Your work was done when you started asking questions that every eight grader knew how to find the answer to.
A fine source of false and misleading information, it's no wonder you are so incorrect on so many subjects.
I’ll say this slowly......it doesn’t matter. We regulate firearms regardless. Hawaii is little more permanent population then Boston. Neither Boston nor Hawaii will do anything but regulate.
As if a "priority to protect the most vulnerable among us" has ever existed for any government. You have to wake up and sniff the real world before you can even start to deal with it.
Trying to regulate what is already regulated, that's a sign of insanity for sure, and a typical anti-gunner thought pattern.
The EPA makes sure your water is safe to drink. Count on it Vegas. "According to the EPA, the spill occurred when one of its teams was using heavy equipment to enter the Gold King Mine, a suspended mine near Durango. Instead of entering the mine and beginning the process of pumping and treating the contaminated water inside as planned, the team accidentally caused it to flow into the nearby Animas River. Before the spill, water carrying "metals pollution" was flowing into a holding area outside the mine." CNN, EPA spill: 'The magnitude of it, you can't even describe it', By Dana Ford, Updated 6:30 AM ET, Mon August 10, 2015. https://www.cnn.com/2015/08/09/us/colorado-epa-mine-river-spill/index.html
Your assurances aside, you're simply wrong about what Hawaii is intending to do. Purposefully being unwilling to admit it is simply ludicrous at this point. Regulating firearms doesn't mean removing the right to bear arms. Which actually is what Hawaii is intending to do. Hawaii is attempting to remove the right to bear arms. I'll say it again for emphasis so you should now be able to understand the difference. Think you're King George all you want, it doesn't cut it in this country.
Ordinary Americans of good will can eventually come together and find real solutions to problems. But that can take a long time. He seldom slips into personal ad hominem, but it happens when so much phony hyped up partisan hate dominates the political discussion in the corrupt MSM. Both sides should cut each other some slack - at least while they are here.
No one should want Medicare or SS unless that is all they can have. They are both very inadequate. Which is inexcusable given the amount of money that flows into the USG and state governments.
My wife and I won't need SS but you damn well better believe we want it. We paid into we're damn well going to get it.
You do live in a dream world don’t you. It’s a mostly occurs as temporary use between law inforcement working in and out side their juristiction . You guys are funny. You’ll make believe anything is normal just to play cops and robbers.
Ha ha.....it’s olderfarders who need it. . No one is going to insure a poor or middle income old person whose retired on fixed income, why do you think it was devised ? I guess you haven’t thought this thing through have you.
Exactly.....we’ve been paying ours in for decades. SS is not a retirement plan. It’s an insurance plan. It qualifies you for Medicare and is a survival plan. Many older people use it for their golf dues. Without SS, half the golf courses in the country would close up.
I was a cop for ten years.....you’re always fearful of the public’s safety. That’s your job. We wouldn’t drive too fast, even to catch a speeder. The few times that we did encounter possible firearm danger, if at all possible, we secured the area first, protected ourselves and the public second and never thought about firing if possible till we got a supervisor there to make the decision. It’s all about training. Volunteers from the public ? Just asking for trouble and more public harm.