George de Mohrenschildt's Daughter Speaks to a Reporter After Her Father's "Suicide"

Discussion in 'JFK' started by resisting arrest, Jun 3, 2016.

You are viewing posts in the Conspiracy Theory forum. PF does not allow misinformation. However, please note that posts could occasionally contain content in violation of our policies prior to our staff intervening.

  1. Your Best Friend

    Your Best Friend Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2016
    Messages:
    14,673
    Likes Received:
    6,996
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Do you think I believe a syllable of the Warren Commission? Even after I called their report "ridiculous" (#23)? You got a wrong number, for sure.
     
  2. Your Best Friend

    Your Best Friend Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2016
    Messages:
    14,673
    Likes Received:
    6,996
    Trophy Points:
    113
    He's on my f(*)(*)(*)ing ignore him list.
    You should read his comments on Jack Ruby and Dorthy Kilgallen sometime in one of the other threads. They are priceless (in a super ignorant sort of way)!
     
  3. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,909
    Likes Received:
    3,589
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Quote one specific passage from the Warren Commission which is a lie and show evidence that it is a lie.

    Name one specific omission and state why it is an omission.

    The crock of **** is Jim Garrisons massive failure at attempting to prove a conspiracy he was publicly crushed and humiliated and absolutely proven wrong.

    He realized nothing of the sort he merely jumped on a band wagon to get some media attention to help his local election chances,
     
  4. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,909
    Likes Received:
    3,589
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Like many things you lie about habing me on ignore and have done so many times. Every time you make that claim you end up responding.

    My comments were spot on and accurate proving you wrong
     
    Last edited: Apr 5, 2017
  5. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,909
    Likes Received:
    3,589
    Trophy Points:
    113
    You never read the report and have no clue what they wrote
     
  6. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,909
    Likes Received:
    3,589
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Wrong his death was suicide and no evidence disputes that conclusion
     
  7. jack4freedom

    jack4freedom Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2010
    Messages:
    19,874
    Likes Received:
    8,447
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The only thing that Jim Garrison failed to prove was that Clay Shaw was involved in the conspiracy. It seemed that all of the others involved were either dead or had been scared into lying. JFKs murder was obviously a result of a deep conspiracy. Howard Hunt admitted to it before he died. That it was a conspiracy is a foregone conclusion. Exactly who was involved and how they pulled it off is debatable.
     
  8. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,909
    Likes Received:
    3,589
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Wrong he failed to prove anything at all concerning a conspiracy.

    It seems means that you have no information at all about these claims. Nor is there any evidence to support them. Ruby for example lived on for years speaking to many people and always maintained no conspiracy.

    JFK's murder was not the result of a conspiracy obviously or suspiciously you need evidence to support this claim and you can cite NONE which has never been discredited and debunked.

    Howard Hunt admitted nothing at all he merely babbled incoherently while languishing with dementia. On the other hand at least 100 men have admitted being the other assassin and ALL have them have exactly the same credibility as Hint and each other meaning none at all.


    That there was a conspiracy is an empty supposition without evidence.

    Now answer the questions.

    Specifically quote one passage from the warren commission which is a lie and show evidence that it is a lie.

    Specifically cite one omission from the report and show why it was a deliberate omission.

    Your claim rests heavily on whether you can answer.
     
  9. jack4freedom

    jack4freedom Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2010
    Messages:
    19,874
    Likes Received:
    8,447
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Were you involved in the murder?
     
  10. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,909
    Likes Received:
    3,589
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Already clearly answered now you answer.

    You have made baseless assertions which requires some support and evidence.

    Quote one specific passage from the Warren Commission report which you claim is a lie and show evidence that it is a lie.

    Your assertions absolutely relies on your being able to do so

    Show one specific omission and evidence that it was deliberately omitted.

    Your assertions require this as well.

    Don't be a complete coward and liar like yourbestfriend go ahead and step up
     
  11. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,909
    Likes Received:
    3,589
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Answer the questions or it proves you are wrong and debunked
     
  12. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,909
    Likes Received:
    3,589
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I see can you cannot answer.

    This is a de facto admission by you that you are wrong and the warren commission conclusion was correct and accurate and you know it is.
     
  13. Your Best Friend

    Your Best Friend Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2016
    Messages:
    14,673
    Likes Received:
    6,996
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Me? Seriously? I couldn't get out of school that day.
     
  14. Your Best Friend

    Your Best Friend Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2016
    Messages:
    14,673
    Likes Received:
    6,996
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No. But his father was identified as one of the "three tramps" arrested at the famous grassy knoll in Dallas just after the shooting
    and then just released by the police. http://jfkmurdersolved.com/lois1.htm

    You have to wonder what sort of investigation just let suspects walk away? The answer? The sort of investigation that
    doesn't want the killers identified....he has already been determined beforehand.
     
  15. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,909
    Likes Received:
    3,589
    Trophy Points:
    113
    None of them were Howard Hunt.

    The Dallas police clearly identified these men as Harold Doyle, John F. Gedney and Gus W Abrams. They were originally arrested and due to the simple fact that they were in the area without explanation. Until they were released on November 26 due to the fact that there was no evidence of any kind of any wrong doing on the part of these men other than jumping trains.

    The link provides no evidence to dispute this it only makes a baseless claim that it was not these men but the Dallas arrest records prove otherwise and that proof is conclusive and unchallenged.

    BTW the link also says none of them were Hint and Hunt's story is not credible and full of massive holes such as his family placing him at home at the time of the shooting.

    Once again facts ruin your claim
     
  16. Your Best Friend

    Your Best Friend Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2016
    Messages:
    14,673
    Likes Received:
    6,996
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Jack Ruby said as much in jail after he was put up to snuff out Lee Harvey Oswald so it was certain he would never get his day in court.
    He said that powerful men were interested in seeing the matter settled and never reopened again and that no one would ever know the true story. He specifically mentioned Lyndon Baines Johnson as one of those men.

    Funny how Ruby languished in jail begging to be taken to Washington DC to tell his story to Earl Warren and his commission and the "fact finding" body just didn't think it was necessary to get the live testimony of one of the crime's central characters on the record.
    Ruby died in custody insisting he needed to tell his side of things but as a long time government informant, who did the Dallas police and the conspirators many favors (including shutting up Oswald for good) he had to know he
    had been one of those dispensable patsys himself.

    That sort of dedicated digging was a hallmark of the Warren Commission and all they were really dedicated to was shutting down the furor
    and burying the crime from beyond human view for eternity.
     
    Last edited: Apr 8, 2017
    jack4freedom likes this.
  17. Soupnazi

    Soupnazi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    18,909
    Likes Received:
    3,589
    Trophy Points:
    113
    He never said that his lawyers did.

    He was not put up to kill Oswald he did so on his own personal initiative and was adamant about that fact until he died.

    He did testify to the Warren Commission they went to him.

    There were no such conspirators and you cannot name one lie from the Warren Commission
     

Share This Page