Discussion in 'United States' started by flyboy56, May 25, 2019.
Sure, if you completely ignore Christian teaching that would be correct.
Are you SERIOUSLY defending MS-13? Who are you, Nancy Pelosi?
That's right. Are you saying that they should go there instead?
Why deport the Republicans if they are in favour of keeping legal immigrants? What does that achieve exactly?
Then such is simply too bad. The united states is a nation of laws.
nancy didn’t defend MS 13 either. I was just pointing out how unchristian your statement was.
I know. I was pointing out how unchristian modern Christians are.
Such is a side effect of modern Christians being subjected to malicious lawsuits in response for merely exercising their first amendment rights in who they wish to associate with.
2 Thessalonians 3:10 10For even when we were with you, we gave you this rule: "The one who is unwilling to work shall not eat."
It doesn't go against Christian principles to want to protect from invaders what one has built up, paid for and died for.
What free stuff did your ancestors expect to get from the ones that were here before you ancestors? Free medical? Free education? Free housing? Free food? Free utilities? Free phones and phone service?
Would your ancestors have survived back then without working their assess off?
But they don’t have such a right if they are a public accommodation. Religious belief does not exempt you from law.
But we aren’t being invaded. Illegals are invited in by republicans and democrat politicians.
Why was it unchristian? You didn't say.
If you were an actual Christian, you’d know
And public accommodations reserve the right to refuse service to anyone at their own discretion.
Not based on religion, race, gender and in several states sexual orientation.
Are you saying that this is a Christian country founded on Christian principles?
No intelligent person could infer that from my post.
You do seem to be basing our immigration policy on Christian principles so it only seems likely that they play some role in your view of America.
As I said, no intelligent person could infer that from my post.
And yet if the public accommodations refuse service but do not specify the exact reason for why they are doing such, those who are denied service have no legal recourse.
If I was an "actual Christian", I would know that calling people who cut kids' heads off "human waste" is wrong? Surely you can't be serious!
Separate names with a comma.