Hard Evidence

Discussion in '9/11' started by Shinebox, Sep 10, 2016.

  1. 9/11 was an inside job

    9/11 was an inside job Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    6,492
    Likes Received:
    102
    Trophy Points:
    63

    That link is full of hard evidence that 9/11 was an inside job.

    thats the UNDERSTATEMENT of the century.the game of chess is over with and with you doing all the checkmating.:thumbsup::clapping:
     
  2. 9/11 was an inside job

    9/11 was an inside job Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2011
    Messages:
    6,492
    Likes Received:
    102
    Trophy Points:
    63
    indeed,the only one who did a dodge is the OP ignoring you took him to school with your first reply to this thread.hee hee.
     
  3. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,163
    Likes Received:
    1,118
    Trophy Points:
    113
    The guy asks for Hard Evidence about 9/11 and when I produce the Hard Evidence (which has been here well before he started this thread), he claims it's a "dodge". You can't make this **** up.
     
  4. Shinebox

    Shinebox Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2015
    Messages:
    1,140
    Likes Received:
    47
    Trophy Points:
    48
    You can certainly make (*)(*)(*)(*) up though ... any evidence of explosives yet Bobb?? ...
     
  5. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,163
    Likes Received:
    1,118
    Trophy Points:
    113
    If you actually read through the thread, you would know I'm not NIST and have nothing to do with them so I didn't make anything up, the entire thread is based on NIST's own published EVIDENCE.

    There's nothing in the thread about explosives other than the fact that NIST did not investigate for that by their own admission. And that admission plus the fact that NIST did not investigate for explosives is HARD EVIDENCE, exactly what you asked for but claim it's a "dodge".
     

Share This Page