Weapons from Space.

    Do you consider this link credible, and if not - why did you post it?

    Engage the point or run from it again.
     
  7. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Dodge noted. Bouncing engines accepted.
     
  8. I_Gaze_At_The_Blue

    I_Gaze_At_The_Blue New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2009
    Messages:
    1,988
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Roll up !!!

    Roll up !!!

    Get your tickets now before they all go ... only 88 days remaining and just 99171 tickets remaining !!!

    FOURTEEN tickets given away in TWELVE days ... by that show of a ticket a day basically there will ONLY be 99083 left ... so be sure to get yours in early !!!

    http://www.nycfor911truth.com/pledgetobethere.htm

    And NOT one single penny further forward either ... STILL 0% of the asked for amount.

    Seems the sofa situation ain't doing much better either ... STILL nobody offering sofa-surfing to the whole SEVEN that asked ...

    http://www.eventbrite.com/event/1464234565?ref=ecal

    Yet another craptacular dose of fail to chalk up ... it hasn't even happened yet, but still everybody sane and rational knows it is going to be one gigantic, stupendous flop !!!
     
  9. candycorn

    candycorn New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,633
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    You'd have to look long and hard for a movement that is more pathetic; even their graphics are shameful.

    [​IMG] lol
     
  10. I_Gaze_At_The_Blue

    I_Gaze_At_The_Blue New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2009
    Messages:
    1,988
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Too true ... has any "movement" ever failed so often or been so ineffectual ... not one single thing they put their mitts on works ... Pangea Ultima will come sooner than Da Twoof ever will !!!

    http://www.scotese.com/futanima.htm
     
  11. candycorn

    candycorn New Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 4, 2008
    Messages:
    2,633
    Likes Received:
    6
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I want to buy some property where that lake in the middle is going to be!

    The truth (pun intended) is that there will likely be 7,000 people there on their side of the coin this year because its a landmark commemoration. Some yutz with a bullhorn will tell them where to stand, when to walk, when to stop selling things and look concerned. And 3.5 seconds after they disperse nobody will have a clue who the yutz with the bullhorn was or who the yutz standing next to them was.

    Each year at The Burning Man, we basically went through the same thing (which is why I'm toying with the idea of not going this year). It's become more or less an anarchist vacation rather than people like me who want to spend a week or just a few days unplugged.

    http://burningman.org/

    Their FAQ sheet is about 5 pages long if you try to print it; the last one is this humorous passage:

    Yeah, 5 pages of advice then? Like having permits to drive to another campsite? Like $20 to re-enter Black Rock City? In their defense, they are trying to keep it manageable which is admirable. But in doing so, they are strangling it; some things are only exist because they are meant to be boundless and spontaneous.


    Of these "some thing" I speak...
    The truth is one;
    The truth movement is not.

    If blackrockcity LLC (ugh!) would take over the twoof movement, they may have a leadership, dues paying members, a presence in the national debate, guerrilla marketing, a code of conduct, a central body organizing and sanctioning events, streamlined messaging, and this little thing called effectiveness. In other words, just what you want from a political or social organization; not from a festival for (admittedly) 20-30-or even 40 something pseudo-intellectual, socially jaded yuppies looking to get their groove on.

    Hope this is making sense; I'm trying to run out the clock so I don't have to do Yoga this morning.
     
  12. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    'Fraud: why do you link to a 'death beams from space' site in your first post? Do you endorse Dr. Wood and her theories?
     
  13. BullsLawDan

    BullsLawDan New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    5,723
    Likes Received:
    98
    Trophy Points:
    0
    LOL... Fraud posted the OP. He made the initial claim.

    Yet when people question that initial claim, he insists that others need to answer other, unrelated questions first.

    He can't just admit he got too excited posting all these "great" links and didn't read this one. Or, he can't admit his laser beams from space theory won't hold up to the light of day.

    The best part of being a twoofer is never having to admit you're wrong, I guess. I mean, everyone knows you're wrong, you just never admit it.
     
  14. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Laser beams. That's what you choose to focus on. "Fascinating".
     
  15. BullsLawDan

    BullsLawDan New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    5,723
    Likes Received:
    98
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yes, I focus on the main part of the claim first.

    Now, can you answer the question, or has this thread just become another one of your hit-and-run posts?

    Here's a fun game we can all play: Let's count how many times Fraud dodges the question raised by his original post before he answers it.
     
  16. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    'Fraud: why do you link to a 'death beams from space' site in your first post? Do you endorse Dr. Wood and her theories?
     
  17. psikeyhackr

    psikeyhackr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2009
    Messages:
    1,601
    Likes Received:
    188
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Is that dude for real? I did some searches and finally searched on STEEL.

    He claims to talk about the LENGTH of steel in the building. He then does the height of all of the columns and the spandrels around the perimeter. I see NOTHING about the Horizontal BEAMS that were on every level in the core. How does he manage that with his A level degrees in a 337 page book? Purdue has the horizontal beams in their simulation.

    http://psikeyhackr.livejournal.com/1276.html

    In a way it is funny but even more it is really annoying. Why should people on either side be taken seriously when ERRORS like that occur. The horizontal beams should have been another 50,000 meters of steel. He let it disappear into space. He is as bad as the NIST. :mrgreen:

    psik
     
  18. psikeyhackr

    psikeyhackr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2009
    Messages:
    1,601
    Likes Received:
    188
    Trophy Points:
    63
  19. psikeyhackr

    psikeyhackr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2009
    Messages:
    1,601
    Likes Received:
    188
    Trophy Points:
    63
    I got this response:

    I still don't see any calculation for the horizontal beams in the core there.

    psik
     
  20. RtWngaFraud

    RtWngaFraud Banned

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2011
    Messages:
    20,420
    Likes Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The "main" part. I see. Perhaps this is a good spot for you to "refocus" the thread (or at least call for backup).
     
  21. Hannibal

    Hannibal New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2009
    Messages:
    10,624
    Likes Received:
    13
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Nothing to refocus on. It's your link, in the OP.

    'Fraud: why do you link to a 'death beams from space' site in your first post? Do you endorse Dr. Wood and her theories?
     
  22. BullsLawDan

    BullsLawDan New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    5,723
    Likes Received:
    98
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It's your thread. You are the one who posted the OP, in which you linked to an article that says giant laser beams from space destroyed the WTC, and that no planes were used at all.

    That became, by virtue of the rules here, your claim to defend.
    I have no idea what you mean by this.
     
  23. NAB

    NAB Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2009
    Messages:
    1,821
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Dance monkey, dance.
     
  24. psikeyhackr

    psikeyhackr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2009
    Messages:
    1,601
    Likes Received:
    188
    Trophy Points:
    63
    I sent him another email:

    psik
     
  25. psikeyhackr

    psikeyhackr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 23, 2009
    Messages:
    1,601
    Likes Received:
    188
    Trophy Points:
    63
    This is ridiculous. That building could not withstand the wind without all of that horizontal steel in the core but it is OK for everyone to just forget it for TEN YEARS.

    psik
     

Share This Page