America received a reasonable and as complete an accounting as can be done of what happened on 9/11. There just happens to be a very small but vocal minority who wishes to ignore the evidence (by their own admission) and promote various conflicting theories they can't defend and have no evidence to prove their theories are true (again by their own admission). THESE morons try to claim there was no reasonable or complete accounting, but they're full of (*)(*)(*)(*). BTW, before you run around claiming I am "insulting" you or breaking the TOS, I am not talking about any one person, but all truthers.
Fair enough. When I talk about shills, I am not talking about any one person either. "Reasonable and complete" is a big stumbling block for most of us that have problems with the "official" BS story. We think, collectively, that there isn't much evidence (if any) that constitute proof of what they claim. There are huge holes in many aspects of the "official" version or the "accepted narrative", and we question these many holes. FOR INSTANCE, for example, etc...Flight 93 buried. Look at that whole fiasco and the absurdity of that whole thread (not intending to rehash it here). There are many legitimate issues with the "official" version of events of that day and they need clarification. So far, the goobment runs from that responsibility. If a complete and accurate accounting, open to questions in some sort of open fashion, and IF the 9/11 commission weren't so incomplete and inaccurate to begin with (as its own members admit it was), then perhaps we wouldn't be at this junction and the whole issue would go away. It doesn't...because there ARE many issues there were that "officially", are ignored with much of the same disregard for substance and truth shown right here by "advocates" of the "official" BS. "Shills" are constantly providing disinformation, and clouding the issues (in my opinion, to intentionally blur the lines between fiction and fact). There WAS NO accurate accounting of the incident, and that has only fueled the speculation, and further buries the truth (which is the way they want it, I'm sure). Where there's smoke, there's fire, and there's smoke all over the place in this disaster.
Never said you were nor have I ever reported you for it. BTW, I can prove you're a truther. Why is it you have to make stuff up about me? That would be because you all have close minds. You've admitted your own mind is closed on the subject. One should be able to refute the evidence on grounds, not just turn up their nose at the evidence because it doesn't fit their preconceived notion of what happened. This is opinion, not fact. You refuse to look at the evidence. You refuse to believe the people who were there who aren't even part of the government. THEN, for good measure, you give us what YOU think happened which has so many holes it is hard to believe there is any substance! Can you prove your claim? Nope. Can you even begin to defend your claim? Judging by your posts, nope. You have the temerity to claim the official story is absurd when you can't even answer the simplest of questions about your own theory. Does that sound logical to you? Does it sound honest? Your theory and dismissal of the official theory based on your opinion sounds neither logical nor honest to me. When one turns up their nose at the evidence before them, it is easy to claim the "official" version needs clarification. Nope. The government spent hundreds of millions of dollars investigating and reporting on 9/11. To date not one shred of evidence has been presented that they got it wrong. Wrong yet again. We've seen EXACTLY how truthers respond to the truth. They tuck tail and run. They pretend any and all evidence they don't agree with just doesn't exist. Then they whine about wanting a NEW investigation because the investigation they got was somehow flawed. Don't tell me that isn't exactly how it would go down because we BOTH know that is exactly how it would go down. Your posts are nothing but whiny pieces of drivel that mean nothing and go much further to describe truthers than non-truthers. You don't stand up and fight for what you believe. That is a shame. Yet you can neither refute the "disinformation" which you SHOULD be able to do if you actually have the truth on your side, NOR can you defend your own theories because you DON'T have the truth on your side. I know this is true because I have the truth on my side, I can defend the information I provide, and I can completely demolish your theories no matter how much you claim I can't. Anyone who reads what you write can clearly see the truth of that. Wrong yet again. There was an accurate accounting of the incident. You had the 9/11 commission report which you cannot find fault with no matter how much you whine about it. You have the NIST reports which you cannot find fault with no matter how much you whine about it. You have the wealth of information that is in the public domain which further strengthens the government story even when one factors in the paid liars like DRG, Slick Willie R, Woods and others, none of whom agree with one another nor can they back their complete horse(*)(*)(*)(*) up. You making BS claims you can't back up doesn't alter reality except maybe in your own psyche. The only smoke being produced is from truthers as they flit from theory to theory trying to get something.... ANYTHING from their theories to actually stick or be proven true. Over a decade later and the entire Truther Movement has amounted to exactly ZERO. No evidence. No coherent theory. No agreement. NOTHING but a bunch of whiny kids trying to pretend they are all growed up and can actually debate the topic. We can all clearly see truthers CANNOT debate the topic. The excuses flow freely, but the excuses don't change the fact.
