"House Passes Concealed Carry Reciprocity"

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by archives, Dec 8, 2017.

  1. jmblt2000

    jmblt2000 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 28, 2015
    Messages:
    2,281
    Likes Received:
    667
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Oh wow you got me...The problem is that North Carolina law does not supersede Federal which the BATFE is a Federal Agency. So even if North Carolina expunges the record, it is still logged in a Federal database. The person would have to have the State Attorney General lobby the Federal Government for the expulsion of Federal Records.

    Try again, by the way, one state of 50 does not epidemic make.
     
  2. archives

    archives Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2016
    Messages:
    4,980
    Likes Received:
    3,727
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Post directly above, gave you six with a two minute search, and as I said, if you read further you'll see lawyers advertising to perform the task for you
     
  3. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    47,848
    Likes Received:
    19,639
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Under each of these, a person can legally own a firearm.
    Not sure how you thnnk this negates what I said.
     
  4. NMNeil

    NMNeil Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2015
    Messages:
    3,073
    Likes Received:
    925
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I disagree.
    The 2nd amendment states the right to keep and bear arms. The word bear could readily be construed to mean weapons that a man can carry, which would preclude nukes.
     
  5. Pollycy

    Pollycy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    29,922
    Likes Received:
    14,183
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Actually, you make a very helpful, and useful point about the 'arms' being of such a dimension that a person could 'bear' them.

    But, you know what's coming next... "Yeh, but what about 'suitcase-nukes'...?" See? For every intelligent observation there's an idiotic counter-point.

    Clearly, it was the intention of the Founders of this nation that every law-abiding citizen should have the right to defend himself, his loved ones, and his property, and that this right necessarily entails the ability to use deadly force if necessary....
     
    ThorInc likes this.
  6. NMNeil

    NMNeil Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2015
    Messages:
    3,073
    Likes Received:
    925
    Trophy Points:
    113
    True, and when Big 5 start selling suitcase nukes it would be a problem.
    Look forward to my Sunday newspaper flyer
    "Labor dale sale. 20% off any nuke in the store"
     
  7. RedWolf

    RedWolf Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 20, 2010
    Messages:
    7,363
    Likes Received:
    1,633
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Is there any reason why law abiding citizens shouldn't be able to exercise their rights freely across the nation?
     
  8. Pollycy

    Pollycy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2008
    Messages:
    29,922
    Likes Received:
    14,183
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    You may not be far wrong! Did you know that, for instance, you can make a nuclear "dirty bomb" with a soft drink can-sized container of nuclear waste, wrapped around with a small jacket of C4 explosive? No, it wouldn't level a city, but it could put several square blocks of a major city off-limits for over a month. Now... what might something like THAT do to 'business-as-usual'...?
     
  9. TOG 6

    TOG 6 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2015
    Messages:
    47,848
    Likes Received:
    19,639
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Yes.
    The left hates the idea of an armed citizenry.
     
  10. NMNeil

    NMNeil Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 11, 2015
    Messages:
    3,073
    Likes Received:
    925
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Why?
    Sarin can be made in a home kitchen. Deadlier than any nuclear device.
     

Share This Page