Hashtag thisismylane Drs vs NRA warning graphical content

Not at the rete of outer southern states, that didn't have concealed carry licenses.

 

Proof of that?

Probably not, because it doesn't exist outside the warped minds of anti-gun organization leaders.

 

It wouldn't matter

 

In other words, you are once again full of BS and cannot prove an iota of what you claim.

 

Prove it. Lol

 

Already did.

Guess that went over your head as well.

 

Marion hammer is a disgrace to this country

 

@Derideo_Te, why can't you explain how the Democrats fear the NRA?

 

Except Florida, with it's large snowbird population, trends more like NY than Mississippi. You're just stretching data without cause and effect parameters. The economy improved - lower crime. Lower unemployment - lower crime. Going to have to call bullcrap on your claim.

 

You're rowing in the same boat, dude.

 

Under longtime Democrat rule, as well; most likely.

 

Prove this.

 

No, but if you want me to understand the garbage that you are coming out with, THAT DOES require you to walk me through it! It is YOUR garbage!

Here is your garbage:

 

Can't the patients simply decline to answer them?

 

Wouldn't the amount of ammo be relevant in determining how strong and effective a militia force is?

Says who?

 

Why can't you do your own research?

You have exactly the same internet access as I do and if you are curious about something there is no reason why you can't look it up for yourself.

These are the kinds of links you will find when you search for "NRA intimidation of Congress";

https://www.theodysseyonline.com/odyssey-interview-congressman-alan-grayson

https://www.newsweek.com/congressman-brandishes-weapon-during-meeting-constituents-876359

https://www.worldpress.org/article.cfm/nra-money-to-congress

 

Yup, and so would a firearms registry!

The FF's who wrote the 2nd Amendment.

 

Thank you for conceding that you were WRONG about the CDC and that study.

 

That still does not alter the REALITY of what the FF's actually DID with the Militia Acts.

 

Thank you for conceding that the FF's did create a registry of firearm owners per the 2A's "WELL REGULATED MILITIA" clause.

 

What's with anti's dishonestly claiming they have been given a concession when none was extended? It is not only blatantly dishonest, but is a not well concealed attempt at flame baiting, a violation of forum rules.

 

Ironic PROJECTION duly noted and ignored for obvious reasons!

Here is a RECAP as to what just transpired!

The former is an accurate factual statement by Rucker61 that DT accepted and subsequently thanked Rucker61 for his willingness to concede to the factual reality of what the FF's envisioned in the 2nd Amendment and ENACTED via the Militia Acts.

 

And is determining how strong and effective a militia force is the purpose of a firearms registry today?

Where is it written that the "concept of a WELL REGULATED MILITIA calls for a national database?"

 

Without that registry information how would you know?

What does the term "well regulated" mean?

Explain how else you would regulate a militia without having any clue whatsoever as to the numbers of men and firearms available?

 

He doesn't say HOW they were intimidated. Is the NRA kidnapping their families or something?
Regardless, isn't it up to the members of Congress to take personal responsibility and not be intimidated by the NRA? Intimidation is only how much you are willing to be intimidated.

What the hell does this one have to do with the NRA?

"If our leaders cross the NRA, they will never forget, and reprisals will quickly follow." It doesn't say WHAT "reprisals."

"But if our leaders cross the gun violence prevention movement, there are zero consequences, so it’s an easy decision for those in power who want to stay in power." Again, personal responsibility - if they bow down to the NRA because they "want to stay in power" then that is on THEM, not the NRA! "They go with the money." What, like bribes?