Just so everyone is clear on just how big a liar DRG is and how far RWAF is willing to go to cover up his lies, please read the following: And of course, RWAF sticking by his lies because they are easier to defend than DRG's lies. So do what RWAF says. Read what DRG says and look at the evidence. Whether or not you believe RWAF's rewriting of what DRG said, what DRG said is a blatant lie. RWAF'S own claims don't hold water any better as he likes to pretend the government just made up the names.
The case that the "official" BS story is a complete lie needn't take so many elaborate twists and repetitive parsing of the overall theme. Just a pc, a non google search engine, and some common sense. Absolutely look at the evidence. We finally agree.
I posted the evidence. You ran from it. Why? If you agree with one should look at the evidence, why do you run and turn up your nose at the evidence? You say the names were all made up. So how about the flight instructors that taught the hijackers before Bush was even in office? Are they in on it? Mohammed Atta was a known terrorist for years and has a well documented history. Why do you ignore it? Is EVERYTHING you don't agree with just made up? If so, I would call that a copout and not a real belief system.
Perhaps part of your apparent confusion with my positions is that you misunderstand what it is, or who it is that I choose to ignore. I ignore shills (as I've stated previously). I admit that I do sometimes find it entertaining to converse with them on occasion. As always, I'm happy and highly interested in discussing objectively, any aspect of 9/11 with similar individuals (by similar I mean objective, and honest). In my opinion, your "team" (and you know who you are) do not fall into that category as has been evidenced here for literally years now. Please don't be offended when I ignore you...rather...consider it a "success" for your team. You've muted me to some degree. Congratulations. Don't worry.....be happy.
More tapdancing without saying a word. Your silence is deafening and only emphasizes the dishonesty of your posts.
I've been learning from the best brother....right here. You've taught me well. Meanwhile, the intelligent reader can decipher fact from fiction....(even though the mud is spun thick).
Oh please. Even other truthers think DRG is nuts and unreliable in his conclusions. He is out to do one thing . . . sell books. The way to do that is keep the controversy unsettled by coming up with crazy theories. If there WAS a new investigation and things were settled to the satisfaction of all concerned, what would DRG to for $$$$?
Even other truthers think DRG is nuts and unreliable in his conclusions. Do they? Who specifically? What group? I promise I'll reference your source and respond to it if you'll be so kind as to point me there.
The threat that DRG presents is to public safety. He keeps the whacktards agitated with his unscientific BS and gives the white nationalists a chance to recruit useful idiots to the RaHoWa because the screaming maniacs thinkk that because DRG says that the government is lying to them, the government is probably getting ready to do something even nastier. I think most of 9/11 twooferism, is sponsored by white nationalists, with a little help from people who just have a grudge against America, like that French felon who fed Killtown a lot of crap about the fires at the Pentagon, or that Nazi that Dylan Avery cited to prove that there was an incorrect engine at the Pentagon. Worse yet, the whackos belittle the real heroes of the day, like the fire fighters who examined the evidence of what occurred at only an arm's remove, or the passengers who rebelled and kept Flt 93 from its target. May God cause DRG's tongue to cleave to the roof of his mouth till he chokes.
The real heroes are the ones that don't bow to the "official" BS story, and the ones who take the time to investigate the BS story objectively.
The real heroes are the ones that don't bow to the "official" BS story, and the ones who take the time to investigate the BS story objectively.
Well, we KNOW you're not talking about truthers. They constantly and proveably post lies they can't defend. They post lies from others they claim are credible, and then, when faced with the dishonesty of their heros, have to cover for them with yet MORE lies they can't defend. It is pathetic and transparent. And THEN, to top it off, they pretend they are the real heros. Real heros how? By demeaning the victims of 9/11 in order to push their various and assorted agendas to demonize the government, Jews, Illuminati, <insert favorite bad guy here>? Truthers can't even agree with what happened, yet you want everyone to believe they are the ones looking at things objectively? Wouldn't a bunch of people looking at the same set of facts and evidence all arrive at the same general conclusion? Oh wait. Truthers ignore and deny evidence unless it backs up their bull(*)(*)(*)(*). Is THAT objective? Is THAT how "real heros" act? No. That is how dishonest liars act.
I have taken the time to investigate. We have three total morons running national defense that day. None of them have the intercranial wattage to have pulled off a successful invasion and occupation of a Thirde World country to capture one foreign operative, let alone as compolex an operation as the whackadoodles claim 9/11 was. My investigations into the conspiritard lines keeps turning up Nazis or their dupes at every tuirn. There is nothing heroic about turds like Chris Bollyn or Luke Rudkowski or Pierrre-Henriu Bunel. And Albert Stubblebein is senile, and of questionable character. His divorce ruling is cited as a precedent in Virginia family law as an example of things you are NOT allowed to do to screw your ex-wife out of alimony, like quitting your paying job to go play house with your bimbo. Don't even get me started on cokehead actors. You all are kind of short of heores, bubba.
Exactly. The biggest problem with the stupid 9/11 Deniers is that, for their accusations to be true, the conspiracy must have been hypercompetant - to pull it off without being caught - and simultaneously completely incompetent - to make all the "inconsistencies" that they insist are there. It's nonsense.
With all the cables and such that were outed by Wikileaks, you'd think at least a "hint" of an Inside Job might have come out in the wash. Considering how many parties would have had to be involved based on most Truther theories and all.... So far, nothing but crickets from wikileaks with regards to 9/11. Of course, that's sort of a big picture thing Truthers aren't fond of.
http://911debunkers.blogspot.com/2011/10/david-ray-griffins-fake-phone-call.html http://911truth.org/article.php?story=20111025072056361
Yeah, that is what you said about DRG lying. I showed you the source and you ran from what he said. You claimed he "REALLY" meant something completely different, yet you can't even defend THAT lie. Do us a favor, RWAF. Don't make promises we all know you're going to run away from once you see you've been beaten yet again.
So these are the truthers you refer to as having said "he's crazy"? I'm not seeing those words. These folks aren't truthers either sir....just so you know. So, it was a lie, a distortion when you referred to "even the truthers think he's crazy"? Would that be a fair assessment?
"911truth.org" isn't a truther website? Really? Both links point out how DRG is unreliable in his conclusions. The first refers to him as a "crank" and the second as his claim being "ridiculous". The Grifter has no rational supporters, including those who shill his books.
Possibly. If that's what I said. But it appears that you have lied about and distorted my quote. What I actually said was . . . The links that I have posted support this. Stop the dance you always complain about RWF.
Insults are against TOS you know. The information indicated in that post is valid and many find it less "moronic" than you do.
The biggest problem with "stupid" official BS story endorsers is refuse to consider anything outside "the accepted" nonsense.
America is still waiting for a reasonable and complete accounting of the incident as well. 10 years on and still the same old gaping holes to contend with though.
