its called 'grandstanding', something pelosi or schumer should have done but, once again, failed their peeps...
Good god. What short memories we have. It was bush who started the war in Iraq the killed at least 400.000. Bush knew that Saddam didn't have wmd's. It didn't bother him that innocents would be killed. And before you people with such selective bad memories start to say that republicans are the war mongers, don't forget the hundreds of thousands of children that died under Clinton's regime.
What’s interesting is nobody is interested in who actually perpetrated the fraud on W., Congress, and the citizens.
No but I think I am in one.. Or Donald just stepped on one and somebodies mothers back is broken.. poor old lady
"Frankly, that is because the mainstream media chose to write stories 90% negative. They werent interested in highlighting any obviously positive news. Because they are an arm of the Democratic Party." Rupert Murdoch is a conservative newspaper proprietor = mainstream media. He isn't an arm of the Democratic Party. I wasn't curious enough about GWB at the time to follow up on this.
What, are you ozzies jealous because we haven't sent you any free burgers and pizza? Don't you get enough funding and protection from us now? For ****ing free?
The fundamental difference here is we have an Australian who seems obsessed with what American presidents choose feed people that hates President Trump with the fire of a thousand suns and carries the guilt enough so he/she/alphabet is forced to praise a past Republican president. I would love to have read his/her/alphabets thoughts when Bush was sending US troops to Iran.
What treason? What war crimes? What fraud? What are you talking about? That Esquire article is simply an opinion piece.
Yes, GW liberated Iraq which is now more peaceful, democratic and prosperous than it has ever been. Saddam did have WMDs surely everyone knows that by now? https://www.cbsnews.com/news/us-secretly-takes-yellowcake-from-iraq/ https://www.nytimes.com/interactive...t/us-casualties-of-iraq-chemical-weapons.html As for Clinton, his was more a sin of omission as was Obama's with his weak foreign policy.
No it's not an opinion piece. It reports on the trial conducted in Malaysia in 2014, in accordance with international law. That you are in denial of facts is your own personal problem Rob, not mine.
I srsly think that serving burgers to college football players is waaaaaay worse than actual crimes against humanity...
No it's not, it's a 'trial' by a 'court' set up by a politician who denies the UN convention on human rights and set it up as he doesn't like the real court in the Hague, it had no authority and was not recognised by anyone. It was trialled in absentia so there was no defence and when it submitted its' findings to a real court they were rightly ignored. It means NOTHING!
And Mellie is racking up the Frequent Flyer miles on the government jets whilst the workers stand in line for food handouts
There was no defense because the defendants chose not to show up and defend themselves. If their hands were clean they could surely have provided evidence of that fact. But their hands were not clean. They lied to the world and to US citizens, and they committed military aggression and killed hundreds of thousands of innocent people. They tortured and murdered, and you defend it.
I think it hilarious how the right who were lauding GW when in office are now spitting on anything he does