Head Of ‘Drag Queen Story Hour’ Org Arrested For Child Porn.

Kind of reminds me of all those priests who sexually assaulted kids, only the LBGT community didn't, you know, try to shuffle them off and hide what they did. Think of all the spiritual enlightenment those kids are missing because those priests are no longer in their lives.

 

You mean there isn't a thread about pedo priests? I'm shocked! You should start one!

 

They weren't 'priests', they were sexual deviants and predators, and the vast majority of them were homosexuals, but you keep peddling that idiotic narrative in the hopes that some day nobody will question it.

This is why that 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' farce was so ridiculous. Now the deviant community is all about brainwashing 6 year olds into believing they need severe sexual mutilations to be happy. Think of all the unnecessary mental illnesses and neurotic depressions those kids would be mussing if they weren't being groomed by homosexual predators in their lives. Of coure, homosexuals didn't hide, they proudly had NAMBLA at parades and in openly their ILGA list of member organizations, so you should be proud.

How is the latest disease the homosexual 'community' is spreading going to be resolved? Will it be a 'solution' like the AIDS Crisis was 'solved', by legalizing homosexual marriages to their pet monkies?

Of course, homosexuals still lead the world in new HIV infections, so apparently homosexuals are illiterates, since all the billions spent on education has completely missed the homosexual demographics for some reason.

 

What makes you think being gay is a perversion?

 

What makes you think it isn't? Some fake 'studies' by homosexual activist 'professionals' who 'peer review' each others' crappy People Magazine type methodologies and distorted 'data'?

One of the funnier ones was that Big Giant Finger Study that was all the rage some years back that was supposed to 'prove' a genetic basis caused homosexuality. Truly funny stuff.

 

But plenty would be when they get it 'normalized' or treated as a 'mental health issue' as opposed to being locked up and quarantined where they belong.

 

But never 'rights' movements with NAMBLA as members though , right? Those are 'special' to you, and all oppressed n stuff.

 

A lot of people just mispell 'libertine', is all, or they don't have a clue what 'libertarian' even is, they just make up stuff to fit whatever silly extremist view they;re peddling at the moment. It's called 'NAMBLA Logic by one wit:

"NAMBLA" logic - an extreme absolutist position which demands that for logical consistencies sake that certain gross crimes be allowed, in order that no one might feel restrained." - Stirling S. Newberry


Here is the guy whose big giant government statue is the Libertarian Party's symbol on how he would likely handle people like NAMBLA and homosexual perverts grooming kids:

very society has a right to fix the fundamental principles of its association, and to say to all individuals, that if they contemplate pursuits beyond the limits of these principles and involving dangers which the society chooses to avoid, they must go somewhere else for their exercise; that we want no citizens, and still less ephemeral and pseudo-citizens, on such terms. We may exclude them from our territory, as we do persons infected with disease.

Thomas Jefferson to William H. Crawford, 1816

 

So I'm assuming you have a degree in this subject, conducted thorough studies and have those studies peered reviewed for you to say any study supporting the LGBT community are fake, right?

 

By quantity, there are more straight molesters, than molesters who are LGBT. However if you control for population, the numbers even out. So people of the LGBT community are no more dangerous to kids than straight people.

 

Yes, an argument that fails to note that homosexuals make up maybe 2 % of the population, yet commit 35% to 50% of kiddie rapes, which of course far exceeds the ratio for 'straight' molesters. And, as we know from the last major FBI infiltration of the NAMBLA gay rights org, they will also molest little girls if there aren't their preferred little boys around.

 

So post some, along with the actual 'studies' themselves, so we can all see the methodologies used for ourselves then, if you think they're all 'real Sciencey n stuff'. Not reviews, not up eds citing them, but the studies.

 

first it was preachers molesting little girls and boys.... now it's drag queens, what is the world coming too

 

I guarantee that is not the position of the Libertarian Party, and likely no actual libertarians.

 

Of course you can; libertarians don't have any real life positions, and therefore can't be criticized, according to them anyway. But, they are very much fans of hedonism, homosexual marriages, and other public displays of degeneracy and deviancy. They get along great with left wing culture warriors, no surprises there since their 'Utopia' looks pretty similar to the Communist 'Utopia'. They just want to skip the middle part of the process is all.

 

And where is your source for that?

 

I'm not the one making the claim. It's up to you to show that for one, being gay is a perversion, and two, any study that says otherwise is biased and fake.

 

So you can't refute squat. I already know that, as does anybody else who eve actually looked at the evidence and history. It is you abnormal who are obliged to prove your fetishes are harmless, so as usual you have it backwards. Go ahead and post all those 'studies' for us showing homosexuals aren't mentally ill and are 'normal', and they never had pedophile organizations as a proud and open part of their 'rights' organizations; we would all love to see the methodologies and data collection methods used to arrive at all that wonderful 'science' you fetishists claim is valid.

 

Where is your source that refutes it? Show us the studies.

 

Again, provide evidence that every study supporting LGBT people is fake.

 

He who makes the claim provides the evidence.

 

Incorrect. Harm is a positive in the sense of proving something. Harmless is a negative. You cant prove a negative. Thus the one making the positive claim must prove theirs.

But here is the big question. Are you going to bother to do anything other than claim that any studies that show that homosexuality (which is not the topic of the thread BTW) is not a mental illness are created by liberals and apologists and what ever other name you are calling such groups?

 

Technically, you have to provide the study that proves them real. That same principle of positive claim holds to you as much as it does to him.

 

I would, if I first stated that every study supporting the LGBT community is accurate. But in actuality, I only asked him to back up his claim. I never made any assertions of my own.

 

Since it's clear the advocates of homosexual fetishists will not post any 'studies' proving homosexuality isn't everything they claim themselves, and what I've said is false, then it's also clear they either haven't read any of them and have no clue, and aren't here to back anything they say up but are only here to merely troll and harass, or they are liars and have read them, and already know what I said is true and factual and therefore are afraid to post them.

One, they've all been posted before, many times, so go find the original posts and ask your questions there instead of begging somebody to repeat then ad nauseam

Two, I didn't question anybody on anything, so either the people sniveling about what I've said can show us all these 'studies' they claim refuted my claims or they can go troll somebody else with their 'normalization' campaigns.

Three, the topic is indeed about allowing homosexual fetishists to groom children, so of course it's the topic.

Four, I always call homosexual fetishists homosexual fetishists, not liberals, not apologists, not anything but what they are. People who know there is something wrong and sick about them are the people who hide them behind euphemisms like gay'. Of course, other deviants will object to correct labels, since if they can sell homosexual fetishism as 'normal' then they can also market other neurotic sick behavior as 'normal', too.

So, post the 'studies' and let us look at all this 'affirmative science n stuff' re homosexuality and have a look at their methodologies and data collection methods. Why are those who advocate sexual fetishes as political causes suddenly afraid to back up their claims?