Horror: Aborted Baby Parts Are Ending Up In Landfills, Says Ohio Attorney General ...

It can't be "separate" and "attached." One or the other. It can't be "individual" and "attached." One or the other.

 

It certainly isn't part of the woman, so yes it is an individual

 

I agree it should be able to, but currently it can't, so it needs to stay inside until it can, with exceptions or life of mother etc etc

 

Incorrect. You can kill in self defense if someone is trying to rape you, you can kill in defense of your property ie. if someone is breaking into your home. I'm pretty sure you'd be able to kill to prevent someone from stabbing you in a non vital organ area of your body.

 

Is the unborn trying to rape the woman, or harm her in anyway period? No.
And in a lot of cases you can not kill to save property and the amount of force used has to be reasonable to fend off the threat, if excessive force aka killing the attacker is used you will be charged and convicted of murder.

 

Then it IS part of the woman or it could survive on it's own from conception....

 

Nope! It is dependent upon its attachment.

 

And the forced-birth fetishists lose again...

 

More than likely if that is what you are seeing. Then you will never be caught up with reality. Which certainly, doesn't bother me any. Its like Poetic Justice.

 

Say what?


The GOP's long game to win the states.....

Republicans made historic gains in state legislatures in 2010. They held on in many states in 2012, or made up for losses in one state with gains in another — even though Democrats won the national election. And they won even more in 2014. This isn't an accident — it's the result of strategic fundraising from national Republicans, beginning in 2010, aimed at engineering statehouse takeovers. Out-of-state contributions were shuffled to states where they would make a difference, particularly as congressional partisanship and gridlock made policymaking in Washington increasingly unlikely. And at a time of national gridlock, state legislatures have done an immense amount of, well, legislating. Since 2010, 30 states, most controlled by Republicans, have passed a total of 205 new abortion restrictions. That's more restrictions than were passed in the entire first decade of the 2000s, according to the Guttmacher Institute:.....snip~

http://www.vox.com/2014/11/6/716428...14-state-legislatures-governors-party-control


Now who is laughing last.

 

You're PROUD of your sexism, misogyny and hatred for the freedom that America stands for? Hatred for half the people of your own country?!

Oh ya, that's what "Republican" is all about.


But abortion is still legal.........so frightened little righty "men" have more work to do to turn their female constituents into nothing more than breeding cattle ( Repub women already are ) Funny how the repub men have this strange obsession with women's insides...that's just isn't healthy or normal but obsessed they are...

 

When you shed your blood for that Freedom.....then you can talk. Until then, crystal balls and Ouija boards will never give you any correct answers.



Yes abortion is still legal. But that changes nothing about PP losing business, Donors, while still being investigated by States and those in Washington.

So terrified tiny lefty men just will have to deal with that.

As will PP while going Political.

 

""""When you shed your blood for that Freedom.....then you can talk"""


Baloney......NO one has to "shed blood" to have all the freedom ( FREE SPEECH) and liberty due an American citizen.


""""So terrified tiny lefty men just will have to deal with that.""""


Ridiculous but in keeping with your sexist/misogynist idea that it's all about men. It's women who will have to deal with it....you know , those people Republicans don't believe have any rights.

Yup, the Repubs appear successful at targeting and subjugating women ..... obviously terrified of women so they need to attack and control them....


No matter what happens to PP women will (and have) ALWAYS be able to have abortions, a power little men fear and envy.......

 

No, all those who serve in the US armed Forces already do that for the rest. Not that you know about that Pride.

Its women.....NOW know that PP doesn't stand for all women. They are against Republican women. Going after Republicans politically makes that point loud and clear.

Oh and believing that PP is the only one that is out there looking out for the best interests of women. Always was false!

 

Too bad the Republicans caved to reality and wound up not touching PP funding in the Omnibus bill. Looks like PP is safe at the federal level until at least 2018, and likely further than that after PP's lawsuits against states trying this BS make their way through the courts...

 

To bad the investigations didn't come to an end. To bad they lost Donors and Business. No relief for them, insight. Just the way it is.

Oh and they have to hope the Repubs don't win the election. As all of the Republican Candidates have stated they will defund PP. That would take place in 2017.

One less bell to answer.

 

MMC: ""Where do you get such drivel? NO one said those in the Armed services are the only ones to get Rights. Just how did you come up such with what was said to you."""


WHERE did I get that "drivel" ? ...From YOUR posts highlighted above in blue.....


And, yes, PP represents all DECENT women who believe women are citizens who deserve equal rights...


PS, try to learn the quote feature....

 

Then you clearly got lost while trying to make something up on the fly. Especially talking about someone you don't know.

Republican women are DECENT women who believe women are citizens who deserve Rights. One is even running for President. Look up Katie Pavlich's book it will help you out with that point.

 

No, I didn't get lost, you were quite explicit as anyone can tell from your words highlighted in blue....you think only those who "shed blood" for this country should have rights....

 

Yeah they can and guess what most can see how you went with your own thought process. Which couldn't comprehend with what was stated. As I never said only those in the Military had Rights. That was you making that BS up.

So yeah you got lost and still didn't understand the point I made.

 

The unborn harms the woman, even in 'textbook' pregnancies.

Abortion is the only way to get it to stop (in early term, when over 90% of them are done), so it is reasonable to fend off the threat.

- - - Updated - - -

You're the one talking about little Bo Peep.

 

The repuklicants need to put up a decent candidate if they want to win. So far, they haven't.

 

You're the on that can't figure out who that is. So the limitation is on you!