How to stop Islamic Terrorism

Yes, and those who are anti-religious are probably the most irrational of all.

 

If the main objection to homosexuality is AIDS then your argument is a huge fail. Most AIDS is transmitted through blood transfusions. In fact it isn't even close. You would be better off making blood transfusions illegal rather than gay sex.

http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/policies/law/risk.html

That being said we have a Constitution and rights. Like it or not you cannot legislate consensual sex between two adults. If you allow the terrorists to dictate how live and interpret the Constitution you are giving them the victory.

 

Whew, you should broaden the base of authors you read. How is ISIS the same as Britain? Your nationalistic view that UK culture is superior to that of the U.S. is an opinion, and you can keep it. But facts are facts - immigrants made up over 12% of the U.S.'s population in 2013 and only 8% of the U.K.'s. We have you beat by some 30 million people. For such an evil place, there sure are a lot of people doing everything they can to come here and live the American dream.

 

Except for when Iraq attacked kuwait. We were correct in that, IMO.

Bush II was stupider than Bush I

 

It works for Islam.

- - - Updated - - -

By definition religion is not rational.

Insofar as Islam is actually rational it is not a true religion.

- - - Updated - - -

Just why do you think the US is the "head of the beast"?

Perhaps the beast is Islam.

 

Since last time I looked HIV in the US was still spreading among gays
about forty times faster than in the nongay population, and was essentially spread to begin with by the gay population aided and abetted by bisexuals..and half of Africa is probably going to die from it--I think I will stick to my opinion that the harm is not imagined.

What is imaginary is the belief in innocence by those who had adequate warnings from traditional sources, had their egos not inclined them to ignore them.

It's too bad that the compassion of the majority toward those dedicated to committed relationships is being used by a perverse minority of the minority to twist our culture further, keeping a wound open where there should be healing.

 

Baloney. Although transfusion is the highest transmission risk, this is not statistically where the most transmissions are taking place:

"Gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (MSM)a represent approximately 2% of the United States population, yet are the population most severely affected by HIV. In 2010, young gay and bisexual men (aged 13-24 years) accounted for 72% of new HIV infections among all persons aged 13 to 24, and 30% of new infections among all gay and bisexual men. At the end of 2011, an estimated 500,022 (57%) persons living with an HIV diagnosis in the United States were gay and bisexual men, or gay and bisexual men who also inject drugs.

http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/group/msm/index.html

I don't give a bleeb about your abnormal sexual practices as long as they don't twist the main society--but there are those among you that appear determined to do just that, irrespective of the potential costs to others.

IMO private sexual practices should be kept private, by everyone, not just gays.

Note that almost half of HIV victims are now non-gay. Thanks a lot. I'm sure everyone who now has it is thanking gays for the privilege.

 

Gay sex practices are normal for gay people.

Lesbian partners have a smaller rate of HIV infection than heterosexuals. According to your logic, lesbians should have the right
to dictate to hetrosexual couples how they are going to conduct their personal lives - who they can marry - what jobs they can have.

 

It worked during the Spanish Inquisition.

 

How about this guy?

 

You should probably study up on some statistics courses before making such claims. If you read your numbers the only population truly at risk for HIV infection is the gay population. However it is statistically clear that you are far, far, far, more likely to get HIV from a blood transfusion. Why you ask? Because only approximately 2% of the population is homosexual. In other words if you engage in homosexual acts, particularly anal reception then you are far more likely to get HIV if you are in that population. However if you are heterosexual you are only going to get HIV from a blood transfusion or sharing needles. So again if you want to reduce the risk of non-homosexuals getting HIV you should support free needle exchanges and put a ban on blood transfusions. Ergo and end to your public health concerns for the non-homosexual general public.

That being said again you would have to violate the Constitution in order to do what you want to do. So you would be willing to destroy the Constitution because a bunch of terrorists don't like how we interpret it...smart.

 

It is you that is illogical; you are overschooled in your own data. Of course lesbians have a lower rate; fewer of them are exposed to gay or bi men. Additionally, it is not I that was trying to "dictate" anything; it is traditional teachings I was referring to.

All I was saying, in the context of this thread, is IMO certain traditional practices and taboos make some sense in the light of HIV--and, IMO, the disturbances gays have created for honorable business people since the legalization of marriage for them makes me wonder what other hazards our culture will face as a result of that legalization. It appears you immediately saw this as an opportunity to change the topic of the thread, which simply proves my point.

 

You are attributing desire to a post that did not express any.

However, your implication that non-gay people are totally safe from HIV is false thanks to bisexuals, gay people that "fake it", and other forms of transmission---as I said, almost half of those with HIV in the US are now non-gay.

The most responsible gays are in committed relationships and use precautions; unfortunately, in a vicious traditional society the most responsible would probably be most at risk since their commitment to each other would make them more noticeable.

 

"What we've got here is... failure to communicate". That's ok, I have that problem everywhere I go. I have a very difficult time phrasing and composing paragraphs etc and its not getting better despite decades of practicing on you all....lol. Anyway, you asked; 'Well if we knew all of that, then why did we go there to begin with? That was pretty stupid don't you think?'

I dont think you understood the point I was trying to make. I meant to say Christianity and Islam have been at war for over 1300 years, but not because of religion, or not because of ideology, not really. The Christian west vs Islam of the west (reversed in the modern age) are doing the dirty work of an entity powerful enough to turn thousands of young men into psychopathic sadistic monsters. Not just Radicalized Muslims. Different 1000 year era, different bad guys, but led and controled by the same dark entity; Revelation 12 'And the great dragon was thrown down, the serpent of old who is called the devil and Satan, who deceives the whole world; he was thrown down to the earth, and his angels were thrown down with him.' So anyway that is what I meant by saddling up the barco lounger, hugging up with your fav firearm and large cooler of Budweisers~ and have fun when the party starts!



Oh lord, is it a sin to ask you to fix my hangover in the morning ?.....

reva

 

Thanks! I didn't realize anyone would need to ask the question you answered.

 

So I got you now. The thing is, my response is still connected to your example. If you're having troubles with your own neighbors in your own back yard, then what sense does it make to rile up their relatives from other countries by going over there, when you feel the need to pull out the AR's here?

 

Mornin Merwen. ..... .....

 

There had been an explosion of this sort of xenpohiobic ignorance (I doubt that this particular poster could even name a city in Pakistan much less find it on a map). This sort of ignorance is beyond reasoning with.

 

Really? Are you muslim? I am not. So it hasn't worked in my case. Actually, I know very few, really none at this time who are muslim. So, it hasn't worked.

 

I don't think so. Islam still exists.

 

So did anyone......Encounter a muslim today? Check them out.....engage them? Give them that mental check for their Grey dense matter to filter thru? Did any let them know where they stand....should they become infected?

Do not fear them.....make them fear you!

 

It is not a big mystery 'HOW' to defeat any foreign aggression. An equal or greater force has historically been adequate to stem the tide of human aggression & despotism. I like this as a summary of how to defeat islamic terror:



“How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity. The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property – either as a child, a wife, or a concubine – must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the faith: all know how to die but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome.” ~Winston S. Churchill

 

Do not blame me for your ignorance and denial.

No one said it did ?