How the Feds control this country

this is my crazy voice talking but I wouldn't be surprised if a bomb goes off in front of the Empire State Building or Wall Street or some other important area of NYC in a few weeks or months. Notice how all of NYC was closed down for the night with barely any snow? Seems like a good way to sneak something in.

and this hopefully to be always hypothetical event will help justify surveillance or something, dunno.

 

454. All fool's event (12/10/06)

There is an All Fool's Day. This poison case becomes an all fool's event. The news reported the dead former Russian spy alleged Putin was behind the poison case. It is a very high level case. One thing for sure is this is a murder case. Another thing is the poison was Po-210.

If someone plans to murder, the priority is to make it a covert one. Al least the murderer would try to leave no clue to draw a detection. For intelligence, they have many high tech killing methods, make a death look like a natural death. If they chose to poison, there are still many choices. The poison they use will be hard to identify.

See what poison they used in Litvinenko's case. A rare metal, a radioactive isotope - Polonium-210. Since Po-210 is a high-restricted material, the way to access this material is very limited. Generally, a murderer will avoid to use such kind of material as poison because it's easy to be tracked from its origin.

Po-210 is a hard to handle material. It is radioactive. It needs special treatment in transfer. Otherwise not only the carrier will be hurt, the environment also will be polluted. Why chose a hard to control poison? The murderer has to worry about his own safety while he carry such kind of material.

Po-210 is a radioactive material and is easy to be detected. Murderer should chose more covert poison than an isotope. Isotope is itself used as tracer in scientific research. With instrument, even a tiny amount of isotope could be traced. Why chose an easy to be detected poison?

The poison case is a big joke from the beginning. Litvinenko was said poisoned on 11/1. He died on 11/23. It was 23 days when he was sick. Hospital didn't know what caused his death.
The news of 11/24 reported it as: "strange, rapid decline", "mystery remains". As an outsider, when I saw the picture of a hairless Litvinenko, I knew it's a symptom of heavy metal poison. (Polonium is a heavy metal, but it's rare. In medical, most referred is lead poison. ) That should be common sense of the doctor. How could they fail to find it? Radiation also causes hairless. Doctor should know it.

The media keeps reporting the poisoned case and almost have new discovery everyday. They found it on the airplanes flying between Moscow and London; in the shushi bar, in U.K.'s embassy in Moscow, now even in German. If the route develops to Teheran, Iran, I will not be surprised. Because that is the target this event created for.

But will a perpetrator, try to carry out a murder case with a hard to get material, hard to handle isotope, easy to be tracked poison in his case? Is he an idiot, or a fool?

No, he is not. It's a rogue group which framed a poisoned case to justify a dirty bomb attack, aimed to have another war in Iran. It treats the public all like fools.

Remember this: In Rove's October surprise, N. Korea had a nuclear test. China arrested several N.Koreas for selling Uranium. All to justify the source of dirty bomb attack. I think it went soured after my revelation.
Then in November surprise, Litvinenko died on Polonium from Russia.
Uranium and Polonium are radioactive material. They were used in these cases to justify the source of dirty bomb attack. When it was revealed too, which will be the next? Maybe US itself? One thing is certain, the Inside group won't stop here.

New war is ahead.

455. "New wars ahead" (12/15/06)

I strongly recommend people to read the article "new wars ahead" written by Jeff Steinberg. It proves my allegation of dirty bomb attack planned by Bush administration is correct.

Quote, "new wars ahead
Jeff Steinberg
Executive Intelligence Review. Nov. 17, 2006

Whichever party lands in the White House come January 2009, the neo-cons hope to be there to share in the spoils. Either way, they are busily organizing a ``Get Iran'' war alliance with frightened Sunni regimes in the Persian Gulf and Arab world and Israel--to make sure that the Bush-Cheney regime commits one more fatal atrocity--a military strike on Iran's purported secret nuclear weapons sites--before leaving office (see preceding article). ...........

Several senior Washington intelligence veterans, and one regional vice president of a major U.S. defense firm, say that their greatest fear-- between now and the New Year when the Democrats take the keys to Capitol Hill back--is a ``Gulf of Tonkin'' incident, a provocation covertly arranged originating from Washington, that would provide the pretext for war. The most likely target of such a scheme: Iran. The most likely architect of such an operation: Dick Cheney and his remaining coterie of neo-con troublemakers and whatever assets they have recruited from within the Special Forces community and the ``black operations'' side of the intelligence community. One burning question is whether President Bush has already signed a Presidential Intelligence Finding, authorizing these covert tricks. "

http://www.warwithoutend.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=63301

Steinberg's article published on 11/17. He said that Cheney's office now becomes the Neo-con central and that they are organizing a Sunni alliance (include Syria, Jordan, Saudi, Egypt) in Mid-east to fight against Shiite (Iran, Hasbolla). His point of view was proved very correct. One week later, on 11/25, Cheney made a sudden visit to Saudi. Obviously to talk about that alliance.

Steinberg's fear about a "Gulf of Tonkin" incident, was well described by my continuous postings about October Surprise and November Surprise. The framed case is a dirty bomb attack. To justify the source of radioactive material, they made secret deals with China, N. Korea and then Russia. These plots went soured after my revelation. What's next? The possibility is to frame a domestic case. Here is a news reported 5 days ago. I think it was released on purpose.

Re: "Nuclear fuels leaving Bay Area
By Ian Hoffman Media News

The Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory recently began shedding its supply of plutonium and enriched uranium - capable of producing dozens of nuclear bombs - with a secret shipment to the Los Alamos National Laboratory.

Details of the first and future shipments, including their timing as well as the mass and form of the material remained classified, according to federal officials."
(Mercury News Dec. 10, 2006)

We don't know what motivated the recent shipment of nuclear material. It will certainly create a chance of "missing" shipment in transfer. I don't think it's a coincidence they release the news at this time, when Rove's October and November Surprise failed to be carried out.

456. December violence (12/20/06)

My computer was attacked on 12/14 and 12/15. I couldn't go internet the whole day. I have to use my daughter's computer. It was attacked too a day later. I lost the memory of URL address stored in "my favorite" and in disk. It took a lot of time to find them back by google search. Obviously, My warning about a dirty bomb attack and Iran war is too true to let people know. Now the harassing is to lose connection of AOL every few minutes, then a page appears to advice to down load some programm to prevent the losing connection. I think it's a trick to force me down load some spy program or a perpetrator one. I may be not able to go on posting any more. If you can not see it on time. You know what is it.

The revived news of the I.D. leaking case of a CIA agent (Plame) means the Inside Group is impatient with Bush administration. They need Mid-east war right away. Or Bush's cabinet will have trouble. Libby is to be sent to the court next month. Cheney will be called to testify as witness in court. Judicial system now is the tool of D.O.J. to whip the horse racing on.

Of course, the best way to stop me to speak up in Internet is a direct elimination. So I saw the Feds tried to lure me to the shopping center these months. They set up a bombing plot on me as a part of the "October surprise" and "November surprise". Though the plot went soured after my revelation, they still go on with their bombing plan. Here is a typical news for justification of a December surprise.

Re: Man Charged in Shopping Mall Jihad Plot

By MIKE ROBINSON Associated Press Dec 08

CHICAGO
A Muslim convert who talked about his desire to wage jihad against civilians was charged Friday in a plot to set off hand grenades at a shopping mall during the Christmas rush, authorities said.

Investigators said Derrick Shareef, 22, of Rockford, was acting alone and never actually obtained any grenades.
"He fixed on a day of December 22nd on Friday ... because it was the Friday before Christmas and thought that would be the highest concentration of shoppers that he could kill and injure," said Robert Grant, the agent in charge of the Chicago FBI office.

Authorities said Shareef had been under investigation since September, when he told an acquaintance that "he wanted to commit acts of violent jihad against targets in the United States as well as commit other crimes."
The acquaintance immediately informed the FBI, officials said.

http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/12/08/D8LSTJL80.html

I don't think the news release of the shopping mall bombing case was a coincidence. It is the continuation of soured "November surprise". For more than two months, I avoided to go to the shopping center in case there was a "bombing ambush". What did the surveillance team do then? They came to my house.

Yesterday, (12/19) I heard someone spoke loudly outside. I went out and saw that member who belongs to the "tire group" (see "448. Highway 680 pass-over bridge was a bomb target (11/15/06) ") walking back and forth at the entrance of the lane, talked to a cell-phone. I left him alone. I knew it was a provocation. If I walked to him I could be gunned down however gently I behaved. Feds is in desperation.

To eliminate by gun shooting is not a rare experience for me. I have encountered such attempt at least three times before. I'll talk about it later.

- - - Updated - - -

457. Surveillance photo (12/25/06)

There was a swift response to my allegation that the Feds planned a violent elimination. On 12/20 I said the Feds obviously try to provoke another dispute between the "Tire group" member and I so they could kill with justification. Next day there was a report in Mercury News.

Re: "Surveillance photo helps solve cold case
FBI agent took picture placing killer on scene

By Sean Webby Mercury News

The story began May 5 1993.

Hidden in a camper, FBI agent Ernest Tibaldi spent an hour taking photographs of everyone who walked in or out of the San Jose cafe. (for other case)

Tibaldi had no idea at the time that among the rolls of film he took that evening was a snapshot of young man just about to kill someone.

..... using Tibaldi's photos, detectives finally caught up with Nguyen the next year and interviewed him. He denied being at the cafe or ever wearing sandals - until police showed him the photos.

The detectives didn't have enough to arrest him.

Then in 2004, (police re-started investigation) Tiboldi's photo showed Nguyen with another man, bao Khoung.

(with Khoung's evidence) Nguyen pleaded no contest Nov. 20 in Santa Clara County Superior Court to the voluntary manslaughter. "

The point in this story is the photo. In my case, my house is surrounded by the Feds' houses. I believe many cameras aimed at me. When the "tire team" member came to me to start a deliberate talk on 11/9 night, the surveillance team had taken many photos and video. Then twice they arranged that "tire team" member to provoke a dispute. The foundation is they had the photo. Of course, they will have "reliable witness" too.

Here is a time table:
11/9 night, I noticed heavy surveillance action in street after November mid-term election. The "tire team" member deliberately came to me to start a talk. (we never talked before even he followed me for more than ten years) The purpose was to get a photo as evidence. A meeting at night. (see #44

11/10 morning, The "tire team" member came to my house, peep into my daughter's car and write down something. He left after I came back to get a camera. A very swift reaction when they got a photo. (see #44

11/20. A murder case finished after 13 years. The suspect obviously got a plea bargain. The case was to convince the police or prosecutor or judge how important the photo is.

12/19. The "tire team" member speak loudly at the entrance of my lane. I went out, had a look, but left him alone.

12/20. I wrote about the second provocation. (see #456)

12/21. Mercury News reported the case ends a month ago. A swift response to my last message and an intimidation and show off as Feds used to do.

To take photos at night by arrange a meeting is a preference of Feds. Which I have talked about in previous messages: "49. Frame attempt" and "54. Trap".

458. The execution of Saddam (12/30/06)

Saddam was executed yesterday. It was arranged by Neocon. It is a strategy step of their Mid-east war plan.

The Iraq government is a puppet of the US. The execution of Saddam must be approved by its master(or ordered by) - Bush administration. Why do they perform such an execution in current situation?

The Neocon's plan in Mid-east is bigger than the Iraq war. After Iraq, the next target is Iran and Syria. To prepare for the Iran and Syria war, US troops must stay in Iraq. That's why we saw there was a continued riot in Iraq. America people are tired of this unjust war. It's them who paid money and lives for it. What's the tactic Bush uses to deal with them? He said if US withdraw from Iraq, then terrorists win and US loses. No people want to admit they support terrorist, no people want to be cowards. Bush uses patriotism to halt anti-war movement.

What excuse the Neocon use to have US troops staying in Iraq? Insurgence and riot. Although some people said Iraq war is like Vietnam war, it is not. There were two big countries: Soviet Union and China behind the Vietnam. It was their support of weapons and economic aids which helped North Vietnam to win the war. There was none such support for Iraq. Iran and Syria, are much weaker and smaller than Soviet Union and China then. They themselves know they are the next target of the Neocon. They dare not to offend US by supporting the Iraq insurgence. To stay in Iraq, Neocon try to make a mess in Iraq - they need a civil war of Iraq.

Al Qaida is a tool of US intelligence. The 911 attack was carried out in the name of Al Qaida. The purpose was to justify the Mid-east war. It succeeded. To provoke a civil war in Iraq, Al Qaida was once again involved.

The conflict between Sunni and Shiiti in Iraq was provoked by the bombing of a Shiiti Muslim Shirine by Al Qaida.
Al Qaida then helped Sunni Muslim in a series of conflict with Shiiti. The purpose is to push for a civil war.

You can view Saddam as a shrine of Sunni Muslim. Kill Saddam is to pour oil on a fire. It will flame a civil war.
America people voted Democratic Party to the House on the hope that the Congress can help US army withdraw from Iraq. Now with this strategy step, Bush will say, the situation is worsen. On contrary, we need more troops there instead of withdraw. A draft may be revived.

The next target in Neocon's map is Iran and Syria. For the coming war, US army has to stay in Iraq. To justify the staying, Neocon needs a riot in Iraq. Saddam's death is one step to reach this goal. Any politicians with brain know the execution at this time will stir the storm not calm it.

(Though Syria and Saudi may be treated as allies in Neocon's plan to deal with Iran, it is only temporary. Remember Saddam also once was an ally of US when he was used to fight against Iran. )

Re:
Quote, "Behind the Cheney Trip to Riyadh
(Reprinted with permission of Executive Intelligence Review)
by Jeffrey Steinberg

Nov. 27, 2006 (EIRNS)-A well-placed and highly reliable source has provided the following account of Vice President Dick Cheney's Nov. 25, 2006 visit to Saudi Arabia.

The essential message delivered to Saudi Arabia's King Abdullah by Vice President Cheney was that there is no basis for dialogue with Iran. The U.S. position in the region has been weakened, and therefore a new security architecture must be established, particularly in the Persian Gulf, to contain and counter Iran's growing influence. Already, NATO has been in dialogue with Qatar and Kuwait, in pursuit of closer, upgraded cooperation. Cheney proposed to establish a new regional balance of power, through a Sunni Arab alliance with Israel, to confront the Iranian threat. Cheney argued that to negotiate with Iran at this time would be tantamount to surrender. A new military organization will be built, involving the Gulf Cooperation Council states, Egypt, and Jordan. NATO and the United States will be closely involved, and Israel will be a de facto participant. These moves led by Cheney obviously aim to pre-empt adoption by the Bush Administration of any recommendations from the Baker-Hamilton Iraq Study Group, to initiate diplomatic talks with Iran.

Cheney took the lead in proposing this new security architecture. There is, at this point, a consensus inside the Bush Administration to pursue this policy. When President Bush arrives later this week in Amman, Jordan, to meet with Iraq's Prime Minister Maliki, he may also hold secret talks with several senior Syrian officials. In that meeting, President Bush will bluntly offer Syria the opportunity to break its ties to Iran and join in the emerging Sunni Arab bloc.

The approach to Syria coincides with a major effort, within Lebanon, to force Michel Aoun to break his alliance with Hezbollah, in the wake of the assassination of Industry Minister Pierre Gemayel. Over the weekend, there was a meeting of leading Maronites, sponsored by Patriarch Sfeir, aimed at tightening the pressure on Aoun to break with Hezbollah, and join a Sunni Arab, Christian, Druze coalition to counter Hezbollah's power. Were the Syrians to accept the Bush offer (highly unlikely), they would be expected to pressure Hezbollah to disarm, as a condition for negotiations to get the Golan Heights back from Israel.

Condi Rice's planned meeting with Mahmoud Abbas and Ehud Olmert is aimed at kick-starting the Israeli-Palestinian talks. But the key to the Israeli policy will be to complete the construction of the wall, and to build similar walls of separation along the border with Lebanon. The argument is that both Hamas and Hezbollah represent extensions of Iran's influence into the areas bordering on Israel, and they must be contained. The "peace" offer being put on the table will center on these walls of separation.

Iran is already aware of these Cheney-led initiatives. While Arab governments will assume that Iran will react and respond to the attempt to create this Sunni Arab-U.S.-Israel security architecture to confront Iran by playing for sectarian conflict in Iraq, Lebanon and elsewhere, sources caution that Iran is taking a more sophisticated view. Recurring statements by President Ahmadinejad are calculated to instigate an Israeli attack on Iran's purported nuclear weapons sites. Iran anticipates some kind of attack on these sites-either by the United States or Israel. Iran would prefer an Israeli attack for several reasons. First, the United States has far more significant military capabilities to strike Iran than Israel does.

Second, any Israeli attack on a Muslim country would trigger a revolt on the Arab streets. Iran carefully studied the response of the population throughout the Persian Gulf and Arab world to the Israeli attacks on Lebanon this summer. They anticipate massive Arab support, across the sectarian Shi'ite-Sunni divide, for Iran, in the event of an Israeli strike.

http://www.larouchepac.com/pages/press_releases

459. December bombing plot in Great Mall (1/5/07)

Great Mall is three blocks away from my residence. It is a big shopping center with a lot of factory outlets there. Feds could justify it was a terrorist target if they bombing that mall. But I rarely go to the Great Mall these days because there is no supermarket in it. I only go there when I do some house repair. There is a Home Depot store there.

In mid-December there was a commercial in Chinese TV which said audience could get a free ticket of the movie "Curse of the Golden Flower" by clicking on KT**** web site. The theater is in Century 20 Great Mall. There was a lot of comments for that new Chinese movie then. It is said one of the best films of the year by National Board of Review. If it is a good movie, it doesn't need to advertise by "free ticket". I had a feeling this was a trap set up by the Feds. To bomb Great Mall is much better justified then to bomb a super market. Of course I wouldn't try to get a free ticket though I believe there was one ready for me.

My feeling was soon proved true. They did plan to lure me to the Great Mall for a bombing trap.

At the night of 12/26, I noticed my daughter parked her car along the fence - a place where used to be parking by my wife's. It was unusual because they always park their car in a fixed place.

There was a big wind that night. Next morning I was awakened by the noise of wind. Tools in the yard fell to the ground, made big bang. The fence was shaking in the wind. I suddenly aware of why my daughter parked her car along the fence where it used to be parked by my wife's mini van. A mini van's body is higher than a sedan. It would shelter the fence from the wind better then a sedan. And one pillar of the three which support that fence had already broken. The surveillance team knew very well about this and targeted at this weak fence.

I immediately strengthened the fence by two sticks. The wind got weaker later that day. How big the wind was it?

"Blustery winds stir up trouble across Bay Area
Thousands left in dark; woman killed in Lagunitas
By Julie Sevrens Lyons Mercury News
12/28/06

It didn't just feel like a hurricane out there Wednesday.

Wind gusts up to 74 mph pounded Pillar Point on the San Mateo coast - strong enough to be classified as "hurricane force." although just barely. Unusually fierce winds also whipped the rest of the Bay Area, downing scores of trees and power lines, disrupting traffic, killing a Marin County woman and injuring several others."

The hurricane like winds of 12/27 was not a coincidence. When I fixed the fence, there was more to come. Next day on 12/28, my wife told me the sink disposer in kitchen was damaged. The water couldn't go down the drain anymore.

Free movie ticket, attempt to break the fence, and damaged sink disposer, all lead to an attempt to force me to the stores in Great Mall. This was the December bombing plot, a continuation of "October surprise" and "November surprise". The bombing would be likely a dirty bomb attack. If the plot went on successfully to eliminate a target whom always revealed their plan in advance, there would be a new Mid-east war followed.

The execution of Saddam Hussain on 12/29 was part of their December plot. Do you realize it?

About how Feds manipulate the climate, see "211. Create windy day (3/4/04)" and Hurricane Katrina "#345, #351 to #355. "

 

'Nee-nee,Nee-nee,nee-nee,nee-nee''a man stuck in his house,afraid to go out in fear of 'agents' waiting to do him harm....agents from an agency on the fifth floor of......The twilight zone...

 

460. Review three plots in last three months (1/10/07)

1. October surprise:
10/9/06, N. Korea had a nuclear test.
10/26, Chinese TV news reported that in Peking, police arrested N. Koreans who tried to sell **gram of Uranium.
In October, three of US Navy strike force grouped on the sea opposite Iran in the Persian Gulf.

Started from later September, there was an attempt to lure me to the shopping center where there is a fly-over bridge of Highway 680. The Highway fly-over could be the justification that it was Al Qaida's target.

2. November surprise:

11/21, an anti-Syrian politician - Industry Minister of Lebanon, Pierre Gemayel - was assassinated. His death caused a big protest of pro-government Lebanese and a big rally of pro-Hezbollah Lebanese as well.

11/23, Litvinenko - a Russian defector, died after strange, rapid declines. The news later reported he died of Polonium poison - a radioactive material.

11/24, Black Friday. There was attempt to lure me to another shopping center with the bait of a pocket video camera which I was eager for. I think this was the action day in Feds' plan. The justification was that the Christamas shopping spree was the target of Al Qaida.

3. December bombing:

11/17, In Executive Intelligence Review there was an article "Cheney and Neo-Cons Plotting More Wars". It talked about Neo-Cons planned to push for a civil war in Iraq. Let Saudi, Jordan and Egypt help Sunni Muslim in Iraq to fight against Shiiti of Iraq and Iran. (see New Wars ahead in #455)

11/25, Cheney flied to Riyadh. On 11/29 and 30, Bush went to Jordan to meet Iraqi P.M. there. They probably decided to kill Saddam at that time. This, proved the extraordinary accuracy of the article "Cheney and Neo-Cons Plotting More Wars". It also surprised me by their eagerness for the war. When the 11/24 Black Friday plot failed, next day Cheney started their new December plot.

12/23, U.N. approved sanction on Iran.

12/25, news reported US held four Iranians in Iraq aimed at people suspected of conducting attacks on Iraqi security forces. There were Iran diplomats among the detainees.

In mid December, a free movie ticket was offered. The theater was in Great Mall where once I often went to.

12/26 night and 12/27 morning, a hurricane like wind raided Bay area. I thought the weak fence was the target. Because if I need material to repair the damaged fence, I had to go to the Home Depot which was in Great Mall.

12/28, the kitchen sink disposer damaged. I believe the target of the Feds this time was the Great Mall.

12/29, (Iraqi time 12/30) Saddam was hanged. A provocation of civil war.
Conclusion

1. To start a war on Iran, US Inside Group prepared a 911 style terror attack - a dirty bomb attack.

2. I was the main target of the bombing attack. Because my revelation is very correct. (Though there will be many other bombings at same time, possibly in Britain and elsewhere US)

Here is proof for that bombing: Fear a "Gulf of Tonkin" incident in article "Cheney and Neo-Cons plotting more wars". (see #455)

And the "mass killing" predict of Pat Robertson. In my point of view, P. Robertson is a speaker of the intelligence. What he said was not a prophecy but the plan of the Inside Group.

Re: Quote, "Pat Robertson: God told me of 'mass killing' in 2007
POSTED: 7:26 p.m. EST, January 3, 2007

VIRGINIA BEACH, Virginia (AP) -- Evangelical broadcaster Pat Robertson said Tuesday that God has told him that a terrorist attack on the United States would cause a "mass killing" late in 2007.

"I'm not necessarily saying it's going to be nuclear," he said during his news-and-talk television show "The 700 Club" on the Christian Broadcasting Network.

http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/01/02/robertson.predictions.ap/index.html

3. There will be civil war in Lebanon and Iraq if the bombing plot succeeds.

4. The main target is war on Iran. All works are for this goal. Three big plots in three months. Very intensify work. Why they are so eager at Iran?

461. Dollar, the Achilles' heel of the US (1/15/07)

What motivates Bush government so crazy to start a war on Iran? It is the dollar. Because the unrestrained spending, there is a great amount of dollar held by foreign countries, mainly by Japan, China and OPEC. These countries, mostly are "responsible" countries who know the disastrous result if they dump the dollar.

But there is another country: Iran. Iran exports oil. If it changes the oil trading currency from dollar to Euro, then it will hurt US economy significantly. And Iran decides to do so. That's why the Inside group is in panic. Though the flag to war with Iran is "nuclear proliferation", "support Iraq Shiite militias", the real reason is the dollar. But to start a war because others refusing to use your currency as trading method is not a justification, so Bush's war machine tries to find other excuse.

Re: Iran scraps Dollar, takes on Euro
Mon. 18 Dec 2006
Iran Focus

Tehran, Iran, Dec. 18 - Iran's central bank will begin to use the euro for foreign transactions, replacing the long-established dollar system, government spokesman Gholam-Hossein Elham told reporters during his weekly press conference on Monday.
http://www.iranfocus.com/modules/news/article.php?storyid=9533

Then on 12/30, there was an interesting news:

Quote, "U.S. TREASURY SECRETARY ARRESTED IN GERMANY
PAULSON AND CHENEY SUBPOENAED BY TRIBUNAL
Saturday 30 December 2006 20:05

U.S. TREASURY SECRETARY SEIZED AND BROUGHT BEFORE 'AD HOC' TRIBUNAL IN GERMANY ON A SUBPOENA HANDED OUT BY THE INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE [OR 'WORLD COURT'] ON CHARGES OF MONEY-LAUNDERING, NON-PAYMENT OF THE WANTA $4.5 TRILLION AND FOR MISAPPROPRIATION AND/OR DIVERSION OF COLOSSAL $ SUMS.
...........
EUROPEAN NATIONAL CURRENCY REVIVAL GATHERS SPEED

One crucial by-product of this crisis, too, is that, as was exclusively reported in our previous posting, both France and Germany have started distributing pre-stored national banknotes (denominated in French francs and deutschemarks) to their respective central banks and leading commercial banks.

http://www.worldreports.org/news/38_paulson_and_cheney_s

Though several days later, there was other news that Paulson would meet the Treasury Minister of Japan in January which indirectly denied the news of his arrest, I still believe this was, or once had been a part of the December plot.
Notice the time of Paulson's arrest: 12/30. The bombing in US was planned in the end of December. At same time Saddam was hanged - a planned justification for Iraq civil war.

Read the news of Paulson's arrest. You will find the real meaning of this incident - a planned collapse of Euro. According to the news, the collapse of the WANTA fund will lead to the collapse of Euro. The events astonished me was that French, German had prepared to replace the Euro with their original currency: Franc and Mark.

I think if the December plot had succeeded, the Great Mall would have been bombed.(and somewhere else in US and UK been bombed as well. ) There would have been a civil war in Iraq followed the execution of Saddam. And there would have been the collapse of Euro following the arrest of Paulson. Iran would have to stay on Dollar because the money they turned on then worth nothing.

I also think the US economy was on a volcano. There are two big bubbles: the housing market and stock market. The Inside group will find excuse to create the incident such like WANTA, Euro collapse, Iraq civil war or Iran war. To blame the economic crisis to other's fault not their's.

There will be big change ahead: war and economic crisis. The victim will always be the ordinary people. They will lose money and lives.

- - - Updated - - -

462. The collapse of Euro and worldwide economic crisis (1/20/07)

The December plot was bigger than you could imagine. The economic crisis was world class.

In later December, Thailand government announced measure to control foreign currency exchange. The stock market value lost nearly 15%. Then on the day before New Years' Day, there was a series of bombing occurred in Bangkok. Which made the Thailand stock market on the first trading day of new year lost 3%.

Remember the South-east Asia financial crisis in 1997? It started from Thailand too.

In Europe, on Jan. 1, Russia doubled the price of the natural gas it sells to Belarus. As a retaliation, Belarus imposed a transit fee on Russion oil which supplies Europe through the pipe in Belarus land. The oil for Europe was cut in early January.

Quote, "EU scolds Russia for cutting oil supply
By Peter Finn
Washington Post

When it comes to energy, the European Union, which is heavily dependent on Russian natural gas and oil, has almost no short-term alternatives. Russia supplies about 25 percent of the union's oil and 40 percent of its natural gas."
(Mercury News 1/10/07)

Paulson's arrest is a necessity to prove the seriousness of WANTA fund. Anyhow the collapse of a fund would lead to the collapse of Euro still will cause suspicion. When people hurt by the commodity price due to the shortage of oil, they would have believed what government told them were reasonable: It was the WANTA and the gas shortage causing the collapse of the Euro.

At same time there would also be a financial crisis taking place in Asia. Hongkong stock market fell consecutively three days in early January. Each day lost about 1.5%. That was almost a repeat of South-east financial crisis of 1997.

But everything get into order after a short while. There is no more bombing in Thailand. Hongkong stock market recovered. Paulson is on news again. Belarus announced on 1/10 that it had reached a compromise with Russia to end a dispute that had shut a Russian oil pipeline to Europe. There is no particularly unrest in Iraq. All because the ring of the plot - the bombing in US (in North San Jose) was broken (went soured) and the whole plan was revealed.

The bombing in US and events in abroad need an organization which control both FBI and CIA to do it. When the three big plots all went soured, who should be responsibe for the failure? In early January, Bush announced the step down of the head of the National Intelligence - Negroponte. You may realize what caused this unusual change.

There is such a big trade deficit and budget deficit in US economy that many people turn their investment into Euro asset and other foreign asset when US dollar is in a dangerous position. If the December plot succeeds, how much wealth people will lose in their investment? Of course, Iran will be a big loser. And how much profit that manipulating group will make? I wonder.

463. Mossad in surveillance team (1/25/07)

Each time there was a big plot, there always came with an internet censorship. My revelation is too true to exist.

I was blocked to post from 1/1 to 1/15 at my own home page in AOL. In web site "Fabulous", someone posted some nonsense with a user's name similar to mine which caused suspicion of other readers. The tactic is to tarnish me as an insanity. Thus to finish my thread. In previous plot, there were cases they even posted crazy articles with user's name identical to mine. Of course, when they did so they presumed that I would die in a bombing or be arrested in a case and could never come back.

In "War without end", I failed to reply to my old thread but found I could start a new one. Then I realized the Feds disabled the old thread to any one so these messages would sink to the bottom forever. They don't want people read it any more. They did it to the plan and didn't think I would come back. When I complained, the explanation was that was a mistake caused by new software.

In "Indyster" they closed the forum "politics". People there asked why a hot site to be closed. I knew the purpose - to censor the old thread the Feds hated so much from the sight of the viewers.(when they think the writer won't come back again.)

In a few other sites, I just was banned.(e.g. "rolling stone") I even couldn't enter the forum. I think my threads there have been moved away.

About in late December or early January, I failed to post a message in "My space". After several tries, I found I could post any other messages but that particular one. At last I concluded that the surveillance team which monitored on me was from Israel. Here is that particular message leads to my conclusion.

Quote, " Israel Kills US Troops, AIPAC Spies on Investigators
By Cyte
Sunday, September 25, 2005

The federal indictment says that AIPAC heads Steven Rosen (director of foreign policy) and Keith Weissman (senior Middle East analyst) sought and obtained classified information about attacks on US troops in Iraq. They also sought and obtained a classified FBI report on the Khobar Tower bombing.

Why is Israel interested in secret reports about attacks on American troops?

US Army Col. J. Denim says the Khobar attackers picked a building that was visited by Israeli advisors. Army bomb experts found residues from explosives that are only available to the US military and Israel.

Marines also believe that it is not Iraqis, but Israeli infiltrators in command and intel who are behind the ambushes."

http://cytations.blogspot.com/2005/09/israel-kills-us-troops-aipac-spies-on.html

I think the surveillance team member who monitored on me at that time was a Mossad agent. He blocked that information because he thought the message was sensitive for his country. It proves one of my allegation. Six months ago I alleged Negroponte had introduced Mossad to US intelligence. Re: "It seems Negroponte has introduced new poison for the Feds from Israel's Mossad." (see "422. Poison food and Indian market (7/20/06)")

I believe for most time, I was under warrantless surveillance of Feds. To avoid an internal investigation, they can say, "No, we didn't do any illegal surveillance or harassment.". They let Israelis do that illegal work

A recent news may prove my allegation too:
Quote, "
The Mossad in the CIA <http://tbrnews.org/Archives/a2608.htm/l005>
Jan 3, 2007

It might be of public interest to know that a significant number of Israeli Mossad agents are now working in the United States as employees of the Central Intelligence Agency. These agents, some of whom are listed below, are initially paid by the Israeli Embassy in Washington but Israel then bills the U.S. Government for the salaries and is reimbursed in full on a monthly basis.

Here is a partial listing of identified Mossad agents (as of 1 January, 2007) along with their dates of birth and salaries. They do not have American Social Security numbers and do not pay American taxes.
<DIR>
Gadi Regev 12/17/1975 $63,000 per annum

Betzalel Yanay 9/4/1978 $75,000 “

....... (a list omitted here)
</DIR>

Most of these U.S.-subsidized spies live in Potomac, McLean, Georgetown and Arlington. I have their addresses and these will be published in a follow-up article.

These are Israeli citizens but many of the middle level CIA officials are American-born Jews and not included in this list but we do know who they are. All of them, without exception, work for Israel and Israeli interests, not American interests and more than a few are known to be friendly with a number of the so-called Neocons, a significant number of whom are also Israeli citizens.
http://tbrnews.org/Archives/a2608.htm#005

464. The tire man (1/30/07)

Four days ago, I received a letter from Homeowners' Association. What kind of trick will they play this time?

It was an annual meeting notice. Inside it there was a Board Member Candidacy Resume.(the only one) The address shows that he lives opposite to the lane of my residence, the one who recently tried to provoke a dispute with me. The resume says he has a small business and serves on a small corporate board, and a trade Associate Board as well. His name reminds me of that tire company.

I have talked about that there was a Feds surveillance headquarter in next lane. I alleged it belongs to a local DEA task force. (I think there are also other task force work here. This is only one of them) I call this group "tire group" because the people there related to a tire business. The "tire man" was a member of that group.

In May 2003, the tire group put a junk tire at the door of my house, tried to provoke a dispute. I realized it could be a death trap and posted the story in message #131 and #133. So the Feds knew one of their group was exposed.

I learned "tire man"s name, address and business from his resume. The old tire company related to that group, (I recognized it from its company car), disappeared from the street after my revelation. In stead of, there was a new tire company car came. After a while, that new tire company's car disappeared too. Now I know that new tire company was "tire man"s. Because the name in resume is identical to that tire company car's. He used his own name as company's.

But there is a strange phenomenon. I check the telephone book. I can't find the new tire company but the old one. It has been more than three years, a new company that hasn't existed? Or more likely, they tried to confuse me by a new tire company to cover up the old one? Or just to deny anything I described? The business "tire man" has now is a towing business.

According to his resume, he lives at this area for 12 years. That is, he moved here in 1995. I knew him earlier. In early 90's when Mrs Chen's case happened, he was one member of the a surveillance group followed me. It seemed that after the drug case (I now think it was a framed case, too.) finished, they planned another project. started to buy all the houses in this area. (a profitable business).

Although he applied to be a board member of the Homeowner Association, "Tire man" is not a resident here. The house is a surveillance house of the Feds. Only agents operate there. His residence is somewhere else. That house is only under his name.

The "tire man" appeared in a provokative event at my door in May, 2003. (see #131, 133)

Three years later, at the night of 11/9/06, he approached me tried to start a talk with me. He left when I refused to go on the talk.

In the morning of 11/10, he came to my house, peeping into the car (my daughter's car) and wrote down something.
He left after I took out a camera. (see #44

12/19, he talked loudly at the entrance of the lane. I think he didn't come inside because I revealed his presence at my door. (see #456)
All these were attempt to provoke a dispute to a purposed violent killing, I think.

Then in this month, he applied to be a board member of H.A. after 12 years living here as he claimed. Obviously to justify his presence at my house. (The board of H.A. has four house inspection each year.) His boss, in eagerness, does everything they can do.


465. The dirty bomb plot goes on (2/5/07)
Four months ago, in October 2006, I wrote:
Re: "445. Dirty bomb attack (10/30/06)
On 10/26, the KTSF Chinese TV reported such a news that China arrested two North Koreans whom tried to sell ** gram of Uranium. (The news was not seen in other media, though) It will justify the source of dirty bomb if the attack happens. "
Three months ago, in November 2006, I alleged the death of the defector Litvinenko plays the same role:
Re: "451. The death of former Russian spy (11/25/06)
5. I think he is part of a secret deal. The deal is to justify a dirty bomb, (or even a nuclear bomb). There was such a deal in October. (N. Korea nuclear test and later China arrested two N. Koreans for selling small amount of Uranium.)"

Last month, I wrote "459. December bombing plot in Great Mall (1/5/07)". Of course, if the plot was carried out, it would have been a dirty bomb attack.

Ten days ago, a news proved my allegation were true.

Quote, "Sting thwarts sale of Uranium
Russian had nuclear-grade bomb material
By Desmond Butler (AP)

Washington - Republic of Georgia authorities, aided by the CIA , set up a sting operation last summer that led to the arrest of a Russian man who tried to sell a small amount of nuclear-bomb grade uranium."
(Mercury News 1/25/2007)

People may say this was a case of "last summer" which doesn't relate to the current plot. The point is why the media did not report that news last summer but report it now when it becomes not "news" but "olds"? When intelligence releases such kind of "olds", they always have a purpose. This is to justify the source of a dirty bomb material.

In recent plots in latest four months, we can see the similarity:
1. Russia and China were chosen to be collaborators. Because they have been the rivals of the US, their story will be more believable.
2. Their satellite country, Georgia; N. Korea; Belarus (in event to cut oil to Europe) joined the plot.
3. The direct purpose is to justify the source of dirty bomb material. (N. Korean selling Uranium, Russian selling Uranium.)
4. The hidden purpose is to spread nuclear panic. (The nuclear test in N. Korea and Litvinenko died of radioactive poison.) So when dirty bomb attacks happen in US and Europe, Bush will have full justification to bomb the nuclear site in Iran.

I think the dirty bomb plot is going on even though the three plots in October, November and December went soured. There was another one in the end of January. The news of the sting operation in Georgia was part of it. The possible targets not only in North San Jose, but also in other big cities, include Boston. In the end of January, there was an Ad scare there. Cartoon signs were thought to be bombs. I think if the main target has been successfully bombed, (that is N. San Jose, or Milpitas), Boston would have been attacked. too. The devices for bomb were there already: the battery and the wire. What the rogue team had to do is to send some innocent workers installing the bomb later when the action time was due. The worker thought they were adding more advertising device in the ad box, not aware it was a bomb. They eventually became "suicide bombers".

I allege so because the strange treatment on this event. I read many story like this. People arrested when they made a joke of "hijack" on the plane. Luggage was intercepted for examination when it looked suspicious. Media always are serious reporting such kind of news . No one think it's a joke. But what I read in Mercury News is this:
Topic, "Ad scare suspects smiling in court
Pair make jokes after posting their bail"

"They appeared amused in court as a prosecutor alleged that one of the devices looked like it had C-4 explosive. "
"The devices also appeared in nine other big US cities in recent weeks but didn't raise an eyebrow in any of them.
Jo Baltz, a bookkeeper for World Cup Coffee and Tea in Portland, had one sitting on a filing cabinet Thursday and called "him" cute.
"the devices were "so obviously not suspicious," Sgt. John Urquhart said. "
(San Jose Mercury News 2/2/2007)

It gave people an impression that it was over reacted. That was conflict to the consistent seriousness when media talked about "security". So I view it as a real bombing plan of the Feds. When it was broken by the alerted Boston people, the Feds play it down by the media they controlled.

Remember, in January 2005, there was a Boston dirty bomb case. (see #284) Boston already has been a target in Fed's plan.

 

Oh Lord......

 

466. More evidence of January plot (2/10/07)

In #465, I alleged that the news release of a Russian selling Uranium and the case of the Boston Ad scare was a symptom that the Feds prepared another dirty bomb attack in later January. Other events proved there was a January plot.

In previous messages, I said that in these plots, after the dirty bomb attack in US, Bush would start war on Iran. It also would come with the civil war in Lebanon and Iraq. In November Surprise, three days before the Black Friday (I think 11/24 was the bombing action day) they assassinated the Industrial Minister of Lebanon - a pro-western politician, to justify a Lebanon civil war. In December plot, they executed Saddam Hussain to justify an Iraq civil war.

What did they do for the January plot? Read the following news:
Quote, "Hezbollah-backed strike shuts down Beirut
By Megan K.Stack (Los Angeles Times)

Beirut, Lebanon - Hezbollah and its allies paralyzed Lebanon on Tuesday, sending thousands of demonstrators to seize control of major roads, brawl with government supporters and choke the seaside capital in the acrid smoke of burning tires.

The swift seizure of the country's roads took many here by surprise and marked a major escalation in Hezbollah's campaign to overthrow Lebanon's US-backed government. At least three people died and more than 100 were wounded as clashes flared around the country."
(Mercury News, 1/24/07)

One day later:
"Strike by Hezbollah disappears, sudden calm returns to Beirut
By Megan K.Stack (Los Angeles Times)

Beirut, Lebanon - By the time morning commuters headed to work Wednesday, the fires had been snuffed out. The roadblocks had melted away. The Rampaging youth who were burning cars and choking off the nation's roads seemed to have evaporated. ......

The sudden peace Wednesday was nearly as disconcerting as the explosion of violence the day before. "
(Mercury News, 1/25/07¬)

Then I saw a news:
Quote, "U.S. can't prove Iran link to Iraq strife
By Maura Reynolds, Times Staff Writer
February 3, 2007
WASHINGTON - Administration officials have long complained that Iran was supplying Shiite Muslim militants with lethal explosives and other materiel used to kill U.S. military personnel. But despite several pledges to make the evidence public, the administration has twice postponed the release - most recently, a briefing by military officials scheduled for last Tuesday in Baghdad. "

"The truth is, quite frankly, we thought the briefing overstated, and we sent it back to get it narrowed and focused on the facts," national security advisor Stephen J. Hadley said Friday. "
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-iran3feb03,0,2695314.story?track=tottext

I checked the calendar, Last Tuesday to Feb. 3 was 1/23. We saw in three days from 1/23 to 1/25, Bush administration officials had prepared a news briefing to release the evidence that Iran supplied lethal arms to kill US military; Hezbollah made a sudden strike in Lebanon (without any reason); and a news release that a Russian arrested for selling Uranium. About same time electronic ad devices installed in sensitive areas in ten big cities in US.

If a dirty bomb attack(s) succeeded in US in later January, the condition for a war with Iran and civil war in Lebanon were ready. For some unknown reason, that plot went soured again. Then we saw the Bush administration postponed the briefing once again; and Hezbollah cancelled the strike as sudden as they starting it.

467. Attempt to murder my daughter (2/15/07)

May Zhou was a doctoral student of Stanford University. She left her dormitory on Saturday, 1/20. On 1/25. She was found dead in the trunk of her car which was parked at a lot of Santa Rosa Community College. Police say it was a suicide. They say there was chemical and medicine found in her blood.

Zhou's father said he asked to see his daughter's body before autopsy but was refused. Police denied it and said "Perhaps there was a miscommunication."

May Zhou's family and friends can't find any reason for her "suicide". Her father accuses the police tried to made a case of "academic pressure" suicide. e.g. Police asked her sister: "When your sister(May Zhou)got an A-minus in a class, (in high school) did your father ever get mad at her?".

"They asked all these strange questions," May Zhou's father said, "My daughter was a straight-A student." Her father said he found red trace on her daughter's wrist which may indicate she was treated by violence before her death. Since police blocked the information, he will pay for a private investigation.

I alleged it was a case done by Feds for my case. The purpose is to cover up a created "suicide" of my daughter.

1. Similarity. My daughter was a sophomore of UC Sandiago. May Zhou was a new doctoral student in Stanford.

2. Several months ago, when my daughter started her new University life, she talked about the academic pressure. She said in phone that the academic work is much heavier than in the high school. She and classmates had to read until midnight. The surveillance team obviously thought of a murder variety. This is why the Santa Rosa police tried to make it an "academic pressure" suicide.

3. Mind influence. When the media beat the drum on an event, it used to have a purpose. (you learned it from WMD propaganda, now the news of "Iran support Shiite" ) Local Chinese media consistently report this case in TV and newspaper. May Zhou's family lives in SanDiago too. My daughter, though rarely read Chinese newspaper and watch Chinese TV news, talked about May Zhou's case with her mother in phone. Media propaganda has planted it a "academic suicide" in public's mind.

4. Timing. You may have noticed May Zhou's disappearance and death was coincidence with the January plot. My case was tightly bound to the Iran war plot recently. Compare the timing with last message.

5. Strange death location. Though to die with overdose sleeping pill is common nowadays, most suicides chose to die in their beds peacefully. To die in the trunk, is surely not a comfortable way. How can Santa Rosa police explain why May Zhou drove a long way to die in a place with no dignity. Isn't that extra work for a "sleeping pill suicide"? Santa Rosa is about hundred miles away from Stanford.

6. My interpretation is because Santa Rosa is a city controlled by the Feds. The court, police, prosecutor, and coroner's office there may be under the command of the Feds. So they can frame any case there. Create or eliminate the evidence. If you remember Mark Karr's Remsey Bennet case five months ago. I alleged that case was created by Feds. On the purpose to convince people that DNA decides everything. (I think Feds have framed me in a crime by planting my DNA in it. see # 436. Ramsey Benet case and DNA (9/15/06)) Ramsey Bennet was murdered in Colorado, Mark Karr's residence is in Georgia, but he was charged by Sonoma County prosecutor.(California) Santa Rosa is the Sonoma County capital. The case was done in Santa Rosa. Mark Karr was prosecuted of child porn case in Santa Rosa, detained there, and the charge was dropped there. Because the evidence of the case was mysteriously lost.

That may explain why May Zhou was found there if it was a murder case disguised as "suicide". A system controlled by Feds can cover up any crime committed by their own people. All criminal trace will be eliminated to their wish.

7. Similar attempt had applied on my case five years ago. When Feds had planned a random shooting death for my nephew, a student of Stanford University, they shot dead an innocent Asian girl near the University on the purpose to cover up the coming murder. (see # "63. A well planed frame case").

While my family and I may be eliminated by "terror bombing" or be framed in "drug case", for my daughter who is far away from the Bay Area, Feds prepared a "suicide" for her.

The sad thing is though my daughter co-operates with the Feds, they still planned death for her because she knew too much in this case.

- - - Updated - - -

468. Follow up to #467, #461 and #462 (2/20/07)

1. Follow up to #467.

One day after I talked about May Zhou's mysterious death, the Mercury News had another article about her. Topic: "Suicide: Families find it hard to believe". May Zhou's father "insisted it couldn't be, even after the coroner's toxicology report said there were toxic levels of an over-the-count medication in May's body". Her father said the credit card record proved she had never buy such kind of medicine in drug store. If the blood test is true, there was possibility she was forced to eat that kind of medicine. The Mercury News talked a lot about "Suicide is "an area that is subject to such myths and taboos," . ..... But while some were perplexed that Zhou seemed upbeat before her disappearance, that detail made sense to a San Jose woman who once attempted suicide." Then it was a story of a woman who was "cheery and productive" but one day she checked into a San Jose hotel to commit suicide with sleeping pills. (2/17/2007, San Jose Mercury News)

Obviously it was a cover up story to convince people that suicide is common and can happen if people are in upbeat mood. But such kind of hypothesis is hard to believe even it was propagated by a newspaper.

My daughter came home for winter vacation. She slept later in the morning. She got a part time job in a store in Great Mall in the afternoon. (So she could be easily eliminated in December plot. I alleged the Feds prepared a bombing in Great Mall for me in later December). She went party with her classmates later at nights. I never saw her reading at home. So the academic pressure is not that much for her. I wrote these in case something happens.

2. follow up to #461 and 462.

On 1/15 and 1/20, I wrote #461 and #462, alleged that US had set up a Euro trap for Iran: If the December plot started, Euro would collapse due to the collapse of WANTA fund and the shortage of oil supply to the Europe. Iran not only would be bombed, but also suffered a huge loss in finance. On 2/1, an article proved the correctness of my analysis.

Re: "The War on Iran
Thursday, 01 February 2007
By Stephen Gowans

In Paulson’s view, Iran is still a major player globally, and needs to suffer the same pariah treatment. (New York Times, September 17, 2006) In October, US Treasury Department officials banned US banks from facilitating transactions involving Iran’s state-owned Bank Saderat. In January, the ban was widened to include another Iranian bank, Bank Sepah.

When Iran sells oil to a customer in Germany, the German customer asks a European bank to deposit US dollars into an Iranian bank account. The European bank then arranges for the transfer of US dollars from a US bank to an Iranian bank account in Europe. Paulson’s ban prohibits US banks from transferring funds if Bank Saderat and Bank Sepah are involved. (New York Times, October 16, 2006) With oil sales denominated in US dollars, the aim is to impede Iran’s ability to sell oil. The way around the US manoeuvre is to sell oil in Euros, something Iran has already begun to do. (New York Times, January 10, 2007)

This would seem to be a simple enough way of beating the US at its own game. It also raises questions about the prudence of compelling Iran to switch to Euros, since a change to Euros, if adopted by a number of oil-exporting countries, would push down the value of the US greenback. US investment banker John Hermann, a comptroller of currency in the Carter administration, wonders whether the US is shooting itself in the foot. (New York Times, October 16, 2006)

http://www.ichblog.eu/content/view/261/52/

In October, US blocked the financial transaction between US banks and major Iran bank which forced Iran to turn on to Euro instead of Dollar in oil trading. Two months later, if the December plot succeeded, Iran would suffer a big loss in finance. The US investment banker John Hermann wonders whether the US is shooting itself in the foot then. He wouldn't have that puzzle if he reads my messages.


469. Extortion on administration and CIA (2/25/2007)

So far, we saw from October 2006 to January 2007, there was a plot aimed to start Iran war in each month. When the old one went soured, there immediately came a new one.

To spread panic of nuclear terror, (because Iran is developing its nuclear project) there was N.Korea nuclear test, the murder of former Russian agent Litvinenko (died of Radioactive poison), China arresting N.Koreans for selling Uranium, Republic of Georgia arresting Russian for selling Uranium. To connect Iran to the civil war in Lebanon and Iraq, (Iran support Hazbollah and Iraqi Shiite) there was the assassination of the Lebanese Industry Minister, the execution of Saddam Hussain, the sudden seize of Beirut by Hezbollah. To hit Iran's economy, US banned the finance transaction between US banks and Iran's. Planned Paulson's arrest and the collapse of WANTA fund, the cutting oil supply to Europe, the bombing in Bangkok and the manipulation of stock market in Thailand and Hongkong.

The direct excuse to war on Iran is a dirty bomb attack in US. In Pat Robertson's words, it would be "a mass killing". The Feds planned "seven NFL football stadiums" bombing. Black Friday bombing, (after Thanks Giving day), ten big cities bombing, (Boston ad scary), of course, each time, they planned one for me.

It costs them a lot of resources. Will they stop and rest for a while? It seems their master won't allow them to take a break. The intimidation, or whipping, comes right away.

Re: "Mr. Cheney, please give us that 'stiff dose of truth'
Nicholas D. Kristof (NewYork Times columnist)

Because I.Lewis Libby is renowned for his caution, Mr. Vice President, it seems highly unlikely that he would have leaked classified information twice to reporters right after talking to you, unless you had sanctioned the leak. "
(2/8/2007 San Jose Mercury News)

"Closing arguments Tuesday in trial of former Cheney aide
By Michael J. Sniffen AP

The defense put in a hand-written note in which Cheney told the White House secretary to exonerate Libby in the leak and not sacrifice him to protect Bush's top political adviser - Karl Rove. "
(2/15/2007 San Jose Mercury News)

This is whipping on Bush administration. "If you don't act, the fire will extend to Cheney."

And more on CIA.
Re: "13 CIA operatives charged
By Craig Whitlock Washington Post

Berlin - German prosecutors issued arrest warrants for 13 agency operatives in the kidnapping of a German citizen in the Balkans in December 2003."
(2/1/2007 S.J. Mercury News)

"Ex- CIA official pleads not guilty
By Allison Hoffman A.P.

San Diego - Foggo, (ex CIA's executive director) now retired, pleaded not guilty to federal charges that he used that information to direct classified supply deals to his best friend, San Diego defense contractor Brent Wilkes."
(2/15/2007 San Jose Mercury News)

"Italy indicts CIA agents
26 Americans accused of kidnapping Egyptian cleric

By Colleen Barry A.P. "
(2/17/2007 San Jose Mercury News)

These are all old cases happened 20 months ago or in 2003. Suddenly they emerged in this month, along with Libby's case. I interpret this as an extortion on CIA. "Go find excuse for Iran war, or create some events for it. Otherwise some of you will be in jail by us law enforcers."

Cheney left US for Japan and Australia on 2/19. Since then Libby's case and CIA case are silent in media. I think a new plot is created. Cheney goes to Asia seeking support for Iran war from Japan and Australia. As for CIA, there will be big events in Mid-east, or Europe, or both to justify an attack on Iran. We knew Madrid bombing, London bombing already.

I am afraid that Prince Harry will be a sacrifice in this plot. The news of his military presence in Iraq is unusually propagated. His death could have been an important justification for Iran war.

 

470. Strong EM wave radiation and February plot (3/3/07)

In last post, I said the Feds didn't take a break and is going on with new plot. I was right. There was another plot planned to take place in February 27.

In last post, I worried about they would sacrifice Prince Harry to justify a new war. I was right. They planned war by sacrifice of celebrities' lives.

Re: "Cheney Targeted in Afghan Blast
Associated Press | February 27, 2007

BAGRAM, Afghanistan - A suicide bomber killed and wounded some two dozen people outside the main U.S. military base in Afghanistan on Tuesday during a visit by Vice President Dick Cheney. The Taliban claimed responsibility and said Cheney was the target. "

http://www.military.com/NewsContent/0,13319,126678,00.html

In previous messages, I alleged there would be international financial crisis came with the terror attack. I was right. This time the Inside Group prepared a big fall on global stock market. On February 27, the China's stock market dropped 8,8%. Japan and US stock market lost more than 3% that day. So were Hongkong and other countries.(U.K., India, Australia.....) They all had a significant loss in stock index.

Cheney's trip to Afghanistan was unnecessary and unplanned.

Re: "US says Cheney wasn't target of Afghan attack.
By Griff Witte Washington Post

WASHINGTON - A purported Taliban spokesman asserted responsibility for a suicide bomb attack Tuesday at the main US air base in Afghanistan and said it was an attempt to assassinate Vice President Dick Cheney. But US officials disputed the claim, stating that Cheney's overnight stay at the sprawling Bagram Air Base had been unplanned and that he was well away from the blast."
(San Jose Mercury News 2/28/07)

Was Cheney well away from the blast?
He himself said "I heard a loud boom" than was moved promptly to a bomb shelter.

Is it true that Cheney wasn't target of Afghan attack?
How could the Taliban spokesman claim they targeted at Cheney? The claim came with the news of bombing. (see the above news right on the day of Feb. 27.) Obviously it was pre-prepared. Do you think the bombing happened at Bagram Air Base was a coincidence that Cheney happened to take an unplanned visit there?

Why US deny Cheney was not targeted one day later?
On Feb 27 the authority said the bombing proved Taliban infiltrated the intelligence. Do you believe Taliban has so remarkable ability? It only proves Al Qaida, as I always said, is a tool manipulated by US intelligence. They do whatever the intelligence want them to do. Cheney's unplanned visit may not be aware by high ranking US officials, how could Taliban knew it and prepared a bombing attack in a very short time? US denied that Cheney was not the target one day later because there were many flaws in this soured plot. A real investigation would have found the root of a plot of false flag attack. So they cover it up as a random attack coincide with Cheney's visit. Otherwise there will be an investigation on their own: the Secret Service, CIA, Pentagon. They will use the "Al Qaida infiltrate the intelligence" as a justification for the next assassination. There is still Prince Harry there.

I have personal experience that each time they planing a plot, the Feds always planned framed case or elimination on me. There is no exception in this February plot.

Feb.17 is Chinese New Year eve. My family member had a re-union dinner in San Francisco. I didn't go.
Then on Feb. 24, my parents and other family members and relatives came to my home, invited me for a dinner to a restaurant. I refused too. I know Feds used to frame an arrest in such occasion.
That night and the next night (Feb 25), there was a strong EM wave radiation shooting on me. I slept behind metal plate, the radiation was so strong that it penetrate the thin metal plates. I could feel uncomfortable, unusual feeling at my face when the radiation was applied on me. I was afraid I might be fatally hurt by this strong radiation that on Feb 26, I moved to sitting room and slept there. My bedroom shares the wall with neiborhood and I allege the strong radiation were from there. The sitting room is seperated from it with laundry room and heating furnace.

It was better after I moved the sleeping place. (though they still shoot the EM wave) Next day (Feb 27), I heard the Cheney case and stock market case. Normally, innocent people may have died after being shoot by this EM wave radiation the whole night. How could they know they must protect themselves by metal shield? I survived with my knowledge and experience. Feds must have killed many people with such a weapon. I am so grief and indignation with the people who were murdered by this fascist "law enforcement agency".

471. The death related to EM wave radiation (3/8/07)

I started to recognize it probably was the house that caused the Feds' persecution on me when someone suggested to exchange his house with mine in early 90s. (see #278 - #282)

Then in March, 2000, after I complained to US embassy in Thailand alleged that FBI manipulated bank practice of remittance, I found there was an attempt to frame me in drug case.(see: #37, 49, 50, 51)
I was in panic and had to seek political asylum from Thailand Foreign Ministry. It only intensified the persecution. So I left Thailand for Laos. Re: "About in early April, 2000, when I was still in panic mood of Thailand event, I read a news from a Chinese newspaper that FBI director Freeh would resign from his post, because FBI abused their power to a man whom bought a house which FBI wanted. It was a strange news. I had a strong feeling the article was for me (actually Freeh stayed in the post until one year later he resigned again when FBI signed a secret deal with China to frame a big drug case. see #61 - 64) It proved my early suspicion that the persecution was due to the house.

In July 2000, when I got back to my home in US, I checked the document in house deal. In it there is a death certificate of the former landlord. ( I took over the mortgage loan from the seller - a widow, but one of the joint borrower had died so they had to prove it with document) He works for US Navy when he was alive. He was in his 30s when He died.
The death was caused by:
immediate cause (A) Probable pulmonary embolus.
Due to. or as a consequence of (B) Thrombophlebitis of leg

I checked the dictionary and learned that former landlord died of clot formed in leg which then blocked the blood to lung. It proves my allegation that former landlord died of a covert murder - microwave killing. Though I don't know what was the motive to murder him, it's unusual he died so young. (in his 30s) The tactic of murder was a skill I am familiar to - microwave killing. (see #5. Microwave killing)
After hours of low dose of microwave radiation, the blood cell gradually died and formed clots. When the clots moved to lung and blocked the artery, the lung collapsed. When it moves to heart, a heart attack happens. When it moves to brain, then it's a stroke.

Why the clot originates from leg? I think the Feds used to install the killing device in engine room. It's easy to be installed there and hard to be discovered. (used to be guised as parts?) Foot to control the pedal is the nearest to the microwave source. Or they deliberately to shoot on people's leg because the foot is less sensitive than the head and hands. Victim is hard to feel it when the microwave is applied on the leg.

Quote, "Cheney treated for blood clot in his leg
POSTED: 5:37 p.m. EST, March 5, 2007
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Doctors found a blood clot in Vice President Dick Cheney's left leg Monday, Cheney's office said.
Doctors performed an ultrasound and found a deep venous thrombosis, or DVT.
Complications from DVT kill up to 200,000 people in the United States each year, but the clots can be easily treated through medication.
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/03/05/cheney.health/index.html

On March 5, when the TV news reported Cheney's blood clot story, (local Chinese TV), I was surprised at the striking resemblance of the broadcaster's description about the blood clot with mine. She said the blood clot formed in leg. "When the clots moved to lung and blocked the artery, the lung collapsed. When it moves to heart, a heart attack happens. When it moves to brain, then it's a stroke." The only difference was she said doctors thought it was probably caused by lacking of movement after long air travel.

Was this the only long air travel Cheney took?
No, I think recently he at least took one to Riyad.to arrange an Iraqi civil war. There seemed no problem of blood clot then.

Was Air force No. 2 a small plane?

No, I think it was not as narrow as the normal economic seat commercial air line used to offer. I am sure it's much, much spacious then any first class cabinet.

Was time sensitive in this case.
Yes, Vice President Cheney was arranged an unplanned visit to Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan where he encountered a bombing. Will he suspect on that? What will intelligence do after their plot went soured?

Also it was at the ending of Libby's CIA leaking case. Libby said he was the sacrifice. Would it be better to have such an ending similar to Kenneth Lay's death in Enron case? The Libby verdict came one day after Cheney's clot story.

- - - Updated - - -

472. Radio frequency weapon that causes vomit (3/13/07)

Statement by
Lieutenant General Robert L. Schweitzer
U.S. Army (Retired)

before the
Joint Economic Committee
United States Congress

June 17, 1997
Radio Frequency Weapons and the Infrastructure

Low cost per engagement
All weather
Instantaneous engagement times
Simplified pointing and tracking
Possible to engage multiple targets
Deep magazines-simplified logistics (can "fire" or pulse as long as there is power in the generator)
Non-lethal to humans when properly adjusted
Well suited to covert operations because of lack of signature; deniability
Not able to detect attacks; silent when used without explosive devices

http://www.house.gov/jec/hearings/espionag/schweitz.htm

The radio Frequency weapons here are the one I referred as EM wave weapon. (Electro-magnetic wave).
Watch the last three advantages of that weapon General Schweitzer said. In fact, it becomes a lethal weapon the Feds frequently used to murder American people. Because it lacks of signature; being deniability; not able to detect attacks. I must add one more point, it is a preferable murder weapon because the death resembles to natural disease.

In normal life, many device works on EM-wave: radio broadcast; TV; microwave oven, mobile phone; radar..... There are different usage for different frequency EM wave. So was it when it used as a weapon.

To my experience, one imitates sleeping wave which can force people going to sleep. The other one is microwave killing device which create blood clot to develop the death like heart attack, stroke or lung collapse. Microwave radiation also cause Leukemia.

Here is another one used as a punishment. It caused the dizzy, nausea and vomit.
In later 1980s or early 1990s, (I don't remember the exact time), I had been sick several times. The uncomfortable feeling was so bad, but lasts very short time. It always ended with vomit. I didn't suspect anything else then.

It was until mid 1990s, when Reno (the Attorney General of Clinton era) had a dispute with FBI director Louis Freeh. (Reno denied a propose from Freeh to have an investigation on something (about Clinton?)) I realized there was such a weapon. At that time, I got more familiar about the Feds. I knew there was EM wave weapon. I alleged former FBI director Sessions who refused to give up his seat to Louis Freeh was punished by the EM wave weapon. He fell and broke his elbow the day before he was fired. So I speculated, would Reno be punished too? I was right. Soon there came the news that Reno collapsed in an open meeting when she made a speech in the stage. (I remember it was in Mexico?) She said she was dizzy and sick.

I suddenly remembered the unusual vomit I had years ago. That was the only vomits happened in decades. It came sudden and left sudden. It happened without any reasonable cause. I also recalled that years ago, the former President Bush Sr. (George W. Bush's father) had once collapsed in a banquet. (in Japan?) He collapsed on a neighbor guest and vomited. I realized there was an EM wave weapon that causes sick and vomit.

In April, 1999, I was in Hongkong to start my South-east Asia drift. Same thing happened to Mrs. Chen Fang An Shen - a top government official in Hongkong. She collapsed on her neighbor official in a meeting. The doctor said later that it was caused by the maladjustment of her balancing liquid in the ear.

In these three cases, all the victims were high ranking government officials. They were punished because they did something disfavored by the Feds. I noticed there was a similarity in these cases. They all took place in open places. In a meeting or a state banquet. In such occurrence, there were a lot of media people. It's easy to install a EM wave device in a camera. When the camera man focus on the face of the target, the EM wave ray also shoot at his head. The particular frequency set to disturb the balance liquid in the ear of the target. The result was the sick and vomit of the victim.

My conclusion soon was proved by another event. I even saw the camera and its handler with my own eyes.

473. EM wave torture (3/18/07)

On 1/24/2000, I arrived at Seal Ream, a town famous with its history site - Ankor wah. A young man picked me up at the bus station and sent me to a Guest House by the motorcycle. It was a common way for transportation in Cambodia.

On 1/25, I came across with him at the reception hall. He offered me a "One day tour" for next day. The bargain included an extra tour. He would ride me to visit Ankor Wah later that day (1/25), because after four o'clock, according to him, the authority wouldn't check the ticket. So I only need to buy one day's permission on 1/26. And I could spent the whole day on other interesting temples. There were about a dozen of them. He showed me the tourist map.

I accepted the deal. About four o'clock, he rid me to the Ankor Wah. He dropped me at the entrance, said I could find him at a tea house nearby. So I went into the temple alone. It was late afternoon, tourists were leaving. I am the only one going the opposite way. I visited the temple with a tourist book. At last I got to the top of Ankor Wah.

It was dusk. I sat on a stone, watching the beautiful sunset, I felt homesick. It was ten months since I drifted in South-east Asia. Though Ankoh Wah was a famous history site, I came here not as a tourist but a refugee to escape the persecution from the Feds. How absurd, a so said democratic country was a so dark country.

Just then I felt a noise, like something moving inside my ear. I felt a little dizzy and sick. I turned around, saw two western men about ten feet away behind me. One held a film camera which was pretty a big one, the other one carried a wooden box which I thought was for battery. The camera seemed aiming at sunset but I knew it was at me. We were on same direction and I was in the middle. I immediately left the Ankoh Wah, left the beautiful sight view which I enjoyed so much.

Next morning I visited other temples until to the Ta Prohm. It was as interesting as Ankor Wah. The temple was kept in its original condition when it was discovered. The giant trees grew up on the temple ruins. Its root stretched in the gap of the big stones. The mood was so ancient and mysterious that some film took it as background. Then I saw that two camera men again. I had to left Ta Prohm earlier to avoid an EM wave torture.

It was before noon. The young man suddenly said the tour was finished. Most temples he introduced the day before hadn't been visited yet. He denied he had made a promise. I couldn't force him to continue. Then why did he gave me two rides that could be done in one day? The road to Ankor Wah was on the same journey to other temples. It was overlapped.

I then knew he must be from secret police of Cambodian. Ankor Wah is a hot travel spot. There used to be a lot of tourists there. To avoid other tourist disturbing the EM wave shooting, the secret police planned a bargain deal at dusk. They almost succeeded if I was not aware of their secret weapon. They did succeed in one thing. That evening on top of Ankor Wah, there were only three people: Me, a potential victim and two men of Feds - special handler of EM wave ray.

On 1/28, I was in Phnom Penh. I joined a local tour. I visited killing field, then to a concentration camp -Tuol Sleng - where Comah Raug (Spelling? Cambodia communist Party) killed several thousand prisoners there. I watched the jail cell, victims' pictures and then, to a room where torture tool displayed. I met with the two camera men for the third time. They already have set up their camera there, aimed at the display torture tool. If the target stood down to watch, a button would be pushed and a real torture would happen. I passed the exhibition without any delay.

It's a sarcasm that the Feds planned a torture at a site where they accuse others committing the torture crime. When this government claim Saddam torture people, kill civilians, I never took it seriously. Because it did same thing.
A totalitarian country does the torture and kill because the system allows them do it openly. So we know it.
A "democratic" country such like US does same thing but rare people knows because they developed a system to do it covertly. Although there is a constitution to restrain it namely, step by step, the Feds are not satisfy with "do it covertly". They try to make it legally by Patriot Act and "War on terror", by Guantanamo and "enemy combatant".
When CIA and Pentagon make "waterboarding" a legal interrogation technic, I can't help to think of the torture room in Tuol Sleng. Though I didn't stop to watch the torture tool display, I knew one tool is a big water box used to choke victim's breathe. (From the picture illustration before the display room) What's the difference between Comah Roug (spelling?) and the Feds?

474. New Federal Attorney and March plot (3/23/07)

Another kind of radio frequency weapon is a very strong ray. (I guess it is Gamma ray which also used in medical surgery which doctor call it Gamma knife ) It was so strong that when it shoot at the leg joint (just in milli-second, a very short moment) the people would fall on the ground. I think former FBI director Sessions's broken elbow was the result of that kind of ray. If they use it less sensitive but a little longer in time then the muscle, nerve or internal organ would be hurt badly. I had such experience two years ago (see #286. Intensified EM wave shooting. (1/29/05)) After I alleged the Boston dirty bomb case was a case framed by FBI, (See #284, 285.) the joint of my left arm was so hurt that I couldn't move my arm for one month.

It seems that Gamma ray team come back again. Though I am not sure it is gamma ray, I call it so because that ray can be strong enough to penetrate the metal plate. (see "470. Strong EM wave radiation and February plot (3/3/07)") Not only I suffered from it recently, they also applied it on my youngest sister. About ten days ago she felt her waist was hurt. Next day she couldn't move her body. Since she and her husband having a business and always being a target victim, I think another framed drug case has been planned.

Paulson - a man works for the Feds and manipulated Chinese currency exchange rate by secret deal between the secret police of US and China - was in Asia in early March. (mainly he was in China) So another secret deal has been made. Then I noticed another news.

In mid-March, news said the East bound road in Bay Bridge would start to detour on March 28 and 29. It was part of the earthquake strengthening work. It said that it would cause traffic jam in first few days but everything would be OK when people get used to the new road. Last year, twice the Bay Bridge had been closed for same work. It coincided with September plot. (see "432. September plot (8/30/06)" and "433. 9/2 plot (9/5/06)"). So there will be another "March plot".

The old Fed team comes back, uses same weapon and plays same tactic and frames same case. I think another drug case is arranged. The drug is from China, (or from Burma via China). The case will break up on 3/28 or 3/29 or around that time. History repeats. To avoid overlap, I only remind people to see # so and so.

There is only one new face: the Federal Attorney who handles N. California. Kevin Ryan resigns his post two months ago on Jan. 16. He is one of the eight Federal prosecutors fired by DOJ which now is becoming a hot case in Capital Hill. I think he lost his post because he failed to frame me in created crime. I also believe the rest seven prosecutors are the sacrifice to cover up Kevin Ryan's resignation.

Two years ago, I already found Ryan was under pressure in my case and was intimidated "do it otherwise you'll be fired." I particularly wrote a comment about it. Now I have to say my sense was very correct.

Re: "It is obviously a push to urge Attorney Ryan to file new big case aggressively. It is also an intimidation which hinted "forced to resign" if he failed to do so. Consider the situation I am in, I think it is direct on me. As a matter of fact, Ryan has done so already. The article says, "Ryan has beefed up the San Jose branch to 20 lawyers from the usual dozen or so, an unprecedented level." (see "244. Push for an aggressive case (7/29/04)")

With a new face of Federal Attorney, very likely one of Feds' own, DOJ quickly pick up the old tactic. In two months they have planned a big drug case after Ryan was fired.

 

475. The fired Federal Attorney and March plot (3/28/07)

Kevin Ryan was fired (in the name of resignation) at the same time when Neigroponte lost his post of the National intelligence head. They were punished for failure to frame an innocent person in created crime. To cover up Ryan's forced resignation, other Federal Attorney became sacrifice. DOJ fired those whom were thought not loyal to Bush to make Ryan's resignation not so evident.

Most of those fired issued a stiff defense of their conduct except Kevin Ryan. It could prove my allegation that they were sacrifice. Read the following news, you may understand better.

Re: "S. F. prosecutor's firing unchallenged
Howard Mintz
Mercury News March 21, 2007

Despite all the controversy surrounding the firing of eight US attorneys, the release of thousands of pages of internal Justice Department documents shows there has not been much protest over the ouster of San Francisco US Attorney Kevin Ryan,.....

Ryan was among the US attorneys asked to resign in the December purge, but Bush administration critics, including Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., have not cited his dismissal as being tainted by politics.
.......

Unlike other US attorneys who protested their firings, there are few exchanges involving Ryan in the newly released documents. One Justice Department e-mail quotes Ryan's former chief assistant, Eumi Choi, as saying Ryan was remaining a "company man" after his firing and refusing to take phone calls from Feinstein."

In early 1990s, when I found Feds (FBI, DEA) using radioactive material as tracing tactic which hurt my health, I complained to Federal Attorney's office. I was very innocent then, after failing to complain in some office like D.A.'s office or organization such like ACLU... I went to the Federal Building. I went there several times until an aide told me that "there is no use to come here. We cooperate with FBI." Then I knew they work together.

Did Ryan, as DOJ said, run his office in disarray? No, he did a very aggressive job. From the news "Ryan has beefed up the San Jose branch to 20 lawyers from the usual dozen or so, an unprecedented level.", I knew he arranged almost eight or so Federal Attorney to frame me in case. What have they done?

To plant drug at my house by "free gift". To disguise contractor for "reasonable search". To block the drainage to search the water after I washing the clothes or take a bath. To collect the garbage by a cover up "garbage company". To manipulate my wife to file tax return without my consent. To cut my financial support...... All these were the work done by the attorneys in Ryan's office with the Feds.

One thing you should know is that Ryan was not fired for doing these evil things. He was fired for not evil enough to frame me in a case they created.

The model of the recent plot are always like this: Iran war to distract a domestic framed case. (Sometimes it's a framed case, sometimes it's a murder bombing ) I view the arrest of 15 British sailors is a part of the March plot.

Re: U.S. Navy Launches Show Of Force Off Coast Of Iran
Mar 27, 2007 10:45 am US/Eastern

(AP) DUBAI, United Arab Emirates The U.S. Navy on Tuesday began its largest demonstration of force in the Persian Gulf since the 2003 invasion of Iraq, led by a pair of aircraft carriers and backed by warplanes flying simulated attack maneuvers off the coast of Iran.

The U.S. exercises come just four days after Iran's capture of 15 British sailors and marines who Iran said had strayed into Iranian waters near the Gulf. Britain and the U.S. Navy have insisted the British sailors were operating in Iraqi waters.
http://cbs4.com/national/topstories_story_086055555.html

476. The Garbage company (4/3/2007)

When I saw the news that there would be a detour in Bay Bridge on March 28, 29, I thought there would be a framed case to be carried out at that time. Then another news proved my allegation.

Re: "Trash hauler admonished
California Waste may lose city deal if it doesn't find Truck storage in a week

By Barry Witt Mercury News
March 21, 2007"

CWS (California Waste Solution) plays a major role in the attempt of regime change of San Jose. (Feds tried to oust former Mayor Gonzalez by a replacement of their own - Chuck Reed.) (see " 425. Manipulate judicial power (8/5/06)") So I alleged it is a cover up company run by the Feds. Feds used to search the garbage of the victims they interested at. So a garbage company is a necessity for them.

CWS won a two years contract (July 2007 - June 2009) with San Jose City six months ago. The utility contract used to be signed for six years to assure residents having a long stable service. Why did the city make a two years' one? It was made to fit the demand of the Feds. Six years is too long for them. They thought they could eliminate me in a short period. But could they have a utility contract for only a few months? That would be a joke. So we saw a two years contract - the shortest they could have.

But situation changed. Started from last October, the Inside Group decided to have another war in Mid-east: War on Iran. It could be a nice distract Feds needed on a big framed case. DOJ must have given the order to Feds that they must go all for it. So we saw each month the Pentagon and CIA had prepared a war and Feds framed a case or elimination on me. For the failure of the plot, someone (Negroponte, Ryan) had stepped down.

The plot of March 28 must be a big drug case. If it succeeded, then Feds is unnecessary to search the garbage in San Jose for another two years. CWS got a week's notice from the City. Watch the date of the news, after a week, it was March 28 - the day framed case planned to break up. At that day the Feds would have known if they need the garbage contract any more and make a decision.

CWS, a particular garbage team.

1. Timing. I was under surveillance all the time. I didn't care because I did nothing wrong. But things changed after I complained to US Embassy in Thailand about FBI. I found there was attempt to frame me in drug case. That is different. It means you will be framed in case even if you did nothing wrong. They plant. So when I came back to US in July 2000, I started to surf in internet, reveal what happened to me.

Feds is scared at my revelation. They started to frame case in US. The garbage company in San Jose then was Norcal.
CWS joined in as a subcontractor in October 2000. Three months after I came back and went internet.

2. A particular team with privilege.
Norcal asked a better pay and welfare for its subcontractor CWS. Former San Jose Mayor promised a compensation deal to secure the contract and to avoid a strike. The result is: the garbage rate raised from 16.00/month to 20.00/month in 2006.

3. Strange logic.
The beneficiary of the deal is obviously the CWS team. But five years later, when Feds needed a regime change, they charge Gonzalez committing bribery because CWS was benefited.(Norcal is co-defendant, because Norcal requested high pay for the CWS.)
The real benefitter - CWS, remained untouched. Last October, Norcal lost contract because that compensation deal. CWS, on the contrary, got the new deal with another company. The garbage rate will raise from 20/month to 26/month. when the new contract is on.
Since CWS stepping in, residents pay higher and higher garbage rate.
CWS get a better pay and benefit and new contract.
Those who worked for CWS - Gonzalez and Norcal, became a scapegoat, either was charged or lost contract.

4. A rogue mark of Feds.
Read the following report to see how Feds worked to persecute the opponent for their interest. Some tactic you should be familiar now. The silence of the victim. (remember Federal Attorney Ryan?) The stroke. (remember Gonzalez got a stroke?) The story was in October 2000 when CWS joined as a subcontractor.

Re: "Testimony undermines trash case

......
Teamster leader R. Morales said he and A. Dean, then the powerful head of the South Bay Labor Council, were threatening to ask the city council to deny Norcal's bid unless the worker who would have to transfer from the city's existing contractor to a new one were guaranteed they wouldn't take a cut in wages and benefits. The Teamsters at the time were earning nearly $11 and hour and had full health care insurance provided for their families; the Longshoremen's contract paid $7 an hour and insured only the worker.

The Longshoremen's union put up little resistance. Roberto Flotte, then the Longshoremen's president, appeared at an Oct.10, 2000 city council meeting at CWS' request to argue on his union's behalf. But after that date, he was never heard from in San Jose again. Luna said she tried to call Flotte but he never responded. Flotte suffered a debilitation stroke two months after the council meeting and was ousted from his leadership position on issues unrelated to San Jose the following year. " (Mercury News 8/14/2006)

- - - Updated - - -

477. Internet planting and April plot (4/8/07)

Sometimes there was a frame popped up when I was surfing. It demands I download some programme. Since my computer was under the control of the Feds' surveillance server, I always take it as a trap and bypass it. I am afraid the material they want me to download are some illegal data used as plant.

Four days ago, when I tried to go internet, a frame popped up again. It said,

"Improving your connection

America Online has detected changes in your connection setup. Click OK to finish updating the changes."

It gave two choice: "OK" and "Remind me later".

So this time they disguised as AOL to set up a trap, I thought. As usual I clicked "Remind me later" to avoid a download. But then the "start AOL" lost function. I re-clicked AOL logo but it was always that "Improving your connection" popped up. "Remind me later" always lead to defunction. It seemed Feds tried to force me a download.

At last I had to turn on to another computer.

The persecution is so intensified that the team believe they'll eliminate me in days. (from the news that garbage team intended to cancel the contract) Anytime they may block me to the internet.

Someone said that I was not that great to cost the Feds that much work. How can an individual compare with a war? That's because they stand at a plate form of the third person.

If you can view the things from another angle, the result will be different.

A criminal can start a war in which they may gain a lot: oil, currency control, security of Israel...... But if there is no war. It doesn't hurt. He loses nothing. He just doesn't gain.

But what about a witness who knows their secret? If they don't eliminate him, their real face will be revealed. Their power base will shaken. Their control will loose. What wait for them maybe not only resignation but jail sentence.

Not gain and lose a lot, which is more important?

That's why in past plots, each time they could start a war but postponed it at last minute. They are waiting for a framed case. What will it be in this coming April plot? Possibly still that drug case not used in March plot. That is against my youngest sister who had been hurt her waist last month. And on me, possibly on tax return.

Attorney General Gonzales has trouble these days. The news of his role in firing eight Federal Attorneys was bustling in later March which was coincidence with the date of the March plot. Now it seems cooling off. But read a news:

Re: " Scandal-ridden Gonzales guilty of nothing worse than ineptitude
By Ruben Navarrette Jr. (Mercury News 4/4/2007)

..... He'll have one last chance to do that, and perhaps keep his job, when he testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee on April 17."

April 17? If you remember what is the last date to file a tax return. And remember the story how CWS - the garbage team - gave themselves a notice to make a decision to abandon a contract or not at March 28? (see #476) Because at that time, they would know if the target is eliminated or not.

478. April plot and tax return (4/13/07)

In the end of last month, when I received the bank statement, I saw there was a tax refund from IRS. That bank account, though is a joint account, is used generally by me when my wife opened an individual account of her own. I asked her what was it. She said that is her tax refund, she still uses that joint account for tax file. (We file tax return separately).

Then I knew Feds planned tax trap on I for the April plot. They try to link me to my wife's tax return.

What will it be? I think it will be an unreasonable search in the name of IRS.

When I quit the business. There was still some merchandise left unsold. I piled them up in the garage. Each year in tax return, I filed a Schedule C (form 1040) report a merchandise stock unchanged. Never missing a year.

Then in January 2006 (for the tax year 2005) the tax book I received from IRS missing the form Schedule C. I had to pick it up from the post office. This has never happened before. I started to suspect the Feds would play trick on the stock. I think Feds has planted drug somewhere in garage and attic. They tried to carry out an unreasonable search by replacing garage door and roof change before. This time they tried to create a condition of "under report the merchandise stock" and carry out a search in my garage.

When I prepared a joint return for year 2005, my wife informed me that she had reported it already by an accountant firm. They filed it electronically without my consent. What lacked was my signature. I was angry. It was a mandate. But since they filed the return already. I had no choice. I examined the return and found big mistake on it. It didn't report the interest and dividend income from a Security company. It didn't report free ticket from Air line company. And, of course, they didn't file Schedule C report the unchanged stock.

I wrote a notice to the accountant company, listing the mistake, demanding a correction. I later even gave them the return I had prepared as a model. Finally they made an amendment. But still missed to file Schedule C about the unchanged merchandise stock. This assured me the Feds had prepared an excuse to search my garage. I refused to sign the amendment, insisted that it must include a Schedule C. My wife said the accountant firm was very busy, they wouldn't do amendment any more. They said, I could do the amendment myself. But I dare not to change other's work. My last word was, if they didn't change it to my wish, then we had to file the tax return separately. They didn't do it to my wish, a very simple one. .

I did prepared a separate tax return and found except that Schedule C, I have little to report. I almost had no income. I checked the tax book and knew that according to the IRS rule, I don't have to file it. So I didn't material file the tax return.

As a revenge to my notice of "file separate tax return". My wife stopped to deposit her paycheck into our joint account and opened an individual account. I had to cancel one of my life insurance and borrow from the other's to support my life.

I filed tax return every year until 2005. I honestly report everything. To frame a case against me, I alleged the Feds (DOJ and FBI, DEA) committed:
1. Manipulated IRS to cut the supply of Form Schedule C in mail.
2. Manipulated my wife to file tax return without my consent.
3. Manipulated the accountant office to file tax return without my signature.
4. Attempted to frame a case of "no report of interest and dividend income".
5. Manipulated the accountant firm refusing my request to file Schedule C which lead to separate filing of tax return at last.

I don't know why my wife still uses that joint account as address for her own tax return. I think it was an attempt to link me to my wife's tax return. Feds have manipulated another framed case related to tax. That's why five days ago, I related the Attorney General Gonzales' hearing of April 17 to the final date of tax return. I have to say again I was very correct. Two days ago, I learned that my wife will have a tour started on April 17. She refuses to tell me where she will go. The tour will last 2 weeks or so. Unusual long compare with her former travels. So framed case will happen in later April. (from Apr. 17) Though I did everything to the rule, you never know what a villain will do. I also worry about the safety of my wife. She is a key witness to the case. She may be eliminated in travel "accident" even though she cooperated with Feds.


479. The rain on Saturdays (4/18/07)

There is a drought in Bay Area. Several days ago, the water district issued an early warning of water shortage in coming season.

It contradicts to a forecast. Expert said this is a year of El-Nino. El-Nino means there would be a wet winter. "But what has been surprising to weather experts is the fact that the Bay Area has see well-below average rainfall totals this winter. (Mercury News, "El-Nino bows out with barely a splash", Mar.9, 2007)"

What made El-Nino lose its power? I allege it is another case Feds manipulate the climate for their case. Several times I talked about the Feds and Chinese secret police had framed drug case on my Brother in law. I thought they had planted drugs in merchandise (umbrella) which was imported by B (my brother in law) from China. Of course, B is not aware of he is set up. Then how can Feds frame him in a case on their planned time? Here is a typical story. Feds organized a strike in harbor for one month. When the strike ended, containers were released at once. At that time, B's employers suddenly quit the job. He had to unload the container by himself. That's how Feds to create a drug case. (see "167. The frame case is going on (9/26/03)").

The merchandise from China is umbrella. The best way to control the break out of a case is to arrest when it is on delivery. Then rain becomes the best way to control the umbrella delivery. B is the boss. He has warehouse worker do the delivery job. How can Feds frame him in? Because B is a hard work man. He works on week-ends. He does the emergent delivery in week-ends when no employers working. Umbrella only sells on rain day. It is an on time merchandise.

Something strange happens. Started from this month, three Saturdays were forecasted rainy day. That is: 4/7, 4/14, 4/21. It's unusual in these dry days. The rain logo became eye-catching compare with the sun logo the rest days in weather forecast chart. The Saturday forecast also said "rain likely", or "Chance of rain".. Why? Because I am the main target. Without elimination of me, they won't carry out the other plot. This time is a tax file plot. I haven't file tax file. So there was little rain on 4/7 and 4/14.

Tax file season ends on 4/17. As Feds are so eager to finish the case, the plot will be carried out right away. My wife left for a trip on 4/17. I think a raid by Feds (in the name of IRS) likely will happen on 4/19 or 4/20. I say so because different from 4/4 and 4/14, this time comes three rain days in weather forecast: 4/19 - 4/21. 4/21 is planned for B's. The other two days is for me. I will tell you why I think so next time if I have chance.

By the way. These days I burned my private letters and my collection of stamps. Those stamps, some are valuable when I insisted the collection during Chinese Culture Revolution. I won't left those valuables to those evil people. They have set their greedy eye on it for a long time. (see "33. Evaluation of property")

 

480. The real killer behind Virginia Tech. massacre (1) (4/23/07)

I think the Virginia Tech. massacre was done by Feds.

1. A very detailed news which disappeared later

On 4/16, I heard the tragedy from local Chinese TV news. It reported that the gunman's visa was issued in Shanghai, and his entry port was San Francisco. My first thought was: "How efficient they are. They got everything right away." Then I became suspicious. Shanghai? My family came from Shanghai. San Francisco? My parents, my sisters live in San Francisco, and have their business there. Next day was 4/17, the day I alleged for the breakout of a framed case. In message of March, I alleged the Feds had collaborated with Chinese secret police for a new drug case. The V.T. killer, obviously was a Chinese, according to the news. Was that part of new plot? When people didn't know what exactly happened inside Virginia Tech. was that strange we got such a detail news on 4/16? Nobody could have that detail except Feds. And nobody could release that to the media except Feds.

Here is the reference for that news. Watch the date the news was issuing. That news now is not available in Sun-Times URL. It was replaced by some different description.
Re: "Gunman kills 32 at Virginia Tech before being killed

April 16, 2007
BY MICHAEL SNEED Sun-Times Columnist

Sneed hears authorities were investigating whether the gunman who killed 32 people in a rampage on the Virginia Tech campus was a Chinese national who arrived in the United States last year on a student visa.

The 25-year-old man being investigated for the deadliest college carnage in U.S. history reportedly arrived in San Francisco on a United Airlines flight on Aug. 7, 2006, on a visa issued in Shanghai, the source said. Investigators had not linked him to any terrorist groups, the source added."

2. The purpose of Virginia Tech. massacre

The US intelligence used to influence American people by media with psychological operation. The news about WMD, the mushroom cloud threat, the film "300", numerous video tape of Bin Laden, Zhawahiri, Zhaqawi, the beheading tape of Nick Berg are all belong to this category. It is used to vilify Islamic and to inflame and agitate people. What if the plot was successful to their plan? People would have believed what Feds told them: the Chinese (Shanghainese) were evil people. They did drug smuggling; they massacre American students.

The most important role of V.T. killing was: it was planned to distract. I have revealed since last October to this March, in each month there was a plot. Each time I emphasized that they used Iran war as distract. Though I talked a lot about April 17 plot, this time I haven't talked about Iran war because I found none. Did Feds abandon their tactic? No, distract is an important tactic in Feds plan. When it became a familiar one to the people, Feds replaced it by a massacre. They killed students as many as possible to make it the worst in US history. This news withdraws public attention from other would be news such like drug case or unusual death in police brutality.

3. The Chinese killer replaced by Cho Seung Hui.

Mercury News on next day reported "Gonzales hearing postponed in wake of campus shooting". I have viewed this hearing as a mark of 4/17 plot in which Attorney General " ..... He'll have one last chance to do that, and perhaps keep his job, when he testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee on April 17." (see #477) Now it was postponed. It means the April plot was postponed. Then will China bear the accusation of "massacre American students"?

China is a big power. When it will to bear an unsavory reputation, the payment in secret deal must be huge. Now the plot went soured. Feds had to seek another replacement. That's why Cho Seung Hui became a killer. He is S. Korean. S. Korea, you know, a country controlled by US. (or protected by US, whatever you think) The image transfer is easy, at least it accords with the definition that "the killer is an Asian."
(To be continued.)

481. Feds ordered stand down (2) (4/28/07)

4. A strange "stand down" after the first shooting occurred at 7:15. The police and University did nothing to pursue the killer and warn students that there was killer(s) at large. According to authority's story, Cho was the only one did all killings. He was given a two hours and a half to do his work without a disturbance. That was indeed a very generous gift from authority and an unbelievable negligence on security rule, particularly at the time after 911.

(1) Another strange news which disappeared later. The original news said the reason of no-reaction was that information showed that killer was out of state. But it took time for killer to escape out of state, even if he took a plane. And how could they learn that? Did they knew whom he was and tracked him all the time? Since the no-reaction was from the beginning, this was a justification with big flaw. It was never heard of since. Local officials didn't know the business out of state. This news, as well as that detail of Chinese suspect, obviously was from Feds too.

(2) If you were Cho Seung Hui, once you fired the first shoot, you knew you were on a road of no-return, would you do something else? In common sense, a killer would go on with his shooting spree because he knew there was little time left for him. The police would arrive in minutes. Would you still care for mailing something? But Cho seemed think in other way. He thought of he hadn't mailed the tapes, (Authority story was that tapes was not made on 4/16) It took him one hour and three quarters to bring the tapes to post office, (7:15 - 9:01) enough time for him to have a breakfast and do a laundry if he wished. Cho didn't worry about police arrest. He was right. Police and University did response with no re-action.

(3) &#8220;Setting up a series of roadblocks, controlling access to very large pieces of property, is very much routine on any university campus in Canada and in the United States,&#8221; Though it is a criminal negligence of no-response to the first two murders in University dorm, we saw little pressure to investigate and affix the responsibility of this massacre. Because it will trace to the Feds. ( Now they may try to find a scapegoat for it) They gave the order of "stand down". They need a history worst to distract another framed case.

Quote, "Feds Ordered VA Police To Stand Down
Local authorities were told to take no action to pursue killer

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Friday, April 20, 2007

Police and EMT workers at Virginia Tech tell us that campus police were given a federal order to stand down and not pursue killer Cho Seung-Hui as Monday's bloodshed unfolded.

Though wishing to remain anonymous for obvious reasons, we have received calls from police and EMT's who tell us that a stand down order was in place, and this is also confirmed by eyewitness Matt Kazee, who is a student at VA Tech.

Kazee talked to local EMT's and police who told him the same thing, that the order was to wait until federal back up arrived before any action was taken. This explains the complete non-response of the police in the two hour gap between Cho's first two murders and the wider rampage that would follow later that morning.

The policy of federal control over the University was put in place following a previous shooting in August 2006 in which a police officer and a hospital security guard were killed.

In addition, a former long-term University police officer, George French, told the Alex Jones Show that it is routine to seal off a campus on which a suspected gunman is loose.

&#8220;Setting up a series of roadblocks, controlling access to very large pieces of property, is very much routine on any university campus in Canada and in the United States,&#8221; said French.

&#8220;After a double homicide, when you&#8217;re looking for a dangerous fellow with a firearm, I find it unfathomable that a series of roadblocks weren&#8217;t set up&#8230;to prevent the felon from escaping.&#8221;

French could find no logical conclusion other than deliberate inaction on the part of officials. &#8220;We have another coordinated, allowed event&#8230;the parallels are so common in each case; you can write the script in advance.&#8221;
(http://www.itszone.co.uk/zone0/viewtopic.php?t=71573&sid=46a585298128996c43550b3544fce1a3)

(To be continued)



482. The collapse of Highway 580. (5/3/07)

Recently, I was harassed heavily in internet again. I was blocked to post in my own homepage as well as other web sites such like Google. I think it is a response to my revelation on Virginia Tech shootings. Feds don't want people to read it.

The persecution is so intensified that they created a highway collapse four days ago. I have talked about several times that one of their option to eliminate one of my sisters who lives in Oakland is to force her taking Bart while the Feds had planned a "terror bombing" in tunnel. The way to force my sister to take Bart instead of driving is to shut off the Bay Bridge. (see #433. 9/2 plot (9/5/06)) When this trick was revealed, Feds developed another one: to shut off one of the exit way of the Bay Bridge. The collapsed highway 580 is a road of "must" if she drives from San Francisco to her home in Oakland. The shut off of Bay Bridge is too evident. It causes alert. This time one of the exit will be closed at least for half years. It saves them a sub-plan during that period.

Another motive of this created event is to cover up the 911 plot. To prove a fire could melt steel. It is a case of killing two birds by one stone. If they created 911, it's much easier to create I-580 collapse. Just cut loose a support screw and then having a tanker fire. It's that simple.

It's not the motive only that makes me conclude it was a planned crime.

1. Timing: The newspaper said, "In the early morning hours, the freeways were nearly deserted." (Mercury News, April 30)
What is that "early morning hours"? 3:52 am. It was night that most people were in deep sleep. I can assure you, no outsider had the opportunity to witness the event. (Of course, exclude those prepared witness. Feds used to have "reliable witness" to prove their framed case. Such as Moussaoui to 911) At 3:52 am in week-days, there still may be chance that some one happened to drive by. Feds made it on Sunday. 3:52 am on Sunday, a most deserted time for freeway. A safest time to create an artificial accident.

2. The damaged overpass was just above highway 880. The tanker happened to burn right underneath at that point. The fire would have burned in open air if the oil tanker crashed a little bit farther or a little bit lesser. Was it a lottery winner that crash took place at the spot? The whole journey of the truck mission is 100 miles? 200? 300? Compare the crash spot (span at 30 to 40 feet), the chance is too rare.

3. Location. A place with busy traffic: the exit of the Bay Bridge, where highway 880 and 580 going through. The best place for propaganda because hundreds of thousands of people drive by there every day.

A right accident (to reason the WTC collapse) at a right place (just at the cross point where a fire can burn the upper overpass. A place about half million commuters pass by every day, a best place for propaganda, ) at the right time. (the most deserted time of highway, so rare people could witness it)

So Bush and his accessories can beat the drum this time. It could be an accident. How rare the chance is, there is still lucky man who win the lottery or unlucky man who was hit by a thunder.

It also could be a black box operation to justify 911 attack. If you believe 911 was an inside job. Then this group has the motive to cover it up. If you think it was not a coincidence that the WTC was changed hands three months before 911 attack( to enable that group to set up explosives inside the building), then you have full reason to recognize it was not a coincidence too on timing and location for this event. It is another covert job to cover up the 911 event.

- - - Updated - - -

483. The video tape of Cho Seung Hui (3) (5/8/07)

5. The man in video tape is not Cho Seung Hui.

(1) Cho's acquaintance and his roommates don't recognize the man in video tape.

Re: "A pastor at a Korean church in Centreville watched the tapes on television with his family. He told the Seoul newspaper JoongAng Ilbo, " All my family said that was not the Seung-Hui we knew. It was the first time we saw him speaking in full sentences." ("Shooter/ A lifetime of silence" Mercury News, 4/22/07)

Re: "April 18, MSNBC, Scarborough Country -- Michele Kosinski reports at about 10:13 PM eastern time that Cho's roommates say they do not recognize him in the film from the package sent to NBC."
http://www.rense.com/general76/cho.htm

Go to that site to compare the pictures. Though they are similar, the ratio of the head is a big difference. (the ratio of the length to width of the head) Different camera won't produce such big difference.

(2) The man in video has a different temperament from Cho Seung Hui.

We all know Cho was "extraordinary lonely", "a life time of silence". He is also very shy and avoid to be in focus. Re: "When a candidate for student council visited the suite this year to pass out candy and ask for votes, Cho refused even to make eye contact.". "Mary Shaw said yearbooks indicate that Cho's only extracurricular activity was the science club during his sophomore year. He did not supply a picture of himself for his senior yearbook.". ("Shooter/ Classmates feared he would kill", Mercury News, 4/18/07)

But in video, the man liked to show off himself. He made different posts with guns, even with a hammer. He spoke fluent sentences. He stares at the focus. In his package, there is not only an 1,800 words statement, (For a real Cho, that's enough) there are also video tape and 43 photographs. Is that too much for him?

(3) These characters don't fit for Cho, but fit for Feds. The video tape resembles other "terrorist" tapes used to broadcast in TV. Those tapes used to do a negative propaganda on "terrorists" themselves. Painted themselves extreme, violent, savage by arms in hand, shooting machine guns, or even beheading. Those tapes used to fit the demand of Pentagon and the Feds - "Don't look for other suspects. I, (terrorist, or criminal) did it." Is there anything else more convenient to solve a case by someone to confess?

Re: "U.S. Government Caught Red-Handed Releasing Staged Al-Qaeda Videos"
(http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/october2006/051006redhanded.htm)

(4) An interesting message for reference.
Quote, "VIDEO PROOF THAT NBC FOOTAGE WAS NOT SHOT BY CHO ALONE
Posted By: Never_Surrender (Send E-Mail (http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?bem=103149)
Date: Thursday, 19 April 2007, 10:01 p.m.
......
Well let me ask a question then, if he shot it by himself, WHY is the camera shaking, like someone ELSE is holding it?
The CHO character is sitting perfectly still in FRONT of the camera and not touching the camera YET it is moving!
At one point in this video I could swear I hear someone cough or clear their throat off camera and at another point I think someone hits the camera and you can hear the BUMP sound or the THUD sound that it makes and it shakes a little....
I believe that what we have here is video proof that CHO did NOT make this video, there was someone else holding the camera, again, I do NOT even believe it is Cho in this video but I have covered that in another post.
Here is the video....
Embedded video does not appear to be showing up so here is link to video....
(http://www.vloggingtheapocalypse.com/view_video.php?viewkey=3efbc24c7d2583be6925 NS)
(http://groups.yahoo.com/group/IssuesAndAlibis_The_Forum/message/18347)

(To be continued)

484. Gunman is a professional killer(4) (5/13/07)

6. The gunman is not Cho Seung Hui.

(1) The gunman is a professional killer. Cho is a new comer. Cho bought the gun on March 13. (There were different saying about the other gun, but it was bought around that time too. ) Only one month before the shooting case. He practiced in a shooting range on Mar. 22. That's all his relationship to the gun.

But according to Professor of Criminology:
Quote, "Seung-Hui Cho Was a Mind Controlled Assassin

Charles Mesloh, Professor of Criminology at Florida Gulf Coast University, told NBC 2 News that he was shocked Cho could have killed 32 people with two handguns absent expert training. Mesloh immediately assumed that Cho must have used a shotgun or an assault rifle.

"I'm dumbfounded by the number of people he managed to kill with these weapons," said Mesloh, "The only thing I can figure is that he got close to them and he simply executed them."

Mesloh said the killer performed like a trained professional, "He had a 60% fatality rate with handguns - that's unheard of given 9 millimeters don't kill people instantly," said Mesloh, stating that the handguns Cho used were designed for "plinking at cans," not executing human beings."

(http://infowars.com/articles/us/va_tech_shooter_was_mind_controlled_assassin.htm)

From media report, we know the weapon is not assault rifle. It is the 9 millimeter handgun and the killer shot at distance, (shooting at the door, not the execute style) So the gunman is a professional of the professionals.

(2) Cho was 5'8". Gunman is ""He was, I would say, about a little bit under six feet tall, young looking, Asian, dressed sort of strangely, almost like a Boy Scout, very short-sleeved light, tan shirt and some sort of ammo vest with black over it. He just stepped within five feet of the door and started firing.

"He seemed very thorough about it, getting almost everyone down. I was trying to act dead," the freshman mechanical engineering student says. "He left for about 30 seconds, came back in, did almost exactly the same thing. I guess he heard us still talking.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20070417.wxshootingticktock17/BNStory/specialComment

(3) The gunman didn't want to be recognized.

If Cho planned this tragedy, he knew it was a way of no return. He was ready to die himself. It was unnecessary to cover up himself with masks or sunglass..... But the gunman did all the cover up. He seemed know he would be alive and didn't want to be recognized later.

Quote, " Pai Cheong Ming - 27 years old, an engineering student, came from S. Korea - was wounded in breast and arm and was in hospital. He told "Central Daily" (S. Korean Newspaper): "The gunman wore a mask covering face, his brown cap wore low to his eyes. He wore glass," (Though the news didn't say it's a sunglass, I think it should be, because Cho Seung Hui wore contact lens that morning according to his roommate. Or there was another killer.)

Pai Cheong Ming's description was quite different from others. I never saw it from "mainstream media". Perhaps because it would contradict to the Authority's story. I read it from a Chinese newspaper "The Epoch Times" April 20.

(4) If Cho real hated the "rich kids, debauchery and deceitful charlatans", then there must be some model he knew. He shoud target on these models. In fact, he chose unknown as victims.

All witnesses referred the killer as "gunman" or "he". No one call the killer "Cho". It means they don't know Cho. Only media describe the killer as Cho. Did they witness the scene?

(5) Another mark of Feds: Silence the witness.

For a random killer, Cho should pick up easy one to shoot at. He should go on to other classroom where there were plenty of easy targets. But he came back to kill the survivor. "He seemed very thorough about it", "I was trying to act dead" he came back "I guess he heard us still talking" (see reference in (2)) Cho has no reason to be thorough on people he didn't know.
It is only a mark of Mafia or the Feds. They kill witness of their crime. Mafia has no motive in this case. Feds does. (see "480. The real killer behind Virginia Tech. massacre (1) (4/23/07)")

(to be continued)


485. Media censorship on VT case (5) (5/18/07)

7. The issue media accepted and rejected.

(1) For a crime, media used to have a field report. It used to come with a map. Investigate reporter would track every step of the killer to detail the story in minute. VT shooting is the worst camp case in US history. There is no such report. What happened in the dorm when first two people were killed? how many classrooms in Norris Hall building? What did other students in same building react during shooting? There is not a word about that. Different media reported odds and bits from survivors but all silenced later about this case.

(2) The no response of the police and University after the first two killings was the main reason that caused the later mass killing. Media has the responsibility to supervise the government. The criminal negligence should be the big issue in first page. Yet, no media had an article about it. They distract this big topic by gun ban. Let the big criminal skip away.

(3) Instead of reporting the detail of the whole story which might reveal the flaws of the framed case, media concentrated to report Cho's private life, tried to prove he is the real killer. I went through all these materials, find nothing could prove Cho was a violent man. True, he was lonely, life time silent. It fits for a word: autism. But media avoid this word, attribute all these for the killing spree. To prove Cho was anger, they said he wrote violent and profane plays. They even gave a sample of his play. "I hate him." the boy says of the stepfather in a copy of the play on the Web site. "Must kill Dick. Must kill Dick. Dick must die."

It's ridiculous. With such standard to judge a person, Shakespeare would be a big suspect. So were many ancient Greek tragedy writers. Hitch (*)(*)(*)(*) (spelling?) - a terror film producer, would be a suspect too, so was Spieldsburg (spelling? who produces film Indiana Jones, the Temple of Doom).

Cho's only relationship to violence was that he bought a gun (or two) on March 13 and practiced one hour in a shooting ranch of March 22. I think he was going for an operation. Before I talk about this, I'd like you to read a news:

8. Cho was under surveillance

Re: "Cho went to bed early by college standards, about 9p.m. He often rose early, but in recent weeks he had been rising even earlier, frequently before dawn, Aust said. Such was the case Monday.

Cho awoke before 5 a.m., then sat down to work on his computer and awakened his roommate in the process. Grewal, who shares a room in the same suite, saw Cho in the bathroom shortly after 5 a.m.

As usual, Cho did not say anything to Grewal. No good morning, no hello, Grewal said. Cho stood in the bathroom, brushing his teeth, wetting his contact lenses and applying a moisturizer.

He also took a prescription medicine, though neither Aust nor Grewal knew what the medication was for." (Mercury News "Shooter/ classmates feared he would kill", 4/18/07)

To get up early before dawn is not popular, especially for those who do not habituate to. Did Cho's suitemate follow up Cho's routine? The description was so detailed that it seems like Cho was under surveillance.

(to be continued)

 

What a pantsload....

 

486. Old wine in new bottle (5/23/07)

The April plot went sour which I think connected with the VT massacre and planned Attorney General Gonzalez's stepping down. The planned Gonzalez's stepping down does not relate to the firing of 8 Federal prosecutors (it's only a cover up) but related to taking the responsibility for the crime Feds would have committed in April plot. (unreasonable search and possible death in the operation.)

As usual, Feds quickly planned a new plot. The marking date for April plot is 4/17. 12 days later, they created a highway collapse on 4/29. (see "482. The collapse of Highway 580. (5/3/07")
The tactic is old: to kill my parents in San Francisco (of course, looked like natural disease), force my sister taking underground Bart from Oakland to San Francisco. Create a "terror bombing" in the tunnel. Thus they could fulfill an "elimination" and "distraction" in one operation.

Feds had carried out this tactic several times by closing the Bay Bridge. I was aware of this because each time they shut down the Bay Bridge, it always coincidence to the alleged framed case. Since Bay Bridge is the second busiest bridge on the globe, Feds each time could only close it for two days (week ends). That helped me to know the exact action day they planned. This time they closed a main exit highway from the Bay Bridge, hoping it could be closed for long period. After the highway collapse, the minister of Federal transportation, Mary Peters visited the spot and promised to pay the full cost. The recover time was set for six month (half year). Wah, DOJ got six months for their plot, I thought.

But that incident made impact on economy. Expert estimate that before the highway reopening, the economy would have a loss of 4 million to 6 million each day. Then, Governor Schwarzenegger announced the rebuilding would be done in two months. He set the date at June 27. What made him choose that date, I don't know. It coincidence with Tony Blair's date of stepping down. It seems the Inside Group having its fiscal year ending at that month.

Yesterday, the newspaper said the highway 580 will reopen on 5/25. From 6 months to less than a month, the difference is too big. A 500% error margin is not professionals should make. The 6 months estimation at first may reflect the Feds desire. They want a long period for their plot. Less than a month is actual time needed for reconstruction. It may also reflect that Feds abandoned their original plan. I have immediately revealed the oil tanker crash was a designed accident of Feds on May 3 - four days after the highway collapse.

Then what will happen next? Still the old tactic. Terror attack and war to distract. After a silence for more than a month, such news come out again, from Cheney, Bush and Muller.

Re: "On Carrier in Gulf, Cheney Warns Iran
By DAVID E. SANGER
Published: May 11, 2007
BRUSSELS, May 11 - Vice President Dick Cheney used the deck of an American aircraft carrier just 150 miles off Iran's coast as the backdrop today to warn the country that the United States was prepared to use its naval power to keep Tehran from disrupting off oil routes or &#8220;gaining nuclear weapons and dominating this region.&#8221;
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/11/world/middleeast/11cnd-cheney.html

Re: "Pres. Prepares for Possible D.C. Nuke
14-May-2007
Recently Whitley Strieber speculated that another terror attack might be on the way-a nuclear attack , this time. On May 10, President Bush issued a national security directive ordering all agencies to prepare for a surprise attack on the Federal government.
http://www.unknowncountry.com/news/?id=6203

Re: 'FBI's Mueller: Bin Laden Wants to Strike U.S. Cities With Nuclear Weapons
Ronald Kessler
Tuesday, May 15, 2007
http://www.newsmax.com/popunders/mainpop_internal.htm

Re: "Confirmed: Photos Show London Dirty Bomb Tests

New photograph confirms devices going up throughout London are to track spread of gasses
Steve WatsonInfowars.net
Monday, May 21, 2007

We hope that the latest dirty bombs tests do not "go live" in an amazing coincidence such as happened on 7/7/05 when scheduled drills of exploding trains actually happened at the same time in the same places.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/IssuesAndAlibis_The_Forum/message/18871


487. Informants troop (6) (5/28/07)

8. Cho was under surveillance

If you used to get up at 7:am, when your family member get up before 5.a.m. would you follow up him(her)? Generally, people would go on with their sleep. Do you have habit to follow up your family member to the bathroom? Generally people don't bother others in bathroom unless there is emergency.

Re: " "Caught in the backlash", (ACLU reported on 11/13/01),

Charlotte Wu, a 20 years old student of UC Berkley, was visited by 3 policemen of camps about one month after 911 last year. It's about 30 minutes after she finished a phone call. In phone call, she instructed her friends how to play an internet game. It's a spy game. Player must put bomb at the foot of wall to break it. Policemen questioned her why she talked about spy and bomb on the phone. At last, she had to go to her friend's place with police to clarify it. Lucky enough, her friend was still playing that spy and bomb game.

Charlotte Wu never talked to policemen for all her 19 years experience. (She was 19 then) She was very scare and wonder how could police know what she said in phone call. Policemen didn't explain.

She may never know her phone is under surveillance if she hadn't talked about spy and bomb.

http://www.aclunc.org/911/backlash/wu.html

http://www.aberdeennews.com/mld/aberdeennews/news/nation/4519596.htm

(I learned this from "World Journal" of 11/14/2002 in which it said Ms. Wu still didn't know how police could know her phone call one year later. Several days later a message told me it was reported by her suite-mate. I am surprised at that for the whole year Ms. Wu hadn't got an explanation from police, now when it became a news, they said it was from an informer. Some response said it was Echelon or Carnivore. So despite of the surveillance system on communication, there maybe a surveillance net of informant? No wonder Ashcroft proposed TIPS programme of one million informants.)

There were other cases indicated informant are everywhere.

In July, 2006, news reported the Miami terror cell case. In which FBI sent an informant, disguised as Al Qaida messenger, to direct the group to attack FBI office throughout the country.

In May, 2007, news reported the extremists group plotted to attack Fort Dix. In which FBI sent an informant to offer the group the assault rifles.

Remember, FBI doesn't have a crystal ball which can tell it where there is a terror cell. There must be a surveillance net gave it the information. So before Feds could send out a directive informant to set up the case, there was an informer there already.

From above samples, we know how densely and thickly the informant are used. Each dorm of the university or about average six people there is one informer. This is a spy country.

In July 2002, former Attorney General Ashcroft announced Operation TIPS in which government will recruit one million mail carriers, utility readers..... to be informants to report suspicious event. . I at first wondered how could the Feds recruit one million people in a short period. How big is US Army? One million and something. It's almost another Pentagon to recruit one million informants. Then as I get familiar with Feds, I knew they have that informant troops already. Operation TIPS is only an attempt to turn one million of that troops from the underground to formal establishment.

Cho Seung Hui's behave in bathroom at about 5 a.m. on 4/16/07 was recorded either by a needle point camera or some people's mind. It means he was under close surveillance that particular day. Because he would play an important role in the coming tragedy - a scapegoat of the massacre. Feds didn't want their plan go wrong.

(to be continued)

- - - Updated - - -

488. S.S.G. and Cho Seung Hui (7) (6/3/07)

9. Cho was recruited as S.S.G.

Informants used to watch and report other people in daily life. But when there is an operation, they will be called to look out, to be "reliable witness", even take part in the operation. Their name then are "Special Support Group".

Re: ," The FBI Special Support Group , or SSG (They're nicknamed G's), supposedly does much of the routine work for the Bureau, leaving the FBI agents themselves free to pursue more important matters. ...

They usually work part-time, and earn about $5,000.00 - $10,000.00 per year or more. The FBI doesn't advertise the existence of the SSG, but it's no big secret either. The reality of the Special Support Group is much different than the "released" information. SSG teams regularly harass and even menace people on the FBI's Black List. ...

The FBI calls this harassment "dangling," and they do it on a regular basis to people who frequently have committed no offense other than to have drawn the ire of the Bureau. Many SSG's are of the lowest caliber of human life, especially those chosen for excessive harassment of innocent citizens. Far too often SSG teams consist of bullies, perverts, racists and ex-convicts and other dregs whose sole purpose is to drive people crazy and ruin their lives. If one of their victims snaps and tears one of them up, the bloodied G will press charges, perjure himself if confronted with his FBI affiliation, and the victim is locked up. Mission accomplished. That's one reason why the FBI is not very open about the SSG. This is just one of the many questionable and outright illegal activities that the FBI uses our tax dollars for. The very people sworn to uphold our Civil Rights are perhaps the most flagrant violators. If you attend a protest rally, or otherwise call attention to yourself, don't be surprised if you start seeing the same bizarre group of people showing up everywhere you go, bothering you and behaving like psychotic clowns."

http://www.angelfire.com/ny5/tradecencrimes/page447.html

Harassing people is only the open side S.S.G.does. Covertly they used to support Feds in their operation: Muhammad and Malvo were accused of as the snipers in DC sniper shooting spree. They were also accused of involved in a murder case in Alabama. In that case, two women were shot when they closed a liquor store at night. One died, one seriously wounded. When patrol police arrived, they saw Muhammad was searching the victim's purse, with a handgun in his right hand. Malvo was about 50 yards away, possibly acting as a lookout. When police chased Muhammad through a parking lot, a blue car darted out to block the way of police. Muhammad thus escaped. Later, law enforcement agent proved the woman died of a rifle shot which was used in DC sniper shooting later.

So, in Alabama case, there were more people involved: the real gunman with a rifle. (Muhammad holding a handgun) and the man who drove the car to block police's chasing. Muhammad and Malvo were possible sacrifice. They worked in front line: checking the victim and looking out. Took the risk to be arrested. Muhammad may also have another job: to be thorough on victims. That was to kill the undead. The seriously wounded woman was lucky enough that police car arrived on time. Or her wound was so serious (shoot at neck) that Muhammad thought she was dead. (see: "115. The third leg in Alabama shooting case. (2/17)")

I think Cho Seung Hui was recruited as an informant and played the same role Muhammad and Malvo played in Alabama case. He was instructed to buy a handgun and then was ordered to practice it in a shooting ranch in March, all purposed to take part in the Virginia Tech. shooting operation. I reached this conclusion after I read another news.

(to be continued)


489. June 15 plot (6/8/07)

When Governor Schwarzenegger announced the June 27 the set up date for that collapsed highway 580. I knew Feds tried to finish their plot at the end of June.

There was a big shift change recently in the long term surveillance team.

1. July 1 is the beginning date for the new garbage contract. The garbage company CWS tried to avoid two more years searching in North San Jose before the new contract starts . (see "476. The Garbage company (4/3/2007)")

2. Two months ago (April) I received a letter noticed me that the management of Homeowner Association was changed with a new company.

3. Last month (May), my next door tenant moved away. The landlord, whom I haven't seen for more than 7 years, said he probably would move back in July.

All these three parties, (neighbor tenant, garbage company, homeowners management company) were there for at least more than 7 years. Now all of a sudden, they left or intend to leave. What will the new face be? It will be just new wine in old bottle - new agents in old place.

Early this month, I received a letter from the new Association Management company. It said, "During a recent site inspection it was noted that your front yard required maintenance, weeding and trimming." , "Please correct condition by: Friday, June 15, 2007." Several days ago, the neighbor landlord also remind me to trim the front yard fruit tree.

The correction work used to be given three months to fulfill. (interval between two inspections) This time it is extreme short: 15 days. Obviously Feds is in a hurry. They try to finish it before July. Feds is under pressure too. They repeat the old tactic. To force a yard cleaning. I think if I put the yard trimming junk on the street, the garbage search team will find drug trace in the trim pile and carry out a search and find the planted drugs at my house.

Why set the day on Friday, June 15? Because Friday is the garbage collection day. The work must be done before that day for garbage surveillance team to collect evidence. Why on June 15, not June 22 or June 29? Because my wife will leave for San Diego University to pick up my daughter for summer vacation on June15. She will know nothing what happens at home after her leave. And I believe my wife and my daughter will be killed in travel accident later. Feds won't let witness of their crime to survive even they are recruited informants.

Another news may prove this June15 plot.

I found the Feds try to frame a case by: search a garbage can or yard trimming pile, found drug trace (planted), then search a house, find the (planted) drug, and carry out an arrest. Any innocent people can be wronged by so said "Law enforcement agency". You can be wronged in a framed case by planted stuff.(drugs, weapons, even DNA) even you have done nothing. It's conflict to the Fourth Amendment that protect people from unreasonable search and arrest. I think it's still an illegal action. Feds just does their last pitch struggle. So some one will take the responsibility for it.

I allege A.G. Gonzalez will take that responsibility. He gives order for an illegal action. Then resigns for the "mistake" in internal investigation. He would have resigned if 4/17 plot going successfully. (see "477. Internet planting and April plot (4/8/07)")

An intimidation for 4/17 plot.
Re: (Mercury News 4/4/2007)

..... He'll have one last chance to do that, and perhaps keep his job, when he testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee on April 17."

Anyhow, 4/17 plot went soured. So was Gonzales' resignation. He would stay. according to the news four days after 4/17:
Re: "Focus shifts from Gonzales to Rove
By Margaret Talev and Ron Hutcheson
McClatchy Washington Bureau (Mercury News, 4/21/2007)

Gonzales' testimony Thursday left senators convinced he wasn't behind the plan or its execution and in fact knew far less than a department head should have about the details. "

But on May 25, resignation came back.
Re: "Stepping down or stay, all will be known in the midst of next month

The Senate has arranged a no-confidence vote over Attorney General Albert Gonzales in the midst of next month. Sen. Ken Salazar, D-Colo said he called the attorney General personally to advise him to resign."
(World Journal, 5/25/2007)

The midst of next month is June 15. When I was noticed to clean the yard before 6/15 and learned my wife will leave for San Diego on same day. I recalled that May 25 news.
Are you familiar with it? The resignation pressure always come with the action date of the plot. Is it a coincidence? Your bet.

490. Ready for war (6/13/07)

VT massacre was done instead of war as a distract to the framed case on me . My revelation is so true that caused fierce reaction from Feds.

I was heavily harassed in internet. I frequently lose contact to internet and had to re-start the connection. I was repeatedly asked to log in the web (it used to be automatically log in) then was told "invalid user's name or password". Thus being banned to post. Though I have request a new password, I never received the reply e-mail. One open intimidation is like this:

TheDivineMsEm Sent: 5/1/2007 6:12 PM

Kathasung - I warned you before. Next mention of the Va Tech killings as some sort of "government conspiracy" will get you banned.

http://groups.msn.com/PoliticallyIncorrectCafe/general.msnw?

My posting at that site since was either deleted or removed.

And Feds obviously upgrade their operation. They used to shut down Bay Bridge for two days in the name of repair. This time they burned down one major exit Freeway of the Bay Bridge. Blocked the road for nearly a month.

The "terror attack" they planned to justify the war from last October to this March was a "dirty bomb attack". This time Feds will use a nuclear weapon. (see # 486)

The "terror attack" propaganda used to be aided by its loyal ally - British, now likely will extend to other European countries.

Quote, "US will extend Al Qaida terror attack into German

Sources told Deutsche Presse-Agentur dpa that US security men tested German security by trying to smuggle C4 plastic explosive past a checkpoint at Heiligendamm.

German surveillance machinery detected the tiny stash in a suitcase in a car and the Americans in plainclothes then identified themselves. German police declined comment."
<http://www.eux.tv/article.aspx?articleId=9424>

The war in Mid-east will be a vast one. Civil war in Lebanon; civil war in Palestine; civil war in Iraq and war with Iran.

The previous plan of Iran war was air strike at Iran's nuclear factory, now it will be a ground war. Then we saw in May, the House suddenly ended a confrontation with Bush administration, released the Iraq military fund. Bush got what he needed for Iran war. The expense for Iraq operation is about 56 billion each year. This time Bush got more than 100 billion, almost double than ordinary expense. What is extra money for? It's for Iran war.

One thing interesting is: almost at same time, Cindy Sheehan quits the anti-war movement. It may indicate that there will be a war. Feds does not want Bush being bothered by peace movement when Bush's population is in historical low.

Is Cindy Sheehan a false flag Feds set up to decompose the anti-war movement? Sheehan got popular in August 2005 when she settled camp outside Bush's Texas ranch. She then led the group to the north for a big anti-war protest. As we know, this was the time of hurricane Katrina and Rita hit the South America. On 9/24 hurricane landing date, there was also a big anti-war protest in Washington. In my case, 9/24 was also Feds' action date which used to be followed by a "terror attack". see "343. Killing two birds by one stone (9/17/05)"
If the framed drug case went successful, there would have been a big terror attack, (possibly dirty bomb attack) the anti-war movement would be humiliated.

Cindy Shehan's rising and elusion connected to two big plots planned by Feds. That's why I see her from another angle.

 

I can verify this. This is indeed a tactic that they use (having experienced it firsthand myself). Investigative agencies closely coordinate with local law enforcement, and they can get a police car to trail someone and look for any excuse to pull them over.

This is also not that uncommon, I have read numerous accounts of this. They will intentionally try to let the subject know they are being watched.
I'm not sure the reasoning behind this, but it probably has to do with something psychological. Try to make the subject feel paranoid.

These people really have too much time on their hands and have nothing better to do. Also, people tend to see what they are looking for, and if someone is under long-term investigation it's easy to misconstrue all their normal activities as suspicious.

Infrared cameras normally cannot see through walls, fortunately. Not doubting there could have been an infrared heat camera, but if there was one it probably had to be installed somewhere, likely covered over with something to make it inconspicuous. If it was small, it would have had low resolution, so it could only see that there was something you were holding that was very hot, not what it was.

I know this sounds unbelievable, but I believe you. Investigators can often have far too much time on their hands, and love to test out their latest high-tech equipment. They are like children with toys.


Sometimes it's really hard to know what is just coincidence and what is a suspicious pattern.

 

491. June 15 plot (2) (6/18/07)

Five days before 6/15, I did the maintenance work. It was a big pile of the yard trimming. I dare not put it for garbage collection. The evil purpose of the Homeowners' management company was very clear. So I managed to cut these yard trimmings into pieces and used them as fertilizer for tree.

Feds' preparation for the June 15 was evident, especially in Mid-east.

1. For Lebanon civil war:

On 6/13, an anti-Syrian lawmaker was assassinated in Beirut. "The killing further tested the precarious fragility of a Lebanese government already mired in an extended confrontation with its opposition, a protracted battle with Islamists in a Palestinian refugee camp." (Mercury News, 6/14/07) Hezbollah said the killing was "targeting Lebanon and its stability."

2. For Iraq civil war:

"Retaliation feared after attack on shrine, Iraqi leader urges restraint"

Two minarets at a revered Shiite shrine demolished whose partial destruction last year sparked a devastating increase in sectarian bloodshed.
(Mercury News 6/14/07)

3. For Palestine civil war:

On 6/13, Mercury News reported "Palestinian factional fighting intensified" with whole page story. On 6/15, "Hamas seizes control of Gaza strip".
"A victory for Hamas would all but destroy the 3-month-old Palestinian unity government and eradicate any hope of reviving Israeli-Palestinian peace talks." (Mercury News 6/14/07)

All these events were serious, would have developed to a big mess in Mid-east. But all have diminished after 6/15. It's miraculous.

Another clue for my case is A.G. Gonzales' stepping down: "Stepping down or stay, all will be known in the midst of next month. "Nothing was heard after the midst of next month (6/15)". It has gone with the soured 6/15 plot.

On 6/15, I switched on my computer. To my surprise, the computer started up with a system set up program. The program lasted for 30 minutes or so. I could do nothing with it in the meantime. I think it was a virus embedded in my computer particularly for the plot. Though I
often suffered computer harassment, they used to happen when I was on Internet. To be blocked at the first second is something new for me. They wouldn't let me leave any message in computer if something bad took place on that day. Feds really prepared everything for the 6/15 plot.

492. S.S.G. in VT shooting spree ( (6/23/07)

10. The two key person in VT case practiced in shooting range shortly before the VT killing.

The news made me think Cho was instructed by an organization to buy a gun and practice it in a shooting range .

Re: " Camps/ Thousands gather at memorials

VT Police Chief Wendell Flinchum said police had not entirely ruled out the possibility that two people were involved. (in camp shooting) ......

The person of interest was identified as Karl David Thornhill of Blacksburg. According to federal affidavits released Tuesday, Thornhill was said to be a friend of Emily Hilscher, the woman killed in the first shooting. Police wanted to talk to him because the woman's roommate, Heather Haugh, told them Thornhill and Hilscer fired guns at a shooting range as recently as two weeks ago.

Some reports Monday indicated that Cho was angry at Hilscher for breaking off a romantic relationship. Haugh said Tuesday that she did not believe Hilscher knew Cho."
(Mercury News 4/18/2007)

1. E. Hilscher was a freshman, Cho was at his final year of education. And Cho was a lonely, silent person who avoid personal communication. There was rare chance for them to meet together. Hilscher's roommate proved it.

2. The story that Cho had a romantic relationship with Hilscher could be used to justify why Hilscher was selected as first victim to be shot at. But it came out without any foundation. So who had the motive to create that story?

3. When police didn't rule out the possibility that two people were involved in shooting case, what made them to think so? Remember the man of interesting was not an oriental but Karl David Thornhill. Someone may have witnessed the person with Hilscher at her last moment was not an oriental but a similar racial like K.D.Thornhill. Boy friend does not necessary become a suspect when a woman was murdered.

4. The most important thing is that Hilscher, a woman of 18 (?) and Cho were least likely to have a gun hobby. But they suddenly went to the shooting ranch to practice the gun just weeks before the VT shooting case. One was the first victim in the case and the other was accused of being gunman, both were the key figure in that big tragedy, was it a coincidence? Shooting range is certainly not a popular thing as cinema. Were they preparing for something? Or most likely, they were instructed or led to do so. Which organization was powerful enough to force them to do it?

5. To my knowledge with the Feds, they prepared with support group which would give cover up and "reliable witness" for each case let alone the big one such like Virginia Tech. massacre.
I think Hilscher and Cho were all recruited informant and were used as S.S.G. in this case. (there probably were more S.S.G. in this event, only we never know.)

6. Then why Emily Hilscher was killed as first victim?
Not everyone is as evil as the Feds. Hilscher may have thought it was fun to work for the intelligence. To follow the suspect to the beach, luxury hotel and casinos, exciting and romantic life like what she saw in film "007". When she was told her job was to kill the undead innocent students, her morale told her to refuse such a mission. She was instantly killed by her handler.

I think Hilscher's death was an incident, not in Feds plan. S.S.G. used to be instructed their detailed work at the last minute before they were sent to carry out their mission if it was a secret job. This one was a top secret. Since there was a Feds command team for that plot in Virginia Tech. on 4/16 already, so there could be a "stand down" order immediately from Feds to local police. They didn't want their plan to be disrupted. The local police also was told the suspect was out of state, an information only Feds could give. And to tie Cho with Hilscher, they even developed a story of romance later.

But even they have that story, it's still a big flaw that Cho killed two people in dormitory, then went on for other business for more than two and half hour, then came back to go on with his shooting spree. It doesn't make sense. Could you imagine that the two gunmen in Columbine High, went to school, killed a teacher, then left for a breakfast in McDonald, then came back continue with their shootings?

As a matter of fact, Cho, (or some other S.S.G.) like other students, didn't know there was a shooting happened in the dorm two hours ago. (The information was censored that morning.) So he could unhurriedly chained the door of Noris building to the plan.

(to be continued)

493. Beware of terror attack around 7/4 (6/28/07)

Now media reports a poll showed Bush is in a new low. His approval rate was only 26%. I think in other way. Since media is controlled by intelligence, it is an extortion on Bush: Act now or you will be the worst President in history.

What action the intelligence demanded? Terror attacks to justify a new war. Terror attack benefit ruling class, it's common sense.
Quote, "Arkansas GOP head: We need more 'attacks on American soil' so people appreciate Bush
Josh Catone Published: Sunday June 3, 2007
In his first interview as the chairman of the Arkansas Republican Party, Dennis Milligan told a reporter that America needs to be attacked by terrorists so that people will appreciate the work that President Bush has done to protect the country.
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Arkansas_GOP_head_We_need_more_0603.html

Here is another news from ABC. May indicate a new plot of terror attack.
Quote, "Exclusive: Suicide Bomb Teams Sent to U.S., Europe
June 18, 2007 4:45 PM
Large teams of newly trained suicide bombers are being sent to the United States and Europe, according to evidence contained on a new videotape obtained by the Blotter on ABCNews.com.
Teams assigned to carry out attacks in the United States, Canada, Great Britain and Germany were introduced at an al Qaeda/Taliban training camp graduation ceremony held June 9.
A Pakistani journalist was invited to attend and take pictures as some 300 recruits, including boys as young as 12, were supposedly sent off on their suicide missions."
http://blogs.abcnews.com/theblotter/2007/06/exclusive_suici.html

Is it true story? I believe so. It's a news from "reliable" mainstream media: ABC. They even invited journalist taking pictures as evidence. But the whole event is a well planned plot. To justify massive terror attacks in Europe and US. Here is my analysis.

1. To convince tamed sheep the news is reliable,a journalist was invited. Have ever heard that covert work to be drum beaten and trumpet blown? Have you ever heard of that CIA, KGB, Mossad .... all secret organization in the world hold a ceremony for their special mission team? It means: "Please get ready to arrest the men we will send to you." Will a bandit have a news announcement before they rob a bank?

2. Even American citizens have problem with their government in travel across the board, many of them were in "no fly" list. How can Al Qaida send large team to wherever they want to go?

3. Taliban lost its own rule in Afghanistan, Al Qaida run cave to cave. They can't even take care of themselves. How can they do whatever they want in abroad?

4. If Al Qaida have nuclear weapon or other WMD weapon, why don't use it in Mid-east where there is US army Base everywhere? And to transfer weapon and militants to US and Europe is much more difficult and dangerous than to use it in Iraq and Afghan.

5. This news proved my allegation. The leadership of Al Qaida or Taliban or insurgence are the informants of the Western intelligence. They work for the interest of the Inside Group. They recruit discontented people, train them into militants, insurgents, or suicide bombers. We are familiar with this tactic. (A typical sample is Miami terror cell. Poor, innocent, discontented people were recruited. Then instructed by FBI informant to swear loyal to Al Qaida and plan attack to FBI office.) In Mid-east, they were trained as suicide-bomber. As you have seen, the suicide bomb target were always innocent people in the market place or the new Iraqi police. On the purpose to provoke a civil war. For the propaganda interest of US intelligence, they now had an education ceremony of the suicides and invite journalist to take photograph despite the danger for its own recruited fighters.

Watch the date of this news: 6/18. After the failure of 6/15 plot, they rapidly develop a new one. I think the "terror attack" will be around 7/4 the independence day. The Feds used to find excuse for the "enemy". And it will be massive suicide bombings in Europe and US.

I felt this two weeks ago. Feds poisoned the food in nearby small oriental super market. I had a severe cough these days. It was a result of food contaminated by radioactive material. The purpose is to force me to the big shopping center to buy food where a bombing will be more justified. I have experienced the same tactic last year. Only the Holiday was not Independence Day but Christmas shopping season. (see "448. Highway 680 pass-over bridge was a bomb target (11/15/06)" and "453. November Surprise (12/5/06)")

 

494. Preconception, a tactic of the Feds (9)(7/3/07)

I used to remind people that a terror attack may come when there is a news about terror case or terror warning from government. I think it is a psychological operation of the intelligence. They pre-settle public's mind for the coming event they plotted. The news of Al Qaida/Taliban suicide teams (see #493) is a typical sample. When that kind of bombing happens, the first thing goes to public's mind will be: it must be done by Al Qaida. The real criminal will be ignored.

On 6/28, I alerted people that there might be massive suicide bombings in Europe and US.(see #493) Next day and the day after, there were three car bombing cases in UK. I think it was part of the July 4th plot.

11. VT case was originally planned as a Terror attack.

In Virginia Tech. shooting case, Feds also had a preconception process. They had issued an article about "terrorist attack school" two weeks before VT shooting case. I have been alarmed by that article in early April and posted a reply to that message. I immediately recalled the article when the massacre took place and back traced it.

Re: Terrorists - coming to a school near you
Police ill-equipped to defend against an American Beslan
Posted: April 2, 2007
Authorities fear the school massacre that shook Russia a few years ago may be a dress rehearsal for what al-Qaida plans to do in America - only on a grander scale, launching multiple school attacks simultaneously across the country.
In 2004, Chechen terrorists associated with al-Qaida seized a school building in Beslan, Russia, and slaughtered 338, including 172 children.
Three years later, schools and local police in this country are still unprepared to deal with such an assault, experts warn. Most don't have response plans for handling a single active shooter, let alone a cell of trained terrorists launching a large-scale attack.

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_id=54975

Clues show that the VT shooting case originally was planned as a "terror case".

Re: "Bomb threats last two weeks
Police said there had been bomb threats on campus over the past two weeks but that they had not determined a link to the shootings."

<http://infowars.com/articles/us/va_tech_shooter_was_mind_controlled_assassin.htm>

Re: "Virginia School Shooting: Another Government Black-Op?

The shootings came three days after a bomb threat Friday forced the cancellation of classes in three buildings, WDBJ in Roanoke reported. Also, the 100,000-square-foot Torgersen Hall was evacuated April 2 after police received a written bomb threat, The Roanoke Times reported. "

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/april2007/160407blackop.htm

We can see how the warning article matches the bomb threat in Virginia Tech. camps.
4/2. Article of terror attack on school issued.
4/2. First bomb threat in Virginia Tech.
4/13. last bomb threat in Virginia Tech.
4/16. Shooting spree in Virginia Tech.

In massive reports from the mainstream media after the case broke off, there were few words about the bomb threat. Because Feds changed their tactic at last minute. So the propaganda was concentrated on individual gunman instead of "terror bombing".

(to be continued)

495, Murder tactic, bombing the shopping center (7/8/07)

In my message #493 posted on 6/28, I warned possible massive terror attack in Europe and US.
Next day and the day after (6/29 and 6/30), there were three bombing case in UK. I think it belongs to the July 4th plot I warned.

That three cases obviously are terror propaganda from intelligence.

1. The two car bombs found in London were loaded with gasoline, nails and gas canisters. It would have caused significant casualty had it exploded. If the third car in Glasgow Airport packed with same thing, the result would be disastrous. But it only caught a fire. Why? Did the terrorist care about the innocent passengers' lives? No, it's because the operator was inside the car. He cared about his own life.

2. If it was a terror attack with a flaming car, one man was enough. Drove a car and crashed it into a terminal, then ignite the gasoline. It's that simple. What was that second man for? Nothing but a "reliable" witness intelligence needed.

3. A typical terror cell created in this way: An informant, disguised as anti - Western fighter, recruit discontented people. In Mid-east, they become insurgents or Al Qaida. In Western, they become terror cell. These people, usually become sacrifice in the plot planned by intelligence.

I think the driver of that Jeep Cherokee is such a sacrifice. He was seriously burned and could die of it. The other one, is a living evidence. In Mardrid bombing, the suicide bombers carelessly left a phone to identify themselves. In 911 attack, the passport of suicide team leader Atta survived the impact and fire. It proved that Arabs attacked US. The unhurt man in Glasgow case plays the role of Atta's passport and forgotten phone.

4. Media has different attitude on different case. It may reflect the attitude of the intelligence. VT shooting case is the worst camp killing in US history. In less than a week, the news about it completely disappeared from the media. They wish people forget it forever. Three bombing case in UK result no death, (improved tactic?) The media keep it alive until now. Each day there is a new development. "Eight in custody for British attacks", "Suspects all in medical field", and recent one, "Two suspects sought to work in US".

That is their real purpose - to justify terror attack in US. Since 7/7/05 London bombing, I always alleged it was a cover up work to justify the real bombing coming up later in US. The real target is me. Though the bombing is in the name of terror attack on Independence Day, the tactic is to lure me to the big shopping center by cheap food so that a murder fulfilled in a "terror attack". The recent ads from nearby supermarket full of the food I used to buy. All with good price rarely seen these days. Of course, I dare not go to the trap. I stay home on stored food.

Then I saw this message.

Quote, "FBI: Suicide Bombs a Big Concern

PAT MILTON Wed, Jul. 04, 2007
The Associated Press

NEW YORK - Suicide bombers have not hit the United States since the 9/11 terrorist hijacking attacks, but they remain a constant concern because of their prevalence around the globe and determination to die for their causes, according to the FBI's chief of counterterrorism.

Billy, the FBI assistant director in charge of counterterrorism, made his comments during a rare wide-ranging interview with The Associated Press, days before the failed car bombing in London and the airport bombing in Glasgow."
The interview was made days before 6/29. It was for July 4th plot. Notice that Associated Press issued it on July 4. It means though National Holiday is over, the bombing plot will continue. So when there is a bombing happens in US, check if it is in North San Jose or its nearby area. I have to go out shopping anyway.

496. Cover up and demonize ( VT shooting case 11) (7/13/07)

Distract is a very important tactic Feds used to use. A terror bombing in school could well achieved the goal. Then why did the Feds changed their tactic in last minute? Because terror bombing in school only distract, an Oriental gunman kill US students could achieve more.

The extra advantage if it was a Chinese gunman who did the VT shooting.

1. A hostility between China and US in appearance would cover up the collaboration of the secret police of these two countries in this case.
2. Demonize the Chinese because the main target of the whole plot were Chinese Americans. They would be wronged in a framed drug case. It's a psychological operation: let people believe Chinese were criminals.

Here is my experience of this tactic.

1. Re: "Because of persecution on me was intensified at that time, I left for HongKong in March, 1999. The visa granted me a three months stay in HongKong. My wife and parents urged me to go to Shanghai but I refused. I had been there in 1994 and 1995. The bitter experience then told me Chinese secret police was co-operated with US agents in persecution. I told them I'd go somewhere else but not China.

On 5/8, NATO bombed Chinese Embassy in Yugoslavia. Three missiles hit the building and caused three deaths. The official explanation was that army Misunderstood the target by using an old map. Of course most people don't believe it. There were big protest in China and HongKong. Media reported anti-US sentiment growing in China. I fell in that propaganda. And thought that in such a situation, China secret police might not work so eagerly for US agency. Maybe I would be safe to go to China at this time?

I visited Chinese travel agency in later May. And applied for a visa there on 6/1.

Then I was hesitated because there was an unusual warm welcome from my relatives. One lesson for me after the drug case is the drift apart of friends and relatives. (see "9. Estranged friends and customers") People were intimidated by agents. Though they won't refuse if I ask for help. To actively welcome a person of "trouble" is perversive. With continued call from my relatives in Shanghai, I had a feeling the invitation were from secret agent. After a re-consideration, I decided to go to South-east Asia.

I was once curious at the event of Chinese Embassy bombing. Was it a designated one or a coincidence? I was almost fell in that psychology trap and went for a dangerous trip to China. But in 1999, it seemed NATO was far from FBI, DEA. "You may over sensitive." I told myself. (That missile bombing actually was done by Pentagon without acknowledge to NATO)

Later development proved my suspicion is reasonable. Similar event re-acted in 2001." (see #193)

2. Re: "194. D.o.D. worked for D.o.J. (1/6/04)

In April 2001, an US EP-3 spy plane collided with a Chinese fighter above South China sea and was forced landing in HaiNan Island of China. In same month both directors of FBI and DEA announced resignation that they would leave in June.

A news in internet revealed that FBI and DEA took part in a secret deal in which they paid a large sum of money to China to release the spy plane and the crew. (The main point of that secret deal was to frame a drug case original from China) I realized in the name of solving spy plane crisis, D.o.J. bribed Chinese secret police to frame a drug case on me. The attempt repeated several times and finally proved by the break out of Fujian drug case. (see attempted drug case at message #61 to 65. See spy plane case at: 'Why DEA, FBI involved in secret deal of spy plane?'
http://hometown.aol.com/sunkat563/myhomepage/profile.html
See Fujiang drug case at messages: 141,142,143,150, 155)

The two accidents (bombing Chinese Embassy in Yugoslavia and collision of spy plane)
played cover up role for the plot of D.o.J.. They create a hostile appearance between US and China to make any plot more deceivable. People would hardly believe there was a conspiracy between two hostile countries. So they would believe framed drug case a true one."

So on the day of 4/16, when the TV reported the heavy casulty in VT shooting spree and it was done by a "Chinese who came from Shanghai via San Francisco." I realized it was created for my case.

(to be continued)

 

497. July plot: a nuclear bombing (7/18/07)

To make a secret deal under table, then to cover up it by a dispute in appearance, it's a trick often played by the secret police. Another typical story is the death of Litvinenko. Litvinenko was killed by radioactive poison. It creates public panic on radioactive material so bombing Iran nuclear site is justified. It also creates a dispute between Russian and U.K. to cover up a secret deal between western and eastern. What is the secret deal? A dirty bomb attack or nuclear bomb attack on Europe or US. The radioactive material or the nuclear bomb will come from Russia. A dispute in appearance makes a cover up. People won't suspect there is a conspiracy behind the scene.That was November plot. (see "451. The death of former Russian spy (11/25/06") It was soured then but now is revived.

In early July Russian leader Putin visited Bush family's Main home. I allege a secret deal have been reached there.

1. A hostility cover up created. On July 14, Putin tears up Arms Pact with NATO. They successfully run up a dispute event.
2. In July, UK ousted 4 Russian diplomats based on Litvinenko's case. After seven months, Litvinenko's case revived again.
3. Though it seems Russia's relations with West hit a new low point, it is only a fake mask. In July, Russia is granted to host the next Winter Olympic game. It is a pre-payment for the secret deal. Too familiar with it that UK was granted to host 2012 Olympic game on 7/6/05, next day (7/7) the first bombing in London broke off. And China was granted the host of 2008 Olympic in 2001 after it signed secret deal with the Feds to frame a big drug case in US.
4. An unusual massive preconception psychological operation in domestic. Here are some major operations: On 7/10, Homeland Security Chief M. Chertoff warned terror attack based on his gut feeling. On 7/11, Government Report Concludes Al Qaeda Now as Strong as in Summer of 2001. Then came with 50 seconds' Bin Laden's tape calling for "martyrdom". The latest is the yesterday's (7/17) "Grim view of terror threat" from National Intelligence Estimate which suggests the threat of terrorist violence against the US is growing worse.
You see, another terror attack is ready. Psychological propaganda has been done. Here is a pre-warning of the planned nuke terror:
Quote, "AMERICAN HIROSHIMA

Expert: Nuke terror better than even bet
Attack likely to exploit existing network of cross-border human, drug traffickers
Posted: July 6, 2007

© 2007 WorldNetDaily.com
WASHINGTON - A nuclear terrorist attack on the U.S. is better than an even bet in the next 10 years, says a former assistant secretary of defense and author of a book on the subject.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=56524

Though the article issued on 7/6, I learned it yesterday. When circumstance evidences show Feds prepared a nuke attack, that article strengthens the idea. So I clicked on it for the original one. I surprisingly found it was the same site that had predicted the VT camp violence. (see "494. Preconception, a tactic of the Feds (9)(7/3/07)). It seems that I have found the original preconception source of the Feds. Read #494 and watch the reference articles from worldnetdaily. You'll understand how Feds manipulate public's mind.

498. Why VT shooting planned on 4/16 (12) (7/23/07)

On 4/8 and 4/13, I wrote #477 and #478, alleged there was an April plot and the action date would be 4/17. I thought Feds planned an unreasonable search that day based on I would file a tax return that day. With which as a reason they would activate a field raid to frame a drug case. (Detail see "478. April plot and tax return (4/13/07)")

I didn't file tax return last year because I don't have to - I have little income which is below the margin IRS requires to file. IRS has no reason to raid a discontinued account unless there is special reason. I believe IRS told Feds (DOJ, FBI, DEA) to provoke me to re-file the tax return so they could have a reason to raid.

That was what I saw in bank statement in later March that IRS had added a refund at my account. I asked my wife why she used my account for tax purpose since we separate our finance for nearly a year. She said it was probably the last year's when she still used the joint account. But several days later (in early April) my wife informed me that IRS would withdraw from my account more than thousand dollars. Because there was just a refund from IRS, she had to admit that this time the withdrawal was from this year's tax file. (2007 file for fiscal year 2006) Of course, she had no words to explain why she used my account for her own tax return.

It really rattled me. Obviously, Feds tried to tie me to my wife's tax return. Last year, my wife and accountant firm filed a return without my consent which deliberately under reported and mis-reported. I had to separate my finance from my wife's because I didn't know what she actually did. But it seems that she still tied me with her tax return by my bank account. I guess she and the accountant firm might still file tax return as joint account without my consent. (with no my signature)

What the best way I can do? Maybe I should file a separate tax return (although I don't have to because I have little income) to prove my finance is separated from my wife? I almost did so before I realizing this was another trap. (I'll talk about it next time)

On 4/17, my wife left for a two weeks' trip. I learned it when she chatted with friend several days before. She refused to tell me where she would go when I asked her. Now I still don't know where had she been in these 16 days. So if something happened on 4/17, nobody knew what took place at my home. And to my experience, my wife would be murdered too in her travel. She played a role in the plot and could be a witness. Similar scene had been acted in 2005 when she, too, took a trip between 9/22 - 9/29. That was for 9/24 plot - a big plot in a created event famous for Katrina and Rita Hurricane. (see "339. The September plot (9/2/05)")

Why it was 4/16? Because I used to mail tax return on the day before the last day. ( in case something un-expected happens on the last day). So when I heard the news of VT shooting spree, I talked to myself, "Gosh, they (Feds) really studied my habit."

If Cho Seung Hui was the real gunman, then he should have been identified immediately. Because no dead person else should have a gun (or two guns) and bullets in his pocket. (You don't expect that when police broke in the building was the time he just exhausted his bullets, do you?)
But it took a day to identify him.
Quote, "MSNBC's FBI profiler: 'students lined up and shot execution style'

19 hours after the first shooting, the shooter(s) has/have not been identified. [00:15 EDT 17 Apr 2007]
Dead Gunman Yet to Be ID'd 16 Apr 2007 In a press conference tonight"

The fact is: The shooting spree took place at about 9:39 am, 4/16.
The gunman was a Chinese from Shanghai via San Francisco was reported several hours later on same day. Very efficient.
Another report that gunman was out of state broadcast at same time. Very efficient too.
Only next day ( 4/17), people knew the gunman was Cho Seung Hui.
On 4/18, large quantity of Cho's life were reported by media. What he said, what he wrote, his life details. All got in hours. Very very efficient. Seems there was a file get ready already. (consider Cho's ID revealed on 4/17 and the newspaper must be printed at midnight of 4/17)

Then why the gunman's ID was released so inefficient? My interpretation is: Feds was waiting for a tax return to be mailed that day. When I didn't do it, they knew plan went soured. Feds released a second scheme the next day. (Cho became gunman.)

My family came from Shanghai and live in San Francisco. I allege Feds framed a big drug case on me and my family. I talk about this very clearly. I also predicted 4/17 was their action day. Obviously their first scheme of VT shooting spree tried to connect the gunman to my case. Please read the origin news again at #480.

(to be continued)

499. July plot (2) (7/28/07)

I believe Feds have planned another big plot in July. They would have framed a drug case in Bay area, then distracted it by a big terror attack - a dirty bomb attack or a nuclear bomb attack. And finally would have started war against Iran.

1. From 7/2 to 7/8, in three big Chinese newspaper of San Francisco Bay Area, FBI had a continued ads: "FBI, to protect the freedom and democracy of our country..... We particularly welcome those who know very well about the Chinese State Security Dept. to contact us. If you don't understand English, our Chinese speaking investigator will help you. Please call (415) 553-6400 or write to: FBI, P.O. Box 36015, San Francisco, CA. 94103. Contact Hao Shi." The ads shocked the Chinese community in San Francisco area. It remained as a hot issue in the first two weeks in Chinese media.

If you have read my previous articles about the Virginia Tech. case, you know what is it.

1. Demonize. Either a Chinese mass killer, or Chinese spies, it used to demonize that Chinese are evil, a pre-conception for a drug case which Chinese will be involved.
2. Cover up. The most direct cover up on the relationship between Chinese State Security Dept. and FBI. As a matter of fact, the two are the partners in secret deal to frame the drug case.

Be noticed that the ads was from the FBI office in San Francisco Bay area. The targets are Chinese. Think of the origin news about the VT shooting gunman was "a Chinese from Shanghai via San Francisco."

2. I have said that July terror attack would be a nuclear attack. (see #497.) Here are other development.

On 7/16, a magnitude 6.8 earthquake stroke a Japanese city Kashiwazaki. What caught my eye in news was a map which showed a nuclear power plant near the site. Was it used for a nuclear pollution panic? Though the first day news said there was no leakage, the later news was different.

Quote, "Level of damage raised at Japan nuclear plant" (S.J. Mercury News, 7/19/07)
"Radioactive leak lasted three days
The indefinite shut down of the world's most powerful electricity generating facility raised serious fears of a summer power shortage." (S.J. Mercury News, 7/20/07)

So that was why the earthquake took place in Kashiwazaki - where there is the world's most powerful nuclear power plant. It was the time when Feds prepared for a nuclear terror attack and war on Iran. If everything went on to their plan, a nuclear pollution would have been propagated and war on Iran would be justified.

( I always think Pentagon has had the technique of earthquake. I have said in "324. Tsunami (6/27/05)"

1. US has developed such technique to create an earthquake and tsunami. Cohen had talked about it as early as 1997, though he blamed the "others". Re: "Others are engaging even in an eco type of terrorism, whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes or volcanos remotely, through the use of electromagnetic waves." American Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen, April 1997.

http://vialls.net/subliminalsuggestion/tsunami.html)


3. Iran war.

"Iran to allow inspectors into nuclear facility" (Mercury News, 7/14/07)

Though the media played it a small news, it was a big one actually.

Iran resisted U.N. inspection on its nuclear cite for a long time. Even bear the punishment to be sanctioned economically. Iran thought it was their sovereignty. What made it to do such a big compromise?

With my own observation, I have concluded that in July, Feds would frame a drug case, made a false flag "terror attack" to distract, and with which US would activate Iran war.
Iran, as a state, has its own intelligence. Iran, too, realized an attack from US was imminent in July. It had to make a concession.

- - - Updated - - -

500. IRS raid (8/3/07)

In later March, I learned from my bank statement that IRS has added a refund at the balance. I think it was a tactic Feds tried to tie me to my wife's tax file. A trick to push me to file my own to separate from my wife's. If there were two conflict tax files, then Feds could do a field raid (in the name of IRS). I didn't react.

Then in early April, my wife noticed me that IRS would withdraw thousand of dollars from my account. It was interesting to observe the psychology of the Feds. When they saw I didn't response, they thought that was because increasing balance wouldn't touch me. They immediately change the method by decreasing the balance. But I would not know there was a withdrawal until in later April when I received monthly statement. What Feds wanted was to push me filing another tax return. The final date was 4/17. So they let my wife inform me orally. How could she know what IRS would do on my account?

At same time, there was something unusual happened.

In later March, my wife told me that Lady R.P. (a relative of hers who live in Philippines) having a trip in US and would live at my home for several days. Lady R.P. had stayed at my home for a short period 17 years ago. She didn't come this time anyway. Then in early April, Mrs. Mao visited my house. She said she intended to live at my house for several days too. (Mrs. Mao was my tenant about 20 years ago.) The sudden requests to live at my house were unusual, apparently it was arranged by Feds. What was their purpose? I puzzled.

A rain forecast solved my problem.

In that period, for continual Saturdays, the weather forecast reported rain. It was evident when there was only one rain logo (for Saturday) compare with other days' sun logo. I knew why. It was a trick to frame my brother in law to a drug case. His merchandise - umbrella - came from China. Secret police must have planted drug in it. My brother in law would deliver umbrella himself at week-ends when his employee were on vacation

Anyhow, there was little rain on Saturdays because Feds had to frame me first. Then I saw a change. On 4/9, it forecast 4/11 (Wednesday) as rain day. I was watchful on rain days because I collect rain water. (Feds has poisoned tap water and sometimes contaminated it
with radioactive material.) I knew Feds controlled the weather these particular days, they had no reason to supply me the water I needed. So there was other purpose.

I worried there would be a house raid in the name of "IRS". Should I collect rainwater on Wednesday? Then the raid team could coincidentally meet me at front yard. All of a sudden, I solved the puzzle of request to "live at my house".

I don't answer the door when I am home alone. "IRS" team may not enter my home unless there was someone else at the house. So Feds planted someone to answer the door. But why they changed Lady R.P. with Mrs. Mao? Because Lady R.P. speaks English. The search, anyhow, would be an unreasonable search. There would be argument. Feds didn't want a witness telling the truth. So they changed her by Mrs. Mao - an old Chinese lady speaks little English. And finally, they decided no one should witness the truth. They thought of rain.

Feds really did a lot of work in April plot. They manipulated IRS to access my bank account in a month, by first adding some money then withdrawing some. They really studied my behavior and relative history by picking up two people whom had once lived at my house so I could hardly refuse their request. I surprisingly saw how quickly they changed their scheme several times by answer door people to natural rain.

I didn't do to the Feds' wish. So there was little rain and no one come to live at my house in
the end.
If everything went on to their plan, Virginia Tech would have a terror bombing to distract in early April. That's how we saw bombing threat from 4/2 to 4/13. (see #494)

501. Surveillance without warrant (8/8/07)

The honorable Senator
US Senate
Washington, DC 20510

Dear Senator

I'm writing you to oppose the newly passed law (Passed in Senate on Aug. 3, signed by Bush on Aug. 5) which gives government expanded surveillance authority without court approval.

I urge you to re-consider the law because of the following reason:

1. The proposed bill is a violation of the Constitution and an affront to our civil rights as US citizens. It especially damaged the Fourth Amendment which protecting people from unreasonable search and arrest.

It's easy for coruptive police to manipulate a "terrorist suspect" to e-mail, or dialogue in an internet forum, to frame innocent people. (In Miame terror cell case of 2006, a FBI informant had instructed the cell member to attack FBI office ).
2. There is no reason to say old FISA rule doesn't work. Under which the government can do eavesdropping any time when it requires. Even if it's in emergence, they can wiretap first and submit an application to court later. Nothing hinder their surveillance work.

A surveillance without warrant means a blank check to the secret police. It opens the door to a fascist country.
3. Surveillance not only means eavesdropping, it also means harassment. FBI, DEA are notorious for abusing power. They harass, plant and frame case. There is lack of a surveillance on these so said "law enforcement". The new law gives them further more room for abusing power. It is an attack on the principle of Check and Balance.

4. A negative side of this law from my personal experience. I posted a lot in internet web forum. I used to reveal the dark side of the government, especially about the law enforcement. I suffered continuous harassment from the Feds cyberspace team. Recently I was blocked from three web sites. (two of them are media's web site)

(1) On Aug. 1, blocked to enter "http://p067.ezboard.com/fdenverpostnewsfrm9 " by technical problem.

(2) On Aug. 4, banned to enter "http://forum.signonsandiego.com/upload/index.php?"

(3) On Aug. 5, banned to enter "http://forums.shoutwire.com/forumdisplay.php?s=&daysprune=&f=7"

Since my posting were all of political opinion, there was no reason to ban me accessing the site. The ban is so thorough that I couldn't complain nor read. I allege it was from surveillance team not from the web site. I think it was done when Feds (FBI, DEA) has been inspired and encouraged by the would passing new surveillance law.

In conclusion, I urge you to re-consider the new intelligence surveillance law, at least do some amendment to limit the unrestricted power of law enforcement. I also urge you to investigate the abusing in internet communication caused by the Feds (FBI, DEA). (see below)

Sincerely
Kat Hak Sung

--------------
Harassment

More complain about law enforcement internet abusing.

1. Made my article unreadable by misplacing the paragraph:

http://anyboard.net/gov/pol/USpolitics/posts/26900.html

http://www.care2.com/c2c/groups/disc.html?gpp=58&pst=587806&archival=&posts=35
http://www.islamonline.net/discussione/message.jspa?messageID=80356#80356
2. Block to enter the forum by various tech. problem. (such like frozen the window frame, blank frame, url changing, function losing, etc. )
http://www.kgw.com/threadsdisabled.html
http://fff.fathom.org/forums/
http://forums.caller.com/cgi-bin/WebX?caller-14@194.uUR6aWpjb5a^2@.ee6d2e3
http://asiansinc.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=15
http://slate.msn.com/code/theFray/theFray.asp
http://thefiringrange.com/forum/display_forum_topics.asp?ForumID=2
http://www.vnn.org/forums/index.html
http://www.darkconspiracy.com/board/
http://news.bostonherald.com/forums/
http://forums.cal.alachua.fl.us/
http://www.marketwatch.com/discussions/msgIndex.asp?siteId=mktw&boardId=21288
http://www.opposingdigits.com/forums/viewforum.php?f=2

3. Ban in a rogue's way:

http://www.allforums.net/showthread.php?p=246086
<DIR>
"You have been banned for the following reason:
None
</DIR>
Date the ban will be lifted: Never"

This is not a normal web site notice but a rogue's reply - a typical Feds' style.

4. Block to post by "incorrect password"

http://www.al.com/forums/
http://messageboards.ivillage.com/iv-elinthenews
http://www.matrixcommunity.org/cgi-bin/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=forum;f=1
http://talk.philmusic.com/board/viewforum.php?f=100&sid=a9c1994cf2bfbcae2b91c98231c78bb1
http://www.v-switzerland.com/forums/

5. Intercept e-mail.

Complain e-mail returned. Application e-mail and enquire e-mail no answer.
<http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/o/2165/t/1027/campaign.jsp?campaign_KEY=12293>

502. Warrantless surveillance and August plot (8/13/07)

I think the new law that allowed warrantless surveillance target on me.

In early May, 2002, I wrote "65. Birthday Party on May 3 (5/10)" revealed Feds had a plot on May 3 that year. In later May, two people in my lane - one was my tenant, the other was the landlady of a house, suddenly moved away at same time. They both came from China. (There are four house units in the lane. Feds put two Chinese secret agents in two units) Then in August, news reported that former A.G. Ashcroft was rebuked by FISA judges for cheating in May. I then knew I was under the surveillance of FISA warrant. I started to realize how important the Fourth Amendment is to innocent people. It protects them from unreasonable search and arrest from corrupt agents. (see "86. FISA Secret Court ruling")

Still continuously I am under surveillance, legally or illegally. Feds must have created a lot of justification to renew the warranty. This time, after the big attempt in April, (marked with Virginia Tech massacre) they may exhaust their cheating tactics. Feds, with the help of its resource in legislative, passed a law to do surveillance without the monitor of the court.

Be mind that law is not only effect on a small number people who related to terrorist. Most Americans have computers and surf the internet. Feds have plenty resource of controlled "terrorists". Or anytime they can get help from collaboration of foreign secret police to frame a case. That means, almost every Americans faces unreasonable search and arrest if Feds wanted. (by a message from "terrorist" to your e-mail or web-site you go) They give themselves an unrestricted power.
It is not only an eavesdropping or wiretapping. It also means surveillance which can lead to unreasonable search and arrest. Do you know what surveillance is? To my experience, it also come with harassment and persecution - radiation of unknown EM wave ray; poisoned food; provocation between family members..... various trap to a framed case.

"Enemy combatants" in Guantanamo are ripped the right to access for legal help. They could be jailed all their life. The new warrantless law does the same thing actually. Every Americans is ripped off the protect of Fourth Amendment. You could be under surveillance any time the Feds wanted without any protect of the law.

I e-mailed a petition to California Senators Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein on 8/8. No confirmation e-mail received so far. An e-mail to Congresswoman Zoe Lofgren was rejected as not deliverable. But a reaction from Feds was very swift. Next day on 8/9, my wife said she would have a trip to Peru between 8/16 to 8/22. My brother and one of my sister will go with her. If you still remember, in mid April my wife has just taken a sudden trip too (the plot marked with VT shooting case)
On same day, (8/9) the neighborhood landlord had a yard work team come. He said he would have his yard re-modeled, including repair the fence between us. The work will last till the end of the month.

One of murder tactic of Feds is travel accident. Each big plot always came with this program. So they prepare again the death for part of my family members. As for me, you can expect that yard work team is a specially trained team. And you know what special skill they have had. The plot time should be between 8/16 to 8/22. For the rest of my family member, there is other traps waiting for them.

503. Earthquake in Peru (8/18/07)

Then there was an earthquake in Peru on 8/15. Of course I view it as part of the August plot. It would be used to justify a tour accident.

That night, I asked my wife what time tomorrow would she leave home for Peru. She happily said, "No, we won't go. Don't you know there is just a 7.5 earthquake in Peru?" Her happy expression revealed it was not a trip she likes to go. I was puzzled. Was it a big coincidence that an earthquake taken place the day before the trip? To my opinion, the quake was created to justify a tour accident, not to cancel that planned trip. Did I make a mistake?

I didn't make mistake. Later that night, after several call, my wife said she still would go. She said the tour guider from Lima confirmed nothing serious happened there. Everything was OK. She left next morning.

Was everything OK in Lima? We now know the earthquake was 8-magnitude not 7.5. The death toll increased to more than 500. I knew there were several tour bus accidents in Peru before. Now you know how reasonable Feds has made it for an mountainous road accident after that big quake. Everything was on Feds' plan.

So was my neighborhood. After the landlord informing me the yard work last week, they suddenly disappeared. The neighbor house emptied for seven days. On earthquake day of 8/15, a yard work team came to dismantle the fence between my backyard and their's. On 8/16, workers used my backyard as their access path. I had to go out to tell them I wouldn't allow them entering my yard.

My daughter, has been home on her summer vacation for more than two months, will leave for a trip too. (8/18 to 8/22?) So these four days, I was home alone.

What about my other sisters and relatives? Between 8/31 and 9/3, the Bay Bridge will be closed for three days. This is a tactic repeated many times. (see their purpose at #433, 482) In less than a year, Feds closed the Bay Bridge for three times. All related to a framed case. I allege at that time ( the end of August or early September), there will be a framed drug case occurring in San Francisco, followed by massive terror attack on US soil. (one will be a tunnel bombing in San Francisco Bay)

That's the whole plan of Feds August plot. (from 8/15 to 9/3) A similar one was the 2005 September plot. (marked with hurricane Katrina) In which the action date was 9/24 - the landing day of Hurricane Rita. Feds had arranged a Vietnam trip for my wife between 9/22 - 9/29/05, so she wouldn't be home on 9/24. And another East Coast trip for my brother and one of my sister (whom this time are in trip of Peru) between 9/10 - 9/17/05. The coincidence was there was a hurricane Ophilia developed in East Coast at same time on 9/10. The Ophilia went along the East Coast for several days then disappeared when my relatives left East Coast for Canada. (see #339, 342, 345)

In these typical cases, Feds both organized murderous tour for my relatives. And activated with their new natural disaster weapon. In 2005, it was hurricane. This time it was earthquake. Both were on top grade. (Hurricane is category 5, the quake is on 8 magnitude) The climate weapon now is a ripe skill for Feds. Remember the earthquake in Kashiwazaki just one month ago (7/16)? It occurred there because there is the most powerful nuclear power plant of the world. At the purpose to push for a nuclear pollution panic. (see #499)

 

504. Fence (8/23/07)

Last night my wife came back from her Peru trip. It means the first phase of August plot was over. In that phase, my relatives and I were the murder targets. The ending signal is the noise from back yard this morning. A fence has been installed hours ago. The synchronization of the events is amazing. It starts from my petition to Senators on 8/8. I think the new passed law is a violence to the Constitution. The response from Feds was swift. Next day -

8/9. ** Yard work team appeared in next house. Landlord informed me he would remodel the yard and would change the fence which separated our yards. I agreed.
** At night my wife came home said she would have a tour to Peru. (the first phase of plan starts)

8/11. Both yard workers and neighborhoods disappeared. Leave it an empty house. I then realized the seriousness of that fence affair. Feds determined to carry out the plot. They didn't leave any chance for me to recall the agreement for dismantling the fence.

8/15. ** Yard work team appeared in neighbor's yard. The fence was dismantled.
** An 8 magnitude earthquake took place in Peru. (The action of first phase starts)

8/16. ** My wife and my relatives left for Peru.
** Yard workers used my yard as their access path. I rebuked them.

8/13 and 8/18. I wrote messages #502 and 503, alleged the August plot.

8/22 ** At night my wife came back from Peru.
8/23 ** In the morning, yard worker appeared and the new fence is installed. (The first phase ended)

During the period of my wife's trip, my backyard was left open. Feds created an excuse to access my backyard. I had to write #503 to announce I didn't allow those workers access my backyard.

The fence actually can't stop a burglar. The fence is only a legal symptom to protect your privacy. Anyone surpasses it without permission is illegal. The Fourth Amendment is same thing. It's a fence of law to protect us from unreasonable search and arrest.

I thought that first phase action was a swift response from Feds to my petition on surveillance without warranty. The coincidence is when that first phase ended on 8/22, next day (this morning) Mercury News has an article about that case. "Intelligence director reveals surveillance facts, figures" (S.J.M.N. 8/23/07)

The fallacy are:
1. Quote, "McConnell confirmed for the first time that the private sector assisted with President Bush's warrantless surveillance program. AT&T, Verizon and other telecommunications companies are being sued in federal court in San Francisco for their cooperation. "Now if you play out the suits at the value they're claimed, it would bankrupt these companies," McConnell said, arguing that they deserve immunity for their help."

The point is these companies don't work with the permission of the Court. Should they practice to the law or they are outlaw?

The point is can the firm be immune from the crime they committed because it is big and famous and facing a bankruptcy? Will thus encourage more violence?

The point is the Feds has an unrestricted power now. They behaved like an outlaw. It makes firms, individuals, organizations all obeyed to it not to the law. That is dangerous to society.

2. Quote, " McConnell said it takes 200 hours to assemble a FISA warrant on a single telephone number. "We're going backwards," he said. "We couldn't keep up.""

All court cases (civil or criminal) take a long time to file. Even to buy a house, there is a long time to fulfill the procedure. It must be dealt with great care. It also takes a long procedure to recruit an agent for FBI. Have you ever heard they complain "We couldn't keep up."?

Nothing hinders Feds to do the eavesdropping. There is a three days grace period for them to re-submit the application. So they can do it any time when they think it's urgent.
What Feds want now is to be an outlaw. Do whatever they want.

Warrantless surveillance means you lost the protect of the Fourth Amendment. Without the protection of that fence, you may face unreasonable search and arrest. The 4th Amendment is set up against the corruptive law enforcement agent. Now the corrupt agent disable the law, they can intrude your house to plant and frame the case. If you still want your civil right, stand up to protect that fence.

http://www.webslingerz.com/jhoffman/congress-email.html

505. Assassination, murder and terror attack (8/28/07)

The rest of the August plot started from 8/20 to September. The action date is between 8/31 to 9/3 when Feds closed the Bay Bridge. (see #503) At that time there will be massive terror attack in US and in Europe. I think that's why Karl Rove resigned in advance. His last date in office will be 8/30. So he will leave before the "Super 911". To get rid of any responsibility of involvement in false flag terror attack. As a matter of fact, he is probably one of the men who took part in the planning of the terror plot. (see #447. Karl Rove had promised an "October surprise" to Republican for Mid-term Election)

The second phase of August plot is between 8/20 to 8/29. A sub-plan to assassinate the President of Taiwan - Chen Shui-bian.

On 8/20, a China Air-line Boeing 737 caught fire after the landing in Okinawa, Japan. All 165 passengers escaped in minutes. People may impressed by the fireball that damaged the plane from TV news.

8/21 -8/29, the President of Taiwan - Chen Shui-bian, takes a trip to Central and South America to visit three countries there. His private plane is a Boeing 737-800, the same type of the plane that damaged in Okinawa and the plane is from the same company - China Air-line.

Yesterday - 8/27 - Federal regulators ordered airlines to inspect the wings of all 737 Boeing jets. The order was prompted by the China Airline accident in Japan.

It is obvious an accident created by Feds to justify the coming air plane accident of the Taiwan president. It is a payment to Chinese secret police who helps Feds to frame a drug case in San Francisco. Chen Shui-bian's life had been several times become a chip in their secret deal. (see "382. The life of the President of Taiwan as a payment (2/2/06)")

It's amazing how close the justification created to the formal trip happening in this plot.
The earthquake in Peru was on 8/15. One day before my wife's Peru trip. (8/16 - 8/22)
The Boeing 737 accident was on 8/20. One day before Chen Shui-bian's trip. (8/21 - 8/29)
This is how Feds playing the pre-conception tactic.

Then comes the third phase - the main stage.
8/30. Karl Rove will leave his office.
8/31 - 9/3. Bay Bridge will be closed for repair. I think one of my parents will be murdered by "natural cause". One of my sisters will be murdered in "terrorist tunnel bombing" when she takes Bart to visit my parents. (because the bridge was closed) And the others will be framed in a drug case.

To distract the framed drug case, there will be massive terror attacks in US, possibly a nuclear bombing or dirty bomb attack. The radioactive material, (or nuclear bomb) will come from Russia. That's why you saw recently Russian revived their cold war patrol. Their long range bomber fly to Quan and England. Russian just play their role for a secret deal. To justify the source of nuclear material.

The whole thing is a soap drama. Feds tries to play it as true as they can. Will you be a loyal audience?

From 8/25 to 8/28, for continuous four days, I was blocked to go internet.

506. The resignation of A.G. Gonzalez (9/3/07)

8/25 and 8/26 were week-ends. While I was blocked to the internet, I wonder this August plot was an unprecedented one. Feds censored my voice one week before the main action. Next day I knew why.

The news on 8/27 said Attorney General Gonzales handed his resignation to Bush on Friday.(8/24) News didn't report it until two days later when Bush accepted the resignation on 8/27. A.G. Gonzales didn't step down for the case of firing eight US attorneys. He stubbornly remained at his post despite the no confidence of the Senate. He quits without a signal.

I think Gonzalez resigned on my case. In early April, I have said the scandal of firing eight US attorneys was a cover up. His post depended on my case. Re: "He'll have one last chance to do that, and perhaps keep his job, when he testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee on April 17" (see #477) It was an apparent intimidation from Feds to A.G. Gonzalez. April 17 was the action date of April plot. Then we saw the Virginia Tech. shooting spree on 4/16. Gonzalez maybe the one who approved the shooting case. Four months later, in late August, he may have to take the responsibility when the Virginia Tech published its investigation review (on 8/22) and other investigation report are due.

Gonzalez may also step down for the approving of August plot which related to big operations - an 8 magnitude earthquake in Peru; a secret deal with China to murder Taiwan's president; an accident of Boeing 737 in Japan; Minneapolis bridge collapse which was used to justify the shut down of Bay Bridge.

His resignation is as mysterious as the resignation of former FBI director Louis Freeh and DEA director. No reason was given in both cases. I allege all quits for framing a drug case related on me.

I was blocked to internet from 8/25, the day after Gonzalez proposed the resignation, to 8/31, the day Bay Bridge closed for repair. (Feds released the control on 8/29. So I could surf in internet whole day that day. Also there was a release of control for about one hour total on 8/26 and 27, so I could post in several web sites at that time.) There were about six days I was banned from internet. I view it as a result of my revelation. My analysis and allegation are accurate. Feds are scare of it.

The censorship is not a surveillance, it is a violence of the Constitution. I think the order is from A.G. He will leave anyway. He doesn't care to approve any illegal request of the Feds. But even for Attorney General, can he be exempt from a crime he committed?


507. The coming stock market crash (9/8/07)

In early August, when I learned that the authority would shut down Bay Bridge in Labor Day week-ends, to my experience with Feds, I knew there would be another plot planned that month, and the action date was at 8/31 to 9/3.

Then news said Karl Rove would leave his office on 8/30. People couldn't find the reason why Rove resigned at this time, they could only guess that he was leaving a sunken ship. I related it to the August plot. Because to distract a framed drug case, there would come a massive terror attack. He left the day before another "super 911", to extricate himself from the suspicion of being the mastermind of terror attack and also to lull the people into a false sense of peace that an evil brain of Bush was absent so no conspiracy was in progress.

Then there came such a news:

Quote, "$4.5 billion options bet on catastrophe within four weeks

Anybody have a clue as to what these 'investors' are expecting?
August 26, 2007

The two sales are being referred to by market traders as "bin Laden trades" because only an event on the scale of 9-11 could make these short-sell options valuable.

There are 65,000 contracts @ $750.00 for the SPX 700 calls for open interest. That controls 6.5 million shares at $750 = $4.5 Billion. Not a single trade. But quite a bit of $$ on a contract that is 700 points away from current value. No one would buy that deep "in the money" calls. No reason to. So if they were sold looks like someone betting on massive dislocation. Lots of very strange option activity that I haven't seen before.

The entity or individual offering these sales can only make money if the market drops 30%-50% within the next four weeks. If the market does not drop, the entity or individual involved stands to lose over $1 billion just for engaging in these contracts!

Clearly, someone knows something big is going to happen BEFORE the options expire on Sept. 21.

THEORIES:

The following theories are being discussed widely within the stock and options markets today regarding the enormous and very unusual activity reported above and two stories below. Those theories are:

1) A massive terrorist attack is going to take place before Sept. 21 to tank the markets, OR;

2) China, reeling over losing $10 Billion in bad loans to the sub-prime mortgage collapse presently taking place, is going to dump US currency and tank all of Capitalism with a Communist financial revolution. Either scenario is bad and the clock is ticking. The drop-dead date of these contracts is September 21. Whatever is going to happen MUST take place between now and then or the folks involved in these contracts will lose over $1 billion for having engaged in this activity.
........

Bear in mind that the last time anyone conducted such large and unusual stock option trades (like this one) was in the weeks before the attacks of September 11.

Back then, they bought huge numbers of PUTS on airline stocks in the same airlines whose planes were involved in the September 11 attacks.

Despite knowing who made these trades, the Securities and Exchange Commission NEVER revealed who made the unusual trades and no one was ever publicly identified as being responsible for the trades which made upwards of $50 million when the attacks happened.

The fact that this latest activity by a single entity gambles on a complete collapse of the entire market by the third week in September, seems to indicate someone knows something really huge is in the works and they intend to profit almost $2 Billion within the next four weeks from whatever happens! This is really worrisome."

Source: Ticker Forum <http://www.tickerforum.org/cgi-ticker/akcs-www?post=4669>
http://mparent7777-2.blogspot.com/2007/08/45b-bet-on-another-911-within-4-weeks.html

I'll post my analysis on this stock option in next message. And besides theories 1 and 2, this group has another way, that is to sell down the market in the name of "sub-prime" crisis - a tactic they are carrying on now.

 

8. The stock market crash (2) (9/13/07)

There was also another similar trade done earlier in European stock market.

Re: "Renée Schultes
16 Aug 2007

Carry trade unwinds as yen hits one-year high

An anonymous investor has placed a bet on an index of Europe's top 50 stocks falling by a third by the end of September, as world equity markets plunged for a third day and volatility hit a three-year high.

The mystery investor has bought put option contracts on the DJ Eurostoxx 50 index that will result in a profit if it plunges to 2,800 or below by the end of September. Based on the 2,800 strike price, the position covers a notional &#8364;6.9bn, and potentially even more using a market price of about 4,100 when the trades were done on Tuesday and Wednesday.

The identity of the investor is unknown but market sources speculated it was either a large hedge fund hedging itself against deepening losses, or a long-only fund manager pressing the panic button to protect its gains.

The investor has bought a total of 245,000 put options on the index. The September put option with a 2,800 strike was the most popular DJ Eurostoxx 50 contract yesterday, according to data from Bloomberg.

http://mparent7777-2.blogspot.com/2007/08/mystery-trader-bets-market-will-crash.html

The news was dated on 8/16. So the main trade was done on 8/15 (yesterday of 8/16). That was coincidence with the first phase of August plot. (8/15, Peru earth earthquake. 8/16, my wife's Peru travel started.) The operation of "make a fortune" started at same time of operation elimination.

Someone unknown foresaw a big stock market collapsing any time between 8/16 to the late September. It could be the result of expecting a mass terror attack. And I have alleged that kind of terror attack would happen right after the action date of 8/31 to 9/3 when Bay Bridge was shut down.(to distract a framed drug case)

This is why on 9/5, we saw two news in media, one was about terror attack and the other was about China dumping US dollars. Both were planned as the first wave of attack on stock market.

Re: "Germany arrests 3 in alleged plot on U.S. sites
By Noah Barkin and Sabine Siebold Wed Sep 5, 9:03 AM ET
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070905/wl_nm/security_germany_suspects_dc

Re: China threatens `nuclear option' of dollar sales
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/main.jhtml?xml=/money/2007/09/05/bcnchina105.xml

Then why did the Feds set the liquidate date of the stock option on 9/21 and the end of September not in early September? Because they planned a main attack on stock market in Mid-September. At that time, Federal Reserve would have a meeting to discuss about the bench mark interest rate.

Feds build up an expectation that the Federal Reserve will reduce the interest rate to save the economy which is hit by the sub prime loan crisis. If the interest rate remains unchanged or goes upwards, then it will touch off a selling wave to crash the stock market.

509. Murder the investigator (9/18/07)

Federal Reserve cut the interest rate by half percent today. Stock market rally. It's a reverse operation. Cut the rate or increase the rate, they always have reason to justify. They still can make money on it by buying an up market.

On 9/6, there was a news in Mercury News: "Rep. Paul Gillmor, R-Ohio, was found dead Wednesday morning in his Arlington, Va. townhouse. Arlington police are investigating the lawmaker's death but police spokesman John Lisle said it appeared to be from natural cause."

Then an article in internet speaks in other way. Paul Gillmor was a member of House Finance Committee. He was investigating that suspicious option trading. He likely was murdered for it.

Quote, "9-11-2007- WHAT'S GOING ON?

September 11, 2007 at 09:58:57

Going into Labor Day weekend, there were lots of rumors anticipating a false flag operation, another 9-11. Trainloads of armored vehicles rolled into Houston. The San Francisco Bay bridge closed for three days. Suspicious activity was reported on ferries in Puget Sound. Ominous civil defense exercises are being held in Oregon, as part of Operation Noble Resolve, which also involves military jets flying over New York. An antiaircraft division is ordered to Washington DC.

We made it through the holiday safely.
Then last Wednesday, Congressman Paul Gillmor (R-OH) was found dead in his home. This was reported as a heart attack, until word leaked out that he had blunt trauma to the head and neck. <http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20649320/> Now we're being told he fell down the stairs. Gillmor was investigating a series of option trades that are suspicious- someone is betting billions of dollars that the market will fall 50% by September 21st. Even with the housing crisis, it would take a major catastrophe, like a "terrorist" attack, to precipitate such a plunge. As part of his job on the House Finance Committee, Gillmor was investigating this deal. Was he murdered because he was about to reveal something?

Would this death, on top of the deaths of Senators Wellstone and Carnahan, and the anthraxing of Senators Daschle and Leahy, have a chilling effect on people in Congress? Maybe that's why they're "spineless".

http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_carol_wo_070911_9_11_2007__what_s_go.htm

I think Paul Gillmor was murdered by Feds. The murderer who is behind the "Bin Laden option trades", and other terror attacks such like Virginia Tech shooting; DC sniper shooting; anthrax letter; 911 attack as well.

Paul Gillmor's death may prove that "Bin Laden option trade" was part of the "August plot"(8/31 to 9/3). The plot went soured under my continuous warning in advance.

His death also proves what we need is not warrantless surveillance and the Patriot Act and its derivatives. These are all the tools Feds used to persecute and murder US citizens. What we need is a law to strengthen the check and balance on Feds, on DOD and DOJ. Those departments, under the cover of "national security" and "top secret", become ruthless, corrupt and outlaw. They are the cancer of democracy.


510. A nuclear attack in August plot (9/23/07)

9/6, under the briefing news about Rep. Paul Gillmor's death, Mercury News also reported: "Nuclear warheads flown between bases in error

A B-52 bomber was mistakenly armed with six nuclear warheads and flown for more then three hours across several states last week,.....
The plane carried Advanced Cruise Missiles from Minot Air Force Base, N.D. to Barksdale Air Force Base, La., on Aug 30."

Then in same internet article, I learned that in military procedure, nuclear weapons must be shipped on the ground in the continental US in case there is an accident.

Re: "9-11-2007- WHAT'S GOING ON?

September 11, 2007 at 09:58:57

Now we learn that on August 30th, six nuclear warheads were "accidentally" shipped by B-52 from Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota to Barksdale Air Force Base in Louisiana. (Five arrived, did one get "lost"? Or is someone unable to count?) This violates all military procedure, which requires that nuclear weapons always be shipped on the ground in the continental US, so that if there's an accident, a bomb detonation won't occur. It would take an order from the Commander-in-Chief to put nukes on a plane.

The warheads were reportedly fastened to cruise missiles, which have a range of 1500-2000 miles. Not enough to cross the Atlantic, but enough to hit cities in the US as part of a false flag operation. This scenario is being claimed by "military investigators" on the Hal Turner show, and is making its way around the internet. It's being said the plan was to hit 5 American cities with nuclear weapons over Labor Day weekend in order to install martial law. If so, we have been saved by the grace of God, operating through loyal American whistleblowers, who made the "accidental shipment" of nuclear warheads public."

http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_carol_wo_070911_9_11_2007__what_s_go.htm

If you are a regular reader of my journal, you know as early as 8/18 I have predicted that 8/31 to 9/3 would be the action day of the August plot.(the day when Bay Bridge closed) I also repeatedly alleged there would be false flag terror attack (likely dirty bomb attack or nuclear weapon attack) to distract the framed case. This news proves my allegation. The attack would be from the government insider not from Islamic terrorist. It also alerted me that I under-estimated the Feds. Their tactic is not distract but pre-distract.

In distract case, a framed drug case broke off. Suspects died in arrest or in custody. Then terror attack follows to distract, turns public attention away from the case. But the news of drug case would leave trace in some people's mind.

In pre-distract case, something bigger takes place in advance of the framed case. Next day, when people are in the peak of panic, any other news would be ignored. Or, most likely, there is no report on any other small news (small compare to a nuclear bombing, and there are six of them. You can imagine how many pages and times spent by media to cover up the scene of each bombed city) No one knows about the drug case. Pre-distract is a thorough censorship.

I have predicted 4/17 as action day of April plot. (The last day for file a tax return) There was a massacre in Virginia Tech which shocked the whole country on 4/16.

I have predicted 8/31 to 9/3 as action day of August plot. (Bay Bridge closed) There was an attempted nuclear bombing incident on 8/30. All planned one day before the main action day. So the pre-distract plays its utmost.

I think my continuous revelation soured the plot. If their plan went through, six US cities would have been destroyed, Feds would take over the states with Martial law. A framed drug case in California next day, would sink into oblivion.

If the plan went through, that B-52 would have been shot down after it released the missile. The crew, actually worked like a suicide bomber. They only deliver something to the order. They never know they were the sacrifice. The news of the "accident" of B-52, would have sink into the ocean of nuclear panic too. That's why the bomb is not regular nuclear bomb. They were advanced cruise missiles armed with nuclear heads. All targets were pre-settled. They shoot automatically by the remote control command. At that time, I believe the TV would broadcast another tape from Bin Laden to claim a victory of Jihad. And Russian would admit they lost six nuclear bombs in their warehouse.

511. Seven most wanted cities by Feds (9/28/07)

In October plot last year, seven cities were targets.
On 10/9/06, North Korea had a nuclear test. (Manipulate N.Korea through China to push for a nuclear panic and justify the source of nuclear material used in dirty bomb.)
On 10/11, Lidle's small plane crashed to a sky-rise in New York. (To justify the terror attack method, that small plane's action is out of control.)
On 10/12, a warning of dirty bomb attack was posted in internet which claimed seven NFL football stadiums will be hit with radiological "dirty bombs".

Homeland Security Department said the threat was being viewed "with strong skepticism". The FBI also expressed doubt about the threat.

However in August plot this year, there is a strange coincidence that a news said Al Qaida targets at seven US cities. This time there was no doubt expressed.

Re: Al-Qaida Plans Nuclear
Attacks on 7 U.S. Cities
NewsMax Wires

Seasoned investigative reporter and former FBI consultant Paul Williams reveals the alarming potential for nuclear terrorism on U.S. soil and the sinister connections among organized crime, illegal immigrants, and al-Qaida.

Recently, FBI Director Robert Mueller, in an interview with NewsMax, confirmed Williams' main claim. Mueller said al-Qaida's paramount goal is clear: to detonate a nuclear device that would kill hundreds of thousands of Americans.

Williams maintains that al-Qaida is not content on blowing up one nuclear device or even simply a "dirty" nuke - but wants to explode real nuclear devices in seven U.S. cities simultaneously

http://w3.newsmax.com/a/dayofislam/?PROMO_CODE=34BE-1

Obviously Feds has 7 US cities as their most wanted. Then why there were only six nuclear missiles prepared in this operation? Because a B-52 can only hang 6 missiles in each of its wing. One wing must hang un-nuclear missiles to justify a security check has been done. So six was their utmost.

Re: "How warheads made an unplanned flight

By Joby Warrick and Walter Pincus, The Washington Post
September 23, 2007

WASHINGTON -- --

The airmen attached the gray missiles to the plane's wings, six on each side. After eyeballing the missiles on the right side, a flight officer signed a manifest that listed a dozen unarmed AGM-129 missiles. The officer did not notice that the six on the left contained nuclear warheads, each with the destructive power of up to 10 Hiroshima bombs."

Which are the most wanted cities of Feds? Two in October plot 2006 were Oakland and Houston. One of my sister (I think she is a murder target of the Feds) lives in Oakland. In August 2007 plot, Feds prepared a shut down of Bay Bridge (which connects Oakland and San Francisco). I think they planned a tunnel bombing for my sister so Oakland could exempt from a nuclear attack last month. Houston is a city one of my cousin lives. (Is my cousin a target too?) I'm sure it's a target because in Katrina case, Houston was the predicted landing spot of Hurricane Rita. And the Hurricane landing day was September 24, the action day of the plot.

The other two cities would be Washington DC and Boston, I think. The White House was said one target of the four planes in 9/11/2001. Only that plane crashed in mid-way. But to justify a war on Iran, to destroy Capital is a necessity. Boston has been in hit list in several terror case. In 1/20/2005, there was a Boston dirty bomb case. In late January 2007, there was an ad scare case in Boston. The ad box which could turn into bombing box appeared in 10 US cities. All planned by Feds, I allege.

Do you live in one of these cities?

512. Attempt dirty bomb attack on 9/14 (10/3/07)

There was a stand down order in Air force on 9/14/07. I think it was an immediate follow up to the soured 8/30 nuclear attack.

Quote, "ACC orders commandwide standdown Friday

By Bruce Rolfsen - Staff writer
Posted : Monday Sep 10, 2007 17:38:42 EDT

On Sept. 14, flight lines will be very quiet at Air Combat Command bases.
The entire command - about 100,000 active-duty airmen - is standing down training flights and many other operations as part of a command-wide safety day.

Command boss Gen. Ronald Keys ordered the Sept. 14 safety standdown in the wake of the Aug. 30 nuclear incident at Minot Air Force Base, N.D., in which six cruise missiles armed with nuclear warheads were loaded onto a B-52H and then flown to Barksdale Air Force Base, La., without anyone on the ground or bomber realizing the nuclear weapons were on the plane.

http://www.airforcetimes.com/news/2007/09/airforce_aircombatcommand_standdown_070807/

I don't see there is anything can be done to improve the "mistaken loading of nuclear missiles" by a stand down order two weeks later. It only eroded the air defense of the US on that particular day. I remembered there was a similar stand down order on the day of 9/11/2001. The order, would open the American sky for another terror attack.

This time the terror attack would be a dirty bomb attack. I alleged in October plot of 2006, Lidle's air crash was used to justify that the dirty bomb attack would be done by small planes. The plot went soured. The plan is still there. Feds tried to use this plan again. They opened the sky for a terror attack on 9/14.

The 9/14 attack could replace the 8/30 nuclear attack and continue the big August plot.
1. 9/14 attack still would cause a nuclear panic Feds needed to distract a framed case and activate war on Iran.

2. The "Bin Laden option trade" could still go on planned process. The due date was in 9/21 and in the end of September (in European stock market).

3. The original plan on financial market could still be carried on. That was:

(1) Around 9/14, there was a financial crisis breaking off in UK. I think that was a procedure in August plot.
Re: "Fears grow for British economy as panic over Northern Rock spreads

Heather Stewart and Heather Connon
London Observer
Sunday September 16, 2007

US Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson flies in to London tomorrow to discuss the worsening global credit crisis with Chancellor Alistair Darling, as fears intensify that the lending squeeze could be the last straw for Britain's buy-now-pay-later economy.

Thousands of anxious customers queued outside branches of Northern Rock to withdraw their savings this weekend, ignoring calls for calm from Darling, after he helped broker an unprecedented emergency loan from the Bank of England to rescue the bank."
The crisis suddenly ended mysteriously. But if 9/14 attack went true, then situation would have been thoroughly different. Because the Little Rock crisis was designed as "the last straw for Britain's economy". European stock market would be hit heavily if UK economy collapsed.
(2) Federal Reserve meeting was at 9/18. If there was a 9/14 terror attack, Bernanky could go in opposite way by raise the interest rate with "consideration of inflation".

So the 9/14 attack still could fulfill the purpose of the original August plot: A terrorist bombing as first wave attack, followed by the second wave of financial crisis.

There was also a coincidence to the terror attack date and the resignation date of two evils.
1. Karl Rove's resignation day was 8/30, same day of nuclear missiles "mistakenly transferred" by a B-52". (8/30 attempt nuclear attack)
2. A.G. Gonzalez' resignation day was 9/14, same day when Air force had a "stand down" order. (9/14 attempt dirty bomb attack)
I have speculated that Rove's resignation related to the coming terror attack. As Gonzalez, I suspect DOJ is behind all that "warrantless surveillance" and the drug case they framed on me was always connected to the terror attack. He might have signed an order of unreasonable "search and arrest" before he left the office. Feds made use of their puppet to its utmost.

 

513. October plot 2007 (10/8/07)

Now we have a review on August plot.

1. In May, the so said opposing party Democrats suddenly withdraw their fighting against the Iraq war policy and released the extra fund requested by Bush. It indicates a plot of false flag terror attack combined with Iran war had been planned. The extra fund, was for Iran war, though in the name for surge.

2. In June, extra US troops were in Iraq. It was for Iran war.
3. A three month plan. (July to September) Marked with 8/30 nuclear missiles attack and Bay Bridge shut down for framed drug case (8/31 - 9/2) and the Bin Laden stock option trade (August to late September) When the nuclear missile attack was abandoned, there was a refill attempt of dirty bomb attack on 9/14.

4. In mid-September, when the August plot went soured, government pushed out a general to explain the surge, described it as a not successful, not failed mission. Because their final goal, is still a war on Iran. So the troops still has to stay there.

5. A new request of 140 billion by Pentagon is approved by the Senate. I think 100 billion is for military activity in Iraq and Afghanistan. The 40 billion, similar to the amount Bush requested for surge, is for Iran war. In addition to that, Bush wants another 50 billion this time. That amount, I think, is for war on Syria. Bush wants to finish the Mid-east road map before he leaving the White House.

For these war, another 911 alike terror attack is inevitable. So attempt of a dirty bomb attack will be tried repeatedly. The news for this month:

Attack on Iran Said To Be Imminent
By BENNY AVNI
Staff Reporter of the Sun
September 28, 2007

Yesterday's edition of Le Canard Enchaîné, a French weekly known for its investigative journalism, reported details of an alleged Israeli-American plan to attack Iran's nuclear facilities. The frontpage headline read: "A report sent to the Elysée - Putin tells Tehran: They're going to bomb you!"

Like most stories in the French paper, the article was based on unnamed sources who said that in order to reduce casualties, the attack against Iran is planned for October 15, the end of the Muslim holy month of Ramadan.

http://www.nysun.com/article/63561

Re: "U.S. Plans Biggest Terror Drill Ever
Three Fictional "Dirty Bombs" To Go Off In Portland, Phoenix And Guam
WASHINGTON, Oct. 3, 2007

The agency said the Oct. 15-19 exercise would be "the largest and most comprehensive" to date. "
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/10/03/national/main3323552.shtml

Months ago, Michael Chertoff had "gut feeling" about TWIN "dirty bombs" going off in Los Angeles AND San Francisco, so the drill in Oregon and Arizona has a connection to it. Among them, I think San Francisco is the main target.

As old tactic, there is another hurried travel for my family member. My brother and his wife, along with my uncle, will take a Panama cruise from 10/9-10/28. An 18 days cruise trip for only $600. To lure my relatives to such trip trap, Feds used to offer big bargain trip, sometimes free.

514. More for October plot 2007 (10/13/07)

1. Chen Shui-bian, President of Taiwan, flew to Marshall Islands on 10/12 for a visit. I have alleged he was a target in August plot (2007) when he was arranged in a visit to three South America countries. He used to be a chip of payment in US-China secret deal. It's easy to create an accident in a long trip.

2. On 10/11, White House announced that Bush would meet the spiritual leader of Tibet - Dalai Lama - on 10/16. The Congress also would award Dalai Lama a gold medal on 10/17. China protested US for the interference on internal affair of China. To create a hostile appearance to cover up a covert collaboration. It becomes a routine in secret deal.

3. On 10/13, Washington Post reported that two of Bush's most senior Cabinet members - Condoleezza Rice and Robert Gates - pitched an unusual new missile defense partnership to Russian President Putin, but they received a firm public rebuke . It also reported that Putin kept Gates and Rice waiting for more than a half hour before he met them. The event plays the same role as Russian sending long rang bombers to Guam and England in August plot. To show Russian is unfriendly with US. The purpose is to cover up the covert collaboration between the two countries.

It means Russian will justify the original source of the radioactive material used in dirty bomb attack. There is a possibility Russian will play a role of witness. I alleged in June 2002, former A.G. Ashcroft had made a secret deal with Russia, let Russian be a witness that Saddam planned a dirty bomb attack on US so to justify Bush's Iraq war. That is famous Padilla case. For Iran war, similar plot repeats. (see # 68. Ashcroft's revenge :Re. 9. Ashcroft in Moscow")

4. As for me, there is a new event. Yesterday was garbage collect day. My wife says our garbage bin was missing. She said a neighborhood told her to call the garbage company to get a new one. Since the area residents mostly, if not all, are agents and informants, and the garbage company is run by the Feds, nobody would take our garbage bin away except the Feds. They want us to have a new bin. What the trick they put in that new bin? I don't know. But tactic is old: to make an arrest by finding drug trace in the bin, I think.

5. E.M wave radiation. At night, when I was asleep, I was attacked by Gama ray. (I call it so though I don't know what kind of radiation exactly is it.) It penetrates metal plate. It hurts internal organ, especially kidney. There was warm feeling when they apply it on me. They used to shot the ray with sleep wave so the radiation could apply longer on victim without being felt. When I was awaken, there was a heavy feeling of kidney. The urine would be red. (bloody urine) It's a malicious tactic to murder under the cover up of "kidney failure".

To arrest by framed drug case, to eliminate by high tech. weapon, or to set up bomb traps... Feds do try their best.

515. Bay Bridge shutdown and Minneapolis bridge collapsing (10/18/07)

From June 2006 to September 2007, in 15 months, Bay Bridge was closed (or partly closed) for four times. All related to the alleged framed case.

1. My father fell and had a surgery in later May 2006. He was in critical condition then. There was an announcement for work on Bay Bridge at the week-ends of 6/4 to 6/5.

2. Bay Bridge closed on Labor Day (9/3-9/5/2006). It coincided with alleged 9/2 action day of September plot 2006. (see "433. 9/2 plot (9/5/06)") Combined with event happened in June, I realized that Feds would murder my parents, and force my sister to take Tunnel Bart in emergence visit. A terror attack would take place in tunnel.

3. Then on 4/29/2007, an oil tank crashed at highway 880 and burned down Highway 580 which happened to be the main exit of the Bay Bridge. It played the mission to close Bay Bridge partly. (see " 482. The collapse of Highway 580. (5/3/07)") Authority originally announced that the re-build of the highway would take six months. But they then finished the work in less than a month.

I think the burned down of Highway was a hurried plan after the failure of 4/17/2007 plot when I started to reveal 4/16 Virginia Tech massacre was done by Feds. But in May when a much bigger plot was made, Feds dramatically finished that highway re-construction.

4. In that much bigger plot, they closed the Bay Bridge on 8/31 to 9/3, planned a nuclear terror attack on 8/30, and a stock market harvest and Iran war as well.

Feds made the decision in May. Then hurriedly finished the burned down highway work. At same time, Democrats suddenly ended their fight against Bush in the House and released the Iraq war fund. That fund, was for Iran war.

In June, US troops increased in Iraq in the name of surge. Actually, it was for Iran war. On 6/30, a brief news said Bay Bridge would be closed on Labor Day.

In July, Putin was invited to Bush's private ranch in Main. I alleged a secret deal has been made. Russia would be witness of "Iran's ambition for nuclear weapon" to justify the coming Iran war. Then new President of France was invited to US for a vacation. Another secret deal has been made. France would be new ally in Bush's Iran war.

On August 1, the interstate 35W bridge in Minneapolis collapsed. Media made it a big news.
When I read the full pages news and picture in Mercury News on 8/2, I thought, it might be a cover up job for the shutdown of Bay Bridge. Really, when I turned to Local edition, a big article with a big title caught my eye. "Bay Bridge will be closed on Labor Day". A collapsing bridge made the shutdown of Bay Bridge full justified.

Interesting reference:
Quote, "1stmilitia PHILADELPHIA,
Posted: Aug 3, 2007 7:46 AM
We have received information across our newswires that indicates an Ultra-low Freqency Blast as reported by the Russian Institute of Solar-Terrestrial Physics in Irkutsk originated from Latitude: 45° 00' North Longitude: 93° 15' West at the precise moment, and locale, of a catastrophic collapse of a nearly 2,000 foot long bridge in Minneapolis, Minnesota. This is obviously the Interstate 35W Bridge spanning the Mississippi River. The Russian Military further stated that a calamity of this size could only have occurred with the use of an "acoustic" weapon which the U.S. military is "known to possess." Interestingly enough, Augsberg College has involved itself into research pertaining to acoustic weaponry and is located ONE MILE from Interstate 35W Bridge!! To further elucidate on the power of such weaponry we cite this CNN report;

<http://mail.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=mail.message&friendID=103800104&Mytoken=4C1F8E16-57B8-46B3-9914CF1A6B04DFA151790324>

Quote, 'ENGINEERS SAY MINNESOTA BRIDGE COLLAPSE SHOULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED THE WAY IT DID *PIC*

Posted By: Guarded_Optimist <Send E-Mail>
Date: Thursday, 9 August 2007, 12:08 a.m.

Bridge engineers Ted Galambos and Robert Ballerini say the Minnesota I-35W bridge should not have collapsed the way it did. They seem to have expected a situation similar to the Webber Falls, Oklahoma bridge collapse of May 26, 2002, where a barge hit the bridge, but only one localized section fell.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0708/01/bn.04.html

516. Iran war next stage (10/23/07)

In early October, there was a summit of Caspian Sea states. The leaders of other Caspian Sea states ruled out any military strikes on Iran from their region. Russian President Vladimir Putin also made clear to Washington on 10/16 that Russia would not accept military action against Iran.

Putin visited Iran in Mid October and met with Iran's supreme leader Khamenei on 10/16. Putin offered a special proposal to Khamenei. The special offer, must relate to a nuclear deal.

Recently, Russia didn't play friendly to Iran. U.N. Security Council has imposed limited sanction on Iran. Russia voted yes. In the project of Iran's first nuclear power plant, Russia delayed the construction and delayed the supply of fuel, attributed all these to payment problem. Iran denied the accusation, said payment were on time, that Russia was just bowing to West pressure.

In the crisis of July to September, (the plot of Iran war justifying by a false flag nuclear attack in US, marked with 8/30 accident of "mistaken loading nuclear missiles on a B-52") Iran felt the approaching war threat from the US and made a compromise by accepting U.N. nuclear inspection in July. It was the time Iran needs the help most. None of the Caspian sea states and Russia gave a word. Why do they suddenly change the direction of 180 degree now?

I think it is a plot continue to the 8/30 plot. After the false flag nuclear attack went soured, Feds set up another trap for Iran. The fishing pole is Russia, the bait is "to finish the construction of the nuclear power plant on schedule", possibly with the permission of "production of highly enriched uranium" which can be used in nuclear weapon. Once the fish bite that special offer, the war will break off. What Bush needs is a justification.

To push Iran to bite the bait, a group of swindlers play a soap opera. Bush threatens World War 3 if Iran goes nuclear, to make Iran think that it belongs to a group. (The word "World War" is particularly selected because it means there are two camps, not two states) Caspian Sea states and Russia made Iran feel it is supported by a group. To create a safe feeling for Iran to accept that special offer.

Whether the fish will bite the bait, we don't know. But one thing is sure: when wolf wants to eat a goat, it will always find a justification. Either it's for "WMD", for "democracy", or for "your security". When Bush asks for more money from Congress, it's not for maintenance of troops in Iraq. It's for Iran and Syria war. And American people must prepare for a "dirty bomb" attack from their own government.

 

517. The California fire is an organized crime (10/28/07)
Quote, "With no new evidence, Fox continues to ask: Did al Qaeda burn California?

David Edwards and Nick Juliano
Published: Thursday October 25, 2007

For the second straight day, Fox News stood virtually alone in advancing thinly supported speculation to raise fears that the wildfires ravaging California are not the result of a confluence of arid heat and high winds but were set deliberately by al Qaeda terrorists bent on destroying America.

Fox & Friends, the conservative cable channel, was panned Wednesday for breathlessly reporting a sketchy, four-year-old FBI memo as if it offered new information linking America's enemies in the "Global War on Terror" with a plot to burn down southern California.

http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Fox_hypes_Qaeda_plotted_fires_theory_1025.html

One point I agree with Fox news is that the California fire was caused by arson. But I think the mastermind behind arsonist is Feds not Al Qaida.

1. Al Qaida is always used as scapegoat for every big case in recent years. 911 attack was done in the name of Al Qaida. (a lot of people now realize it was done by insiders to justify Mid-east war) The conflict in Iraq between Sunni and Shiite was provoked by Al Qaida. (killing innocent civilians by "suicide bombers" and bombing shrine mosques) A soured nuclear attack on US on 8/30 was also warned previously by HSD chief Chertoff and FBI director Mueller that Al Qaida would nuke US cities. So was this time.

2. Media is a manipulate tool of Feds. The base of this news came from FBI.

3. Though they could blame it for Al Qaida, one thing Al Qaida unable to do is to create a wild fire situation like this. The fire in Southern California is caused by arid heat and high winds. The technique to control climate needs a long time experiment and huge fund support. So far I haven't see any other country has the ability to do it except US. I have alleged in my case Feds used their climate weapon to create high wind, hurricane and heat. See heat: 424. An unprecedented heat wave (7/30/06), see wind : 345. hurricane, a tool to distract (9/27/05).

4. This was an organized arson case. From TV, several days ago, I caught a brief news that police had shoot dead an arsonist. It also said police were tracking 5 suspects in separate arson case. It used to be individual even if a wild fire was caused by arson. Five separate arson in a wild fire certainly is an organized crime. (consider there were more undiscovered arson in the case) Who has the power to do it?

5. Media censorship. The arson obviously played an important role in this California fire. I caught it from a brief news from TV. Later I tried to find this report from newspaper for detail. I couldn't find any, not a little bit. Obviously it was censored by media. Someone doesn't want people connect the fire to arson despite the fact it was a big one. (Police even killed one suspect.)

6. Motive. I think it is the continuation of the elimination plot. The attempt to finish the plot was so eager that the plan goes one after another.

* 8/31-9/3. Bay Bridge shut down. (marked with 8/30 B-52 nuclear missiles accident)

* 9/14. Air operation stand down. (an attempt of dirty bomb attack)

*10/15 - 10/19. A biggest ever terror drill for three Fictional "Dirty Bombs" To Go Off In Portland, Phoenix And Guam.
* 10/21 Sunday. Alleged dirty bomb attack in Great Mall, Milpitas. My sister and my parents came to my house. My sister asked me if there was a McDonald nearby. They intended to have a lunch there. The nearest McDonald is in Great Mall. I didn't go. Just 10 months ago, there was an alleged bombing attempt plot in that Mall for me. see # 459. December bombing plot in Great Mall (1/5/07)

* On same day, 10/21, California fire started. If I went to McDonald that day, I believe a bombing would have happened and there would be more arson to make the fire a much bigger disaster.

7. California fire not only planned to distract but also carried up a mission to eliminate my daughter. One week before 8/31, local newspapers, both Chinese and English, had big articles about May Zhou's death. The point was that Santa Rosa police concluded May Zhou's death was suicide while May's father referred to an independent pathologist who spoke in other way. The similar articles, must have been shown in San Diego media too, because May's family lives there. Eight months ago, I wrote "467. Attempt to murder my daughter (2/15/07)", alleged May Zhou's death was created to justify would be my daughter's death. Feds revived the issue in August plot again. Obviously determined to make it a big elimination.

To continue the plot, that big fire targeted at San Diego though it also burns in other places. San Diego University evacuated the students. My daughter wondered in Los Angles in a car with her classmates next day. She went home on 10/23 till today.

That is the event for a girl who doesn't live with us in Bay area. Feds prepared different way of elimination.

518. Earthquake after wildfire (11/3/07)

On 10/28, I wrote #517 alleged California fire was an organized crime.

On 10/31, there was a news in World Journal (Chinese) said a teenage admitted he caused a fire when he played with match on 10/21. That until 10/30, 18 fields out of 23 wild fires has been 100% controlled.

On 11/2, there was a brief news in Mercury News.

Re: "Boy, 10, admits causing devastating wildfire.

.....Corner had raced up a hill toward the source of the flames. At the top, she saw a stunned-looking 10-year-old boy and his parents frantically trying to beat the flames down with towels.

The 10-year-old boy quickly admitted he had been playing with matches.

....The fire he admitted starting was one of more than 15 roared Southern California. ...Causes have ranged from arson to downed power lines to sparks set off by construction work."

So 23 different cases caused this wild fire coincidentally. Among them, how many caused by downed power lines? How many caused by construction work? And how many, caused by arsons?

While I try to track the brief news from TV that police are tracking 5 suspects in separate arson and one suspect being shoot dead story, the two news were the only report I could find. Obviously it's a cover up of the arson. Since there were too many to cover up, Fox News even developed a fallacy that Al Qaida did it. But as I said, Al Qaida has no such ability to create an arid heat and high winds which requires huge resources. Feds has.

The California fire was under control in the end of October. Then it came an earthquake.

At 8 p.m. Oct.30, a 5.6 temblor rattles Silicon Valley. It was the first time I encountered with such big a quake. The house shook for 30 seconds. My wife and I rushed out of the house. It was quiet outside. I was surprised to find my wife and I were the only two in the lane. No other people was at sight. I could only think my street neighbors were agents and informants who knew what kind of the quake it would be in advance so they behaved different from ordinary people. Or the surveillance team members didn't want to show their face off. The picture of newspaper next day showed crowd of people outside their house, description: "Frightened San Jose residents wait for firefighters to give the all-clear sign after inspecting the Apartment."

I think the quake was created by Feds. Recently, the framed plot came one after another. In timing, it follows closely to the Southern California fire.

By location, the epicenter is the closest to my house. Scientists used to warn the danger of a big quake at Hayward fault. Hayward fault runs parallel to San Francisco and Oakland, stops at Fremont. The nearest fault to my house is another one: Calaveras fault. The 10/30 quake took place there.


So the temblor is out of scientists' expect. Topic," Energy sent south, away from danger"
"The rupture on the Calveras Fault, just seven miles east of Milpitas, directed its energy to the south, away from the Bay Area's most heavily populated urban centers and the dangerous of Hayward Fault." (Mercury News, 11/1/07)

It was not the energy went south. It was the local energy released artificially.
I looked at the map of the newspaper. The shortest distance from my house to Calaveras Fault is just the distance the epicenter to my house. So my house would be affected by the temblor to its utmost. The technique of artificial earthquake is to apply EM waves on fault to touch off a temblor. Feds picked up a point on fault that is the nearest to my house. Or will someone say it's another coincidence? ( In last message, I just said the nearest McDonald to my house is at Great Mall, Milpitas. Measure with radius, the distance from my house to epicenter may be shorter than Milpitas to it.)
The quake, maybe an intimidation, or a practice, or a pre-drill for a bigger one. It may prove my allegation last year was true. see "396. Rain to create a liquefaction quake (4/5/06)"
From August to now, Feds practised climate weapon many times. There was a Peru earthquake (8/15) to justify an attempt murder disguised as accident on my family members. (their Peru travel 8/16 to 8/22). There was a Minneapolis Bridge collapse (8/1) to justify the close of Bay Bridge. Both showed in media in big articles on 8/2. There were huge winds and hot weather to help California fire a historical big one. (10/21 to 10/2 And on 10/30, there is a quake the epicenter just 7 miles from my house.

519. 11/10/07 plot (11/8/07)
On 11/2, I saw a letter in my front yard. It was from Senator Dianne Feinstan's office. I had a petition to her in early August urging her to reconsider the warrantless surveillance law. (see #501) She said she supports it after she had conversation with Mike McConnell, the Director of National Intelligence. The letter dated on 10/17. Why it took two weeks to arrive at my front yard? I puzzled.
Next day, I knew why. The News said Feinstein and Schumer to vote for Mukasey on 11/2. Obviously, Feinstein's letter was dropped there by an agent to show off how they could manipulate the law makers and had their favorite get nominated.
The confirmation of Attorney General nominee Michael Mukasey seemed being in trouble until last Friday. He likely would have failed his hearing in Senate because Mukasey refused to clarify his stand on water boarding torture. Now all of a sudden, his master came to help. DOJ will have an obedient puppet to work for them.
The letter in front yard may mean more. What is it? Two days later, news reported that on 11/4, US Defense secretary Robert Gates arrived in China to question the top officials there about the purpose of their military buildup and to pressure them to stop providing arms to Iran. I am familiar with that kind of cover up. It is another confirmation of a secret deal.
The sudden pass of G.A.'s nomination and the sudden China visit of Gates means a new plot is planned. Feds will have a yes man to cover up their illegal activity. The plot is an old one: a drug case. China will frame the case and offer witness for it. The plot have repeated many times since April 2001.
To confirm my speculation, yesterday's weather forecast show it will rain on Saturday. It is old tactic too. (see #500. IRS raid (8/3/07))
It means the action day will be on this week end.
How will Feds apply the case on me? The only speculation I can have is the garbage bin. Four weeks ago, it was stolen. (see #514. More for October plot 2007 (10/13/07) One week later, my wife said she found it was used by a neighbor cross the street and got it back. She had suggested me to call the garbage company for a new one. I didn't do it. So they returned it a week later. Will Feds make an arrest by claiming they found drug trace in it? I don't know. May be Mukasey will approve it. But if Feds arrest people not for what they doing but by discovering something in their garbage bin, then is it too convenient for them to wrong anyone they dislike by just planting?


520. A brilliant proof for secret deal allegation (11/13/07)

Quote, "The uninvited guest: Chinese sub pops up in middle of U.S. Navy exercise, leaving military chiefs red-faced
By MATTHEW HICKLEY - 10th November 2007

American military chiefs have been left dumbstruck by an undetected Chinese submarine popping up at the heart of a recent Pacific exercise and close to the vast U.S.S. Kitty Hawk - a 1,000ft supercarrier with 4,500 personnel on board."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/li...ews.html?in_article_id=492804&in_page_id=1811

Is Chinese submarine so advanced that US Navy couldn't detect it even it was at the heart of a Navy exercise? I don't think so. One important principle for military is to hide its ability so its rival can't find a proper tactic to deal with it.
How could Chinese Navy broke that principle? Even Chinese sub has that ability to avoid being detected by US Navy, it was unnecessary to pop up to reveal its ability. Was China stupid enough to make such a show off? No, it's not. Then what is it?

It was another soap opera directed by DOJ and DOD. Chinese Navy and US Navy acted it to deceive the public. I view it as a brilliant proof of the allegation of my last message "519. 11/10/07 plot (11/8/07)". It is the result of a secret deal between US and China marked with Gate's Nov.4 visit.

The submarine's pop up event plays the same role of Russian's long range bomber which patrolled to Guam and approached Britain in July - September plot. To show a hostility existed between two countries to cover up an actual collaboration between them.

It may also help DOD to ask for more money from the House. In this May, DOD got 46 billion extra money for surge. I alleged it was for Iran war. The war on Iran failed to be carried out. It doesn't cost that much for surge. Where did the money go? I think they used it in climate war.

For the last big plot, (or also you can say when they got the extra money for surge) there were a big earthquake in Peru, an earthquake in San Jose, a bridge collapse in Minneapolis, and a huge wind and hot weather in southern California. All these were large operation took a lot of money. Intelligence had no such budget, DOD had.

For the coming plot, more climate manipulation will involve. Bush has request another extra 46 billion for it. The submarine event will help his proposal.

521. An air express lane for Iran war (11/18/07)

Quote, "Bush announces plan to ease airport delays

(New York - WABC, Nov. 15, 2007) - Ahead of the holiday travel crunch, President Bush ordered steps Thursday to reduce air traffic congestion and long delays that have left passengers stranded.

The most significant change is that the Pentagon will open unused military airspace from Florida to Maine to create "a Thanksgiving express lane" for commercial airliners. It will be open next week for five days - Wednesday through Sunday - for the busiest days of Thanksgiving travel"

http://abclocal.go.com/wabc/story?section=traffic&id=5763091

We know the air traffic delay mainly caused by inefficiency of the airline company and airport, not by the lacking of airspace. If you cross the continent by a car, the traffic jam likely to happen in the city where you start the travel or in the destination city (for air travel it's airport). Seldom you have trouble once you are on freeway. (airspace) It is a joke if Bush says he solves the city traffic problem by adding more cross country freeway. Then why did he make such a ridiculous solution?

In 911 attack, one plane targeted Washington D.C. crashed in midway. Another plane targeted Pentagon likely was hijacked to somewhere else where all people on board were terminated. Circumstance evidence showed that what hit Pentagon was a military drone or a missile not a commercial plane. All four planes left their original airway. Now if there is another 911 alike hijack, what will the crew of the planes do? They will do whatever they can do because they know otherwise it will be death. That may change the result of the original plot planned by the perpetrator. How to comfort the crew member when the plane is led to a different route? The best way is to convince them they are directed to a "Thanksgiving (or Christmas) express way." So there will be little time for crew member to re-act when the last moment comes. (At that time the plane is taken over by the auto-pilot system.) It is a pre-concept psychological operation.

Though it is a speculation, I believe so. Consider Bush and Pentagon never cares human's lives. (The negligence of hurricane Katrina and New Orleans people and the soldiers' lives who died in mid-east war.) Consider Bush only cares for looting people's civil rights (Patriot Act, warrantless surveillance) and money (keep on asking for big war funding), how can Bush suddenly care for your trip delay? Consider Bush is eager to start war on Iran; Consider recent soured plots to justify Iran war (August 30 B-52 mis-loading nuclear missiles, 9/14 air force stand down, 10/15 dirty bomb drill), I allege the likely target of "terror attack" will be some military nuclear facilities or nuclear power plants which located in deserted area under the protect of "military airspace" for security reason. Nobody can sight them even from air before. Now for the necessity of Iran war, they open that forbidden airspace for commercial planes. (or a designated human plane bomb)
The Thanksgiving express lane is an express lane to Iran war. I allege.

 

522. Bombing shopping center (11/23/07)

On 11/9, newspaper said FBI has issued a warning that Al Qaida has clearly stated "they intend to attack the U.S. or its interests". ABC news reported that Al Qaida was preparing to attack shopping malls in Chicago and Los Angles this holiday seasons.

So far, almost all "terror attack" activated by so said "Al Qaida" were for the interest of the Inside Group. 911 attack targeted at civilians so Americans would support Bush to start the Mid-east war. Bali bombing targeted at Australian tourists so Australians would support their government to join the Iraq war. Al Qaida in Iraq targeted at Iraqi civilians by bombing the market and Shiite shrines to provoke a conflict between Sunni and Shiite. I allege this is a tactic of Pentagon and CIA to wipe out the resistance of Iraqis. Under the cover up of Sunni and Shiite conflict they assassinate Iraqi elite and anti-American force by the death squads. Bin Laden and his vice used to issue a video tape when Bush administration need help either in election, to intimidate people for more power and money, or frame a terror case.
So Al Qaida is only a tool of the Inside Group. We can see how Al Qaida helped Bush administration since he took the seat of US president. This time when FBI repeats the Al Qaida threat, that's old wine in new bottle - to justify a bombing in the name of terrorist. The likely spot will be shopping center near my residence. Especially the big mall - The Great Mall in Milpitas.

There was such attempt in last December when they offered a free ticket for a new Chinese movie. (see "459. December bombing plot in Great Mall (1/5/07)") Last month on 10/21, the day when Southern California fire started and other my family members on a bargain cruise trip, my youngest sister and my parents came, asked for instruction to the nearest McDonald. It was obviously a trick to lure me to the Great Mall where the nearest McDonald was. I think my youngest sister was under the order of Feds. She didn't know it was a death trip. The event remind me of 7/7/05 London bombing. The four "suicide bombers" were in same situation. They were instructed to there but never knew it was a death mission.

One month later, on 11/21, there was a burning smell in sitting room. There was a short circuit in switch box. The electrical power to kitchen and sitting room was cut. The wire in switch box was burned so severe that I have to restore power by setting up a new electrical wire. I have no material. My wife wouldn't do the shopping. She said, "I am afraid the Home Depot is closed on holiday." Today will be the third day kitchen remain in dark. Of course I won't go Home Depot. It is in Great Mall. I'm afraid a bombing there.

Not only I won't go Great Mall, also I don't go nearby shopping centers for more than half a year for same reason. I'll talk about it later.

523. Cyberspace harassment and power abusing (11/28/07)

From 11/11 to 11/13, for consecutive three days, Mercury News put an investigation series of "Cybercrime" on its first page. It is a big article with big title. I then knew FBI would expand their power abusing in internet area. That article was used to request for more power and budget.

The article said that Cyberspace force is the third biggest force in FBI. They are:

1. The biggest one: counter terrorism, (5,987 employees)
2. Next big: Counterintelligence. (4,479 employees)
3. Third big: Cyber Division. (1,151 employees)

What does that third big division do? Cyberspace law enforcement which deal with internet attack, compact-disc privacy and online child pornography.

What about communication of terrorists? It should belong to counter terrorism. Communication of spy? It should belong to counterintelligence. Other agencies also take big role in cyberspace area. The Secret Service, practiced in combating counterfeiting, handles computer-driven financial crimes. Homeland Security Department, the Federal Trade Commission, U.S.Postal Service and Immigration and Customs also have roles. So is that third big division too small as FBI said? I think it is too big that caused internet harassment.

Since I started to post in internet forum, I suffered endless harassment. I allege Feds have organized harassing team in internet which used to spread disinformation and attack dissenters. For my personal experience, I allege:

1. Feds organized team to attack me personally with words such like "insane, tin-foiled man, schizophrenia...."

2. Feds intimidate readers of my article. I reveal plot of Feds and having analysis on how they did it. My article used to attract more and more readers. It may appeal readers by hundreds each time I posting a new one. Then all of a sudden, the readers disappeared. The number dropped to less then a dozen.(I keep a record each time I post) It may caused by (1) Feds called reader of my article, tarnished me as a bad guy they were tracking. (2) blocking my article to readers by cyberspace technique. (such like technique of "ignorance")

3. Feds intimidate web-site host. Some administrator obeyed under the pressure to ban me though I didn't do anything against the rule. Some boards run by media would rather finish the service of discussion board. I think media still put "free speech" as their first principle and wouldn't to ban without appropriate reason. They include "New York Times", "www.alternet.org, www.npr.org, smirkingchimp.com.

4. Harass by misplacing paragraphs of the article, made my post hard to read. It happened in care2.com, Islam, U.S. Constitution and Politics Discussion Forum.

5. Recently I was blocked to post in some web-sites or even being blocked to enter the site. Such like "myspace"; OC on line, perspectives.com; truthaction.org; asiansinc.com. I think it was done by the surveillance server of the Feds.
The ghosts in the browser is no other but Feds. They commit the crime of violation of the Constitution. Yet they can go on with the power abusing because they are part of the DOJ. When they demand more resource to expand their power, a darker age of cyberspace is coming.

524. Bin Laden's tape and dirty bomb attack on Europe (12/3/07)

Bin Laden used to issue a tape when Bush administration needs help. Or you can view it is the work of misinformation of US intelligence. 11/29/07, Osama let out another one.

The only "achievement" Bush can boast, (or he thinks he can boast for himself) is the "war on terror". Al Qaida is a tool created by US Inside Group to squeeze money and power from people. When they need a war, or pass a "Patriot Act", or for an election, Bin Laden's Al Qaida always came out to help, either by a bombing or by a tape. So was this time.

Bush's population is so low, how can his war party - GOP to win the next election? There is another war plan still needs to be fulfilled. That is war on Iran. Bin Laden must work to support Bush.

1. Bush's Iraq war was supported by Tony Blair. To show he is not alone on his war policy. For the next war, (Iran war) Bush still needs a support from Europe. It is likely he developed some supporters such like France and German. But how can they make people support their new war? Old tactic - terror bombing. That's why Bin Laden's new tape turns on to Europe. The title of news is: "Osama Urges Europe to Stop Helping U.S.". The real meaning of this tape is: "Al Qaida will have a terror attack on you to push you support US".

2. It's strange to see that in this tape Bin Laden said he was the "only one responsible" for the Sept. 11 attacks on New York and Washington - six years after 911 attack.

The background of his confession is that after six years, one third of Americans realize 911 attack was an inside job. And majority of Americans think Government knew 911 attack in advance but let it happen. So government needs a strong defense lawyer. No one can be strong enough than Bin Laden. The Inside Group had push out a "defense witness" - Moussaoui. He cried loudly in court "I am Al Qaida." and admitted he was plotted to attack on 911. Bin Laden is just another Moussaoui. Their purpose are so clear and direct: " Don't doubt on Bush and his administration. I did the terror attack." Isn't that easy and convenient to suppress the suspicion on Inside Group?

Rudy Giuliani is a leading runner of president candidate. He is trumpeted by media as a 911 hero. As a matter of fact, he is a leading role to cover up the truth of 911 attack. The Inside Group needs him to go on the cover up job on a false flag attack. So they need someone to justify that 911 was a real terror attack not an inside work. Bin Laden does it in his new tape.

I wrote "Bin Laden's new tape" on 11/29 when I learned the news.(see above) One day later, another news proved my allegation.

Re: "Britain faces threat of dirty bomb attack at Christmas, Home Secretary warns
30th November 2007

Britain faces an increased threat of a "dirty bomb" attack over the Christmas period, Home Secretary Jacqui Smith warned today.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=498488&in_page_id=1770

525. NIE (2007) and Trojan horse (12/8/07)

On 12/3, media reported that US National Intelligence Estimate said Iran halted its nuclear weapons program in 2003. The revelation caused a debate on Bush's Iran policy. The point missing in this debate is how could such an important information be learned by government and public so late - it took more than four years. (2003 - Dec. 2007) It took three years and eight months for US to get in World War II. ( Dec. 1941 - Japan surrender Aug. 1945) If US intelligence is so incompetent, that it took four years to reach an important conclusion, then by the time when they got a NIE of "Japan will attack Pearl Harbor", the war had finished already. This NIE of Iran is absurd. It's not intelligence but National History estimate.

This new NIE on Iran (2007) is a contradict to another one (2005) which asserted that Iran was "determined to develop nuclear weapon". If 2007 NIE took four years to conclude event of 2003, apply same efficiency on 2005 Assessment, does that mean "Iran seeking nuclear weapon" was something on 2001? Or more likely, this government just select information that fits its demand?

Review recent situation, Bush administration and media used to demonize Iran as a nuclear threat to the world. US had its Navy battle squadron gathered at Persian Gulf to show its force. Iran war for several times were just inches away from breaking off .

Bush administration also took a blind eye on that new assessment (Iran halted nuclear weapon programme). Bush knew that estimate in August.

Re: "Bush told Iran may have halted atom work

Thu Dec 6, 2007 7:03am GMT

By Tabassum Zakaria

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President George W. Bush was told in August that Iran may have suspended its nuclear weapons programme, http://uk.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUKN0565348320071206

Yet, two months later in October, he warns World War III if Iran goes nuclear. This proves he treated the NIE as a junk piece.

Then why the intelligence let out such a "junk" information (possibly a truth but not favored by Bush administration) at this time?

I think it is a part of Iran war tactic.

1, Iran will be directed to a nuclear weapon "trap". The war will be done in Bush's remnant term. Bush has a swift re-action to that new NIE. He insists Iran a threat despite new report. When Iran war breaks off, Bush will be painted as a hero.

2. A psychological operation to push Iran to a nuclear weapon trap. Iran may feel safe that Bush is under criticism for his aggressive Iran policy and accept a "special offer" from Russia's Putin. The special proposal maybe a bait of enriched uranium which can be also used in military weapon. (see #516. Iran war next stage (10/23/07)) It's a tactic to push Iran to accept a Trojan horse. Russia's nuclear deal with Iran is that Trojan horse.
Bush activated Iraq war. Bush tries to plant a Trojan horse in Iran. Bush will start war on Iran once the Trojan horse is planted.


526. Beware of a holiday season attack (12/13/07)

When I learned the new Bin Laden tape, I wrote "Bin Laden's new tape". (see #524) Then other news surged which combined with Bin Laden's new tape, could justify a dirty bomb attack in Europe. It may prove my opinion is correct: "But how can they make people support their new war? Old tactic - terror bombing. That's why Bin Laden's new tape turns on Europe. The title of news is: "Osama Urges Europe to Stop Helping U.S.". The real meaning of this tape is: "I'll push you to support US" (by terror attack on you)."

The three events (watch the time of the news date) : 1. Bin Laden's new tape. (11/29)

2. Gang selling enriched Uranium. (11/29) 3. British warns dirty bomb attack. (11/30) if you put them together, could make another perfect 911 story. Do you think they came out coincidentally? Who can manipulate these three events and make their debut at same time? (Bin Laden or Western intelligence?)
Re: Gang arrested trying to sell enriched uranium

Times Online
November 29, 2007

A gang arrested by Slovakian police was trafficking uranium so enriched that it could have been used by terrorists in a dirty bomb, it emerged today.

Two Hungarians and a Ukrainian man were arrested as they tried to sell the uranium last night. The consignment had been tracked by police after it came to their attention inside the former Soviet Union.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article2968535.ece#cid=OTC-RSS&attr=2015164

I always said that Feds frames case with the collaboration of Russia and China. In this Christmas and New Years holiday plot, there is no exception. It's interesting that to cover up the secret deal, they use Hungarians and Ukrainian this time. But the source finally leads to Russia. All roads go to Moscow in the end. (or Beijing)

There is a lot of advantage to plot with Russia and China. 1. Even if others get suspicious and want to track, they will kick at an iron wall. These two countries belong to another camp. Litvinenko's case is a sample. 2. It's deceivable. Public won't doubt when Russia and China involve in the case. It's hard to imagine that government work with former enemies.
As for Al Qaida. It is a tool of the US intelligence. I always say so.

 

527. S.F. Bay Oil spill and Bay Bridge (12/18/07)

In Fed's framed case, shut down the Bay Bridge always played an important role. I noticed that in 15 months, they managed to close the Bay Bridge four times. see "515. Bay Bridge shutdown and Minneapolis bridge collapsing (10/18/07)".

On 11/7, about 8:30 in the morning, a Chinese commercial ship - the Cosco Busan, rammed a support tower of the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge, caused an oil spill. The media bang on the 58,000 gallon oil pollution. I didn't relate it to the framed case because though the ship got a big scratch, there was little damage on the Bay Bridge. (or at least media didn't report it) News concentrated on the dead sea birds, ban of fishing, polluted beach and ship and its crews and the pilot. No word about the Bridge. The only question was it was foggy that morning, why the ship still left Oakland port while it could stay until the sight view was clear.

The ship owner is a Chinese company in Hongkong which bought the Cosco Busan last year. (second hand ship) The company said it would take all the cost of oil pollution. The first thought I had was: "What a generous company it is. The cost to clean the oil will be huge."

Early December, an analysis article in Chinese newspaper reminded me this is not an accident. The opinion was from an experienced captain - Jing Gang - a retired captain from Taiwan who had served in Navy for 20 years and also had more than ten years experience as captain of commercial fleet, said the accident shouldn't have happened.

Besides the professional analysis, (omitted here), the captain has some suspicions: 1. The span between the two bridge supporters is 2,000 feet - very broad for a ship to sail through. The error tolerance of the GPS is less than 60 feet. The ship should also have at least two radar. The accident shouldn't have happened. 2. Coast Guard had informed Cosco Busan that it sailed on wrong direction. Why there was no response and correction? And there is no explanation later. 3. Most puzzled thing for him is, the Cosco Busan was sailing parallel along the Bridge. It could only happen when the main engine or helm damaged. 4.Cosco Busan could avoid to hit the bridge support tower unless it was on speed.

If captain could view the incident from another angle, his puzzle can be solved. The "incident" was a deliberation. The purpose was to damage the Bridge supporter to close the Bay Bridge. Then it explains everything. Why did the Cosco Busan sailed parallel to the bridge not vertical to cross it? Because the shape of the foundation of a bridge supporter is in olive shape. Which has more chance to hit an olive - by head on head or to hit it from its side? Other questions such like speed, radar, GPS, no response to the warning from Coast Guard.... all could be answered if it was a deliberate hit.

To close the Bay Bridge by a ship bomb is just a copy of 911 attack while the bomb in 911 case were planes. It was one plan in Feds cabinet. The plan was prepared one year ago when they bought an old ship. (ready to be destroyed in an "accident'). The company is likely a cover up one of the intelligence. When the 8/31/07 plot went soured, (marked with the shut down of Bay Bridge and the B-52 misloading of nuclear missiles) they immediately prepared another one. I called the new one as "holiday season plot". It marked with "Bush's air express lane offer; Bin Laden's new tape; London dirty bomb warning; Chinese sub's popping up; Gate's visit China.... " and also this one: a ship collapsed the Bay Bridge.

It almost succeeds. Only several yards away they could close up the Bay Bridge for a long time. Much longer than the one when they burned down a highway by a fuel tanker. (that highway is a main access to Bay Bridge)

Was that a mission went soured by a hair or a mission soured by its own operatives? Nobody knows. When Mohammed and Malve became scapegoat of DC sniper shooting case, or the Atta and his hijack team became sacrifice of 911 plane bomb, more and more people realize the trick played by intelligence. When four Arabic British became sacrifice of 7/7/05 London tunnel bombing, we saw four suspects of the following bombing (7/21/05) all survived well. The designated bombs didn't explode. All four of them.

So what did the pilot and the crew of the Cosco Busan think the moment when the boat would hit the support tower of the bridge? Were they willingly to become a suicide ship bomb? Suppose they were the operatives of the intelligence. Your bet.

528. Bird Flu in Holiday season plot (12/23/07)

In late 2005 and early 2006, Feds activated a wave of propaganda about bird flu. (or avian flu). I think Feds planned to kill a lot of people in the framed case on me. For nearly six months, media is full of scaring article such like:

"March 14, 2006, ABC news

"Society just can't accept the idea that 50 percent of the population could die."
http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/AvianFlu/story?id=1724801

Virtual Pandemic: 90 Days to Infect Entire U.S.
By Robert Roy Britt LiveScience Managing Editor, 05 April 2006

A new computer model reveals how a pandemic like the avian flu might spread quickly across the United States and what methods would best thwart the scenario.

http://www.livescience.com/humanbiology/060405_virtual_pandemic.html

I wrote #410. The pandemic and the death of the Director of WHO (6/5/06), alleged Feds plotted a pandemic of bird flu. To cause a world wide panic, they murdered the Director of WHO and let their own candidate to take over the control of WHO. I think my revelation is very correct. Since then, the Frightening Warning disappeared from US mainstream media thoroughly. How can a pandemic which could kill 50% of population and infect entire US in 90 days suddenly lost its importance? Here we get familiar with Feds' pre-conception psychological operation and how mainstream media helps it.

Although US mainstream media rarely talk about bird flu since June 2006, the pandemic still remains as a mean of mass murder. In local Chinese newspaper, it becomes a routine to report the death caused by bird flu in Indonesia and Vietnam.
Here are some briefing news I collected:

12/20/05 Indonesia bird flu. . the man will be the tenth in Indonesia died of Bird Flu.
4/29/06 Another Indonesian lost in bird flu. The man will be the 25th victim of Bird Flu.
10/14/07 Indonesia Bird Flu. A boy died of Bird Flu. The death toll increases to 88.

Each week or so, Indonesia reported a Bird Flu death. I alleged the president of Indonesia works for US intelligence when the Big tsunami happened in 2005. Indonesia becomes a practice field for US bio and climate weapon. They made the bird flu (avian flu) a continuous disease there. Because the framed drug case on me is a continuous one - new plot created immediately after the failure of old one. So when their framed case goes succeeded, they can have a bird flu case right away on hand to justify a pandemic. When people live in panic of death threat, no one will notice the mysterious death in an unreasonable search and arrest case.

When Gates visited China in early November, I knew there was a new case created by the cooperation of US and Chinese intelligence. The ship which hit the Bay Bridge was one step in the plan. There is more.

On 12/8, Chinese newspaper reported: "Man to man. Avian Flu took the lives of Father and son in JiangSu Province"

"Chinese Health Department confirmed the 24 years old man of Nanjing died of infection of Avian flu virus H5N1. His 52 years old father had infected the same virus.... WHO in Geneva said they wouldn't exclude the possibility that son passed the Avian Flu virus to his father. (a man to man case).......

Besides, the neighbor city Shanghai, enters a high alert situation to watch the passengers from Nanjing."

The Holiday season plot is a big one. Not only they will activate terror attack in Europe, they will also create a bio-attack - a bird flu pandemic world wide. There will be mass killing in the plot, both in US and China, especially in Shanghai where I have a lot of relatives. Those people know of my case and had cooperated with authority to monitor me when I went to Shanghai in 94. But Feds won't allow witness of their crime alive even these people work for them. Atta and his hijack team of 911 attack were, "Suicide bombers" of London 7/7/05 bombing were, Cho Seunghui and Emily Hilscher in Virginia Tech shooting case were all sacrifice. They were killed by their master without hesitation.

529. Feds' main target (12/28/07)

In recent years, Feds planned a lot of false flag terror attacks, some are real big one such like 8/30/07 nuclear attack on US (A B-52 misloading 6 nuclear missiles) or 07 Holiday season plot (marked with Bush's military airspace offer which may imply the bombing on US nuclear facilities). Within 18 months, for five times Feds has shut down (or try to shut down) the Bay Bridge. All these plots went soured. I think because either I had revealed the coming plot in advance or they failed to eliminate the main target of the plot - that's me.

Though Feds can gain a lot - both money and power - from the terror attack, they would rather postpone the plan when they failed to eliminate me first. Feds won't lose anything if they haven't carry out a terror attack, but it will hurt them if I am alive and go on revealing their crime. The method of elimination are:

1. To make an IRS search to arrest. (I think Feds has planted drugs in my house.) To reach this goal, Feds manipulated my wife to misreported tax-return last year without my consent as well as this year. (because I have unsold merchandise stock in my garage.) To search and arrest in the name of IRS is one tactic Feds used to use.

2. To make a search in the name of natural disaster - earthquake. Early last year they attempted to do so with a Liquefaction quake. (see #397 and #399) In October this year there was a 5.6 quake at my area. I think it was a pre-practice. see "518. Earthquake after wildfire (11/3/07)". Since then, I almost felt daily earth shaking. So mild that media never report it but I could just feel it. I think they are practicing and adjusting the vibration frequency. There will be a big one if Feds has certainty. Honestly, I haven't feel it for days so far. The earthquake team may be on holiday vacation.

3. By applying EM wave on me. (I allege it was a gamma ray)

4. Poison food, especially the water.

5. Shopping center bombing. I used to go different shopping centers. Early this year I stopped to go around to avoid a mall bombing. I think that's the main murder method Feds apply on me now.(see #459, #517)

Some people don't believe there is earthquake technique. Here is the information released ten years ago.

Re:

DoD News Briefing: Secretary of Defense William S. Cohen

April 28, 1997

There are some reports, for example, that some countries have been trying to construct something like an Ebola Virus, and that would be a very dangerous phenomenon, to say the least. Alvin Toeffler has written about this in terms of some scientists in their laboratories trying to devise certain types of pathogens that would be ethnic specific so that they could just eliminate certain ethnic groups and races; and others are designing some sort of engineering, some sort of insects that can destroy specific crops. Others are engaging even in an eco- type of terrorism whereby they can alter the climate, set off earthquakes, volcanoes remotely through the use of electromagnetic waves.

http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/transcript.aspx?transcriptid=674

530. Storm and Iowa Primary (1/3/0

When recent media poll dramatically changed the rate of Democrats' candidates - by pulling down Hillary Clinton's and push up John Edwards', I felt that Feds would put their own representative - Edwards - to the throne of President. Generally, unless something big happened, the public's opinion is not so easy to change. A dramatical change of the polling data without convincible reason only reflects intention of Feds. Feds is the one who manipulates the media.
Yesterday, two news touched my mind. They were about weather. It said snowstorm socked Midwest, dumping more than a foot of snow and creating hazardous driving condition there. Since it becomes common that Feds alters a climate condition to help its operation, I think Feds created that storm to help John Edwards in today's Iowa Primary. I wrote "John Edwards".
I used to put that kind of article in political thread. But before I could finish the article in a reply, it disappeared - I lost connection to internet. It happened before when I wrote article Feds disliked. I had to re-write it on WordPad than copy and paste it to avoid the loss of article. Then there were repeated losing connection of internet when I tried to post it on the board. The harassment convince me what I wrote is accurate. Feds is afraid of it. I decide to put it in this thread too. Here is it:

John Edwards (1/2/0

John Edwards works for the Inside Group. He has the characters of a Feds. Feds is a tool of the Inside Group to control this country. They monitor and spy on people. Blackmail and intimidate politicians. Murder and assassinate if necessary. Infiltrate different groups with moles. Manipulate media and rig the election. Feds has no its own opinion. It works to the order from its master. He smiles at the man whom he plans to kill tomorrow.

John Edwards is such kind of man. Media used to post a picture of his smiling face. Is he liberal or conservative? Nobody can tell. Because he has no distinctive opinion. He ducked the debate to avoid express his own opinion. (when he was a Senator) He tried not to offend anyone, either individual or group. Because his work is to monitor others but not to be noticeable. That may be why he resigned from the Senate. (tries not to express his own opinion so no mistake can be exploited by his opponents when he later joins the campaign)

But in crucial moment, they came out to carry out their master's policy. That's how he voted for Patriot Act and Iraq war Authorization bill. He only shows his true face in critical moment.
Now is a crucial point. Bush is so unpopular that to rig a victory for GOP will be too obvious a forgery. The Inside Group needs a representative in Demo. Hillary, though is a follower of the Inside Group, can't compare with Edwards - a representative of Feds' own.

This is how to rig the Iowa Primary. Different from normal election which is easy to rig. ( a rigged election done by the election office controlled by Feds and the result justified by manipulated media poll) Iowa Primary (Demo) depends on the presented individuals. It's hard to rig the count of the presence of people. (just like it's hard to rig the campaign donation money of Ron Paul's) Then how Feds can do to rig the primary? - by altering the weather. They create an extra cold condition for the Iowa.

Edwards will win the Primary because his supporters (A troop of Feds informants who work under discipline) will attend the vote despite how cold the weather is. The supporters of other candidates will be affected by natural humanity softness. Most people will stay at home if it's too cold and dangerous outside. That's how Feds to rig an election with climate change.

The other news that reminds me this is a rigged election (by altering weather)
"Clinton Backers: Californians try to sway voters

By Mary Anne Ostrom
Mercury News, 1/2/08

Cear Rapids, Iowa - Iowans are being warned to stay indoors because of deadly cold temperatures and dangerous roads, but a dozen Silicon Valley campaign foot soldiers are in a race over snow and ice to get them to come out for Hillary Clinton."
An Iowa victory will justify the later rigged election for Edwards. Make the rigging more reasonable. That's why Feds tries its best to make Edwards "win Iowa".

531. Swift response from Feds (1/8/0

Feds used to react swiftly to my revelation. When I found this, I put the date on my post.
*I posted Judi Bary's story on 3/25/2002.(see #60) Several days later, I was surprised to read the news that her case was going to trial on 4/8/2002. Judi brought the case to the court in 1991. It was delayed again and again. Judi herself couldn't see the trial. She died of breast cancer in 1997 which I alleged a radiation murder. On 6/11/2002, the jury found FBI and Oakland police lied in the case and violated victim's Constitution right of 1st Amendment and 4th Amendment. Judge ruled a 4.4 million compensation. The late justice came after 11 years dragging. I thought it was a swift response to my message. They try to clean up the odds. Anyway, it's a small case for them. (see #96)

*On 12/18, I wrote "527. S.F. Bay Oil spill and Bay Bridge (12/18/07)". Two days later, I surprisedly heard the news that Cosco Busan, the ship that caused oil spill left Bay Area on 12/20.

Just on 12/14, Captain Anya Hunter of Coast Guard said the vessel could not be released before authority finishing the civil and criminal investigation. That day, the ship changed its anchorage to Pier 9 where the fee for berth was cheaper. Obviously it would stay there for some time.

But one day after I revealed it was a criminal case, they let go an evidence despite the investigation far from finishing.
*On 12/28, I wrote "Negative campaign fund planting (12/28/07)" in which I alleged Norman Hsu worked for Feds in order to manipulating politicians. Five days later (1/3) he was put on a trial and sentenced 3 years prison on same day.
Norman Hsu is a fugitive of a fraud case 15 years ago. (1992) A fugitive should live in covert, try not to be noticeable. But Hsu went on with his forgery. He even became a fundraiser of Democratic Party. He appears in high profile event with Hillary. There was no trouble for him. It means he has background. He can go on with his crime until when Feds needs a case to tarnish Hillary Clinton.

Here is the original article. Notice the sentence which touched off a swift one day trial on Norman Hsu.
Re: Negative campaign fund planting (12/28/07)
"Ron Paul To Keep White Supremacist Donation". A recent popular article about Ron Paul's campaign fund.

People are too innocent not to recognize it's another dirty trick of election. Feds used to plant negative contribution to candidate so they have an issue to attack these candidates.

The similar way they do to Clinton by Norman Hsu's contribution.

GOP is skilled in those dirty tricks. You also saw Swift Boat Team attack on Kerry in 2004's election.

Ron Paul is a disfavor of ruling class. So once again, FBI plays trick to tarnish the most hopeful candidate. The two most fearsome rival for GOP are: Ron Paul (Republican) and Hillary (Demo). So the attack concentrate on them.

Who control those organization: Communist Party; supremacist; peace movement; even ACLU and other groups? FBI.

Quote, "FBI Ran Aryan Nations After Butler's Death
Federal Informant Rick Spring, Close Associate Of NSM / Schoep, Admits He Was On Federal Payroll

9/19/2007 4:09:21 PM
Discuss this story in the forum <http://www.answp.com/forum>
Overthrow Staff

-- In a confessional emailed out to white nationalist leaders, federal informant and convicted bank robber Rick Spring admitted today that he operated the Aryan Nations as a false flag front group for the FBI after the death of Richard Butler.

"I have to bare my heart and soul to the good folks of the movement, although this is hard for me to say, I must tell the truth. I Rick Spring have been working for the FED's for some time now and I am sorry," Spring wrote in an email today.

http://www.overthrow.com/lsn/news.asp?articleID=10582

Now you know why supremacist donate to Ron Paul's campaign? And why some one cooks this issue hot? It may all be done by the same hand.

 

532. We need an honest, transparent election (Iowa Primary lesson 1) (1/13/0

Obama wins Iowa - a state with 92% white population. Why a white state which generally considered conservative has elected a black candidate? It means American people are too resentful to the policy of current government. They hate Iraq war and the loss of civil right.

How can we have this result? Because Iowa Democratic Primary Caucus is an honest, transparent one. Residents gathered at the site on time to discuss their choices then raise their hands. The counting is present, direct and clear. Voters know the result right away. It makes an election hard to be rigged.

As we have seen the mainstream of public opinion is to change the status quo, then Ron Paul should have won the Iowa Republican Caucus too. He has more distinctive flag than Obama has. But he only got 10%. Why? He obviously lost to a corruptive vote system in Iowa Republican Primary - ballot counting.
The ballot was counted by election office. Then an officer would tell you the result. A number can be faked or altered easily. Voters can hardly verify it individually.

This is proved in New Hampshire Primary:

Quote, "Voter Fraud Against Paul Confirmed in Sutton, N.H
By admin | January 8, 2008
Sutton with 100% reporting reported 0 votes for paul but poster in Sutton posted:
My mom, aunt, and dad all voted for RP today in my hometown, My mom and aunt both work passing out ballots, and checking them off. I just looked at the politico map and it says their town has ZERO votes for Ron. Now i know that there isn&#8217;t corruption on voting in that little town, so where they reported it must be. What do I do, anyone know???
http://www.ronpaulwarroom.com/?p=655#more-655

Greenville Vote Discrepancy SAME as Sutton
Moreover, when Sutton had been found out, they quickly added 31 votes, and cited &#8216;human error.&#8217; What is their excuse for this source, now showing Greenville at 25 votes:
http://www.nashuatelegraph.com/apps/pbcs.dll/section?category=news0807

The problem is, you have to take what they told you but can't verify it. They could tell you it's zero, that forgery is easy to be find out. They could also tell you it's 31 (or 25) then it is hard for you to confirm it's a rigging while the real votes may be 131 or 125.

-----------------

This is a covert totalitarian country. They select president by rigged election. (They control the voting office by intelligence) and justify the result by fake poll. (They manipulate public opinion by media)


533. "Change" what? (Iowa lesson 2, A covert totalitarian) (1/18/0

Obama won Iowa Demo Caucus with a great victory, a big conflict to what poll predicted that Clinton led other Demo candidates. He owes the victory to "people want a change". The other candidates, Clinton and Edwards, also followed to claim that they are for "change" too. The ridiculous thing is, nobody dares to say what they try to change. It's a taboo. The utmost limit they could go is "to change the status quo". That's it. They stopped here.

What is the status quo? Let's review seven years since Bush stole the seat of US president. In his regime, US suffered 911 attack which now majority of American people think government more or less involved in. With that as justification he activated two wars in Mid-east: war on Afghanistan and war on Iraq. The government also passed Patriot Act - a law that seriously hurt civil rights of people. Bush also signed a lot of Presidential Directive and executive order to expand police power and erode civil liberty. In his ruling, torture and warrantless eavesdropping blossom and prosper. What else has he achieved? A high national debt you have to pay later.

So what is mainstream of public opinion for "change"? Simple, abandon the war policy, (withdraw from Iraq), invest money in domestic society (spend more for society than on war expense) and recover civil liberty. But even such a simple opinion became a taboo, a scarcity for candidates. They dare not to put it at the point of slogan. All they can do is shout "change". Change what? They dare not say.

In fact, despite most of GOP candidates (belongs to Bush regime, the target of change) the current leading Demo candidates are the same. Hillary and Edwards, both voted for Patriot Act and Iraq War authorization Bill. In this main point, they are no difference to Bush. How hypocrite they are when they cried "change". They should be the target of change. Even Obama is a puppet too. He voted for Patriot Act and voted for the bill for funding the Iraq war, although he voted against Iraq war authorization bill. People have nothing else to choose. Among three rotten apples, they have to choose the lesser one.

The only candidate with a distinctive flag is Ron Paul. He is anti - Iraq war and insists the value of civil liberty. But in a covert totalitarian, a disfavor of the Inside group will never win in a manipulated election.

Not only candidates dare not speak out what people are thinking, (maybe due to the media censorship) the Iraq war and civil rights topic are also the taboo of media. In election news from mainstream media (in my area, Mercury News which I collected a pile of newspaper) there are a lot of report about religious topic, immigration or medicare or sometimes even about economy. All these are long existed problem not related to Bush regime much. They just avoid to touch the topic of Iraq war and civil liberty. (notice what TV and newspaper report on campaign news)

"Change". Change what? Ask your candidate.

It's sad to see such a phenomenon. Candidate shout of "change" but dare not say what to change. That is totalitarian. People, candidates dare not speak up. Then an election became a puppet show. The Inside Group pick up candidate through rigged election. (Feds controlled election office) and make people believe the result through fake poll. (manipulated media).

534. Feds strategy (Iowa lesson 3) (1/23/0

1. Pre-conception mind control. Iowa is a small state. Its Primary used to be neglected by media. But this time Media beat the drum to propaganda the Iowa Caucus in advance, said it's important because in most recent two elections, Iowa picked up the right choice - Bush. It hints that an Iowa choose President would be President of US. So Feds prepared two winners of their own in both parties: John Edwards and Mike Huckabee.

2. Bush is an unpopular president. He can sit on that chair due to the corrupt voting system. But after eight years bad performance, it's hard to keep GOP in top position anymore. The Insiders group has to have one of their own representative - John Edwards, to be the leading candidate of Demo. The tactic:

(1) Three years preparation. Edwards was planted in Iowa for more than three years before 08 Caucus. How can an individual, not very popular in his party, be so sure that he could win the next election that he even sacrifice four years to move to a small state? He is not that foresight. It was a strategy planned by his master - Feds.

(2) Create a cold weather to prevent rivals' supporter from attending. (Iowa Demo Caucus count on the heads of attendants) Feds created deadly cold temperatures and dangerous roads condition on Caucus day. Edwards' supporters would come to vote (Most of them informants of Feds, vote under discipline) while others may be halted by harsh weather.

(3) They thought a white domain, conservative state would prefer a white man to a woman or black.

Feds almost succeeded in this strategy. The nearly four years hard work in local Iowa and cold weather worked. Edwards beat the Hillary - a big banner of Demo of Bill Clinton, although it's a small, one point victory of 30% vs. 29%.

But Feds loses to the will of people. It didn't expect people are so resentful that they turned out despite the cold weather, abandoned racial prejudice to vote for Obama. People want change.

3. Why Feds planted Edwards in Iowa, not big state like Florida? Because Iowa is a small state easy to be influenced and be propagated as indicative. Giuliani runs Florida because there is more votes there. It's practical. Feds ran Iowa for its psychological operation. Iowa Demo Caucus count on heads of present voters. It's direct and clear and honest. Winning an honest campaign will justify the later rigged ones. I believe if Edwards had won the Iowa, then he would have been rewarded most victories in later primary of other states. The rest campaign count on ballots - a system easy to be rigged.

To reach their goal, Mercury News - the tool of the Feds - introduced the counting method of Iowa Demo Caucus in detail one day before the voting. The purpose is to show people: see, (if) Edwards win the first caucus, it's honest. So there will be no doubt when he wins all the way of other campaign. Only Feds under-estimated the indignation of the people. It failed in Iowa Demo caucus.

4. Un-common sense. Obama won Iowa Caucus because it was an honest voting. People view him the one who can cause change. Huckabee won Rep's Iowa with no reason. Just because the ballot counting is a corrupt system easy to be rigged.

The two favorites of the Feds, Edwards and Huckabee, are unpopular compare to their rivals. They too, have much less campaign fund then their rivals. Huckabee's victory may indicate Feds will send its representative to the president chair in rogue's way. They can manipulate a poll number or voting result willfully. No matter how unreasonable it is.

535. Huckabee and Evangelical (Iowa lesson 4) (1/28/0

Why I say Huckabee is a representative of the Feds?

1. Media blew the trumpet on Iowa Primary to hint that it had correctly selected the president in recent primaries. It hints that Edwards (planned to win Demo Caucus though failed) or Huckabee would be the next US President. It is a pre-conception mind control. I view it as Feds' intention.

2. Huckabee was unpopular compare with other Republican's candidates. He also has less campaign fund than his rivals. How could he jumped to the leading seat? He is said conservative, so are the most of other GOP candidates. Is he a Bush basher? Then nobody can compare with Ron Paul. Does he have any extraordinary policy to appeal public? None. How could he suddenly become a hot idle and win the Iowa Primary? The media voluntarily cooked his news. (compare to how media deliberately censor the news of Ron Paul) Since the election office and the media are manipulated by Feds, I view him as Feds' candidate.

Anyhow, media gave a reason why Huckabee won Iowa - it says religion lift him to victory. When did President election become a religious campaign? Is it for a politician or for a missionary? It's as ridiculous as that a man won the CEO of a big firm because he identifies himself as an evangelical. The media says, "Affable Huckabee wins over evangelical voters."

3. Although it is absurd, I think media - a traditional mind control tool - this time tells truth. I view evangelical voters as a power base of the Inside group who controls this country. "Evangelical voters" doesn't mean majority of Americans but the will of the Inside Group. Here is the story how Feds related to this power base and how its representative announcing its annual plan in the name of prophecy.

Quote, "John Ashcroft to teach class at Va. college
By Richard Willing, USA TODAY

One month after leaving office, former U.S. attorney general John Ashcroft has a new job: He'll be a part-time professor at a Christian university run by television evangelist Pat Robertson

<http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2005-03-16-ashcroft-teach_x.htm>


Quote, 'Pat Robertson Predicts Worldwide Violence, U.S. Recession in 2008

Wednesday, January 02, 2008

NORFOLK, Va. - On Wednesday's "700 Club" broadcast, the founder of the Christian Broadcasting Network predicted that evangelism will increase and more people will seek God as the chaos develops.

Last year, Robertson predicted that a terrorist act, possibly involving a nuclear weapon, would result in mass killing in the United States.

<http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,319728,00.html>

1. When Feds has the technique to alter climate, such like create hurricane, earthquake.... while people don't know there is such kind of technique, they would believe it's work of God. (Hurricane Katrina, 2005 South Asia tsunami...)

2. When Government insider used to activate false flag terror attack (911 attack, anthrax letter....)to grab power and money from people, innocent people thought it was done by Al Qaida, Saddam....

3. While Feds controlled the election system by their informant or assets, it's easy to rig the election. That's how Bush could be selected twice and Ron Paul always be neglected.

You know the trick, then you know so said God for Pat Robertson is Feds. He just announces their annual plan in advance. Plan sometimes went soured due to the situation. But he still goes on with his psychological operation under the cover of evangelical broadcaster. He had predicted Bush would be president. (they control media and election office) He almost successful in prediction of nuclear attack in 2007. (Remember 8/31/07, a B-52 mis-loading nuclear missiles and flying over US continent) Now re-consider the meaning of his words:"evangelism will increase and more people will seek God as the chaos develops."
_________________
If Feds call you and defame my message, it is a tactic of intimidation. They don't want people know the fact.
It also proves what I wrote are truth. They are afraid of it.

536. Feds and Obama (2/3/0

It seems Feds has a deal with Obama and chooses him as the most favorite of Demo candidate.

1. Mercury News - a tool of Feds - recommends: Barack Obama as Demo candidate and John McCain as GOP candidate. That's not a decision based on opinion or policy but on Feds' intention. John McCain is famous for his "Bomb, bomb, bomb Iran.". If Mercury News is anti-war, then it should have picked up Ron Paul. But it chooses a warmonger. Then why it picks up Obama in Demo instead of Clinton?

2. From Republican's platform, Obama is easier to be defeat than Clinton. So they would rather have Obama as their rival. Or in another word, it will be more reasonable to defeat Obama in a rigged election. Obama may represent mainstream public opinion. So what. Ron Paul has a more distinctive flag, hasn't Feds successfully put him at the bottom? With same tactic they can easily defeat Obama. Justify it as Americans are not ready for a black president.

3. Even if Obama wins. He is easier to be manipulated than Hillary. Hillary, backed by a huge Demo party machine, has to take care of the interest of the Demo Party more or less. Obama is a new berry. He has not that burden. He will satisfy Feds demand more than to his party.

4. Bush is awarded by two terms of US President because he loyally carries out the policy of Feds. DOJ got Patriot Act and warrantless eavesdropping, DOD got fat budget and war. Feds got their own representative as their head: Ashcroft, Gonzalez, Mukasy. This time, when they failed to get Edwards as Demo president candidate, they have him as their future head - Attorney General.

Quote, "Attorney General Edwards?

WASHINGTON, D.C. - Illinois Democrats close to Sen. Barack Obama are quietly passing the word that John Edwards will be named attorney general in an Obama administration.

http://www.creators.com/opinion/robert-novak/attorney-general-edwards.html

537. Missile murder attempt under the cover of meteorite (2/8/0

To coordinate the election, to improve the image of Republican Party, the news about war on terror significantly reduced recently. Feds tried not to relate GOP to notorious Bush's "achievement". US casualty in Iraq drops to a new low. Al Qaida and militants take a vacation . Terror attack warning is less heard - which was once so prosperous in mid 2007. Do you still remember the gut feeling of Chertoff, Mueller and other "terror" experts who warned feverishly in July 07? Media tries its best to avoid the issue of "Iraq war", "war on terror", "warrantless wiretap". To reduce the criticism on Bush to the least.

The terror attack, mostly are manipulated by Feds, I think. They try to make it a big one to distract the framed case on me. The case is so big that in 18 months Feds had closed (or tried to close) the Bay Bridge for 5 times. The recent silence on "terror attack" news doesn't mean the persecution is postponed. It goes on, in another way - in a form of natural disaster. In early February, I found such a topic in a web-site. "50/50 chance we die on January 24"

Quote, "Asteroid 2007 TU24
A meteor the size of a sky scraper is coming dangerously close to earth. On January 24 4PM the meteor will hit.
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread328087/pg1

Then I remembered another news in that month:
"Spy satellite on collision course
By Eillen Sullivan A.P.

Washington - A large US spy satellite has lost power and could hit the Earth in late February or early March. ..... The satellite can no longer can be controlled, and it is unknown where on the planet it might come down." (Mercury News 1/27/0

My interpret to these two news is that Feds planed a murder case in the cover of natural disaster - a meteorite explode in January 24. When that plan went soured they immediately (3 days later) prepared another one - by announcing a lost control spy satellite which will hit Earth in late February.

Why the plan of January 24 failed? I think "Asteroid 2007 TU24" was a rock not a missile. Though they could expect the time the rock entering the atmosphere of the Earth, they couldn't control its track to a designated area. How to throw an object on to a targeted area (that is San Francisco Bay Area) from space? By a controlled satellite. Of course the mastermind is Feds, so easy for them to find an old spy satellite as sacrifice. They moved it to the track they wanted. (It was easy for them to announce the satellite is out of control) To make it look like real, it takes weeks for the satellite to descend to the atmosphere. But the satellite is not a missile, how do you know it will direct hit the designated area?
Don't worry. The real work will be done by missiles. (Theoretically, the debris possibly scattered in a range thousands miles long.) Nobody can tell the damage is done by a missile or by a satellite. Because the investigator is the murderer. It will be similar to 911. A self demolishing (in this case, a missile attack) under the cover of the collapse caused by plane impact.( in this case, a satellite's impact)

To prevent the revelation of the truth, the article ("Spy satellite on collision course") also warned "The spacecraft contains hydrazine - which is rocket fuel - according to a government official who was not authorized to speak publicly. Hydrazine, a colorless liquid with an ammonia-like odor, is a toxic chemical and can cause harm to anyone who is in contact with it." They don't allow outsiders have any chance to investigate it. But by common sense, any fuel will be burned off when the satellite enters atmosphere. It won't survive the high temperature caused by friction.

As for a missile attack disguised as meteorite, I have talked about this tactic two years ago in " 356. Tsunami, flooding and meteorite (11/7/05)" I said,

Quote, "Unknown object falls on Indonesia
Meteor or bomb? Officials not sure, no injuries known

Jakarta, Indonesia (AP)

Indonesia air force radar detected an unidentified object falling toward the Earth at a great speed before disappearing at around the same time as the noise was heard.

Police have been on high alert in Indonesia in recent days after several Western governments reported that Islamic militants, blamed for a series of attacks in recent years, were planning more bombings."

(Mercury News, 12/19/04)

I believe it was an experiment of space weapon. A practice of a missile cruised in space to hit the target on earth. But a missile is not a meteor. Everything would be clear if there was an investigation. That's why the news drew a tail, to hint it might be a terrorist bombing.

It's not a coincidence that both events which Anthony Carr prophesied (tsunami and meteor) took place in Indonesia, almost at same time. (12/19/04 for meteor, one week later, on 12/26, for tsunami)

Because two months ago, in October that year, Yudhoyono became the President of Indonesia. Inside group then had a safe place to carry out their experiment for new technology under the protection of a puppet dictator.

 

8. More about meteorite (2/13/0

Review the article I wrote two years ago:

"324. Tsunami (6/27/05)

As I have told in #261, 262, 302, 305 that Anthony Carr's Big Prophecy for 2004 was a proclamation of Inside group being used to influence the psychology of Americans. In the newspaper, there were seven big prophecies, five with pictures which I have talked about already. There were two without picture.

1. Meteorite hits US. A super size meteorite will hit a desert city of America.

2. Big lake area will become a water country. Storm will sweep over the boundary of US and Canada. There will be a great flooding in Big Lake area. Few boat will survive it as Noah's Ark. Besides, nuclear explosion will cause tsunami in Cuba. Half of Cuba will be drowned. "

Anthony Carr's prophecy was made on 1/1/04. The big tsunami took place in 12/26/04. (Replace Cuba with Indonesia) The big flooding took place in August 2005. (Replace Big lake area with New Orleans) The meteorite hit programme was delayed until now. The original plan obviously was to eliminate the target people in Las Vegas (A desert city. Easy to arrange a vacation for target people) Anyhow, it was almost done at that time.

Quote, 'Bush almost made major speech last month regarding incoming asteroid

Earth almost put on impact alert
By Dr David Whitehouse BBC News Online science editor

Some scientists believed on 13 January that a 30m object, later designated 2004 AS1, had a one-in-four chance of hitting the planet within 36 hours.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3517319.stm
http://www.whoi.edu/institutes/occi/currenttopics/ct_abruptclimate.htm

Of course, if the project had been done, they can always give you a code story that it's a work of "2004 AS1", or "Asteroid 2007 TU24". Just like they told you the plane hit on 911 is "Flight 93" or so and so. Ignorant people would believe it was God's will. We know it was the work of the Feds.

The amazing thing is Bush almost did the same work Anthony Carr did. No former US presidents had ever tried to warn a coming asteroid. No former US presidents had ever brought so much natural disaster to the world. The great tsunami in 2004 killed nearly 200,000 people. A big city (New Orleans) was drowned in 2005. South California had a historical wild fire in 2007. Minneapolis Bridge collapsed in same year. All can be stories put in Bible. Yet they were created by Feds who developed new technique.

Three weeks ago a submarine cable was cut in Mid-east. Internet communication was disabled. I think it was done by US - a step to Iran war. Feds will do it in US too. I am harassed by cyberspace team so much nowadays. I suffered by slow processing and was unable to post in some web sites such like AOL and Myspace. It is not a ban but equals to it because I failed to post anything to the forum. The surveillance team also sent out harassing e-mail from my IP address to the host to cause a ban. Which happened in Denver Post web site. The warrantless wiretap task force not only do the surveillance work but also commit the crime to violate the civil right of free speech.

539. Bush waves terrorist whip again (2/18/07)

On 2/14, Bush announced the plan to shoot down that spy satellite. I think it was a cover up reaction to my revelation posted on 2/8 and 2/13.

Though the missile murder plot (disguised as explosion caused by flying object from space) went soured, the persecution plot never stops. Almost at same time Bush announcing the shooting down satellite plan, he had another announcement. Missile murder plan is replaced by terror attack.

Quote, "Bush Warns Terrorists Planning Attacks Far Worse Than 9/11 -
Demands Far Broader Powers to Spy on Americans

At a morning appearance in the Oval Office, President Bush pressed the House to adopt quickly a plan that the Senate approved on Tuesday to broaden the government&#8217;s spying powers and give legal immunity to telephone companies.

The plan is essential, Mr. Bush said, because terrorists are planning attacks on American soil
&#8220;that will make Sept. 11 pale in comparison.&#8221;

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/14/w...q=Eavesdropping+Law+Is+Likely+to+Lapse&st=nyt

As I always says Bin Laden and Al Qaida are puppet tools of US intelligence. They act to the demand of US ruling class. They attacked on 911 in US to give Bush an excuse to activate war in Mid-east. They bomb Iraqi civilians so Pentagon has excuse to send more troops to Mid-east. They are in Afghanistan, in Pakistan, in Indonesia, in Philippine.... But strange to say, there was no Al Qaida in Iraq under Saddam's regime. There is no Al Qaida in Iran and Syria too. Why? Because Al Qaida are commanded and protected by US intelligence. So they only exist where US intelligence dominates. That's why Bin Laden can never been captured. They work like a whip to attack ordinary people. When people are hurt, they give up their civil right and money to the ruling class.

This time, Bush again waves the whip of "terrorist attack" to extort for the power of warrantless wiretapping. What is it to make 911 pale in comparison? Likely a nuclear attack. What time will it be? Likely at the planned time the spy satellite dropped onto the Earth - in late February or early March. To Feds working style, the plot will come with a framed drug case; comes with a terror attack to distract. Possibly this time, they'll start war on Iran.

540. Murder attempt coincidence with war attempt (2/23/0

In later January, a series of storm started a rain period in Bay Area. On 1/26, the Mercury News complained, "When will it ever end? too wet to go out, too cold to play ball: Rain through monday and that's not all." It was not all. The rain continued two weeks. The last rain stopped on Sunday, 2/3. Next day, 2/4, there were two 3.0 magnitude earthquakes in San Jose, plus another one on 2/6. Newspaper said they were aftershocks of the 5.6 scale earthquake happened last October. Though the quakes were small, they took place right after two weeks' rain. I view it as an attempt to create a liquefaction quake. (see Rain to create a liquefaction quake (4/5/06))

Then I learned that in Mid-east, the Internet communication problem was caused by the cut of undersea cable. In a time span about two weeks, there were 5 cable cuts: two in Egypt, left side of Iran; one in west coat of Malaysia, right side of Iran; and two at the doorstep of Iran.

Quote, "Submarine Cables, Subsidiares and Subversion
Iran is going to have their own &#8220;oil stock exchange,&#8221; but why does this matter? The Iranian oil bourse was going to be a stock market for petroluem, petrochemicals and gas. What&#8217;s the big catch here? The exchange planned on being ran with currencies excluding the U.S. dollar. If you remember from earlier in the post, Iran stopped allowing purchases of their oil with the U.S. dollar in December of 2007. So, obviously, the U.S. is not going to be happy about this. The biggest piece of information linking this to the recent damages is the proposed location of the bourse: the island of Kish. This is the island that is RIGHT NEXT TO at least two of the cuts that have recently occurred:
Some of you may suddenly be thinking to yourselves that this sounds familiar. That&#8217;s because the last person who decided to stop using the U.S. dollar for trading oil was a man by the name of Saddam Hussein in the fall of 2000.
http://www.ilovebonnie.net/2008/02/06/submarine-cables-subsidiares-and-subversion/
I checked the map at that site and found a strange coincidence. The two cable cuts at the foot of Iran happened at the time when I alleged there were attempts to eliminate me.

1. * In thread "50/50 chance we die on January 24", it said Asteroid 2007 TU24 would hit Earth on 1/24. Which I think was a plan of missile bombing murder in the name of a meteor hit the Earth. (see #537)
* An undersea cable was cut near the Dubai coast on 1/23 which I allege was a step for war with Iran.

2. * In San Jose a rain lasted two weeks stopped on 2/3. Two small earthquakes took place on 2/4. Which I alleged was an attempt of creating a liquefaction quake.
* Fourth submarine Fiber Optic Cable Cut. Cable linking Qatar to the United Arab Emirates was cut on Sunday, February 3, causing more telecommunication disruptions. Which I allege was a step for war with Iran.

A big event (this time it's Iran war) to distract the elimination. The timing of war and elimination must be collaborated. One collaboration may be a coincidence. Two collaborations you can hardly say a coincidence. What about a third one? They planned a lost control satellite to hit the Earth. Since they had destroyed that satellite two days ago, it's not likely they would cut cable again to prove there had been a plot. How do you know there was a pre-step to Iran war to distract the missile bombing murder case (in the name of a satellite hitting the Earth)?

There is a trace.

541. Eiffel Tower bombing had been planned for Iran war (2/28/0

3. * The Mercury News reported on 1/27/08 that a large US spy satellite could "hit the Earth in late February or early March." I allege it was a plan of missile bombing murder in the name of a satellite hit the Earth.
* Quote, "Iran's Oil Bourse Could Topple The Dollar
By Mike Whitney
2-5-8
France is also planning military maneuvers in the Straits of Hormuz. Operation "Gulf Shield 01," will take place off the coast of Iran and will employ thousands of personnel in combined arms operations that will include simulated attacks on oil platforms."
Exercises are scheduled to take place from Feb. 23 to March 5, and will involve 1,500 French, 2,500 Emirate, and 1,300 Qatari personnel operating on land, at sea and in the air, the ministry said..."Around a half-dozen warships, 40 aircraft and dozens of armored vehicles will be in the war games", Fusalba said.
http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?F=3346953&C=mideast

How well the Feb.23 to March 5 overlaps with the late February or early March. This third coincidence, combine with the previous two undersea cable cuts, may show us that Bush administration would start Iran war because Iran abandoned the US dollar as oil trading currency. And Iran war, has been planned to distract a domestic murder case in US which would be covered in the name of liquefaction earthquake or the explosion caused by flying object from space.

Since Tony Blair's stepping down, US finds another war partner - Sarkozy of France. I have alleged there is a secret deal between Sarkozy and Bush when Sarkozy was invited for a private vacation in US last summer. This news proves it. France will play a big role in Iran war.

Of course, US and France are so said "democratic country". To distinguish from Hitler, they need a justification. So we saw a false flag attack 911. Then what will be it for Iran? Like 911, they will bomb a famous landmark - Eiffel Tower.

Quote, "Terror plot to blow up Eiffel Tower uncovered
By IAN SPARKS - 11th January 2008

A plot by Islamic terrorists to blow up the Eiffel Tower has been uncovered.
A scrambled short-wave radio conversation exposing the planned attack on the world's most visited monument was picked up by Portuguese air traffic controllers and passed on to French spy chiefs.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/li...article_id=507760&in_page_id=1811&ito=newsnow

This is a pre-conception propaganda. At the same time they let out this news, Bush started a Mid-east tour (1/9 to 1/16) obviously to arrange the coming Iran war with Israel and other ally Arabic countries. Then we saw the above events. I believe if they could successfully fulfill their elimination mission, Eiffel Tower would be blown up and followed by an Iran war.

542. Terror attack, prophecy and payment (3/4/0

In this early 08 plot, Feds activated their premeditated plans. Three of them had been appeared in Anthony Carr's big prophecy in 2004. That is:
1. Meteorite hits US. In this case: they at first declared that Asteroid 2007 TU24 would hit the Earth then replaced meteorite by a spy satellite.
2. Earthquake in California. Which once took place in Oct. 2007 in San Jose area where I live and then took place in same spot on 2/4/08. Though it was not so strong as prophecy predicted, it combined with two weeks continuing rain and could have caused big damage (a liquefaction quake) if they raised the magnitude of the earthquake.
3. Eiffel Tower would collapse after an attack. You saw that secret conveniently "picked up by Portuguese air traffic controllers and passed on to French spy chiefs." in January 2008.

I have referred the meteor in prophecy. Here is what I wrote about Eiffel Tower and earthquake in Anthony Carr's prediction three years ago: "It said, Canadian Anthony Carr, viewed as a modern Nostradamus, predicted that Eiffel Tower would collapse after an attack, Rome of Italy and California of US would have strong earthquake in 2004." (see "261. Prophecy (10/14/04)")

Eiffel Tower was not attacked in 2004. Because at that time the President of France was Chirac. He didn't agree with Bush's terror policy. Terror attack could only be done under the permission of evil leadership. That's how we saw Al Qaida can only exist in countries where government cooperate with US. Because it works for the interest of US. That's what Obama saw: Al Qaida was not in Iraq until Bush invades it. 911 happened 8 months after Bush took the office. Great tsunami happened two months after Yudhoyono became president of Indonesia. And Eiffel Tower bombing threat heard three months after Sarkozy became president of France. Evil men followed with evil matter.

Of course there is always big payment for big deal. Great tsunami took place in west coast of Indonesia. The Acheh province was drawn in water. Yudhoyono got a big political gift. Long time Acheh rebel had to give up its armed resistance and took the offer from government. China got the host of 2008 Olympic and membership of WTO in 2001 secret deal. Tony Blair got the host of 2012 Olympic for London 7/7 bombing. What will Sarcozy get for the secret deal of Eiffel Tower bombing and Iran war? Here is one of the payments.

Quote, "US lawmakers blast Boeing defense contract snub
Mar 1
US lawmakers have reacted angrily after the US military awarded a 35-billion-dollar aircraft deal to Europe's Northrop Grumman/EADS group, in a major blow to US manufacturers Boeing.
http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=080301224212.az5r6vht&show_article=1

The news uses the name of Europe's Northrop Grumman/EADS group. What it doesn't say is the main beneficiary is Air Bus company and France.

 

543. Harassment and warrantless eavesdropping (3/9/0

Early this month, (on Mar. 1 and Mar. 3) I found two web sites changed its window format. I also found in my long time thread in that two sites, a period of postings were lost. (in one site, the latest two years of postings was lost. In another one, six months of postings was lost.) I can only conclude that in that two years (or for another one, six months) I posted in a fake web site the surveillance server supplied me. The readers of the real web site can never see my postings. And I posted to a fake forum only Feds could access. I guess that when the warrantless wiretapping law expired in February, one of the surveillance team (work in the name of "anti-terror" task force) had to leave. I think so because the warrantless wiretapping law was said to target at foreign agents and terrorists. And the two web sites locate in Canada. When one of the surveillance team who watched foreign communication left, they had to turn the connection back to the real sites. Then I encountered with a new window format and lost postings. The postings that lost must be in the file of the surveillance server of the leaving team.

My experience proves the Feds not only eavesdrop, they also harass and commit crime to violet the the Amendment of Free Speech. They blocked my internet communication to the other people. Here are the url of that two web sites.

http://www.freedominion.com.pa/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=8351&p=696005#p696005

http://www.vivelecanada.ca/modules.php?name=Forums&file=viewtopic&t=32734

Why did I say one of the surveillance team left? Because the main team remains. The harassment is aggressive these days. The day before yesterday, I was blocked to post a comment in AOL news story discussion. The page kept on telling me: "Your comment could not be successfully saved at this time. Please try again later." At last I had to give up. Yesterday, when I posted in the forum of Mercury News, the board lost paragraph function. My message became a big lump. I had to put ".........." between each paragraph to make it a little easier to read. See url:

http://prod.forums.mercurynews.com/forums/node/13453

A continuous problem of lost connection to internet also forced me to abandon a lot of chance to discuss and post in many forums. This is a rogue team. There is a lack of check and balance. Yet they want more - a blank check of warrantless eavesdropping.

544. Step by step, dogs take over the power (3/14/0

I went back to the freedominion.com site and found its window background went back to the usual format. The missing two years postings came back too like nothing had happened. Only the message I posted on March 1st 08 is missing which reminds me it was not a dream. The surveillance server did supply me the old format on 3/1 then pulled it back later. That action carried away the message I posted on that day. I tried the url I loaded on that day. It leads to another thread of two years ago which I have never attended. It may prove Feds did give me the old thread which was intercepted two years ago. So when they withdrew it(url) from the list they had to replace it by a nearby thread that ends at same time - April 2006.

This is a typical way how Feds manipulate this country. They control media and internet. They intercept and censor your post if they don't like it while you misunderstand your post could be read by other people. Election is similar. Feds control the election office. People who vote thought their ballot would be counted. As a matter of fact, the officer who control voting box decide everything. If the result meets their will, they let it go. Otherwise they censor it and give out a fake one. Nobody can verify it. What they need to do is to let out some reason in media to justify the result.

Three days ago, news reported: "SPITZER/ Federal wiretap caught plans to meet prostitute". "January FBI stakeout of Spitzer reported". From the topic I got three points. 1. Demo is the target. (Spitzer is an elite of Democrats) 2. FBI openly show off in stage. 3. Wiretap emphasized. It is an extortion from DOJ obviously. What relates to these three points recently? Warrantless wiretap!

Here is a brief news today:
"House closes doors to debate wiretapping

The House held a closed session Thursday for the first time in 25 years to discuss a hotly contested surveillance bill.

Republicans requested privacy for what they termed "an honest debate" on the new Democratic eavesdropping measure that is opposed by the White House and most Republicans in Congress.

Lawmakers were forbidden to disclose what was said during the hourlong session. The extent to which minds were changed, if at all, should be more clear today, when the House was expected to openly debate and then vote on the bill."
(Mercury News 3/14/0

Human raise dogs to protect their homes. Dogs were chained because otherwise they might kill with the power they were given. But with so much power dogs want to be master to govern the human. So they had a false flag attack on 9/11 2001. Now it's another extortion to increase dogs' power - to attack on their own will. (Dogs used to be told they could only attack with the permission of human - a court warrant) Under the extortion of the dogs, will human give them another blank check?

545. Warrantless wiretapping law and my case (3/19/0

At least two provision in Patriot Act are designed particularly for my case. One is the Library surveillance and the other is the moveable phone-line surveillance (on any phone suspect used not particular on one fixed phone line.) Because I found that my article in internet could only be readable on computer connected to my phone line but couldn't be found on computer which connected to my tenant's phone line, although we lived in same house. Later I tried to verify this censorship in computer of public library. So I knew the provision is targeting on my case when they changed the Act.

But even under Patriot Act, Feds need warrant to legally put me under surveillance. I am neither a terrorist nor a drug dealer, how could they get warrant from the judge? At first they cheated the judge, then Feds just abandoned that effort. They simply authorized themselves to monitor without warrant - by warrantless surveillance. This is, anyhow, a big violence to the civil rights the Constitution promises to the citizens. The principle of Check and Balance collapsed before it.

So the Warrantless wiretap law was only a temporary one. It was designed to be terminated in the end of January 2008. I observed there were three attempts of elimination on me (and my family) combined with attempts of Iran war. I found these three attempts matched with the expiration of the warrantless wiretap too.

1. The warrantless wiretap law expired on 1/31/08. The effort of elimination by missile bombing - in the name of Asteroid 2007 TU24 would hit Earth on 1/24. An undersea cable was cut at the Iran door step on 1/23.

2. That wiretap law was extended 15 days hastilily from 2/1 to 2/15. Second elimination attempt by liquefaction earthquake - a two weeks' continuous rain followed by two earthquakes in my area on 2/4.
There was another undersea cable cut at the Irans doorstep on 2/3.

3. On 2/12, Senate passed to extend that eavesdropping law for another 6 years. It failed in the House. Why Feds didn't get it passed this time? I think maybe they were more confident on the third operation. The spy satellite would have more accurately crashed at target area. The Iran war would have been a big one with multi-nations to join, especially France. The third operation was a big one.

This is why I think Spitzer case was for reviving the warrantless eavesdropping law. After the three operations went soured, Feds renew their effort - reset their secret deal with China (to frame a case) and plan new case for Iran war. The harassment in internet is even more aggressive. It is a lawless rogue team. It took me hours to post an article in internet sometimes.

546. New plot and India's role (3/24/0

I was blocked to the internet. After I posted at one or two web sites, my computer would lose connection to internet and remain blocked for the whole day. This problem has been lasted for consecutive four days. (3/21 -3/24) It means my analysis is too accurate to be tolerated by Feds. They don't want other people know what I said. It also means there will be a new framed case coming. The time may be in early April.

My wife will go to Hongkong and China from 4/4 to 4/19. To my experience, each time there is a new plot, Feds used to arrange a tour for my relatives.

The last plot was planned at late February and early March - the time a spy satellite would drop to the Earth. It ended earlier after I revealed it was a missile murder plot on 2/8 and 2/13 and Pentagon announced they destroyed the satellite about 10 days later.

Feds immediately planed a new plot. As usual, China plays a role in it. This time India too. On 2/26, State Secretary Rice made a "hurricane" style visit to Bejing. She did the same work that Defense Secretary Gates had done three months ago. (see "519. 11/10/07 plot (11/8/07") A new deal was done. On same day, Gates went to India. India will play a role in this new secret deal. They will admit the terror bombing relates to Indian terrorists.

If you still remember, I talked about Feds introduce Indians into my area. They try to turn people away from the Chinese super market so it will be easier to run poisoned food. I found this and tried to buy in India market too to avoid poisoned food. (see "422. Poison food and Indian market (7/20/06) and 423. Mumbai bombing (7/25/06)") I think Feds then planned "Indian terrorist bombing" in my case.

The first symptom that the secret police cooperation between US and India could be found in Glasgow Airport terror case on 6/30/2007. (see, "495, Murder tactic, bombing the shopping center (7/8/07)) The suspects related to that case were Indians. As I said, false flag terror attack must be taken place under the regime which collaborate with the US. That's why there was no Al Qaida under Saddam's regime but it turns to be prosperous once Iraq is occupied by US. Because they can only be prosperous under the protect of the government. And you saw India joins with US in the game.

What is the payment? A nuclear energy deal. India is apparently beneficial from that deal because it will allow energy-starved India to buy nuclear fuel and technology on the world market to generate nuclear power. But US won't give it free unless the false flag terror attack would have been done. Then we saw a tricky way of that deal. The deal has never come to true since last year. The excuse is "Opposition within India has for months delayed the completion of the deal." The truth is that "opposition within India" will only disappear once there is a terror attack done related to Indian in San Jose area. Of course, since last year, I dare not to set foot in local India store.

Here is a news after Gates' visit to India. They renew the secret deal again.

Quote, "US gives India deadline on nuclear energy deal
By Somini Sengupta New York Times

A senior State department official on Wednesday gave India a three month deadline to complete negotiations on a landmark nuclear energy deal so that Congress can vote on the issue before its summer recess. "
(Mercury News 3/6/0

Since the censorship for consecutive four days is unusual, I might be censored for longer time.

=============

#546 is the latest article I wrote on 3/24. Since then I was blocked to access to internet for more than a month. One thing is clear: What I said are thuth. Feds is afraid of it. (5/3/08. Sung)

 

546. New plot and India's role (3/24/0

I was blocked to the internet. After I posted at one or two web sites, my computer would lose connection to internet and remain blocked for the whole day. This problem has been lasted for consecutive four days. (3/21 -3/24) It means my analysis is too accurate to be tolerated by Feds. They don't want other people know what I said. It also means there will be a new framed case coming. The time may be in early April.

My wife will go to Hongkong and China from 4/4 to 4/19. To my experience, each time there is a new plot, Feds used to arrange a tour for my relatives.

The last plot was planned at late February and early March - the time a spy satellite would drop to the Earth. It ended earlier after I revealed it was a missile murder plot on 2/8 and 2/13 and Pentagon announced they destroyed the satellite about 10 days later.

Feds immediately planed a new plot. As usual, China plays a role in it. This time India too. On 2/26, State Secretary Rice made a "hurricane" style visit to Bejing. She did the same work that Defense Secretary Gates had done three months ago. (see "519. 11/10/07 plot (11/8/07") A new deal was done. On same day, Gates went to India. India will play a role in this new secret deal. They will admit the terror bombing relates to Indian terrorists.

If you still remember, I talked about Feds introduce Indians into my area. They try to turn people away from the Chinese super market so it will be easier to run poisoned food. I found this and tried to buy in India market too to avoid poisoned food. (see "422. Poison food and Indian market (7/20/06) and 423. Mumbai bombing (7/25/06)") I think Feds then planned "Indian terrorist bombing" in my case.

The first symptom that the secret police cooperation between US and India could be found in Glasgow Airport terror case on 6/30/2007. (see, "495, Murder tactic, bombing the shopping center (7/8/07)) The suspects related to that case were Indians. As I said, false flag terror attack must be taken place under the regime which collaborate with the US. That's why there was no Al Qaida under Saddam's regime but it turns to be prosperous once Iraq is occupied by US. Because they can only be prosperous under the protect of the government. And you saw India joins with US in the game.

What is the payment? A nuclear energy deal. India is apparently beneficial from that deal because it will allow energy-starved India to buy nuclear fuel and technology on the world market to generate nuclear power. But US won't give it free unless the false flag terror attack would have been done. Then we saw a tricky way of that deal. The deal has never come to true since last year. The excuse is "Opposition within India has for months delayed the completion of the deal." The truth is that "opposition within India" will only disappear once there is a terror attack done related to Indian in San Jose area. Of course, since last year, I dare not to set foot in local India store.

Here is a news after Gates' visit to India. They renew the secret deal again.

Quote, "US gives India deadline on nuclear energy deal
By Somini Sengupta New York Times

A senior State department official on Wednesday gave India a three month deadline to complete negotiations on a landmark nuclear energy deal so that Congress can vote on the issue before its summer recess. "
(Mercury News 3/6/0

Since the censorship for consecutive four days is unusual, I might be censored for longer time.

=============

#546 is the latest article I wrote on 3/24. Since then I was blocked to access to internet for more than a month. One thing is clear: What I said are thuth. Feds is afraid of it. (5/3/08. Sung)

547. Plant "drug money" (5/17/0

In 2006, my wife filed tax return with obvious error and sent it without my consent. I thought it was another Feds' plot of searching house in the name of "IRS raid". To avoid it, I had to separated my tax report from my wife. Then my wife deliberately emptied our joint bank account. When my relatives knew it, they helped me financially. Family help is Chinese tradition.

I met with my relatives this February. It was Chinese New Year. They gave me some cash. Mixed in small notes, there were some hundred dollars bill. I am sensitive at it. I have bitter experience with isotope money. I know it is used by Feds to track drug money. As a target, I also worry about to be planted with "drug money".

I still remember a news I read more than ten years ago. DEA raided a house at night. The home owner, a millionaire, thought the intruder were robbers, met them with gun. He was shot dead. The agent of DEA told judge that the reason they raided the house was because that millionaire spent a hundred note that marked in drug trade. My doubt is if there was a drug trade, why not to arrest at the scene? That whole case could be a deliberate murder with a planting of "drug money".

Several times I refused to accept hundred dollars bill. Once my mother came back from a Chinese tour, gave me three thousand dollars, said it was the gift money from my elder aunt in Shanghai. My elder aunt is a frugal woman. Three thousand US dollars was a lot of money for Chinese. It ran counter to her character and, they were all hundred dollars bill. Of course, I didn't accept it. I viewed it as attempt to plant. And this time, they mixed it with small bills. Was that a new attempt?

In late March and April, I was blocked to access internet. In April, rice price jumped double within days. News said people bought rice with tens of bags. It seems Feds tried to push me to spend these hundred dollars bill. They were so sure that I would be terminated that the judge (or prosecutor attorney) even approved internet censorship?

May 11, Sunday, was Mother's day. As usual, my family met together to celebrate it. I returned the hundred dollars bill to them. I would not say my point of view is hundred per cent correct. Strange enough, next day, May 12, internet re-opened for me. I could surf in it the whole day without big problem till today. (small harassing still exists.) Did a judge, or a DOJ attorney, or just the surveillance team itself decided to stop censorship because the "drug money" case doesn't exist any more? Or is it only a coincidence? Anyway, it's nice I can speak up again. All the occurrence may only prove what I said are truth. Feds is afraid of it.

548. Alex Jones, a kook or a hook (5/22)

On 5/19, in the afternoon, I read a news about Alex Jones which said Alex is a shill. I agree so. In this country, any opinion against the government used to be suppressed. Martin Luther King is a good example. (Even he is "politically correct" in the name) For those dissenters who can stand long time without problem, there used to be a purpose. I wrote a comment on that thread. Before I could finish it I encountered a problem to type a reply. I had to re-write it in the word-pad and cut and stick it to reply. Then I was blocked from internet the rest of that day. The blockade continued several hours the next day.

The event made me believe my point of view was correct. Here it is:
The news. Quote, "Alex Jones
An honest investigator of crimes?
Or a criminal trying to confuse us and protect his network?
Alex Jones is typical of investigators in this 9/11 truth movement. Specifically, he has been exposing 9/11 and other crimes for many years. He is an experienced investigator.
This page has some audio and video excerpts of Alex Jones to help you understand that he is trying to shift the blame away from Zionists and onto other people, mainly Americans, but also some British and Chinese. Most of the people and the "truth movement" are doing exactly as he does, so try to understand this technique so that you are not fooled by it.
http://www.erichufschmid.net/TFC/Alex-Jones-summary.html

My reply to someone who said Alex is a kook:
"Not a kook but a hook.

He pretends to be a host of 911 truth movement. To collect the witnesses information. And these information, likely go to the Feds office in the end.

Of course, in order to appeal the people who have real important information, what Alex Jones' report are mostly truth. A true bait to attract true bird.

For those who really have information that is fatal to this regime, you can imagine there is a disastrous end for them.

This is an evil country in the name of democracy. Be careful people."
Feds used to disguise as a booty buyer to trap thieves and robbers. They use the same tactic to collect information of 911 witnesses. So in debate they can ask: "Where is witness?". Because real witnesses are eliminated by "natural death" or cancer or accidents. Absolute power leads to absolute corruption. No check and balance makes Feds a dangerous criminal.

549. Plant "drug shoes"? (5/27/0

On 5/11, my relatives came to my home. They picked me up for a shopping ride. After I finished the food shopping, we went to KOHL Store. I want to buy a pair of shoes.

While I walked around to watch and test shoes, my brother suddenly urged me to go home. He said others were waiting us to go for the dinner. He said he had extra shoes to give me to save my money. So we went home. That night he gave me three pairs of shoes. The size fits my foot.

They were all used ones. Some even worn out with holes. I washed them thoroughly days later.

Then I noticed something unusual in surveillance team in my area. There are new faces to replace the old ones and they are aggressive. I wonder if they frame a new case of "drug shoes"? I thought of "shoe bomber" story. That was an authority's frame case full of flaw 6 years ago. The work was much more of a 007 story done by laboratory of intelligence because it needed special explosives and fine work than to be done by a homeless with mental problem.(see PROBLEMS SURFACE WITH SHOE BOMBER STORY http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/shoedoubts.html) So will this time Feds create a case of drug shoes? Consider Feds almost exhaust all their resource to frame a case against me, it's quite possible. (only for the purpose to close the traffic of Bay Bridge, last year they plotted 1. Burning down a main Bridge exit Highway 580 by an oil tanker on 4/29/07 2. Collapsed Minneapolis Bridge to justify the close up of Bay Bridge in 8/30-9/1/07. In the name that Bridge needed a repair. 3. Tried to collapse Bay Bridge by hitting Bridge's supporter with a boat Cosco Busan. on 11/7/07.) There is no difference between planting drug shoes and planting drug money. Although it doesn't make sense to deliver drug in empty shoe heels. After all, there is no Custom to watch, why made such a dramatic operation?

I don't think my brother touches drugs. And I washed these shoes thoroughly. How can Feds make a drug shoe case? Only by planting. After I washed the shoes, my wife took out a box, asked me if I want to store them. She used to put extra shoes in garage. The garage is separated from the house and easy to access. That's an ideal place for planting. Her suggestion reminds me of the frame case. I refused. I am home all day long, surfing the internet. How can Feds intrude my house to plant drug shoe? The only chance is when I go out to shopping food on week ends. Then I did a test. Last week end, I stay at home. For consecutive three days, (last week end was memorial day long week end) my wife went out every day and ate outside. I think my speculation is correct. Because my wife used to be home on week ends, cooking food. especially these days when gas price is so high. I think Feds arranged her absence. It gave Feds a chance to intrude the house to plant if I went out shopping.

This is why I view the Fourth Amendment so important and warrantless surveillance so evil. It gives corrupt Feds chance to plant and frame innocent people.

550. Cyclone in Burma (6/2/0

A cyclone attacked Burma on May 3, 08. I looked at the path of the cyclone. It went along the coast of South Burma, then finished in Thailand. I think it was created by Pentagon. A climate modification needs spreading of chemical, how could Pentagon operate it in Burma - an unfriendly country? The cyclone path told everything. It was easy to create a cyclone in ocean area, then push it on to a designated path by creating an target area of low air pressure - in this case it was Thailand. Thailand is an ally of US. Its military collaborated with Pentagon actively in Vietnam war. So it was easy to produce a low air pressure space over there. And the south coast of Burma is the nearest area to the international air. Where planes could spread chemical to modify the moving of the cyclone.

About three years ago I have said hurricane Katrina and Hurricane Rita were artificial weather system created by Feds in frame case against me. Though Feds activated its accessories to repudiate the weather modification technique, more and more information prove the weather control skill. Here is one:

Quote, "Navy Research Paper: 'Disrupt Economies' with Man-Made 'Floods,' 'Droughts' |
February 11, 2008
By Noah Shachtman

Hurricane_andrew A recently-unearthed U.S. Navy research project calls for creating mad-made floods and droughts to "disrupt [the] economy" of an enemy state.

"Weather modification was used successfully in Viet Nam to (among other things) hinder and impede the movement of personnel and material from North Viet Nam to South Viet Nam," notes a Naval Air Warfare Weapons Division - China Lake research proposal, released last month through the Freedom of Information Act. But "since that time military research on Weather Modification has dwindled in the United States."

The proposal suggests a study of the latest weather manipulation techniques, to "give the U.S. military a viable, state-of-the-art weather modification capability again." With that in hand, American forces would be able...

To impede or deny the movement of personnel and material because of rains-floods, snow-blizzards, etc.

(2) To disrupt economy due to the effect of floods, droughts, etc.
.......
http://blog.wired.com/defense/2008/02/navy-research-p.html

There is no doubt US has ability to manipulate the weather. But is it just to "disrupt [the] economy" of an enemy state this time? No, there is other purpose. One thing unusual this time is media aggressively reported Burmese disaster, accusing Burma government for rejecting international aid, or allowing limited help, or controlling aid. Someone even suggests to invade Burma to punish its negligence of people. Will it develop to another Iraq style invasion? A wolf always finds reason to eat a lamb. But it's ridiculous to invade with such a reason. Should US be invaded for its negligence in Katrina disaster?
Burma was once famous for its opium trading business. To invade Burma, or put a pressure on it, is it more appropriate to invade Burma by accusation of drug smuggling than by accusation of negligence of a natural disaster? But US doesn't mention a word on drug smuggling. Why?

It is a case to push Burma regime to revive drug trading, I allege. (to be continued)