Hi, my name is José Luís from Colombia. The point is that my writing is not very good and I need to know if this text has sense. Human rights have a long antagonistic tradition against the legitimacy and sovereignty of independent countries, and the institutions that monitor and protect it IGOs were viewed with greater suspicion, due to their very existence that questions the independence, sovereignty and legitimacy of the countries. Since decisions of these institutions exist in political situations where a member state is under pressure to confront terrorist groups that questions their legitimacy, this country is under a double pressure of legitimacy undermining, creating a defensive status when legal decisions are taken against him. This makes that countries wish to cut ties with who questions their legitimacy as an expected result. Even so, members of the political elite should think hard about doing it, because, although IGOs are incomplete Leviathans, they are unable to take direct enforcement action, but with the separation of IGOs a country undermines his legitimacy, segregating it from the brotherhood of nations and creating havoc at the diplomatic, scientific and economic levels. "IGO = interguvernamental organizations"
