Hashtag thisismylane Drs vs NRA warning graphical content

Know what?

I'm not denying that information was gathered for the purposes of a well regulated militia.

 

Why don't you research threats to members of Congress for yourself to find out instead of just pretending that it isn't happening?

Classic example as to how NRA behaves when it comes to using their guns to intimidate others.

Obviously you have never bothered to do any research for yourself on this subject.

 

Read your own post!

 

Talk about dreaming things up, like the NRA has guns to intimidate politicians with.

 

Any individual (they don't have to be a physician) is allowed to speak up and research any topic that is on their interest list. I would say including you, but for the fact that you are a foreign meddler in our affairs.

Regardless, my doctor, or should I say surgeon, is FULLY aware that I own firearms, and doesn't care. As he has rightly concluded that I'm not the type of person that stands a danger to anyone who doesn't deserve it.

 

Denial of the existence of death threats by NRA members is disingenuous.

http://www.brooklyneagle.com/articl...ys-he-getting-death-threats-anti-nra-comments

 

You didn't even bother to read the story, "Trolls & bots came out in full force. Called me fat, said I should resign, etc. I laughed."

Not a mention of any threats from NRA members.

Nice try at promoting another lie, but typical for those who hate the NRA and it's membership.

We don't threaten anyone anywhere, except at the ballot box, and that is where our power originates from.

 

Try telling that to people like Gabby Giffords!

 

Irrelevant, she wasn't shot by an NRA member.

 

Good for you

Now don't you think that research has international repercussions?

Oh! And I will stay away from American politics when you lot stop spreading poisonous mupyths about guns

 

How do you know?

 

Because I dug into it when she was shot by Loughner.

 

http://nymag.com/intelligencer/2018...vivor-gets-nra-death-threats-on-facebook.html

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...da-shooting-twitter-dana-loesch-a8240341.html

 

Hogg has been proven to be less than truthful, as such his comments are to be taken with a grain of salt.

He recently blamed the NRA for him being rejected by two California colleges after digging into the claim we proved it to be another anti-NRA Hogg-wash, he was rejected because his GPA didn't meet the requirements for admission.

There is nothing threating about that video promoting Loesch's new program.

 

Such is neither proof nor evidence. Such are nothing more than opinion pieces by those who are upset by due process of law being a thing they have to deal with. The above articles are nothing more than the incessant whining of individuals who are throwing temper tantrums over not getting their way.

 

Such, however, is not evidence that NRA members are the ones committing the supposed death threats.

Barring evidence to the contrary, this is just another fake hate crime, as has been so well documented in previous accounts.

http://www.fakehatecrimes.org/

 

Jared Loughner was not an NRA member, nor affiliated with the group in any way. Therefore the point being raised on the part of yourself is irrelevant and immaterial.

 

Kneejerk denial of factual information duly noted and ignored for obvious reasons.

 

Kneejerk denial of REALITY given that it was NRA meetings that were involved is risible.

 

It is not factual information, but rather opinion pieces. Come back with something that amounts to actual facts, or cease wasting the time of others present with what amounts to nothing more than conspiracy theories.

 

Kneejerk denialism of the NRA's SUPPORT of the mentally unbalanced having access to lethal firearms duly noted!

 

Ironic PROJECTION duly noted!

 

Hardly, what I posted where the words of the person claiming to have been threatened and not once was it mentioned, those words came from or where related to the NRA.

The actual wording since you missed it was "Trolls & bots came out in full force."

 

The article was read, and nothing pertaining to threats of death submitted by members of the NRA was to be found. To the contrary, the article speaks of the councilmember being the one to engage in open, unprovoked, unjustified hostility and threats against not only the NRA, but firearm owners in general. Going by the article in question, the individual, Justin Brannan, is being subjected to insults rather than death threats.

“Anti-gun individuals have been incredibly violent … targeted their families,” Loesch said about gun-owning victims supposedly under fire from violent liberals. “They’ve done horrible things and threatened to even kill law-abiding gun owner because these individuals hate guns so much.”

If Justin Brannan cannot tell the difference between profanity and death threats, perhaps he should not be holding public office to begin with.

 

Another factually deficient claim for which there is no evidence. Come back with actual proof or recant the statement entirely.