Head Of ‘Drag Queen Story Hour’ Org Arrested For Child Porn.

Well, they never will, and they will then spam us with alleged 'refutations' that are links to advocates, and never to the 'studies' themselves. That's because they know they're fake 'science'.

 

I'm still waiting for you to back your claims. What study do you have that illustrates every study that supports LGBT is false?

 

Are you illiterate? Do show me where I said there was a study that says every study is false.

Just admit you've either never read any study relating to homosexual fetishism at all, or you know they're all just bullshit propaganda. Again just post any studies that prove homosexuality is 'normal'. We can all see for ourselves just how 'scientific' they are.

 

True enough in and of itself, and I didn't intend to imply that you had made an assertion. Merely pointing out that what you asked for cannot be done.

 

As have the studies for what you asked for, so pot, kettle, achromatic.

T

Where did I say anything about you questioning anyone? Strawman much?

No the topic is about transgenders, not homosexuals. The fact that you automatically assume that transgenders are homosexuals pretty much shows that you are ignorant on the topic. And I am not saying that you have to agree with it in order to be not ignorant.

You must be young to talk about gay being a euphemism. Gay, when it started being a word associated with homosexuality, was initially a pejorative, an insult. The homosexual community simply turned it around and made it acceptable. But they were not the ones who started the use of it. And homosexual is a correct label. I'm guessing that if you feel that gay is a euphemism then straight is also a euphemism. Otherwise your claim of euphemism makes no sense. Which is usually standard for those who get hysterical on what other people do that doesn't actually affect them.

Another pot kettle moment. First off, psychologically speaking, fetishes are not, in and of themselves, considered any kind of negative status. They enter the realm of a problem, when they interfere with the life of the person who has the fetish or when that person begins to impose it upon another. And, because I know where you will go with that line, it is not imposing upon you when it is openly discussed, unless you want to accept that Christians openly discussing their morals is imposing them upon others. So talking about a spanking fetish is not imposing that fetish upon you, but trying to spank you without your consent would be. Secondly, why are those who claim sexual "fetishes" as political causes to ban the "fetishes" suddenly afraid to back up their claims? Oh, You say that those links have already been provided? So have the ones saying the opposite, so if you don't feel you have to post yours, why should anyone post theirs? Goose and gander.

 

Here.

You ask me to quote you saying that studies supporting the LGBT community are false and biased only for you to say that here? I'm still waiting for your evidence that being gay is a perversion as you have yet to illustrate that.

 

lol that isn't what I said, but you're desperate and need strawmen now. I'll ask again, so you can deflect again:

Where did I say there was one study that says all the studies are false?

And also again, why are you terrified to post any of those studies that prove homosexuality is 'normal'? I myself already know the answer to that, but lurkers might want to know what you're afraid of seeing in them.

 

lol more pompous rubbish, no studies for us to examine. The fear is palpable here. You advocates are challenging my claims, so let's see the scientific proof I'm wrong. And lying about the origins of using 'gay' as a euphemism for homosexual fetishism doesn't help your credibility any, nor does your reliance on long winded rubbish.

 

I'm not the one claiming that homosexuality is a perversion. You are. Therefore it is up to you to prove that assertion. He who makes the claim provides the evidence. Until then, I'm not obligated to back up anything I say.

 

Pot kettle achromatic

You challenged our claims first so where is the scientific proof that we are wrong? If you want to use the excuse that they are already present in other threads, then that reasoning is equally valid for us as well. Goose and gander.

And what part of the origin of the word use are you claiming is a lie?