Homosexual marriage

So homosexuals are correct because if you don't like them they will beat you up?

Might, err .... homosexuality makes right?

Let me marry Ken and pay me government bene's or I will beat you up?

Well, in that case, I rather dislike I bulllies and would say 'No' just on the priciple of the thing.

 

Did you read the post he was responding to? Dixiehunter's post is the one that suggested one party might do harm to another, and it sure as hell wasn't that gay couples should be instigating violence. Youenjoyme420 is just pointing out that not all gay men are the limp-wristed weaklings that homophobes fantasize about.

 

and now you are the one insulting

it is why the majority on the thread (even this section of the forum) are stepping on you

so now you are rewriting the bible?

perhaps reinterpreting it?

maybe even making up BS because your 'faith' is being challenged, by the evolution of knowledge?

the fringe is the adherant who cant sustain their faith as being founded

you opened up your post with an insult

It appears your posting is purely to do just that whenever you are found at fault.

quite the opposite. The dialogue of the thread is about homosexual marriage and whenever you make a claim, the material is found incorrect and then you insult as your redirect.

The failing character is observing in the posts you keep making.

jesus never said he was christ and charged his disciples not to call him that.

Jesus said 'another' is coming.

So which moron is a theist without integrity?

Nobody here is questioning jesus.

It is the neutral post that represents the ignorance of selfish pride and stupidity that returned to insults when found a liar.

quite the opposite. the bigot is the idiot that labels anyone who is not like them an atheist

problems can be solved if liars are held accountable, then the process of growth can begin with quality dialogue

how about you are in heaven and dont comprehend it, right now!

ie... what more do you want? Perhaps for everyone to be a fricken liar and hope someone else fixes your problems with integrity, honesty, compassion, responsibility and awareness of pure love.

 

Hey Neutral, you forgot to directly answer a question;

 

Lesbians want to come to Jesus. Jesus wants lesbians to come to Him.

 

Jesus was a Lesbian!

 

Do you believe that AIDS isn't a scourge for the heterosexual community as well?

Because Africa's infected population is reported to number in the multi-millions.

 

You have certainly spent an awful lot of your valuable time posting in such a stupid thread...

 

Proving Wolverine's point yet again... Well done!

 

And get ready to be called ignorant!

 

That is nothing new for that poster. In fact, it's nothing new for that poster to post something like that to look intellectual AFTER the fact.

Some browsed the username and found that he/she has been banned ALL OVER the internet!

 

This is not true.

http://www.avert.org/origin-aids-hiv.htm

 

This is not true.

http://www.avert.org/origin-aids-hiv.htm

 

I'd hope he'd try that with my friend the gay Marine.

 

Sure I am.

As we interrupt a thread about homosexual marriage with quotes from the OTthat have nothing to do with homosexuality or marriage, I am sure his point is something other than sheer ignorance and bad mouthing Christians?

Well, lets try this again, not the first time.

So, you are a tribal leader in the ME, and another tribe is making war on you. YOu have decided to fight, and, in a pitched battle, basically wipped out the tribes men ... leaving behind a bunch of women an children.

So, what do you do?

Do you leave them? Where, without a warrior group to protect them, they will surely fall pray to the either the desert or another tribe - who will most likely take them as slaves with no chance for marriage or integration.

Do you slay them all? Those who are innocent?

Or do you offer them a chance to join your society? AFTER they have proven they have let go of the animosity of battle?

I am sure you have a better solution though? Just as I am sure the intent of raising such a quote in a thread about homosexual marriage was about .... something other than the usual non-contextual slander atheists hurl like its supposed to be intelligent?

Is it are fault the lot of you are ignorant and just looks for reasons to call people stupid and violent?

Must be, because its never your fault.

 

I believe the scenario was "confrontation" not merely "dislike." So you do not believe if someone like Dixiehunter--a self-avowed gun-toting gaybasher were to "confront" a homosexual that said honosexual would be justified in "confronting" said gaybasher right back? To defend oneself against violence constitutes bullying in your book?

 

I don;t believe that is what I said AT ALL.

I said that it was devestating to the homoesexual communit because of high risk sexual behavior that is prevelant in the community.

That is apparently taboo though?

And in Africa, why is it so devestating? Why, because there was a culture of high risk sexual behavior where men in particular eschewed condoms even as they engaged in sex with prostitutes and others - ensuring the rapid spread of the disease.

That subject though, is not taboo?

Its the high risk sexual behavior that is the problem.

Really, need we through up emotional bocks like discussion the negatives in the homosexual community is just off limits?

 

Of course he read it. He ignores the parts he doesn't like.

 

Is that what was said?

Because, like your gay Marine friend comment, it was clearly might make right.

In inferrence very clearly being if you express something that a homosexual does not like, he'll kick your ass.

Supposedly, that means the opposite is OK?

Don't we already have one thread where we are discussing the atheist tendancy to shift context to just be contrarians?

Lets see if the standard is applicable - bullying is wrong no matter who does. See if you can apply it neutrally or objectively - for once.

 

Heh heh. Good luck. He won't.

 

I would just like to know why you refuse to respond to Wolverine's question regarding Leviticus. Actually, don't bother explaining yourself--I already know the answer to that one.

 

And?

Does might make right?

Its pretty simple. If someone does not like you because you are gay, beating them up or threatening them is not the correct way to go is it?

Quite frankly, I have seen a hell of lot more violence than anyone on this forum, and if you think it solves problems .... you're an idiot.

If you are easily goaded into physical violence .... you're an idiot.

If you thing vauge threats of beating people up through the internet is .. scary ... you're an idiot.

Whomever else might or might not have done it? Who cares. That's the one I read. And if homosexual are looking for equality, which is what this whole issue is about, then maybe they shouldn't be acting like spoild bullies.

I don't like bullies. Pretty damb easy.

Somehow though, that makes me a bad guy? You atheists are interesting folk.

 

I believe I just did.

Its amazing how many quetions are answered for you and you miss. Feel free to apologize again.

Then notice that you completely skipped over my questions:

1. How is the quote relevant?

2. What is your response to the question ACTUALLY raised by the quote in context? War.

I mean if that is how you and Wolv see homosexual marriage, as a form of warfare between two consentual adults you fear advocating the rape and enslavement of one another ...

My advice would be to seek either a sex or marriage counseler - or both.