GOA files petition for Cert in SCOTUS against NFA

It can, and if the case get there, it probably will.
HOW it rules depends on how the case is argued.

 

If it isn't required to make a firearm to function, and the function it enabled isn't restricted, there's no Constitutional reason to control them at all.

 

Funny story true story the only barrels that fit that gun are those made by the company with integrated suppressors.... so you're wrong but that's never stopped you before

 

I accept your concession.

 

That is a violation of forum rules....or so I have been told

 

And that means if suppressors are unavailable, firearms will not function?

 

What have I conceded?

 

For perhaps the 10th time now: For those firearms that only function with barrels that are integrated suppressors such as the example I linked you? YES.

 

There are no such firearms, as any suppressed barrel can be replaced by an non-suppressed barrel.
Barrel: essential and integral to the function of a firearm
Suppressor: not.

 

Suppressor: legally a firearm.

 

Irrelevant to the point I made.

 

Which is itself irrelevant with regards to the OP.

 

See link already provided one of many examples of an integrally suppressed barreled weapon.

Also as another poster has already pointed out : since suppressors are "firearms" by law it is in fact essential to the operation of a firearm: the suppressor.

Which is what makes it so perfect: the slimy little **** gibbons and their fudd enablers get hoisted by their own petard

 

A suppressor is not an integral part of a functioning firearm, period.

 

It's legally a firearm itself according to ATF.

 

Then there is even less legitimate reason for it to be subjected to restrictions under the national firearms act.

 

Understood, I don't agree, but that is the rule for now.

 

I hope the NFA is overturned, though I doubt it will be.

It was, from the outset, designed as an end run around the Constitution that never should have survived judicial review.

 

The USSC is changing and if Trump gets the chance if RBD retires, there might be a chance the NFA in it's entirety gets tossed out the window.

It would be an interesting change in the direction of gun banning, when the liberal anti-gunners wake up and discover they not only failed to ban the AR-15, but the M4 just became legal for private ownership.

Talk about liberal heads detonating.

 

Is your disagreement that it's a firearm, or that the ATF considers it as such?

 

That ATF considers it such.

 

The ATF also went on the record as stating it believes a shoelace is a fully-automatic firearm.

 

In regards to NFA 1934, it's listed as a firearm type on the Form 4. I don't see how it gets more unequivocal than that.

 

Then you totally missed my point.

 

No, they did not. Bump firing is not illegal.