Have you told Mr Trump we are all going to die down here?

True fact, entropy is changed at the rate of gain and loss, by sending extra radiation at me , my entropy is being affected. You quite clearly know very little, is that an actual picture of yourself?

 

P.s do you think Trump got rich from being stupid? Mr Trump has a high IQ ,

Do you think Mr Trump became the president by being stupid?

Objectively you are full of ''beans''.....

 

Obviously....your coherence and grammar make it very clear.

 

''They'' always say that when they have no counter argument. Mock the poster instead of contesting their ideas, quite lame indeed.

 

LOL, the cartoon version of alarmism. Sorry observed science isn't cooperating with the cartoon but hey, everyone needs an hobby.

 

Do your REALLY need a Humvee to travel 600 meters to the local store?

 

Yeah suuuuuure

Backs away slowly

 

By "they" I must assume you refer to those who grasp basic scientific understanding and thus am I forced to accept the compliment. I am not necessarily mocking you as pointing out aspects of the reality that escapes you. Regardless...

Have A Nice Day

 

Your scientific understanding is mostly subjective and dogma. The whole world has been subjected to subjective thinking by the forced discipline of education. Like I said and I stand by it, the world is stupid and naive. I have studied science online for years, from day one I knew science was wrong and to this very day it is still wrong.

Would you like to debate the wrongness in science? Would you like to start with time? You will lose badly.

 

I will accept the challenge even knowing you begin with pre conceived bias that obviously dismisses the majority view. Please express your evaluation of time.

 

I think your problem might be "I studied science online". The internet is proof that if you gave a thousand monkeys typewriters something would emerge

 

Mocking people isn't science. Actually much, if not all of the alarmism isn't even based on science but designed to make an emotional appeal to sway the useful idiots to accept something they normally wouldn't if they used their thinking caps. I do find it funny that most here that repeat the dogma don't even have 'online science' under their belts.

 

Defining time : Time is a quantifiable measurement directly proportional to change.

Do you disagree with my evaluation?

 

Could you ever imagine somebody who was smart who never really got subjected to science education at school and then found science themselves, studied it to observe from a totally unbiased view some irregularities in science thinking. Nobody can tell me I will fail my exam if I do not mimic the answers taught. See the error in education? Education does not allow the smart people to ''shine''.
Education tells people what to believe and think.

 

That is one of many possible explanations or definitions, an extremely limited and simplified version however.

Any definition of time must inherently be contextual. However in its most base form time can be defined as the human reaction to changes in perceived reality.

 

There is no perceived reality in objectiveness. The reality is that time dilation does not occur and Einstein was incorrect. My time definition shows this to be true with various other things. Relativity is full of ''parlour tricks'' and the subjective belief is astonishingly stupid.

A simple fact is that any measurement of time greater than 0 becomes immediate history at any rate .

 

One has only the need to ask the colorblind to debunk your first statement. Experiments have been done to confirm time dilation right here on Earth:
"The Hafele–Keating experiment was a test of the theory of relativity. In October 1971, Joseph C. Hafele, a physicist, and Richard E. Keating, an astronomer, took four cesium-beam atomic clocks aboard commercial airliners. They flew twice around the world, first eastward, then westward, and compared the clocks against others that remained at the United States Naval Observatory. When reunited, the three sets of clocks were found to disagree with one another, and their differences were consistent with the predictions of special and general relativity."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hafele–Keating_experiment

My watch can be set to wake me up at a time in the future...yours can as well because it "Measures" future time.

 

The trouble is you do not have what is called the cognitive framework to judge even what is true science and what is pseudoscience

Withoutbthat you are flailing in the dark

 

Quite clearly you have no ability to do your own thinking, do you know the difference between time and relative timing? Relative timing being explained in the above link you presented which you really do not understand yourself or you would of not needed to provide such dogma and subjective of the link.
Quite clearly you have not read my paper posted in this forum section.

The link you provided shows a timing dilation, of course you do not know any better because my paper as yet to be published.

Please ignore the dogma and think for yourself .

Any measurement of time greater than 0 becomes immediate history at any rate. This postulate and axiom proves all Einsteins thoughts on time dilation and simultaneity to be wrong. It also shows the Lorentz contractions to be wrong. Your link which is greatly misinterpreted wrongly does not show me to be wrong. You will have to try better than provide something that is wrong, in fact you need to ''break'' my postulate. Believe me when I say it is unbreakable, nobody ever as yet contested the postulate, because that is an impossibility.
Good luck in trying to prove me wrong, I know already you can't, in fact nobody in the world can or the entire Universe.

 

Some of Einsteins thoughts are worse than pseudoscience.. If it is not 100% then it is not true.

 

Have a Nice Day

 

I rest my case, you could not even attempt to break the postulate , you know why? because I am correct and have chucked a spanner in 100+ years of science . You can go runaway now like most do, denial is just an excuse for ''fear''.

 

Actually, I simply realized that you are an ignorant troll of no value and decided to let you masterbate in peace.

 

Now comes the name calling and the normal accusations of ''your a troll''. I am sorry you got ''beat down'' in one sentence , it is not my fault I am smarter than you. I have no problem if you wish to remain naive and contempt in living lies, that is your personal choice. I have destroyed Lorentz and Einstein in one sentence, ''trolls'' are not that smart .

 

Thanks for your permission...ever wonder why you find it normal to be referred to as a toll?