How fake news is created, re: 911 hijackers

Discussion in '9/11' started by Eleuthera, Dec 6, 2018.

  1. Adam Fitzgerald

    Adam Fitzgerald Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2018
    Messages:
    67
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Gender:
    Male

    I already have. By pointing out one of the victims of the planes impact. Just saying you dont believe it isnt contradicting evidence.
     
  2. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    5,616
    Likes Received:
    1,901
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That you are so credulous as to believe fake evidence is a hallmark of those who still believe the official fantasy 17 years later. That you believe government propagandists does not mean that we all do.

    I am not so afflicted.
     
  3. Adam Fitzgerald

    Adam Fitzgerald Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2018
    Messages:
    67
    Likes Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    8
    Gender:
    Male
    Just because you claim it is fake wont make it fake. Unless you have empirical evidence to suggest it.
     
  4. Eleuthera

    Eleuthera Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    5,616
    Likes Received:
    1,901
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Just because you believe it is true does not make it true. We were all deceived in 2001. Many now understand that, but some don't and likely never will understand they were tricked.
     
    Bob0627 likes this.
  5. Bob0627

    Bob0627 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2015
    Messages:
    6,017
    Likes Received:
    1,065
    Trophy Points:
    113
    It's difficult to respond to your post when you are responding to the wrong quote and changing the point of my argument on top of that. What you quoted is NOT about the video, it's about your claim that there's nothing disputable with the alleged 4 planes and the hijackings as officially claimed. Please review your own posts, you're confusing 2 different issues.

    You've made claims about evidence that YOU decided coincides with the official narrative. There is a vast amount of literature that disagrees, questions or suspects that the evidence shows the official narrative is correct and I agree with quite a bit of that literature. In other words, it has all been disputed and that is not even debatable. You are in denial (or pretend to be).

    This is clearly false. I am not against the facts of what happened that day nor have I ever been. The facts of what happened that day are indisputable. The problem is no one knows what the actual facts of what happened that day are. The official 9/11 narrative does not represent the facts of what happened that day, it is a phony story designed to coverup the facts of 9/11 targeted for the gullible. This is supported by a mountain of evidence that I've written numerous posts on. That evidence is not mine, it stands on its own merit. And it seems to me you and others like you are attempting to defend and promote the official narrative as fact.

    You have not shown proof of anything about 9/11 despite your boast. You are not the source for 9/11 proof of any kind and never will be.

    False again. The burden of proof is not on me no matter how much you want it to be so. Nor can anyone prove a negative.

    Is that a joke? In trouble with what exactly? This is merely a discussion forum, not a place anyone should fear some kind of retribution.

    In fact your newest thread confirms 100% my opinion of you. It is so incredibly biased in favor of the official narrative and against those who don't believe it that I consider it wholesale indoctrinated propaganda trash.
     
    Last edited: Jan 2, 2019
    Eleuthera likes this.

Share This Page