Howie Carr: Come Clean On FBI Frame-Up, Bob Mueller

Howie Carr: Come Clean On FBI Frame-Up, Bob Mueller​

By Howie Carr
April 12, 2018

What did Bob Mueller know about the FBI’s framing of four innocent men for a murder they didn’t commit, and when did he know it?
This is an important question for the “special counsel,” and for two days I’ve been emailing his press office, asking for answers about his tenure in the U.S. attorney’s office here, specifically, his time as acting US attorney in 1986-87.
No response. Zip, Zero, Nada. (emphasis mine)

This is a major FBI scandal, perhaps the most outrageous one in American history. The FBI railroaded four men to prison for a murder the G-men knew they did not commit, and then made sure they remained in prison for upwards of 30 years.
They (or their estates, because two of them died in prison) were eventually awarded a total of $102 million in 2007 by a federal judge for false imprisonment.​

~Snip~
When you were working in, and then running the office that insisted that the innocent men not be released from prison, did you ever write any letters demanding that the parole board not correct this gross miscarriage of justice?
And when did you find out that the FBI office in Boston was in the business of framing innocent men on behalf of their serial-killing, cocaine-dealing underworld paymasters?
And what exactly did you do about when you found out the extent of this unprecedented corruption in an agency you supervised for eight years?

Source: http://www.bostonherald.com/news/co...e_carr_come_clean_on_fbi_frame_up_bob_mueller

~~~~
I was hoping Howie Carr would bring out this can of worms and Mueller’s involvement to light again.
I’m no fan of the FBI’s leadership. I think this is a strong case on which to base criticism of Mueller. The lawsuits were settled “on his watch” as FBI director, so he might actually spin himself as the “good guy” who “made things right”. One could claim that his actions then were a CYA. There are other issues on which to attack Mueller such as Uranium One to criticize him.
To be clear, I mean it relates to wrongdoing on Mueller’s part, not minor as it affected the victims of the 1965 frame-job or American jurisprudence.
Anyone who didn't know it before knows it now. For those who still don't get it: "We have to protect the reputation of the Special Prosecutor, in order not to compromise the process of correcting the mistake the poorly informed voters made in 2016."
Progressive Marxist Socialist Leftists support the removal of basic human rights because they believe the TV talking heads. The majority of Americans are against putting innocent men behind bars for decades for murders committed by mobsters covered up by the deep state, especially covered up by the FBI.
We note that like any successful mobster, Robert Mueller has wiped his trail of criminal activities.

 

What made you think a 1965 case qualified as a current event?

Just doing the god emperor's work, huh?

 

What made you think, Boston Herald story published not a few hours ago, does not qualify as a current event?

Feeling butthurt about everyone' picking on your poster boy Mueller, huh?

 

Because it demonstrates a predisposition and historical precedent to what he's attempting to do now with Trump!

 

What's funny is that if Mueller was investigating Pres Obama right wingers would be up his ass like a suppository.

 

I love Republican on Republican hate.

 

So many similarities between Donald Trump and a 1965 case for murder. LOGIC.

 

Why? I am on record having said that so many things Mueller has done over his career are abusive, or flat out misuse of his office and power. Even if it were an investigation of Obama, I can't think of a guy I would rather not have doing it. HIs ineptitude, his willingness to frame folks in his investigations with obstruction just shows how uniquely corrupt the guy actually is. I would rarely defend Obama, but should it be Mueller, I probably would.

 

The similarities are between what Mueller did then and what he's doing now....not between Trump and a 1965 case.
Even if you're somehow ill-equipped, you still should be able to understand this simply idea.

 

Would you like something more recent, like Bulger?

 

And you would be calling him a racist

 

What did he "Do then"? He didn't prosecute anyone as I recall. I don't think he even investigated anyone.

 

Can you provide a post where you attacked Mueller and it didn't have anything to do with Trump.

 

Why would I be calling him a racist, the only time you worry about being investigated is when you have broken the law.

 

Based on information available at the time, we sure did. Conservatives are not infallible.

 

You have a heightened sensitivity towards racial issues and the left frequently defended Obama by saying anyone who disagreed with him is a racist. So if Mueller had investigated Obama then somewhere along the line you would have made it about race

 

Howie Carr, Trump's New England mouth piece and recent Mar-a-Lago member, trumpeting nonsense on behalf of Trump. Imagine my surprise......

 

Hmmmm... just WHERE was Bob Mueller on November 22nd, 1963?? He would have been 19 and probably at Princeton at this time (a known hotbed for crazy college kids) and it would only be about 25 hours by car to Dallas.... HAVE HIS WHEREABOUTS been CONFIRMED????

Nutballs...

 

And he actually believe Meuller owes a response! Robert Mueller doesn’t owe Howie Carr the time of day.

 

Do you have anything resembling even a modicum of evidence that Mueller's conduct was the same or similar?

 

Did you need a definition of the word, "current?"

 

Goes to character of the investigator, counselor.

You already knew that though.

Maybe Mueller should have stuck with prosecuting homemakers, he solved that case at least.

It would be hard for Mueller to be current, since outside the investigation Mueller wasn't current in the first place.

You already knew that too though.

 

Then put the thread in the political opinions forums. Not the current events.

But then, you knew that.

 

~~~~
There are no statutes of limitation for criminal acts of this nature.