How Feminism has Backfired leaving a generation of spinsters

Of course, there is an upside to being a spinster, in that it means that the woman is not legally entangled with a self-centered oaf who has slid back into a stagnant side-stream of evolution.

Our ancestors rose above the rest of the apes specificly because men were conditioned to actually support their mates and their communities. It's in the fossil record.

Your attitude, and that of your father, who is also, apparently, unable to measure up to the responsibilities of an adult relationship, are proof that there are bobbles in the advancement of the species through evolution.

 

Don`t let your mistress hear you admitting that men are capable of positive contribution, or you`ll be sent to your room.

 

Dude, that article relies heavily upon the maunderings of a pathetic snake oil salesman and AIDS denier and blatant racist piece of crap.

The monkeys at the zoo will provide you with better referrence material if you just look at them the right way.

 

Actually, if you bothered to ask even the simplest questions, you would know that Rachel is in a stable relationship.

 

Well, actually, there are more women (and men) who subscribe to feminist beliefs than there are humans with an IQ over 70 who subscribe to the garbage that was preached by that worthless sack of crap William Pierce whom you held up as some sort of intellectual guide.

Actually, there are strong feminist movements in the Middle East and Africa. They are not man-haters. They are just Muslim women who want the rights laid out to them in the Qur'an.

That means they also want an end to such garbage as FGM. That aint in the Qur'an.

Oh, and the African feminists are, generally, not ugly.

 

I can't say feminism is a bad thing, though it certainly hasn't done me any favors. As a generally nice guy I may as well be dead so far as women are concerned; deushbags get laid, nice guys get (*)(*)(*)(*). On the whole however they should be able to do what they want. Freedom isn't always convenient, and in all honesty I'd rather remain alone than be with some girl that was married to be for property or some other BS. I'm certainly not happy with being alone, and according to every male I talk to should have a good girl, but whatever. Either way my hatred towards women grows as I'm ignored, but I'll still fight for their equality. Not really sure what to say; I may die alone but I believe in justice for all. Even thought that's meaningless so is life, so whatever. Individual rights and freedom need to rule supreme, even if it doesn't favor you.

 

That has nothing to do with it. The women who go around sleeping with "(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)bags" most likely don't know the first thing about feminism.

 

You obviously have had the wool pulled over your eyes and still beleive women are discerning princesses capable of such thought.

Dominant alpha (*)(*)(*)(*)(*)(*)s get the chicks, including feminists, supplicating betas get the fat encrusted remains.

But that's okay right? Eventually feminism willl teach evil men how to love the fat ugly frump or manjawed "plain jane" over the voluptuous beauty.

 

Real women do not let a man define them.

 

Real women who care about attracting the best possible mate wouldn't grow fat cankles or act like men.

 

You're welcome to your philosophy, it's very boring, but you're welcome to it.

 

What's the best possible mate? Oh wise one. Let me guess, it's all about genetics and social status... yawn.

 

That is, however, how the militant anti-feminists view it.

 

You assume incorrectly, being a less than ideal mate for any woman yourself, specificly because of your attitude.

Assuming you are not deluding yourself about your financial status and sex appeal, I can see that you might offer the appearance of an acceptable mate, but you clearly are not one because of your attitude. It is thus not your place to define "real women."

 

Women have historically withheld sex until the man 'proved' himself to not only her but her family. With the advent of feminism, women have become just as promiscuous as men. A man no longer needs to prove his worth in order to 'take a dip' leaving absolutely no reason for a single guy to get married. Just poke 'em and go on to the next one. Heck, even if she gets 'preggers' she'll likely 'take care' of it so she can retain her killer bod so she can go out an get some more. It's a new 'progressive' era.

 

In this leftist progressive society, appearances are considered more important that substance.

 

Exactly.

 

Totally delusional. Credit default swaps and securitized mortgages were not a liberal invention.

 

Of course not, they just want everything given to them.

 

The underlying bad loan policies of Herb Moses (Federal overseer Barney Frank's butt-buddy) at Fannie Mae caused the bad paper in the first place. I am sure many liberals dipped their beak in these securities as well especially after Frank ranted and raved that Fannie Mae was solvent when questioned by the then Bush administration. It is you who are delusional.

 

Total derail. I just wanted to point out that the right wingers here assume too much that is not so.

Being unmarried is not a curse, compared to being married to a monster. You make the mistake of assuming that everyone wants what you would want yourselves.

 

Seems the other way around to me.

Normal human beings have shared empathy. Those who cannot understand what others wants and needs are we call psychopaths.

 

That applies to half of the GOP, certainly to most rightwing radio people. The most sociopathic are even the most highly paid there.

 

I realize that's what you're told to say by your Socialist block-captain but come on now, the real sociopaths currently occupy the White House. Everyone knows it by now. Except maybe....you?

 

You are making the mistake of trying to typify the "monsters". Not working, sorry, that`s a fail.