How Feminism has Backfired leaving a generation of spinsters

Discussion in 'Women's Rights' started by SiliconMagician, May 2, 2012.

  1. SiliconMagician

    SiliconMagician Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2010
    Messages:
    18,921
    Likes Received:
    446
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ahh what delicious irony.

    A feminist on here tried to tell me that when I hit 40, I'll suddenly become a "creeper" (meaning that creepy old dude in the bar who hits on women way out of his league)

    Well I hate to tell you honey. "Creeperism" only applies to out of shape balding men who have been destroyed by a failed marriage.

    Men like me, who keep our bodies in shape, our attitudes dominant, and take care of our careers, will always have lots of options. My father is 55 and consistently dates beautiful women in their late 20's and early 30's. He would never be considered a "creeper". He maintains his muscular form, his youthful looks and the best part is he maintains a good paying career with lots of interesting hobbies. Women love older men when those older men are in shape and successful. They pine after it like a thirsty person in the desert.

    The fact is, men are able to remain sexually viable until at least their 60's and beyond.

    Women? The above quote is the fate you have for yourself.

    Remember this:Men who have lots of options, will always have lots of options. Women, only have options for a 2 decade window at best.. after that, they are useful for nothing but a quick Cougar pump and dump.

    Feminism freed men of all responsibility. We can have as much sex with as many women as we want and you won't stop us, because you like sex too. While plenty of weak mouse men will grow fat and bald. The best of us continue to take care of our bodies, maintain our careers and have way to many options in the new feminism to ever marry your asses.

    Enjoy your single mother spinsterhood because I can guarantee you I love the hell out of my single bachelorhood.

    It's a great time to be a "cad" because being one is no longer an insult, but a compliment.

    Some will say "you'll never find a "good" woman with that attitude."

    What is a "good" woman? One who offers me emotional support and love? Don't need it. Real men are their own emotional support. A "friend"? Don't need them for that either, I have a group of guys to bond with when I need friendly advice or to vent.

    In short, most men really don't need women for anything at all, except sex and luckily most of them are more than willing to give that up for the price of a few dates. Thanks fems. I look forward to screwing all of you.
     
  2. Viv

    Viv Banned by Request

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2008
    Messages:
    8,174
    Likes Received:
    174
    Trophy Points:
    63
    This of course, is total wishful thinking and nonsense. Your character is going to show up in your face at some point and then its curtains for you. Either that or you'll open your mouth and dispel any doubt about who you are.

    I am past your two decades and have more creepy twits annoying me now than I did in my teens. Your theory is cobblers.

    Regarding the quote in the OP, it strikes me as odd that anyone cares what their ex is doing 35 years on. I'm sure most don't even know where the ex is, unless there are children involved. It's a bit of a waste of a life if you spend it looking back, which I'm sure she doesn't. Probably just making it up as she goes along, in order to meet her deadline.
     
  3. Anders Hoveland

    Anders Hoveland Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2011
    Messages:
    11,044
    Likes Received:
    138
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I completely agree.

    My mother is actually one of these "self-made" women. Very financially successful. But unfortunately she is now all alone, in large part because of her career.

    Sad to say, but many women simply do not have the temperments for putting up with a high-pressure job. They have family responsibilities also, even the ones that are working full-time. Someone has to attend to the children, clean the house, make meals. Trying to "share" these responsibilities with the man just never works very well in practice, even when the men themselves say they are trying to encourage equality in the household. All that stress turns women women into crazy irritible creatures. And men do not want to get anywhere near them.
     
  4. Not The Guardian

    Not The Guardian Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2011
    Messages:
    2,686
    Likes Received:
    36
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Racist: Check

    Homophobe: Check

    Misogynist: Check

    Bigot: Check

    Delusional: Check

    Someone (no one in particular :)) on this forum better look forward to a few more years of living alone jacking off to pictures of women on the internet.
     
  5. Viv

    Viv Banned by Request

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2008
    Messages:
    8,174
    Likes Received:
    174
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Your mother apparently does have the temperament for "putting up with a high pressure job", as you say she is self made and apparently successful at it. Women are not required to put up with some ball and chain of a relationship just in order to be socially acceptable to men they don't care about. I'm sure if she wants company, it is easy to find.

    If time was lacking regarding parenting perhaps we can help with some of those abandonment issues and introduce balance, tolerance, understanding and humanity before the lack thereof causes unhappiness to said child in the real world.
     
  6. Anders Hoveland

    Anders Hoveland Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2011
    Messages:
    11,044
    Likes Received:
    138
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I really hope something can be done in society to help women.
    But I think we first need to recognise that there are inherent differences between the two genders, that are never going to completely go away, nor should they. Some of the "advancements" feminists have made have wrecked havok on the family, and caused both men and women more grief.
     
  7. Viv

    Viv Banned by Request

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2008
    Messages:
    8,174
    Likes Received:
    174
    Trophy Points:
    63
    You recognise away. Women are helping themselves in society, interested in their own rights and needs and the only way it's going to improve for children is if men grow up and start pulling their weight in the home. Women don't need them for financial support any more and are done idolising and spoiling lazy men, so if they don't man up and meet women half way in a fair and equal adult relationship they are going to be divorced.
     
  8. SiliconMagician

    SiliconMagician Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2010
    Messages:
    18,921
    Likes Received:
    446
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Why do you automatically assume I'm some lame ass loser who has to use porn, etc? I mean really. Does that make you feel better? It really doesn't change any of the facts about my life.

    I laugh at your assumptions, because each and every one of them are in fact, dead wrong.

    I don't even partake of porn, really. I hate the stuff. I don't like fantasy. I prefer the real thing, and I engage in activities guaranteed to get me the real thing. So while I'm sure your lame ad hominems make you feel better. Honestly, your assumptions don't affect the truth one bit.

    Just because you don't like the truth, doesn't make it not true.

    The fact is, beta males who don't get any.. don't think the way I do. Only men with lots of real sexual options have the balls to break free of the matriarchal social programming. I'm not "bitter" at women. I laugh at them for their attempts to demonize men like me who adapted so perfectly to the world they created.

    A world where the average 22-25 year old man is so lame and immature and feminized, a 35 year old is seen as a good catch for women of that age group.
     
  9. SiliconMagician

    SiliconMagician Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2010
    Messages:
    18,921
    Likes Received:
    446
    Trophy Points:
    0
    While this may hurt the vast majority of weak beta males, truly masucline men dont' give a (*)(*)(*)(*). I don't have to marry to have lots of gratifying sex therefore your threat of divorce is meaningless.

    What else ya got to threaten me with? Women most certainly are not cutting me off.

    Women can't use sex to blackmail me, because if they don't give it up, I dump them and find another one who will.

    So all your "power" that you had over men, the sexual monopoly predicated on patriarchal ideas of no-sex-without-marriage, is gone. There is nothing to hold over my head. I win.

    Men are very simple. We don't require all the emotional gratification that women do. We simply don't care about most of that stuff. We can provide it for ourselves.

    I mean really, what advantage is there for a man such as I to tie myself down with a one sided marriage contract? There is no benefit for me. Not legally, not financially. I'm going to be driving a BMW at 45 and still banging hot women in their late 20's and early 30's. So please.. by all means tell me exactly why I should be anythign but a cad, when it is so advantageous for me to do so?

    Save your moralist BS to. I'm not interested in hearing it. I have no "duty" to "be a man" by your definition of the term than you have a duty to "be a woman" by mine.

    Why should I "be a provider" when there is obviously very little, if any, personal benefit for doing so.

    Face it Fem.. you can't beat me. You set up the social conditions for your own loss. You have no power over me whatsoever and any ad hominem attacks you make against me are simply proof of your impotence.
     
  10. SiliconMagician

    SiliconMagician Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2010
    Messages:
    18,921
    Likes Received:
    446
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I also find it very very telling that the one fem who has the vagina to actually speak up, defends spinsterhood as a desirable outcome for most women. That is truly laughable. No real woman wants to become a spinster.
     
  11. yguy

    yguy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2010
    Messages:
    18,423
    Likes Received:
    886
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    This suggests the emotional aspect of your sexual liasons is of no consequence, in which case you're banging either blowup dolls or women who serve the same purpose from your perspective. Have I got that about right?
     
  12. SiliconMagician

    SiliconMagician Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2010
    Messages:
    18,921
    Likes Received:
    446
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Man, come into the modern day. What do you think the "hook up culture" is all about? Certainly not about emotional gratification. Women don't want any emotional attachment anymore than men do until they suddenly hit 30 and that biological clock goes "tick tick tick" by then it's too late because most men in their 30's are just hitting their sexual prime and banging chicks at least 5-8 years younger.

    Feminism created the Hook up culture. Why not take full advantage of it?

    Its quite simple. Apply a specific set of positive emotional and physical stimuli that are specifically proven to excite the mating instincts in women and get your game on. Then kick them out at 4am with cab fare and leave them to deal with the emotional consquences of their actions. Me? I fall blisfully asleep and never think twice. Buyer's Remorse is for women, not men.
     
  13. yguy

    yguy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 4, 2010
    Messages:
    18,423
    Likes Received:
    886
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Boy, are you in for a surprise. :smile:
     
  14. Til the Last Drop

    Til the Last Drop Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    May 14, 2010
    Messages:
    9,069
    Likes Received:
    384
    Trophy Points:
    83
    While feminism has done right by professional women seeking careers, that simply isn't the majority of women. As long as a man can turn off true feelings for a woman outside of sex and make sure not to get one pregnant, he can escape all the socially engineered trappings to enslave him to a woman. Even though right now it isn't the majority realization of men, it is the growing realization, and attitudes resembling that of the OP's will soon be the largest demographic. However, I would like to say even though I can honestly share in some of SM's perspective, it is hard not falling for some of them. One would have to be a psychopath. For most men with the ability to read between the lines, the only option is withdrawing from relations with women completely. Just as careerist females are the minority, so are men in Jaguars with homes in the Bahamas. It isn't SM or his father who will ever be screwed by this social fiasco, nor will it ever be Martha Stewart or Oprah. It is everyone else. From the males being trained to be unnaturally soft, to the females being trained to be unnaturally hard. No good will come of this in the long run.

    However, on a side note. As a nationalist who wants his nation back. A man who wants to hang central planners. This is all the work of God, nature, yin yang, karma, etc. For unnatural programming must be a constant to remain effective, where what a human is naturally can be returned simply by removing said programming. And for the amount of blood that needs to be spilled in order to regain sovereignty from the global regime, a 100 million single men who haven't been laid in 10 years is just what the doctor ordered.
     
  15. SiliconMagician

    SiliconMagician Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2010
    Messages:
    18,921
    Likes Received:
    446
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It doesn't take a psychopath. 40% of the American female population is morbidly obese. No man wants a fat pig for a wife. Out of the other 60% the top 20% of those will go to the rich and famous and powerful men, the elite.

    So out of that remaining 40% of available women, how many are emotionally damaged goods, suffering from various psychological hangups that make them unattractive long term mates? 10%?

    So we're talking about a mere 30% of all women are actually suitable for 80% of men.

    Competition is stiff. This isn't psychopathy, it's cold hard mathematical fact. 70% of the female population is either undesirable for one reason or another, or unavailable to the common man. So that means, if a man wants to be happy he will have to either settle for a fat hog or enjoy a lifetime of cad bachelorhood, or sexless bachelorhood.

    Since I have no desire to marry a fat hog, or settle into a life of sexless bachelorhood, I prefer being a cad.
     
  16. gamewell45

    gamewell45 Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2011
    Messages:
    24,711
    Likes Received:
    3,547
    Trophy Points:
    113
    In other words what your trying to tell us is that you have historically been unable to maintain a committed relationship Thank you for sharing your experience and phobias with us.
     
  17. Unifier

    Unifier New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2010
    Messages:
    14,479
    Likes Received:
    531
    Trophy Points:
    0
    SiliconMagician might be the only other person on this forum that understands the science behind how attraction works. All the PC libs are clueless. The women are bitter, old, and resentful, and the "men" (if you can call them that) can't figure out why they keep getting stuck in the friend zone. I kind of feel bad for you guys, though. I remember when I used to believe what you believe. I didn't get it either.
     
  18. SiliconMagician

    SiliconMagician Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2010
    Messages:
    18,921
    Likes Received:
    446
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Please. Feminists and their liberal allies create the "hook up culture" and obliterate the nuclear family. Then when men begin to adapt to it and abandon the responsibilities that patriarchy demanded of them in the same manner that women abandoned theirs. Suddenly he's a piece of dirt. He's "phobic" about commitment, a misogynist becuase he refuses to accept taking part in a society where all the responsibilities of patriarchy remain on his shoulders, but none of the benefits that patriarchy brought to him.

    What a sick double standard. But then, Feminism and Liberalism in general are all about double standards. Freedom for me, but not for thee is the watch phrase of both Feminism and Liberalism.

    We men will no longer be dominated by the legal institutions that the new matriarchy has attempted to foist upon us. We rebel.
     
  19. SiliconMagician

    SiliconMagician Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2010
    Messages:
    18,921
    Likes Received:
    446
    Trophy Points:
    0
    It's more than that. There is a growing movement among men who have realized that raw deal that feminism has attempted to deal them. The deal is that men are supposed to maintain all the responsiblities and domestic miseries that patriarchy demanded of him while recieving none of the legal or social security or safety that it brought to him.

    This movement will not much longer be supressed. In the end we'll either be free, or dead. But we won't be enslaved. Learning the Science of attraction is but one piece of that movement.
     
  20. Anders Hoveland

    Anders Hoveland Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2011
    Messages:
    11,044
    Likes Received:
    138
    Trophy Points:
    0
    That is the difference between feminists and the rest of female-kind; feminists do not feel there is any need for a man! It is no coincidence that many feminists are also not even sexually attracted to men.
     
  21. SiliconMagician

    SiliconMagician Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2010
    Messages:
    18,921
    Likes Received:
    446
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yeah but the funny part is when you read the writings of "happy spinsters" they whine and cry about this "social construct" that MEN supposedly created that makes women feel bad about being such.

    Men did not create that dynamic. Men are not the ones who create the social constructs of our time, women do. Women have always been brutal about enforcing their own instinctual dislikes against those who discard their own biology.

    If you're happy being an asexual spinster, fine, but don't demonize the vast majority of women who find that fate abhorrent and then blame iton MEN. We didn't create that social dynamic. That is entirely reinforced by women amongst themselves. LOL\

    Here is the BEST article in the world, written by a PhD.. a woman:

    HAHAHAHA
     
  22. Anders Hoveland

    Anders Hoveland Banned

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2011
    Messages:
    11,044
    Likes Received:
    138
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yes, I believe that much of what feminists are fighting against are not "social constructs" but rather human EVOLUTION !

    Men earn more money than women? "It must be discrimination against women!", they automatically assume.

    What feminists simply fail to understand is that much of the actions of men are actually driven by the mate selection desires of women!
    Men who do not possess the attributes desired by females are not as successful at passing their genes on to the next generation.
    Women say the want men to do one thing, when the truth (as men all well know) is that women actually sexually desire something completely different! "Sensitive" men do not have much success getting females. The extreme of this is the small number of women that actually unconciously go around searching for men that will abuse them.

    Men will stop earning more money than women when women stop preferring men who earn more money than them. It is that simple.
     
  23. marleyfin

    marleyfin Well-Known Member Past Donor

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2010
    Messages:
    2,105
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    48
    If spinsterhood was the only other option to dating an egotistical selfish little boy who is completely disconnected with reality I wouldn't hesitate to start adopting cats and try out some gourmet friskes. Fortunately that is not the only option. Most women have a plethora of choices in men, don't be bitter if you don't make the cut.

    Also why would any man claiming to be dominant and so masculine in nature be threatened by a woman who could take care of herself, truly laughable. Sounds very childish in my opinion, most women I know do not like dating little boys.
     
  24. Colonel K

    Colonel K Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2010
    Messages:
    9,770
    Likes Received:
    556
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I couldn't agree more. The bleating self-pity in this thread suggests some woman has explained exactly where the cold wind blows to some emotionally stunted manboys.
     
  25. Libhater

    Libhater Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2010
    Messages:
    12,500
    Likes Received:
    2,486
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male
    Of course it isn't the womans' only option; they do what most of the femanazis do when they get tired of their man--they take a trip to lesbo land to meet up with their counterparts where they'll surely tie the knot at one of several states that gives them the right to wed the dyke/butch of their choice.
     

Share This Page